MG Mg7 vs Chery Omoda 5

What's the difference?

In a world obsessed with SUVs and electric powertrains, a mid-size petrol sedan almost feels rebellious. But the MG7 kind of is. A sleek fastback with a turbocharged engine, a sporty edge and a price that makes you look twice - it’s a compelling combination. There are some drawbacks for families in efficiency and back-seat practicality but it's not a bad offering for those wanting something a bit more fun than an SUV.

There’s little argument that Chery is focusing on value-for-money when it comes to its model range, and that’s absolutely the case with its new range opener - the Omoda 5 FX.

The spacious, flexible and neat cabin also get a tick. 

Purely looking at this car on paper, it is hard to beat for $27,000 drive-away. And if you stick exclusively to urban areas without hitting the open road, you might be happy with your purchase.

However, the overall drive experience, including the behaviour of the advanced driver assistance tech, is well off the pace of mainstream rivals from Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, VW and more. 

If that price is too good to look past, then be sure to do back-to-back test drives with other similarly priced rivals to compare.

The MG7 is genuinely good looking. The fastback roofline gives it a sleek silhouette, and there’s a confidence to the way it carries itself.

The blacked-out badging, quad exhaust outlets, 19-inch Michelin tyres and red brake calipers all lean into that sporty brief. It looks fast standing still. The frameless doors are a nice touch, and the retractable rear spoiler adds a bit of theatre and fun.

Inside, the cabin follows through on that upmarket intent. Deep burgundy leather and synthetic suede are used generously throughout, giving it a sumptuous feel. Although, my husband joked that he wouldn't be able to drive it during State of Origin... sorry, Queenslanders!

There’s less reliance on piano black trim, which I appreciate as it scuffs easily, and most surfaces look well-finished. The integrated headrests up front give the illusion of proper sports seats but I do wonder if the interior would pop half as well if it was finished in the optional black.

The dashboard is dominated by a wide digital display incorporating a 10.25-inch instrument cluster and a 12.3-inch media screen. The panoramic sunroof helps keep things light and airy, and while there aren’t many physical buttons or dials, which is usually a gripe of mine, the overall execution feels cohesive and premium for the price point.

The Omoda 5’s design is bold, certainly more so than its larger Tiggo 7 and Tiggo 8 stablemates.

At the front the narrow daytime running lights integrate into the busy-looking grille that is surrounded by vertical headlights.

Tall wheel arches, narrowing rear three-quarter windows, creases, a boot lip spoiler and a perky rear help it stand out, but when you look at it front on or rear on, it seems oddly proportioned. Like it’s on stilts or something. 

The cabin design is smart and restrained with a high-set centre console, piano black inserts, attractive three-spoke flat-bottom steering wheel with clear dials and minimal use of buttons.

Soft-touch materials adorn the top of the dash but the doors make do with hard plastics, which I have no issue with. The passenger side dash is upright but that doesn’t impact functionality. 

Up front is where the MG7 feels most generous. The electrically adjustable front seats are comfortable and supportive for daily driving, although extendable under-thigh support would help reduce fatigue on longer trips. You do get heating for both the seats and the steering wheel but having to dive into the media menu to activate them is annoying.

In the second row, legroom is respectable for a mid-size sedan. Headroom, however, is tighter thanks to the fastback roofline and panoramic sunroof. Tall teenagers won't feel like they can sprawl out but younger kids will be fine. The second row features two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points but two child seats will fit best. Bending down to buckle in a child will remind your back why SUVs became all the rage, but it's certainly doable.

The seats in the second row are thickly padded and comfortable, and the fold-down armrest sits at a good height to lean on. Amenities aren’t especially extensive given there’s only one grade available, but you do get a couple of cupholders, map pockets, directional air vents and two USB-C ports.

Storage in the front row is about what you’d expect for a car of this size. There’s a decent glove box, a shallow middle console, large door bins and some handy little nooks near your knee. A sunglasses holder and a dedicated phone cradle with wireless charging round things out nicely. The wireless charger can lag a little in topping up your battery, and it's quick to overheat your phone - added ventilation would be a big help here. However, there’s also a 12-volt socket and two USB-C ports if you prefer a cable.

The media system itself is responsive and largely intuitive, although the touchpad-style controls on the dash feel slightly back-to-front in use. On the plus side, it’s very easy to flick into Sport mode and open up the exhaust using the cluster controls, which adds a bit of fun to the daily drive.

