Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Audi Q5

What's the difference?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug-in Hybrid EV is an interesting inclusion for the brand, especially as it is typically considered a ‘value player’ in the market.

But with negligible real-world fuel consumption benefits if you drive beyond the limited EV range and a high price premium over the non-PHEV models, it’s important you see if the sums add up for your particular needs.

Primarily going to use the car for running around town? Cool. Think the 50-ish-kay EV range will work for you and make you happy? Amazing. Sold on the look of the car? Hat tipped.

But let me say this - if you are considering the Eclipse Cross PHEV, there are some alternatives you should also have on your list, including the MG HS PHEV, the Hyundai Ioniq PHEV, Kia Niro PHEV, and - the one I’d buy - a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. For me, plug-in hybrid tech is a bit of a halfway house, in most instances offering too high a price premium for the range you’re getting to drive electric. Heck, a Kona Electric isn’t much more than the top-spec Exceed PHEV, and I’d have that if I wanted a real day-to-day EV experience.

The new Q5 does a lot right even if it doesn’t feel as resolved from behind the wheel as I had expected.

It catapults one of the oldest premium SUV nameplates into this decade, and all three of its launch powertrain options are great, so you can’t really go wrong.

Each features the smoothness and efficiency of genuine hybrids backed by punchy turbo combustion thrills, while the increase in standard kit across the entire range is notable at a very reasonable price increase.

You’re going to be able to tell the PHEV model from its more conventional counterparts by those oversized ‘Plug-in Hybrid EV’ badges on the front doors, and if you want to tell those behind you what you’re driving, there’s also a ‘PHEV’ badge there, too. Wait, wasn’t the plan to do away with the term ‘PHEV’, Mitsubishi? 

But aside from that, the outside features just the different 18-inch alloy wheels (which are the same on all PHEV models, no matter the cost - I think that’s a bit lame, because if I’m spending $7500 on the Exceed I’d like a different wheel design!). Oh, and the Aspire and Exceed get that different lower front splitter, too.

Plus the PHEV has two fuel filler doors - one on each side of the car over the rear wheels. The driver’s side one is the EV charging ports (x2 - detailed below), and the passenger’s side one is for the petrol. Note: while the EV port is push-openable, the petrol cap still requires you to lift a lever in the driver’s footwell. 

It may be categorised a small SUV but at 4545mm long, riding on a 2670mm wheelbase, 1805mm wide and 1685mm tall, it’s big for its boots. The popular Mazda CX-5 is only 5mm longer, and it plays in the midsize SUV segment!

Inside there are some design differences, with a specific gear joystick-style selector, and a different instrument panel.

It is impressive how the brand has managed to shoehorn a petrol engine, two electric motors, a battery pack and more into the car, but there are some practicality implications. Read about them in the next section.

Proportionally, the new Q5 is quite a departure from its curvaceous predecessors, thanks to a more chiseled bodyline and stronger flares over its wheelarches. While this makes it the biggest stylistic departure for the Q5 ever, embracing its all-new PPC (Premium Platform Combustion) underpinnings, its stylistic motifs are still somehow very familiar.

The traditional Audi grille is maintained, although has been modernised with a geometric pattern and integrated highlight pieces depending on styling package, and even the light profiles manage to be somewhat familiar despite their twinkly new customisable LED elements and contemporary slimline appearance.

A closer look only makes the car feel more contemporary, with strong contours around its face and bumpers, which were absent from its more plain-looking predecessors.

In addition, the brand tells us the Australian market in particular has one of the highest levels of uptake of large wheels, so it offers a range of designs to choose from on the options list, many of which are on the larger side, despite the standard wheel being 19 inches.

The interior is where the biggest changes are. While Audi interiors have been familiar for the longest time, the new Q5’s interior appointments feel dropped directly out of its Q6 e-tron electric alternative.

The result is a completely re-thought approach to the interior design, which is now dominated by huge touchscreens as well as a collection of contemporary shapes and mouldings that transport the Q5 into the current decade.

Still, elements of familiarity are present. The seats feel like Audi seats, the materials are as you’d expect for the brand and the wheel is backed by familiar switchgear.

Up front, the cabin is a pretty smart place, with nice enough materials and finishes, and a few good storage options. There’s a cubby in front of the shifter, but oddly enough it doesn’t have a wireless charger (there are 2x USB 2.0 ports above) and isn’t quite big enough for a smartphone (even the smaller ones don’t fit there all that easily), and there are cup holders between the seats, a decent covered centre console bin, and door pockets large enough for bottles.

