Lexus UX250H vs Mazda 3

What's the difference?

Most cars get worse as they age as their makers try and save pennies by scrimping on quality and features. But the reverse seems to be true for the Lexus UX.

The 250h Luxury 2WD we tested is the car that the brand should have launched with back in 2018, with an appealing balance of performance and economy, comfort and sporty handling, as well as refinement and features. The UX has finally come of age.

Given how effortlessly it traverses the mainstream and premium small car classes, the Mazda 3 might be the best value small car on the planet.

With racy styling, sports car handling, classy interior presentation and impressive, intelligent efficiency, there’s plenty to sink your teeth into here.

Poor rear vision, a dark back-seat area and smallish boot aside, it doesn’t have any glaring faults.

In a world overrun with SUVs, props to Mazda for evolving the small car so brilliantly to mask a half-decade of existence. Continuous improvements have made the 2024 G25 Evolve SP Vision an essential small car shortlist proposition, regardless of price.

A hefty portion of the UX’s engineering underneath is shared with the popular Toyota C-HR. Not that you would necessarily know that by glancing at it.

Even five years on from launch, the current model looks slick and contemporary, and it seems to have informed the styling of newer, larger Lexus SUVs like the latest NX.

Not that you’d call the UX an SUV – it’s very much a higher-riding hatchback, with a ho-hum 160mm of ground clearance.

To put that in perspective, other crossovers are taller: the GLA has 213mm, while Subaru’s new Crosstrek boasts 220mm. At least the UX’s is loftier than the C-HR and its pitiful 137mm.

That said, the angular wheel arches and wide-track stance serves the Lexus well.

How is it that the current Mazda 3 is already five years old? This hatchback is still stunning, the sort of car you look back at when walking away.

The shape is sleek and almost coupe-like, with a shark-like nose, cab-backward-style long bonnet, upswept shoulder line and a fastback silhouette.

More importantly, it’s the way the light dances across the sculptured sides that draw the eyes in. Bereft of clutter, it makes you wish all mainstream manufacturers had the courage to be so daring.

We’ve said it before – the 'BP'-generation Mazda 3 (Axela in Japan) is the brand’s boldest C-segment hatch since the 1993 'BA' 323 (Astina/Lantis/323F).

But there’s a price to pay for such timeless beauty…

The UX’s compact crossover-esque hatchback proportions have implications inside. Inevitably, this is no larger than the (related) Toyota Corolla, despite having the higher seating position.

Beyond that, though, the 2023 model highlights how Lexus has made its so-called ‘gateway’ model better than before.

For starters, despite being the base grade, this UX has a properly premium ambience, backed up by exceptional fit and finish.

From a sensory perspective, the UX looks, smells, feels and sounds like a Lexus should. And by the latter, we mean the cabin is pleasingly isolated from the outside world.

The overhauled touchscreen and multimedia system is a huge step forward for the series. The larger new display looks great and works well – what a monumental improvement over the infuriatingly fiddly old set-up. It’s difficult to see how they’ll improve it. Dependable and glitch-free. Are you listening, all European manufacturers?

Meanwhile, the carryover parts that worked well enough before continue to impress.

The UX’s front seats are sumptuous in their cushy softness and comfort, yet provide sufficient support over longer driving distances.

There’s also the excellent driving position, with most switchgear within grasp. There’s just enough space for taller people to settle in nicely up front. And the basics like ventilation and storage are thoughtfully executed. The climate in the UX is always fine.

Negatives? Don’t worry, we’ve identified several.

As mentioned earlier, the now-better-equipped Luxury does have all the essentials. But for a car that’s approaching $60K-drive-away, we’d expect kerb-side mirrors that dip down when reversing to avoid damaging alloys against gutters; we couldn’t get ours to auto-fold when locking up, either.

Driver vision out isn’t great. Thick pillars and that rising shoulder line make changing lanes and reversing a technology-reliant affair, as it’s difficult to see objects that are too-easily obscured. For the same reasons, a front camera would be useful in this grade.