The boot offers 375 litres of capacity, which is on the smaller side for the segment. Comparatively, the Sonata N Line offers 480L, the Skoda Sportline 600L and the Camry 524L. That said, it’s been perfectly usable for grocery runs and the odd road trip this week. You do need to load bulkier items further back toward the seats to work around the sloping fastback design. A powered tailgate adds convenience, and there’s a temporary spare tyre underneath, which I always prefer to a repair kit.

The cabin offers enough space for a small SUV. It feels wide across the front seat and there’s plenty of headroom, too.

The driver’s seat is power adjustable and while the fabric and stitching look cool, there’s almost too much padding under your bottom.

There are clear controls on the comfy door armrest and on the lovely looking three-spoke synthetic leather, flat bottom steering wheel.

The console sits up high, presumably to give the cabin a sports car look, and the dash is neat and clean, largely due to a lack of physical buttons. There are two phone holders that dominate the lower part of the dash and they double as device chargers in higher grades, but not in the FX.

There is space under the console to fit a bag or other items but the USB-A and USB-C ports are on the passenger side so you have to reach over to connect a cord if required. Thankfully, the Apple CarPlay is wireless. It connected easily and did not require reconnection while I had the car.

Two smallish cupholders are found near the gear shifter, and a sizeable central bin will store a number or items. The doors can stow a tall and wide bottle as well as other flat items. 

Chery’s dual-screen set-up looks nice and not a world away from Kia’s integrated screens. The driver instrument display is not customisable in this grade and many of the items on the display are quite small. It would help if these were a little larger.

The multimedia side is simple to use with iPhone-like icons for functions like vehicle settings and more. There’s even a cute little bubble face on the side that you press to dictate commands. I asked the system to perform a few basic tasks like turning the air con off and on and it did it immediately without fault.

Air con controls are housed in the screen as well but it’s not as fiddly as some systems from other manufacturers. The only complaint is that it doesn’t appear to show the exact temperature, and the air flow could be stronger for a hot climate like Australia.

Taller passengers will probably need to duck their heads getting in and out of the Omoda 5’s rear seats, because of the low roofline. Once in the rear, there is a decent amount of knee and legroom, and headroom is good too despite the roofline.

Those rear seats are flat and not the most comfortable but fine for urban drives, and they feature ISOFIX points on the two outboard seats and three top tether points for child car seats.

In terms of amenities, there’s one USB-C port in the second row, lower air vents - something too many small SUVs go without - a centre fold-down armrest with two (shallow) cupholders and enough space for big bottles in the doors.

All petrol Omoda 5s have a cargo capacity of 360 litres, which increases to 1075L when you fold the 60/40 split rear seats down. This is more than the GWM Haval Jolion petrol’s capacity (337L).

It has a manual tailgate, a high loading area and some under-floor storage, but there is more than enough space for some luggage or a large amount of groceries in the boot. 

It has a temporary spare wheel which is essential in Australia if you’re driving beyond urban areas.

The only negative is the flimsy parcel shelf. It struggles to stay in the groves that are designed to hold it. I had to re-fit it every time I opened the boot.

At the time of publishing, the only non-Chinese-branded model in the mainstream small SUV category available for less than $30K drive-away is the 14-year-old Mitsubishi ASX. The only other sub-$30K small SUVs are from Chery, GWM Haval and MG - all from China.

Since launching the Omoda 5, Chery has placed value at the heart of its pitch to buyers, and that has only sharpened with the launch of the new base FX grade, tested here.

The FX kicks off at $27,990, drive-away, which lowers the price of entry to the Omoda 5 range by $6500. Not bad at all.

The only other models that compete on price are the GWM Haval Jolion Premium from $26,990 drive-away, the soon-to-be replaced MG ZST Vibe at $26,490 drive-away and the Mitsubishi ASX GS which is $26,740, but that doesn't include on-road costs. 

Spec wise, the FX is not missing much from the next grade up, the $34,490, drive-away, BX. You get halogen headlights instead of LEDs, and it loses acoustic glass, soft-touch upper door inserts, ambient lighting, a wireless device charger, a 12-volt outlet in the boot and a frameless rear-view mirror. 

Compared with the BX the FX suffices with single-zone instead of dual-zone air conditioning, the audio system drops from eight speakers to six and it has fabric rather than synthetic leather seat trim.