The PHEV models get a different instrument cluster dial for EV driving readout info, but all have the old-school 4.2-inch TFT colour display that lacks the size and usability of some rivals with larger info screens - the MG HS PHEV, for instance, has a 12.3-inch digital display, which shows you a lot more info than this tiny little screen does. Heck, there’s not even a digital speedometer in there - and you only get one if you buy the Exceed model, which has a head-up display (HUD).

That’s part of the problem with the way this car’s interface operates. If you want the most detailed information you need to use the touchscreen media system, but that negates the usability of the media functions. On multiple occasions I found myself switching between Apple CarPlay phone calls and searching for that particular driving info screen I found most useful (there are about 15 screens to choose from, and plenty of them are hard to decipher).

It’s a huge disappointment for a customer who might want to see all that detailed information but also listen to a podcast, answer a call, follow their phone’s mapping or just have anything other than the hybrid info come up on the infotainment screen. The screen itself - an 8.0-inch unit, with sat nav integrated into the top spec only - is fine, but small compared to today’s rivals.

In the back seat, there’s a compromise for cabin space. The leg room is good, but the seat has been bumped up to accommodate some of the electrical hardware and the petrol tank, meaning someone my size (182cm/6’0”) will find they’ve got enough room for their legs but not their head, and those even larger will really need to take care getting in and out. While pre-facelift examples of this car had a clever sliding second row seat, that’s gone. It was never a feature in any PHEV version, and undoubtedly the layout of the battery pack has something to do with that. 

The double pane sunroof no doubt eats into the space in the rear to a degree as well, and in the Exceed it likely feels a bit more cramped because of the black headliner. 

While three adults could potentially fit across the back row for very short trips, there are dual ISOFIX and three top-tether points for child seats. The Exceed is the one you want if you’re aiming to treat your rear-seat passengers right: it has heated rear outboard seats, rear directional air vents and two USB ports for charging - the ES and Aspire miss out on all that stuff.  

Boot space is 359L (VDA) for PHEV models, which is a step down from the 405 litres (VDA) for the non-hybrid models. There is extra hardware under the floor, and you don’t get a spare wheel in the PHEV models either - instead there’s a tyre repair kit. For context, we only just managed to fit all three CarsGuide hard suitcases (124L, 95L and 36L) in the boot of the PHEV version, while it was far less of an issue in the non-PHEV.

Oddly, no model comes with a power tailgate. 

While the interior might feel as modern as they come, it also brings with it some of the pitfalls of contemporary design themes.

The most obvious is the over-reliance on touch panels for controls. The most egregious example is the lack of physical buttons for the climate control, which is interacted with via a permanent part of the touchscreen, but it doesn’t end there.

On top of this, there are capacitive gloss finish panels for the steering wheel controls, and even a capacitive panel in the door to control the mirrors and lights. It all looks swish, but isn’t the best to use compared to just… buttons.

Apple CarPlay worked flawlessly in my time with various versions of the car, and the stock software is fast and crisp. Interestingly the digital instrument cluster is the most plain version of Audi’s usually stellar virtual instruments yet. Without the big animated cluster dials it used to have it feels a bit less fun to look at.

Adjustability and space is great for front passengers, as is the amount of visibility on offer, plus the seats are as comfortable as ever in all grades.

Storage is ample in the cabin, with big bottle holders in the centre console, large pockets in each door, and a halfway decent centre console. The phone charger sits tucked away at the front with the USB-C outlets and a volume dial.

The back seat is less impressive. The Q5 never had the most spacious second row in this mid-sized segment, but it’s disappointing to see this new-generation car hardly improves on the formula. It’s spacious enough for me at 182cm tall behind my own driving position, with enough room for my knees and airspace for my head, but it’s certainly not as spacious as many rivals. In addition, the centre position is compromised by a huge rise in the floor, making it a hard pitch for an adult to sit there.

On the plus side, there’s plenty of amenities with bottle holders in each door, a further two in the drop-down armrest, netted pockets on the backs of the front seats, and an entire third rear climate zone with touch panel temperature control and physical air vents. There’s also two USB-C outlets.

One trade-off for the small second row is a large boot. It measures 520 litres with five seats up, or 1473L with the second row down. It also comes with a few neat things like a net and sliding cover.

