Mitsubishi ASX vs Ford Puma

What's the difference?

There is no question the new ASX is a much better car to drive than the model it replaces. This one is actually fun behind the wheel. The tech represents a massive upgrade, so too does the interior design and practicality. The fact is, it’s a much more expensive car than the old ASX. It is a European built and designed small SUV with loads more tech and features so when you consider that, the pricing makes more sense.

Regardless of the previous model, this new ASX impresses. It’s not perfect - the LS is missing too many items, no hybrid, slightly firm ride - but it’s now a genuine rival for higher quality rivals in the small SUV segment. If the ASX is in your price bracket, it might be time to add it to the consideration list.

If a minimum price and maximum interior space are your priorities, then the Puma is not for you. Especially so in the flagship ST-Line V, which may seem too small and a tad cramped compared to, say, a Seltos, C-HR or ASX.

Where the Ford excels, typically, is in the way it encourages the keen driver while cosseting four occupants (and a surprising amount of their cargo). There's a poise and maturity to the way the Puma moves that puts it on a par with or even beyond some premium compact SUVs. Even the styling is a statement. If the badges (and dashboard) were covered, you might be convinced this cat is actually a Jag.

If all that is more important, then the ST-Line V is for you. The very antithesis, then, of the unassuming and unloved EcoSport the Puma usurps.

The look of the new ASX is not a huge surprise given it’s based on the second-generation Renault Captur that launched in 2021. Actually the ASX we get is the mid-life facelift for the ASX/Captur twins in Europe, so the design has been refreshed.

At 4238mm long, 1797mm wide, 1585mm tall and with a 2639mm wheelbase, the new ASX is 127mm shorter, 13mm narrower, and 55mm lower than the original, but the wheelbase is only 31mm shorter.

It has a round almost bubble like quality to the exterior design, and not in a bad way. The redesigned front end has Mitsubishi flavour thanks to the ‘Dynamic Shield’ front-end signature, while the sleek headlights and black and chrome grille give off an almost menacing look.

C-shaped tail-lights at the rear flank a massive ‘Mitsubishi’ badge and the lower cladding ensure there’s no doubt this is an SUV.

It’s a handsome car and should get some attention on the road.

Inside, it’s not the last word on interior design, but it’s well laid out and functional. It’s definitely another massive leap over the old model.

At the launch there were no LS grades to drive, but the Aspire comes with cool grey cloth trim and roofliner that adds a nice contrast to the darker plastics and finishes. It’s more vibrant than the top-spec Exceed which has an all-black interior with leather-appointed seats.

The top two grades feature a floating console where the gear shifter is housed (a standard shifter in LS, and notch-like ‘eShifter’ in Aspire and Exceed), while the big multimedia screen dominates the dash.

If you search for the 1998 Puma coupe, you'll see some vague similarities with its modern SUV namesake, especially in their anthropomorphic face. It's in the eyes. There are also hints of Aston Martin (DBX), Porsche (Macan) and – let's face it – Mazda (CX-3).

Yet the real achievement lies in the way Ford has managed to make a 4.2-metre-long by 1.8m wide by 1.6m high crossover look so svelte, with the resulting balanced proportions, flowing lines and taut surfacing giving the Puma quite an athletic visual presence. After the EcoSport failure, head-turning looks were deemed paramount.

The extra girth gained by widening the Fiesta's platform allowed Ford's designers to create a muscular body that could also accommodate a metre-wide tailgate opening, while beneath the cargo floor is an exceptionally deep storage box, bringing better-than-expected practicality to boot.

This is an area the ASX excels in.

Up front there are loads of storage options. Multiple nooks for mobile phones, keys and other items, and the Aspire and Exceed get a wireless charging pad and extra storage under the shifter.

The central bin isn’t massive but doesn’t need to be with all the other cubbies, and there is ample room for large and tall bottles in the door bins.

A pair of USB-C ports and a 12V port up front handle electronics.

Thankfully there are physical controls for climate control at the base of the multimedia screen. The other functions housed in the screen like vehicle information and connectivity options are logically laid out and the system is not overly complicated.

