Mazda CX-3 vs Zeekr 7X

What's the difference?

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

Not the most comprehensive of tests, I'm afraid. But early signs are good for the Zeekr 7X, which ticks plenty of on-paper boxes, looks sleek and fresh and feels sorted from behind the wheel.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

It’s a sleek-looking SUV, the 7X, and is nowhere near as boundary-pushing as its stablemate sibling, the Polestar 4, which rides on the same platform. For one, the Zeekr has a rear windscreen.

Zeekr calls it 'hidden energy' design language, which I take to mean, at least partly, that you can’t immediately tell what’s powering it. It could pass as an internal-combustion car, a hybrid, PHEV or EV; at least until you look closely.

There are light bars front and back, but sadly we miss out on what the brand calls its 'Light Curtain' - a pixel-filled bar of light that spans the entire front end. Apparently it fell victim to the ANCAP crash-test requirements and has been replaced by a black cover.

Even without it, I dig the 7X’s athletic stance. It looks good in the metal, especially finished in deep green paint.

Inside, it’s a pretty plush-feeling cabin, without being revolutionary, and the big central screen and digital dash are bright and clear. The addition of a camera to monitor back seat passengers without having to turn around is a clever touch, too.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

The 7X stretches 4787mm in length, 1930mm in width, 1650mm in height and rides on a 2900mm wheelbase.

As is pretty typical of electric SUVs, interior space is great, especially for backseat riders. I'm 175cm and have heaps of knee and headroom behind the driver's seat set to my position.

Storage space is good, too, with a deep bin between the front seats, a pull-down divider in the back row and pull-out draws beneath the back seat which mean you can hide laptops or valuables when you lock the car.

One key quirk, though, is the location of the USB charge ports in the back, which are accessed through the pulldown seat divider. It means that, should there be three passengers in the back, you won't be charging any devices.

The boot is 539 litres of flat, wide space – though that number grows when you drop the 60/40 split-folding back row. Rear-drive models also get a 62-litre 'frunk'.

There are three ways into the 7X, with two rear-drive models and one AWD Performance completing the trilogy.

That story begins with the 7X Rear-Drive, which gets the smallest battery and lists at $57,900, before on-road costs. Next is the Long-Range at $63,900, which is also a rear-drive model but nabs a bigger battery and a longer driving range.

Finally, the Performance is $72,900, and is the only twin-motor model. It scores the same 100kWh battery as the Long Range, but significantly ups the performance, which in turn dramatically lowers the zero to 100km/h time.

Standard kit is pretty impressive across the board, with the entry-level model scoring 19-inch alloys, LED lighting all around, a powered tailgate, a glass roof (with powered shade) and ambient interior lighting.

Tech is handled buy a 16-inch central touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and there are two 50W wireless charge pads. You also get a digital dash, tri-zone climate and a 10-speaker stereo.

The Long Range model adds a better 21-speaker stereo and a head-up display, while the flagship Performance gets trick auto-opening and closing doors (you just push a button in the pillar to open and step on the brake to close), as well as genuine Nappa leather trim, 21-inch alloys and very good adaptive air suspension.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

The two rear-drive ZX models share the same rear motor producing 310kW and 440Nm. Not stratospheric numbers but the powertrain delivers plenty of useable, real-world grunt, with both variants reporting a zero to 100km/h time of 6.0 seconds.

The AWD Performance model really ups the grunt, though, adding a second electric motor at the front axle lifting total outputs to 475kW and 710Nm and dropping the 0-100km/h run to a crazy-brisk 3.8 seconds. It’s also the only model to ride on the very good adaptive air suspension as standard.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

The cheapest 7X variant scores a 75kWh LFP battery, while the Long Range and Performance nab a 100kWh NCM unit. All have an 800V electronic architecture, allowing for mega charging speeds of up to 450kW DC charging (actually 420kW on the 100kW battery).

Now, I don’t think we have chargers capable of pushing that much juice in Australia, but even using our 350kW chargers Zeekr promises you’ll go from 10 to 80 percent charged in 16 minutes or less. AC charging is up to 22kW, too.

In terms of driving range, you can expect 480km in the rear-drive, 615km in the Long Range and 543km in the Performance, all on the WLTP cycle.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The 7X is very much the vehicle Zeekr has been waiting for in Australia, so expectation weighs heavy on its metallic shoulders. Happily, and not to spoil the ending, it largely lives up to those expectations with our taste test revealing an electric SUV that shines in most areas.

Our drive experience took place at one of Australia’s longest and fastest race circuits, The Bend outside Adelaide. And not in the AWD Performance version, but in the less-powerful Long Range model. Not exactly the natural environment of a circa 2.5-tonne electric SUV, then.

And while the rear-drive Zeekr is no out-and-out performance car, the 310kW and 440Nm served up from that rear-axle motor is plenty to get the 7X up and moving, with the power arriving in a steady and unbroken stream that saw us pretty easily push to 200km/h on one of the track’s lengthier straights.

I’d argue that’s more than enough grunt to satisfy most, if not all, Zeekr owners without them having to dig deep for the Performance model. But there’s no escaping the fact this is a heavy vehicle, and one inspired by efficiency, not the red mist of racing.

So, things start to drop away a bit when the lesser 7X is really pushed, with an off-putting kind of buffeting movement at speed and sometimes spongey-feeling dynamics a reminder that this is a vehicle more at home on public roads.

The AWD Performance, however, sharpens things up considerably, helped by its adaptive air suspension and all-paw grip. It feels far tighter, grippier and more composed through corners. Sadly, by the time I jumped in, my lead-footed colleagues had drained the battery to the point where I could only accelerate at 50 per cent capacity, which made the AWD slower on the straights than then RWD model, but it made up plenty of lost ground in the way it corners.

All of this is, of course, is likely to be of little relevance to any 7X customers, who are more likely to find themselves on the moon than they are the main straight of a race track, and so my opinion hasn’t changed — the AWD is faster and more technically advanced, but when you boil it down to the actual life a mid-size electric SUV will live, I think the smart money is on the Long Range AWD model.

Side note: We also did some pretty serious off-roading (again, something no owner is likely to do) in the AWD model, and I can report that the softest suspension, steering and accelerator settings add a cosseting comfort to the drive experience on rough roads, and that there is some genuine of-road capability on board.

How it drives on actual roads? For that, you’ll have to wait just a little longer. But early signs are good for Zeekr’s most important model.

The 7X wears a maximum five-star Euro NCAP assessment and I want to point out a pretty wild feature. Standard across all trims is a high-def camera in the B-pillar aimed at the rear seats. You can cover it, if you’d like, but the idea is that anyone up front can hit a button near the central screen that will pull up a high-def feed of what’s happening in the back seat. So, no more having to turn around to see what the kids are up to in the back seat.

Happily, all 7X models get the same safety suite, which includes a 360-degree camera, autonomous parking and 15 ADAS functions.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.

The Zeekr 7X is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, while the battery is covered for eight years or 160,000km. There’s five years' roadside assistance thrown in, too.

Servicing is recommended every two years or 40,000km, with what the brand describes as optional health checks in years one, three and five (the first one's on the house).

Go for all the services, including the optional ones, and you’re looking at $2415 over the first five years. Skip the optional ones, and it’s more like $1755.