Others might expect a sunroof, or cooled seats that massage, or a head-up display for the instrumentation, but we’d argue that they’re hardly necessities. Lexus has to upsell buyers to something.

Moving on to the back-seat area betrays the UX’s compactness most.

The back doors have small apertures. Entry/egress is challenging for folk with long legs. Legroom is tight, and three adults abreast would be a struggle, so it’s best to treat the littlest Lexus crossover as a four-seater.

Yet headroom is fine, the appearance and finish remain first class as it is up front, and the basics are all present – air vents, grab handles, coat hooks, overhead lighting, one map pocket, centre armrest with cupholders, two USB outlets, and windows that wind all the way down. Narrow front seats aid with light, vision and ambience, too.

Further back, the luggage area is pretty petite for an SUV, though the boot is (slightly) larger than the Corolla and Mazda3’s. That powered tailgate is useful if your arms are full, but the loading lip is high.

Normal boot floor depth is shallow but most of that flooring can be removed to reveal a hidden compartment underneath.

Small side pockets are also useful. You’ll find a 240V outlet. Bag hooks and floor tie-down hooks are fitted.

And – being a hybrid – there’s no spare wheel, just a tyre inflation kit. And the flimsy cargo cover is there only to keep prying eyes out.

Not big on utility, then, but the UX is true to its role as a Lexus in concentrate form.

There is a price to pay for all this quasi-coupe styling flair, and that’s a comparatively snug-feeling interior, though you’d never call it cramped.

Actually, the Mazda 3 is no less spacious than most of its competition in all but one area, with enough room even for 200cm drivers, along with sufficient shoulder width and ceiling height to match.

If you’re really tall, maybe that missing sunroof isn’t such a bad thing, after all.

Sat so low-down on cushy, enveloping front seats that offer plenty of comfort and support, this is the anti-SUV. Maybe Mazda should have called this the MX-3.

Sporty and spot-on, the driving position is a laid-back affair, with an emphasis on better ergonomics, as emphasised by the thoughtful placement of switchgear that’s all within easy reach, ahead of a beautifully flowing and layered dash. Proudly Japanese in flavour, it brings to mind functional minimalism.

Drilling into some of the 3’s finer interior details, the analogue-look digital instrumentation is super-legible, ultra-classy and gorgeously lit at night. As previously mentioned, the dials and surrounding air vents are reminiscent of the later Porsche 944 and 968.

It’s not just all for the sake of aesthetics, either.

Yes, it’s lovely, but the thinned-rim three-spoke steering wheel feels great to grip, with nifty little paddle shifters that are a delight to prod.

Same goes for the physical volume knob and climate-control buttons, sidestepping the need to get distracted and frustrated by virtual sub-menus.

And having a conventional gear lever with old-school Tiptronic-style shifts suits the 3’s athletic vibe.

Plus, forward vision is A-OK, ventilation is faultless, storage is better than you might expect, and the fit and finish is as good if not better than any of this 3’s German premium opponents.

Out back, the split-fold rear backrest is set at a comfortable angle, the cushion is well padded, and you’re provided with USB ports, air vents, and an armrest with two cupholders. More thoughtfulness.

But while knee room is fair, rear headroom isn’t great if you’re tall or wear a beehive, as the falling ceiling line reveals.

Vision out is limited by that rising window line and fat pillars. Getting in and out of the back requires some contortionist moves. And the small windows mean it can be gloomier in the back than a Smiths album.

Finally, at just 295 litres, the 3’s cargo capacity is disappointing. Sure, it eclipses the Corolla hatch’s 217L cubby, but other rivals are far larger back there.

At least the floor is wide and flat and there are 60/40-split backrests for cabin access for longer items.

Note that a space-saver spare wheel lurks underneath. Mazda argues there’s always the closely-related CX-30 if you need (slightly) more space (317L).