Opting for the Aspire or Exceed means you get the brilliant Google Built-in, which is exactly what it sounds like. It’s essentially the Google operating system but for your multimedia screen so you have in-built Google Maps, Play and Assistant. Log in to your Google account and all your favourite places show up on Maps, and you can also log into Spotify and the like. It's a great set-up.

The seats are supportive and well bolstered. Much nicer than the old ASX’s overly cushioned seats.

The second row has more space than you’d expect looking at the car. It’s not cavernous by any stretch, but clever touches like scalloped out front seatbacks and roofliner ensure decent leg, toe and headroom, even with the sunroof in the Exceed. However, three adults in the rear isn’t super comfortable - we tried. Kids should be fine.

Amenities include more USB-C ports, rear air vents (very rare in this category), storage for small bottles in the door, phone holders in the door arm rests, dual map pockets, but no central armrest, which is no great loss.

That rear pew is comfy and more supportive than the old ASX. And it has a neat party trick. You can slide the entire row (via the base) forwards by up to 16cm, making for more cargo space in the boot. It also folds 60/40 split and when the boot floor is in its highest setting the seats fold flat, aiding loading.

Yet another clever feature is the split level boot. It features under-floor storage that adds a handy 183 litres to the cargo capacity.

With all seats in place Mitsubishi says the cargo space is 484 litres, which is 23 per cent more than the old model. If you slide the rear seat forward as far as it goes that increases that figure to 616L. And if the second row is folded flat the capacity is 1596L.

Interestingly, despite having space for one under the bottom boot floor, a spare wheel (even a temporary one) is not a standard feature. Instead the ASX comes with a tyre repair kit and offers a temporary spare wheel as part of its accessories offering for $750. If you’ve got the space for a spare wheel, why not make it standard? Especially when Mitsubishi is a popular brand in regional and rural areas.

Compact yet spacious, the ST-Line V's interior has strong as well as weak points.

Let's start with the latter. The most obvious connection with the Fiesta is in the Puma's dashboard, which is largely shared between the two. After all the effort expended on the design and chassis, this is somewhat disappointing. There's nothing wrong essentially with the fascia's aesthetics or functionality – it's just that the look is humdrum and dated. What's needed is something with the visual wow factor as found in the latest Peugeot 2008, especially at this price point.

Yet Ford has at least tried to put some tinsel inside this most expensive version of its smallest SUV.

Stitched perforated leather seat facings, carbon-fibre-look trim and soft vinyl coverings in key touchpoint areas bring an upmarket look and feel, backed up by a now-familiar digital instrumentation layout, a lovely flat-bottomed three-spoke steering wheel, easy and intuitive multimedia interface and a wireless phone charger. That electronic cluster, by the way, changes colour and markings but doesn't have the scope of multimedia displays of, say, Audi's Virtual Cockpit. It's comparatively rudimentary.

Conversely, there's a solidity and quietness as well, offering a level of refinement that's usually found in more-premium Euro alternatives. We weren't expecting that, though of course this is a German Ford product.

Our test car also boasted a vast glass opening sunroof, adding to the opulence. With all this gear, the ST-Line V's cabin is properly appealing.

On the practicality front, entry and egress is pretty good, the driving position is excellent (thanks in no small part to a big amount of adjustability for both the steering column and seats), the front cushions themselves are sumptuously enveloping, while wide door pockets and a big glovebox obviously come in useful. And there's a USB-C outlet in the centre cubby between the seats. How modern.

However, rear vision out is poor, there are no seat warmers and some of the lower-lying plastics are a bit drab.

The back seat isn't really suitable for people over 175cm, as kneeroom is limited and taller scalps may scrape the ceiling with the twin-pane sunroof in situ. The latter also means no overhead grab handles.

But the backrest angle and cushions themselves are fine, even for longer journeys. Just don't expect to squeeze a third adult in the back unless rubbing shoulders won't bug you. Note, too, that the rear cushion does not slide or tilt forward to allow for a lower load area when the backrest is folded down. Pity.

There is a receptacle in both doors for small bottles but no cupholders whatsoever (how can Ford call itself an American company?), or face-level air vents – though the large dash vent outputs do reach the rear. Amenities such as USBs and cupholders are AWOL; and vision out from back there is limited by the high shoulder line. Tough if you're trying to peer out. Sorry, Fido.