Out of these missing items, you’ll miss some more than others. Offering halogen instead of LED headlights is increasingly rare these days, even on base grades, and halogens are just not as strong, especially on regional roads at night. 

But I am yet to encounter a truly effective device charging pad in a car so that’s no great loss.

The safety list is solid (see Safety section below) and it still has a good level of standard gear, especially for the price.

The FX comes with rear passenger air vents, keyless entry and start, a proximity key, a six-way power driver’s seat, dual 10.25-inch screens (multimedia and driver instrumentation), digital radio, an intelligent voice command as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. 

The MG7 has a 2.0L, four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine producing up to 170kW of power and 380Nm of torque. That’s pretty gusty compared to its nearest rivals, although the Sonata N Line still beats it with its 213kW/422Nm outputs. The Hyundai is more of a dedicated sports model. Still, with these outputs the MG7 manages a 0 -100km/h sprint in a swift 6.5-seconds!

Power is delivered to the front wheels and the nine-speed auto transmission punches through its gears relatively smoothly. You can also flip it into Sport mode, where gear changes become more pronounced.

Overall, the whole setup creates an engaging on-road experience without lulling you into any false pretences. The MG7 is not a racer, even though it looks like one, but it holds its own.

There are two petrol engine choices for the Omoda 5. The FX, BX and EX use a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbocharged unit delivering power and torque outputs of 108kW and 210Nm, respectively. 

These grades are front-wheel drive and the powertrain features a continuously variable transmission (CVT). 

Those outputs are inline with the GWM Haval Jolion petrol but offer more punch than the MG ZST.

The Omoda 5 GT grades use a more powerful 137kW/275Nm 1.6-litre turbo, but they also come with a higher price tag.

The MG7 has a claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 8.0L/100km. With its 65-litre fuel tank, that equates to a theoretical driving range of up to 812km.

That places it broadly in line with the Hyundai Sonata N Line, which claims 8.1L/100km, although the Hyundai delivers stronger engine outputs. The Skoda Octavia Sportline is notably more frugal at 6.1L/100km, while the Toyota Camry SL continues to dominate the efficiency conversation with its 4.0L/100km hybrid figure.

In real-world driving, expect that 8.0L/100km claim to creep up. Even after a week consisting mostly of longer highway stretches, my trip computer was sitting at 8.6L/100km. That’s not wildly unexpected for a turbo-petrol engine, and it’s hardly alarming, but efficiency is a major consideration for families. Against hybrid rivals, it doesn’t win that particular argument.

Combined CO2 (ADR 81/02) emissions sit at 183g/km, which is comparative to the Hyundai Sonata N Line but not as low as its other rivals.

MG recommends a minimum 95 RON unleaded petrol to be used.

Chery says the official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel use figure for the Omoda 5 1.5L is 6.9 litres per 100km and the CO2 emissions are rated at 164g/km from the Euro 6-compliant engine.

After a week of urban, freeway and outer suburban driving we recorded a figure of 10.3L/100km which is well off the official figure.

It has a 51-litre fuel tank and runs on 91 RON petrol. Based on our calculations you can expect a theoretical range of about 765km.

Power delivery in the MG7 is smooth and responsive, and it doesn’t take long to feel confident with the turbo-petrol engine. For a bit of extra fun, flick it into Sport mode and open the exhaust; gear changes become more pronounced, and the engine note gets noticeably throatier. It’s not a performance sedan, but it’s definitely engaging on the road.

Handling is another highlight. The steering is responsive and firms up depending on your selected drive mode, and the low-slung stance helps the car feel surprisingly nimble in corners. That said, it’s not always surefooted when accelerating out of tight bends, which reminds you that the MG7 is sporty but not track-focused.

Visibility is adequate but not perfect. The thicker pillars, lower roofline, and relatively small windows do make the cabin feel a touch enclosed, and there’s some road noise, which is enough to remind you it’s not a luxury saloon, but it never becomes intrusive.

The MG7 feels agile in tighter spaces, and the 360-degree camera system is high-quality. Parking is straightforward, which frazzled parents will appreciate.

The Omoda 5 has two personalities depending how and where you’re driving. If you only drive in urban areas and rarely exceed 60km/h, it’s more than fine as a daily driver.