Unfortunately, while there’s a small amount of underfloor storage, there’s no spare wheel, with Audi only offering a tyre repair kit.

The new Q5 arrives in five variants spread across three powertrain options, and the starting price has copped quite a hike. Audi says that's to account for a steep increase in standard equipment, the inclusion of new hybrid tech and the S-Line styling package across the range.

The new entry-level Q5 is the base front-wheel drive TFSI petrol, which wears a price of $81,000 before on-roads, replacing the previous entry-level Q5 35TDI that started at $73,400.

Included is 19-inch alloys, Matrix LED headlights, LED tail-lights with projection light, an 11.9-inch digital dash and 14.5-inch multimedia touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, online connectivity with built-in navigation, eight-speaker, 18-watt sound system, multicolour ambient lighting, leather interior trim with brushed aluminium inlays, wireless phone charging, a 360-degree parking camera, a power adjust driver’s seat with heated front seats, tri-zone climate control, keyless entry and push-start ignition.

This trim level is also available as a TDI quattro with diesel and all-wheel drive at $87,600. Next up is the TDI quattro Sport from $94,100 which adds 20-inch two-tone alloys, a panoramic opening sunroof with shade, S-line front seats, with the S-Line interior package that also features a three-spoke alternate steering wheel design, steel sports pedals and black headlining.

Next is the SQ5 Edition One. The most prominent upgrade for this grade is the return of the 3.0-litre turbo-petrol six-cylinder engine, although this grade also gets its own trim level including 20-inch black metallic alloys, to go with a black pack exterior, red brake callipers, S Sport suspension and privacy glass.

Finally the top-spec SQ5 scores 21-inch alloys, aluminium exterior highlights, acoustic glass, premium leather interior trim, front seat ventilation and message functions, a head-up display, 16-speaker Bang & Olufsen premium audio and improved outputs for the USB-C connectors. Premium paint options are free (aside from Gold) on the SQ5.

Other option packs include the Premium Package ($5400) which adds the head-up display, Bang & Olufsen sound, improved USB outputs and acoustic glazing, the Tech Pro Package ($5700) which is only available on the TDI quattro Sport and SQ5 adding heated steering, a front passenger display, electrical adjust for the steering column, heated rear outer seats and digital OLED tail-lights.

Finally two Style Packs exist, adding 20-inch wheels, a black pack, and privacy glass to lower grades ($4900 for the TFSI and TDI, $3400 on the TDI Sport) with the Carbon Style Package only available on the Edition One and SQ5 for $9200, adding carbon mirror claddings, inlays and a roof spoiler.

On the value front the Q5 is more affordable than an entry-level BMW X3 (20 xDrive - $86,800) and Mercedes-Benz GLC (200 4MATIC - $89,000) although both rivals offer all-wheel drive as standard, rather than the front-wheel drive Q5. Outside of the Germans, the Lexus NX (250 FWD) starts at $63,400, while the Genesis GV70 (2.5T Advanced AWD) starts at $78,700.

With that price tag, I’d say the Q5 is priced just-right compared to its rivals.

The plug-in hybrid version runs a non-turbocharged 2.4-litre Atkinson cycle petrol engine producing just 94kW and 199Nm.

Meagre outputs, but the petrol unit is backed by two electric motors - the front motor has outputs of 60kW/137Nm, while the rear motor produces 70kW/195Nm. It’s all controlled by a single-speed transmission.

There is no ‘combined power output’ figure, but there is a 13.8kWh lithium-ion battery pack as part of the equation as well.

The engine can power the battery pack in series hybrid driving mode, so if you want to top up the batteries before you get to a city, you can. And there is regenerative braking, of course. More on recharging in the next section.

Here’s where things get interesting. Despite featuring three carryover engine options, the Q5’s big upgrade is the introduction of a hybrid system.

The brand calls this technology MHEV+, which I think is underselling what the system can actually do. Normally a mild hybrid (MHEV) system consists of higher-voltage electrics to assist auxiliary systems and take a small amount of load off the engine, or provide a more robust stop/start system, but this new Audi tech consists of an 18kW/230Nm electric motor placed after the seven-speed transmission that can motivate the entire vehicle under electric power for small periods. It can recapture up to 25kW of energy and is supported by a 1.7kWh battery pack.