Meanwhile, at the other end of the 3…

Mazda has rationalised the MY24 3 range, with fewer grades and no more manuals, sadly.

The pretty little piece of automotive industrial design you see here is the mid-range Evolve SP Vision, which sounds less like a car and more like a posh hairdryer from Vidal Sassoon.

Priced from $36,520 before on-road costs (or about $41K drive-away before you start haggling), this Mazda 3 is a sporty and well-equipped alternative to the likes of the speedy Hyundai i30 N-Line Premium, spacious Kia Cerato GT Turbo, new Subaru Impreza AWD 2.0R and evergreen Toyota Corolla ZR. All cost roughly the same money.

The thing is, do Mazda’s upmarket aspirations mean the 3 possesses the ride quality and chic to embarrass at times substantially more expensive hatchbacks with premium pretensions? We’re talking rivals like the BMW 1 Series, Mercedes-Benz A-Class, Peugeot 308 and VW Golf, here.

Stay with us, because we reckon you might be surprised by how far the 3 has come since its humble 323 predecessors.

Anyway, this version comes with most of the good gear, including a full suite of driver-assist safety tech like front and rear Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), blind-spot alert, lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control, as well as keyless start and walk-away lock, powered driver’s seat with memory, 360-degree camera views, a head-up display, digital radio, sat-nav, auto tilt/folding exterior mirrors, dual-zone climate control, Bluetooth phone/audio connectivity and 18-inch alloys.

Oh, and for 2023, an upgraded version introduces a smartphone charger and wireless for the Apple CarPlay/Android Auto function, along with USB-C port access front and rear.

What’s missing at the Evolve SP Vision’s price point? Some mainstream rivals offer leather and a sunroof, available respectively in the more-expensive GT Vision, from $40,000, and flagship Astina grades, from nearly $42,500.

Still, that’s quite a lot of small car for the money, given the quality of the presentation and design. Speaking of which…

The UX’s Corolla/C-HR connection continues with its 2.0-litre (1987cc) twin-cam four-cylinder petrol engine, delivering 107kW of power at 6000rpm and 188Nm of torque between 4400 and 5200rpm.

The 250h Luxury pairs that with an 80kW/202Nm permanent magnet motor and 1.4kWh Ni-MH battery, for a combined power output of 135kW. A second, rear-mounted motor is available in higher grades, providing all-wheel drive. But not in this Luxury guise.

As with most Toyota and Lexus hybrids, charging is only via the petrol engine and recuperated energy from braking. Electric-only drive is only offered during brief spells of low-speed light-throttle driving, or off-throttle coasting where conditions allow.

Drive is sent to the front wheels via an electronically-controlled continuously variable transmission (CVT). Three modes are offered – 'Eco', 'Normal' and 'Sport'.

Tipping the scales at 1625kg (kerb), the 250h Luxury offers a power-to-weight ratio of nearly 83.1kW per tonne. That’s a hefty output for a hybrid. Top speed is 177km/h, with 0-100km/h needing 8.5 seconds.

Underpinning that performance is a MacPherson-style strut-front and a multi-link rear suspension set-up.

When you think about it, shoehorning a big torquey engine in a light and agile small car is a recipe for fun. Ford did just that with the Escort RS2000 in the 1970s… and Mazda’s now an expert at it, too.

The engine in question is the G25, a 2.5-litre four-cylinder naturally aspirated twin-cam petrol engine, delivering 139kW of power at 6000rpm and 252Nm of torque at 4000rpm.

As this Evolve SP Vision hatch tips the scales at 1415kg, it makes for a healthy, and consequently very lively, power-to-weight ratio of over 98kW/tonne.

That’s if you decide to use all the available revs, which the six-speed torque-converter auto makes great use of.

Driving the front wheels, it offers a 'Sport' mode to extend the revs even more, which is keeping in line with this Mazda’s sporty character.

Less so is the company’s decision to ditch the old multi-link independent rear suspension system a few years back for a more prosaic torsion beam arrangement. We’ll get to how that affects ride and handling in a moment.