The Puma's overall compact footprint and rear packaging clearly suggest that this is aimed at singles, couples, or couples with smaller kids/pets to transport around.

Still, for a small SUV, the cargo area isn't bad at all. The standard floor depth is fairly generous, with a long and flat loading area, but below that is a narrower yet deeper waterproof area, while under that again is a space-saver spare wheel. Clever. Also intelligent is the luggage cover that lifts automatically with the tailgate, as per Mazda's CX-5.

For the record, cargo capacity is rated at 410 litres with the 60/40 split-fold rear seats erect – or 1170L with them folded down flat. These figures far outstrip the CX-3.

To sum the cabin experience… it's far-better than its Fiesta-sourced dashboard may suggest, while the ST-Line V treatment goes a long way in helping justify the premium. That's a win.

In Australia, the Puma plays in the burgeoning 'Light SUV' segment, so goes up against the ageing yet athletic Mazda CX-3 as well as Honda's HR-V, along with more recent challengers like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic, Nissan Juke II, Toyota Yaris Cross and Volkswagen T-Cross. All are ready to pounce on the bestselling Hiroshima crossover.

What every one of these baby SUVs have in common is that they're based on B-segment – or supermini – platforms. However, prices and sizes do blur in this corner of the class, with larger small-car-derived rivals from the 'Small SUV' segment above, led by the Mitsubishi ASX, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona, also in the Ford's crosshairs.

Formidable opponents indeed, and just like that, the first big hurdle appears for the Blue Oval hopeful. Puma is Light SUV-sized but Small SUV-priced, with the entry-level grade kicking off from a tenner under $30,000, and before on-road costs. That's even more expensive than the VW.

This instantly eliminates it from many buyers' radars.

In contrast, a CX-3 Neo Sport starts from just $22,890. But that's with a manual gearbox, plain interior and steel wheels, whereas the Puma includes a ripper turbo engine/auto combo, climate control, a smartphone app that allows for remote vehicle location/ locking/unlocking/starting, voice-activated sat nav, wireless smartphone charging, lane-departure warning and assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver impairment monitor, 17-inch alloys and a leather steering wheel.

Along with other goodies like AEB with pedestrian alert, reverse camera, Bluetooth audio and telephony, Apple CarPlay/Android auto, digital radio, live traffic updates, fuel-saving engine stop/start, auto headlights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cornering fog lights, powered folding mirrors, push-button start and puddle lamps, the Puma looks and feels up-spec inside. To match most of that stuff in the CX-3 you'll need a Maxx Sport auto from $26,890.

Rising to the $32,340 ST-Line drops the Puma's ride height by just 2mm (to 164mm), but adds firmer suspension, a body kit, glitzier alloys, sports seats, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottomed steering wheel, paddle shifters and racier trim for a racier experience, though it loses the climate control for a manual air-con set-up. Strange. This grade might just be the sweet spot in the Ford's range, though it does sit about $1300 higher than the CX-3 sTouring equivalent.

Finally, the subject of this test, the ST-Line V, scores privacy glass, lashings of chrome, keyless entry/start, leather upholstery, climate control, premium audio, a powered tailgate and 18-inch alloys. All for $35,540, it's about on a par with CX-3 Akari, but lacks the latter's powered driver's seat and heated front cushions, among other items. The Mazda also goes one better with a $2000 AWD option from all mid-level grades up, as well as manual availability.

We recommend the $1500 Park Package, which ushers in adaptive cruise control with full stop/go and lane-centring tech, as well as blind-spot detection and auto parking. Premium paint adds $650, a panoramic roof $2000, roof rails $250 and a black roof $500.

Against compelling alternatives costing less, like the high-flying Seltos Sport+, CX-30 G20 Touring and Toyota C-HR Koba, the ST-Line V struggles to make sense on paper. Can the Puma's cabin and driving experience claw back its obvious price disadvantage?

For now, all grades of the new ASX use the same 1.3-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine offering up 113kW of power and 270Nm of torque. That’s up on the old 2.0-litre naturally aspirated unit’s 110kW/197Nm.