The three engine options supported by this include the base TFSI 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo front-wheel drive (150kW/340Nm), the mid-spec TDI 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel (150kW/400Nm) exclusively in all-wheel drive, or the SQ5’s 3.0-litre turbo-petrol V6 (270kW/550Nm).

There’s no disappointments here. All powertrains feel up to the task, and for those of you waiting for an all-wheel drive base petrol or a plug-in hybrid, the brand assures us both are on the way soon.

The Eclipse Cross PHEV has an official combined cycle fuel consumption figure of 1.9L/100km. That’s astounding, really, but you need to realise that the test calculation is only for the first 100 kays - there’s a really good chance your real-world consumption will be a lot higher, as you can only deplete the battery charge once before calling on the engine (and your petrol tank) to juice it back up.

Electric driving range is stated at 55km based on NEDC cycle testing, while the WLTP rating is a more realistic 45km. In our testing we fell between the two during our “fully charged” 100km run, in which the electric charge initially ran for 50km. But, over the 100km run, the dashboard info screen said the car used “82 per cent” electric driving, while somehow also showing 3.9L/100km for petrol consumption.

I did the numbers at the fuel filler, and the actual return was 4.5L/100km. That’s okay, but not nearly as spectacular as you might hope, and I’ve seen very close in a RAV4 hybrid - which in most instances is cheaper than the Eclipse Cross despite being bigger and, frankly, a lot better.

I also ran the car for a further 100 kays without plugging in, just to see what the ‘worst case scenario’ might be - and it wasn’t too bad, with the fuel consumption jumping to a real-world return of 5.5L/100km. But again, that’s worse than you’ll likely get with a RAV4…

When it comes to charging/recharging, there is available AC charging using a Type 2 plug that can fully recharge the battery in as little as 3.5 hours, according to the brand. DC fast charging with a CHAdeMO plug should fill from zero to 80 per cent in 25 minutes. Maximum charge input is 3.6kW.

Like me, you’ll want to do the maths to see what is going to be the most economical way to run your car - aside from just plugging it in at the office and hoping nobody notices.

A standard 10-amp household plug - which should take about seven hours to replenish the batteries - could cost as little as $1.88 to get back your circa-50km EV range - that’s based on overnight charging, off-peak, on an average 13.6c/kWh electricity price. Of course, if you’re considering a PHEV, you might have a solar array and the electricity could well be free. Good for you.

But remember, there’s more to it than just the electricity costs - you need to also consider the additional purchase budget required just to get into the PHEV model over a regular Eclipse Cross. 

All engine options are also relatively efficient, although the total fuel reduction from the introduction of this new MHEV+ hybrid technology is surprisingly small. Audi says it saves up to 0.74L/100km and 17g/100km of C02, which doesn’t sound like a lot for a system that can pull the whole car.

Regardless, fuel consumption is 5.7L/100km for the TFSI 2.0L FWD petrol, 5.4L/100km for the TDI 2.0L AWD diesel, or 7.6L/100km for the 3.0-litre petrol V6 SQ5. The emissions are also relatively low for a premium SUV.

If you’re after that electric car thrill of near-silent, almost mind-blowing acceleration, the Eclipse Cross mightn’t be the right car for you

But if swift progress and the buzz you get from taking off from the traffic lights without any hesitation at all is more your thing, it could be great for you. And if you’re not quite ready to go “full EV”, then it’s probably something you’re considering.

The EV driving mode is the best driving mode in this car. You can run it just on the petrol engine to ensure you save your battery range, and you might choose to do that when you’re driving on the freeway and know you’re approaching an urban area where the EV goodness will be better used. Or you could have it so it's using battery and petrol power, and that’s where you’ll get maximum combined performance.

But running the car in the default, EV-prioritised mode means you will make the best of this powertrain's strengths, because - for the fifty odd kays you’ll get out of the battery - it’s pretty good.

It’s also impressive the way this powertrain dips between petrol engine, battery pack or both at higher speeds. When the battery range had depleted on my test drive, the engine kicked in almost imperceptibly, working to power the car and also generate more electricity for the battery pack. It then dipped out of petrol, back to battery, and so on and so forth, multiple times during my drive. 

The best thing about the way it did so was that it was smooth. There is barely any vibration from the petrol engine, the transmission doesn’t have any gears to fumble with, and overall the refinement is really good.