Officially, the 250h averages an impressive 4.5 litres per 100km on the combined cycle, which is just 103 grams per kilometre of carbon-dioxide emissions.

Now, out in the real world, with plenty of inner-city and urban driving as well as a spell of fast highway runs punctuated by some very heavy-footed acceleration, we managed just under 7.4L/100km pump-to-pump.

That’s not too bad given how hard our UX was caned. The trip meter showed 5.6L/100km over the same distance (nearly 400km).

This is one Lexus hybrid that will happily sip from the standard 91 RON unleaded petrol pump. With a fuel tank capacity of a smallish 43 litres, expect a range of between 930km and 1000km.

For a luxury small crossover, these are economical figures.

Mazda claims the G25 averages 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle… for a carbon-dioxide emissions rating of 154g/km. On a 51L tank, that gives a potential distance of over 940km!

Driven good and hard in our hands, we managed 7.5L/100km, which isn’t bad given the speed and conditions it was subjected to.

Plus, the Mazda’s happy on 91 RON 'standard' unleaded petrol.

Before driving the 2023 UX250h hybrid, there was some trepidation.

All versions of the original series from 2018 were tested previously, and in every one bar the base 200 on small wheels and tyres, none lived up to the promise of a premium Lexus crossover. A harsh ride, excessive noise intrusion and dull handling made this model a disappointment.

That’s all in the past, thankfully, thanks to a sustained program to save the UX from mediocrity. The company really got the basics wrong the first time around with the horrid CT200h predecessor back in 2011, so we imagine that it would be damned if this was going down the same sorry path again.

In the 250h Luxury, as reviewed here, it is difficult to objectively fault the way everything works and drives.

Let’s start with performance. Even in Normal or Eco mode, the UX steps off the line briskly, and initially at least, it’s the electric motor and battery that silently whooshes the car forward.

If you’re gentle, you can reach speeds of up to about 40km/h before the petrol engine chimes in unobtrusively.

Beyond that, there’s a stream of electric power you can feel, keeping the acceleration coming on strong, even as speeds rise above 100km/h.

This is also true for Sport mode, except that it all happens a bit quicker and earlier, and with extra urge.

And the welcome news here is that the CVT doesn’t really make the engine sound too droney, unless the driver is mashing the pedal to the metal.

Travelling along at normal urban speeds, there’s a seamless transition from electric-enhanced petrol propulsion back to electric-only if the conditions are right – such as when coasting off-throttle.

This is most common in heavier traffic, and the resulting smoothness and quietness adds to a refined and relaxed experience.

About our only objection is when you apply the brakes. In our test car, they felt a little on/off, like a switch. At times, they seemed too grabby for smooth stopping.

That said, the driver can downshift using the gear lever to provide powertrain braking, to help minimise snatchiness.

Road noise seems to be more muted than before, supporting Lexus’ claims that retuning the suspension and beefing up the structure/chassis has helped with refinement.

We wouldn’t say the UX is at the top of the class for quietness, especially on Australia’s coarse-bitumen highways, but now things have hushed sufficiently enough for a crossover purporting to be a premium.

Where the suspension changes really transform the UX, at least on the 215/60R17 tyres the Luxury wears, is how much softer and comfier the ride is.

Where before there was suddenness there’s now suppleness, substantially improving the experience. We wonder whether the bigger-wheeled rubber the richer grades receive are as well-resolved.

As the 250h Luxury is not trying to be a hot hatch, the resulting body lean through fast corners is a happy trade-off, though it’s not so roly-poly that handling composure is adversely affected.

Plus, the steering – while light and easy at parking speeds – still offers enough response and feedback for most drivers to enjoy taking the UX for a cross-country blast once in a while.

To that end, the steering’s weighting does increase in Sport mode… though you won’t be selling your Peugeot 205 GTi for one just yet, but that previous dullness is history. In fact, whether behind the wheel or ensconced in one of the inviting outboard seats, the UX250h as a whole is a much sunnier experience all-round than before.