This is paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission driving the front wheels only, so there’s no all-wheel-drive version.

Mitsubishi is looking into the mild hybrid and full hybrid versions that are offered in Europe but not confirmation on those as yet.

A multiple international engine-of-the-year winner, the compact and lightweight, 999cc 1.0-litre twin-cam three-cylinder turbo petrol unit is the sole choice for now. Driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT), it delivers 92kW of power and 170Nm of torque.

With no all-wheel drive option, there are instead five driving modes – Normal, Sport, Slippery (for snow) and Trail (gravel) applications, working on the traction, stability and transmission algorithms to mimic some of the benefits of AWD. In the ST-Line V, a set of paddle shifters are fitted in lieu of the sadly-absent manual gearbox.

Owners of the previous-shape Fiesta S and EcoSport would be familiar with the 1.0T's smooth and strident performance, though these 2010s models used a completely different type of DCT. This was the highly-publicised Powershift, which consisted of a dry-clutch system, and was prone to a multitude of problems and failures in the petrol-powered auto versions.

In contrast, the Puma adopts a next-generation transmission dubbed 7DCT300; related to the item found in some smaller Mercedes-Benz, Renault and Nissan models, it instead employs a more-robust wet-clutch system with a higher torque threshold, so promises to be far more durable and reliable than the problematic old dry-clutch unit.

The new ASX consumes 6.4 litres of fuel per 100 kilometres on the combined cycle and emits 142 grams per kilometre of CO2.

That’s a decent figure for sure, but not quite as frugal as the 1.3-litre Nissan Qashqai, which manages 5.8-6.1L/100km.

The ASX drinks 91 RON fuel and has a 48-litre tank which makes for a theoretical driving range of about 750km.

The Puma's official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.3 litres per 100km, which works out to 121 grams per kilometre. Fitted with a 42-litre fuel tank, the potential range averages out to almost 800km between refills.

Out in the real world, we managed an exceptional 6.2L/100km, no doubt helped by an ever-eager stop/start system (which, annoyingly, kills the air-con when it extinguishes the engine; we found ourselves constantly pressing that 'off' button as the days wore on). This figure was achieved in motorway-heavy driving scenarios, albeit loaded with holiday gear and with the air-con blaring.

So, we took another, urban-focused test, in lots of slow-moving traffic situations, and averaged a still-solid 8.0L/100km.

Note, that while the Puma requires 95 RON premium unleaded, it's also perfectly happy on – and is even recommended by Ford for – the cheapest petrol currently offered in Australia, 94 RON E10 unleaded. Either way, the ST-Line V is a frugal small SUV.

Look, it’s fair to say the original ASX was not a driver’s car. Reliable? Yes. Spacious? Absolutely. Great value? You bet. But fun to drive? Not so much.

So it’s good news then that the new-gen ASX is much more engaging to drive. I quite enjoyed the current-gen Renault Captur the last time I drove it, and the underpinnings of the ASX are the facelifted version of that Captur.

The 1.3-litre turbo-petrol unit might not be ultra quick off the mark, but it is sprightly and really comes alive when you’re at speed. It also has a decent engine note.

I've recently driven another Renault model with basically the same powertrain but it suffered from dreadful lag - a combination of a turbocharger and a dual-clutch transmission.

I had expected the same of the ASX, but there’s little lag to speak of. And the transmission is much smoother in this application. It doesn’t hold gears or do anything DCTs are known for, which is a lovely surprise.

Steering is sharp enough and the feel can be adjusted in the settings. Aspire and Exceed grades come with Comfort, Sport and Perso mode, which is for personalisation.

Ride quality is fine on smooth roads but big pot holes and other bumps are felt in the cabin. It is a European car, so no surprise that it’s been tuned for a more European experience. It’s not so firm it’ll dampen the drive experience, but it could be a touch more supple.

On that, the ASX has not undergone a local ride and handling tuning program like the one its larger Outlander stablemate has benefited from.

That doesn’t mean you can’t have fun in the ASX - you can. It handles high-speed bends on country roads surprisingly well, with more grip than you’d expect. There’s a little body roll but nothing dramatic.