There are drive modes - Eco, Normal, Snow, Gravel and Tarmac - and in my test I kept to Normal. I did fiddle with the regenerative braking reactiveness, though, using the paddleshifters to dial up or down the aggressiveness of the energy recoup system. It doesn’t feel as aggressive as some pure electric cars, but thankfully it has a decent pedal feel and progression when you apply the brakes yourself. 

The steering is light and lacks feel, and doesn’t offer that much engagement or involvement. That might matter to you if you’re like me. I wish it was more fun. But at least it’s easy to park.

While the suspension is fine and comfortable on the highway, it can feel wooden and the ride is quite lumpy at low speeds. It never really feels all that well resolved for urban driving, which is a bit of a downer considering that’s likely where a car like this will spend most of its time

The tune of the suspension - being a bit firm at lower pace - surprisingly doesn’t have any payoff when it comes to cornering, as it lacks a bit of body control, shifting its weight side to side. 

All in all it is a decent plug-in hybrid offering – and will be perfectly suitable to someone who wants some EV driving as a part of their lifestyle. It’s just a matter of doing the maths as to whether it will work for you.

To drive the Q5 is familiar in some ways and less familiar in others. The initial impression is good, with each variant being relatively quiet on the road, offering a nice adjustability and driving position, with great visibility around the car.

The new powertrain options are all a joy to pilot, with all feeling punchy and smooth-shifting through the seven-speed auto. This smoothness is helped along by the introduction of the new MHEV+ tech, which can push the car along at reasonable speeds without needing the engine to assist.

It might not be quite as punchy as some other hybrid systems in terms of overall assist, but it’s certainly better than other systems we’ve seen on the market that barely help with driving or smoothness, and end up being a cynical emissions-saving device. It’s nice to see this tech is a step forward for the brand.

The familiar Q5 driving points are mostly intact, too, with the most notable upgrade being the ride comfort. This car is much more adept at dealing with road imperfections than its predecessor, with a softer suspension response.

This having been said, I expected more from this ground-up new platform. Each version of this Q5 I sampled felt less dynamically engaging than its predecessor. The usually sharp Audi steering tune feels a bit disconnected in this new car, with a little bit too much electrical and software assist, and the suspension, while more comfortable, isn’t as engaging in the corners.

It, too, lends the car a disconnected feeling over undulations and corrugations, giving the new Q5 an overall less resolved feeling from behind the wheel than I would have liked. The previous car was a bit sharp, but at least it was consistent in the way it responded to the road.

The previous car started to feel old towards the end of its run. Previous Audi owners will enjoy how this new car catapults the nameplate into this decade in terms of its cabin ambiance and general demeanour, it would have just been nice to see the consistency return, too.

A massive list of active safety kit is present in the new Q5, from autobahn-speed auto emergency braking (AEB) to lane departure control as well as the expected blind spot and cross traffic alert features (front and rear).

It also features the newer features, like traffic sign recognition and 360-degree cameras, while the brand’s signature high-end adaptive Matrix headlights are standard across the range.

The systems are well calibrated judging by our brief drive, with only the occasional tug of lane keep assist present. In addition, the adaptive cruise is well behaved.

The Q5 is yet to secure an ANCAP score at the time of writing, but it already has a maximum five stars from Euro NCAP in its home market, which I’m sure the brand is hoping will carry across.

There’s a huge 10 year/200,000 kilometre warranty on offer - but it’s valid if you maintain your car with Mitsubishi’s dedicated dealer service network over the 10 years/200,000km timeline, or else you get a five-year/100,000km plan.

But while the rest of the car will be covered by that decade-long warranty if you service it with Mitsubishi, the battery is only covered for eight years/160,000km, no matter where you have the car serviced.

Maintenance is due every 12 months/15,000km. But just a note - the more complex powertrain means higher service costs than the regular turbo-petrol versions. The annual fees are: $299, $399, $299, $399, $299, $799, $299, $799, $399, $799; so an average cost of $339 for the first five years, or $558.90 per visit over 10 years/150,000kn. 

Included for customers who service their car with the brand is four years of roadside assist.

Do you have questions over reliability, issues, concerns, recalls, automatic transmission problems, or anything else of that ilk? Check out our Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross problems page.

Audi continues to offer its fairly standard five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty with five years of roadside assist and this is paired with the option of a five-year service plan.

This costs an additional $3520 ($704 per year) for the 2.0-litre variants, or $3560 ($712 per year) for the 3.0-litre V6-powered SQ5. Servicing is required every 1500km or 12 months.