It’s when you’re on the open road or a freeway that its flaws are revealed.

The 1.5-litre engine is responsive enough, although there is some hesitation when accelerating under full throttle, and it’s slower to pick up pace when you’re already on the move at 60 or 80km/h. 

The throttle is quite sensitive, however, and can be a little jolty when taking off. And light tyre chirp is also possible when accelerating hard.

Chery’s CVT is fine and doesn’t have the drone of other CVTs, but the manual mode toggles on the side of the shifter are in a confusing spot. When I first got in the car, I mistook this for the button that allows the shift between drive and reverse that many other cars have. I only made that mistake once, though.

The engine is rowdy when accelerating hard but not unpleasant, and Chery could do more to keep noise out of the cabin. Wind noise is particularly noticeable. 

The Omoda 5’s ride can be jittery, particularly on uneven or pockmarked roads. The tyres seem to soak up road reflectors and smaller bumps but the suspension tune is on the firmer side which means it’s crashy over bigger bumps.

It also leans a lot when cornering, feeling top heavy in bends. This is not the sort of dynamically capable crossover you can have fun with on a twisty road, like the sadly departed Ford Puma, or the Mazda CX-30 or VW T-Roc.

Some general impressions - the brakes are a little slow to respond but you learn to adjust. The steering feels artificial and twitchy and you’re constantly fighting with the lane keeping aid. More on that in the ‘Safety’ section below. 

On sunny days a distracting reflection of the top of the dash appears on the inside of the windscreen. It’s not great. But another general impression is that the proximity key works a treat. Which is not often the case. 

As mentioned earlier, Chery has a long list of standard safety gear for all grades of the Omoda 5 from the base FX to the top-spec GT AWD.

In fact, the only feature the FX and BX don’t get is a 360-degree surround-view monitor. 

It comes with a centre airbag to help mitigate against injury during a side collision, front and rear parking sensors, multi-collision brake, forward collision warning, auto emergency braking (AEB), emergency lane keeping, lane departure warning and prevention, traffic jam assist, lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert and traffic sign recognition. 

ANCAP gave it a maximum five-star crash safety rating in 2022. 

There is no question you get a bucket load of safety gear for your money. However, some of the advanced driver assistance features let the car down.

We have written before about the poor performance of systems like the lane keeping aid when the Omoda 5 launched 18 months ago.

Chery was very quick to recalibrate some of these systems to ensure they are better suited to Australian conditions. But it’s still well off the pace of other more established small SUV rivals.

Despite the improvements, the active lane keeping system still isn’t great. On a freeway, the steering is incredibly jittery and it makes for an unpleasant driving experience. The car ping pongs between the line markings and sometimes it feels like it’s going to steer you into the next lane.

At one point I had the indicator on to change lanes and even then the steering was fighting me to stay in the lane I was in.

It feels like one of the first examples of lane keeping systems from several years ago. Many other brands have sharpened these systems to the point they are barely noticeable. 

The blind spot monitor beeps a lot and at inappropriate times. It is quite frustrating. You can turn off some of these systems in the settings menu, but you shouldn’t have to do that. They should just work without distracting from the task at hand - driving.

Chery’s driver attention alert is infuriating. I lost count of the number of times the ‘You’ve been distracted for a long time’ warning flashed up when I was looking straight ahead at the road. At one point the display flashed when I was at a roundabout trying to turn. So I was distracted by what? My own driving? 

The adaptive cruise control, however, is responsive and adapted to forward traffic without getting flustered.

Chery may have improved the ADAS calibration after the Omoda's launch, but the carmaker still has a lot of work to do in this area to be anywhere near its mainstream rivals.

MG backs the MG7 with a seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. If you service exclusively through MG service centres, that coverage can be extended to 10 years or up to 250,000km, which makes it one of the more generous warranty offerings currently available.

At the time of this review, servicing intervals and service prices haven't been set for the MG7. It's fairly easy to secure servicing for an MG, as they have around 90 service centres nationwide at the moment.

Chery has a solid aftersales offer that includes a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, seven years of roadside assist as long as you service with a Chery dealer, and seven years of capped-price servicing.

The service schedule is every 10,000km or 12 months, whichever comes first. That’s off the pace of some rivals that don’t make you return to the dealership until 15,000km.

But the cost of the first five services is $280 a pop before increasing to $391 and then $295. That is well priced for the segment.