Ask yourself. What do you want from a new small car?

Since the first Familia of the early 1960s, Mazda’s been at it constantly, through the 1300 and 323 eras and into the modern age of the 3.

The Hiroshima brand knows its stuff. Space, practicality, comfort, ease, reliability and affordability. But a small car has to offer more, specifically in the way it makes the owner feel.

That’s why, while the Focuses, Lancers, Astras and Pulsars are gone, the 3’s still here. And it isn’t just the lush visuals inside and out that are, well, sensory-rich.

As older Alfa Romeo owners know, there’s something special about an engine that sounds alive, and the moment you push the 3’s starter, it purrs into life. That’s the first clue.

Slot the refreshingly old-school lever into Drive, and the G25 leaps into action, and, if you need it to, will keep pulling forward strongly, engine buzzing, like it’s on a mission.

That describes the torquey urge of this big 2.5L four, paired perfectly with the sensibly-geared auto.

We miss Mazda’s magnificent manual immensely, but the 3’s instant response reflects its favourable circa-100kW/tonne power-to-weight ratio.

And, as we’ve harped on in the past, the twin-cam unit’s extra oomph beyond 4000rpm delivers muscular high-speed responses akin to a good turbo – or a great old-school Alfa. You can keep your laggy dual-clutch transmissions, Europe.

Now, sweet, smooth and speedy performance is one thing, but having the chassis tuned with precise and fluid steering for tactile handling, and confident roadholding, backed by nuanced driver-assist and traction controls, are another.

There is a consistent and unifying control to the 3’s linear and forgiving dynamics, reminiscent of past masters like the Focus (and today’s brilliant Peugeot 308) that makes it a joy to drive enthusiastically through fast corners, with the knowledge that it won’t suddenly snap-oversteer and bite an unalert driver back.

For a Mazda, the ride is quiet enough, but there is still some droning transmitted through the cabin, via the Bridgestone Turanza (215/45) tyres, on coarse-chip bitumen surfaces.

And while suspension comfort is pretty impressive for the most part, larger bumps reveal the torsion beam’s limitations, as the car can occasionally thud over them in a way that we remember the multi-link rear end wouldn’t.

Anyway, what we’re saying is that, overall, the 3 Evolve SP Vision is an immersive and interactive driving experience that is right up there with the best of them.

Brawny performance, exquisite agility and a refinement that, collectively, have eluded every small Mazda in living memory until this generation’s 2019 debut. This 3’s right on the money. Still.

Tested way back when this generation was new in early 2019, the Mazda 3 scored a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test rating.

On the driver-assist front you’ll find front and rear AEB (with a working range of 40km/h to 200km/h) with pedestrian and cycle detection available between 10-80km/h, while the 'Forward Collision Warning' operates from 40-200km/h.

Blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warning, lane-keep assist, 'Forward Obstruction Warning', rear and front 'Cross-Traffic Alert', 'Secondary Collision', auto high beams, breakaway pedals, adaptive cruise control (with full stop/go functionality and cruising/traffic support), parking sensors front/rear, 360-degree round-view monitor, reverse camera, traffic sign recognition, driver monitor and tyre-pressure monitors are also included.

The lane-keep support systems work between 55-200km/h.

Seven airbags – front, side, curtain and a driver’s knee bag – are fitted, along with anti-lock brakes with 'Electronic Brake-force Distribution', 'Emergency Brake Assist', stability control, traction control, hill-start assist are also fitted, seat-belt pretensioners, and two rear-seat ISOFIX points as well as three top tethers for child seat straps.

Lexus offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are at 12 months or 15,000km.

The first three scheduled services are capped at $495 each, with the work carried out detailed online.

Mazda offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, with five-years roadside assistance… and that’s nothing special nowadays.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km.

A fixed-price service scheme is available, averaging out to $434 annually over the first five years. Mazda shows pricing right up to 16 years and 240,000km on its website.