More time behind the wheel is needed, but the tight chassis means the ASX likes a corner.

The cabin has better insulation than the outgoing model but it’s still not the most hushed small SUV money can buy. But it’s another element that’s far from a dealbreaker.

If the Puma's pricing is complicated, its cabin surprising accommodating and its real-world efficiency particularly parsimonious, then the upward trajectory of pros over cons continues with performance that's downright spirited.

Around town first. A small-displacement engine plus a turbo plus a DCT usually spell interminable spells of lag when all the driver longs for is an instant and measured response to a right foot flexing down onto the throttle.

But the Ford largely sidesteps such pitfalls. Though momentarily hesitant at take-off, the three-pot turbo does then get down to business in no time, with a sustained and satisfying surge of thrust as the revs grow, accompanied by a lusty and raspy thrum that's entirely in keeping with the Puma's track-pants appearance. And it doesn't let up either, with speed building up strongly through the gears, and much more so than the mere 999ccs suggest. Great for overtaking, or taking over a rapidly diminishing gap in the peak-hour derby.

Selecting Sport (a fiddly action that's located too far from the driver for safe eyes-on-the-road operation) lights an even bigger fire in the Puma's belly, with punchier acceleration and a very attentive transmission tune, slicing seamlessly through the seven ratios, leaving you in awe that a heart so small can possess such deep lungs.

Where the Ford really leaves an indelible mark is its enthusiasm to corner just as keenly, armed with brilliantly slick steering and a planted chassis that is set up to both encourage and interact with the driver. Minimal body roll and lots of grip from a quality quartet of Continental tyres ensure the Puma can be punted about like a sporty little hatchback, while the electronic safety tech allowing just enough leeway for lots of fun before they gently reel everything back into line.

We cannot think of a more enjoyable small SUV. And, by the way, those same driver-assist systems provide exceptionally nuanced lane-keep and adaptive cruise-control intervention – certainly they're right up there with the premium SUV brigade.

Given that our Puma wore 215/50R18 rubber, on a 'sports' suspension tune, the ride around town is commendable, with ample cushioning from the rough stuff. There is some tautness to the ride, but it isn't hard or rough; the ST-Line V walks a fine line between urban-agility and surface-decay isolation. In other words, it's commendably relaxing to travel in.

At higher speeds, some road and tyre noises do permeate through inside, and those Dumbo door mirrors do create some wind whoosh, but overall, given how dynamic the chassis is, the Puma feels grown up and sophisticated.

Tested under the 2019 Euro NCAP crash-test regime, the Puma scores a top five-star ANCAP rating.

However, this means it does not meet the more stringent frontal offset crash, side impact crash and far-side impact crash-test criteria introduced by ANCAP for 2020 model-year vehicles – despite launching in September of that year.

Safety items include dual front, front-seat side and side curtain airbags (six in total), AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection (working between 7km/h and 80km/h), lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver fatigue alert, rear parking sensors, tyre pressure monitors and emergency assistance. These come on top of anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control and traction control.

As mentioned earlier, adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, front parking sensors and blind-spot detection are part of the $1500 'Park Package'. Do it.

Mitsubishi's standard warranty is five years or 100,000km, but if you service your car exclusively at a Mitsubishi dealer, it extends to an impressive 10 years or 200,000km.

You’ll also get 10 years of roadside assistance and capped-price servicing. The servicing schedule is every 12 months or 15,000km.

Service pricing starts from $349, but bigger services every four years or 60,000km will cost circa-$1000. The average price of a service across the 10 years is $568, or the total overall is $5686.

Mitsubishi has an extensive network of 185 dealers across Australia and many in regional areas. So service coverage is among the best in the country.

Ford offers the industry-average warranty of five-years/unlimited kilometres. Services intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km.

There is also a capped-price servicing scheme under the 'Ford Service Benefits' banner, with the first four years/60,000km of 'A and B' logbook services pegged at $299 per visit, and then between $320 and $560, for up to 12 years.

There is also a Ford loan car program, SYNC 3 map updates and Motoring Club Membership included during that time frame.