Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Mercedes-Benz Eqc400

What's the difference?

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 Epiq N-Line AWD leverages an electric powertrain’s best attributes brilliantly well.

It’s ultra smooth and comfortable with ample performance and great dynamics thanks in part to this car’s N Line spec.

Its price tag pits it against formidable competition from the German Big Three, Tesla and others. But it has what it takes in terms of quality and value to fight that battle. It’s an impressive machine.

When I was telling my colleagues about the Mercedes-Benz EQC my summary was, basically, it’s the best electric luxury car I’ve driven. 

It’s plusher than a Jaguar i-Pace, more polished than a Tesla Model X - indeed, it feels like a different kind of electric car to both of those models. It’s an impressive foray into the segment, and we can’t wait for the chance to put it against some like-minded electric European luxury SUVs at some point in the future.

Is this a big hatchback or a mid-size SUV? I’m on team hatchback, while Hyundai defines the Ioniq 5 as an SUV.

But who cares? They’re just words and the fact is even after close to three years in market this five-seater looks fresh and contemporary thanks to its confident, chiselled lines and wide stance.  

For car-spotters the N Line exterior treatment consists of flat aluminium badging, specific bumpers front and rear, with a deeper nose spoiler incorporating larger vents to cool the front brakes.

There’s also body-coloured cladding and side skirts, gloss black mirror caps, unique 20-inch alloy rims and a ‘hidden’ lighting signature across the top of the front bumper.

Inside there are Alcantara- and leather-appointed seats, an N Line-exclusive partially-perforated leather steering wheel, red contrast stitching and accents, and brushed metal covers on the pedals.

Add in the twin 12.3-inch screens display and this understated, super-cool interior comes to life with a sporty twist. 

The Ioniq 5 scores points for a manual dial for audio control and an Ioniq 5 update earlier this year included a row of simple-to-use buttons for the ventilation system and another on the centre console for seat comfort settings and more. A sensible blend of physical and digital controls.

The Mercedes-Benz EQC is entirely different to what we expect from the brand, but it’s really what we expected all along when it came to an electric SUV from the Daimler stable.

It is sleek, streamlined and smooth, with panels that almost look like they’re formed from liquid. And it has the eco-edgy graphics you’d expect, with a specific grille treatment (yes, a real grille), headlights that are unlike any other Benz (they even have an LED that runs the width of the grille), and a rear-end style that looks almost like it was penned with another Stuttgart-based brand in mind… Porsche. I’m talking about Porsche.

But one thing that I really love about the EQC is its moustache. It's more prominent when the car is finished in white paint, but there’s a moustache that former Daimler chief Dieter Zetsche himself could be envious of. And he had one helluva soup strainer.

It is clearly made to be slippery, despite essentially sharing its underpinnings with the more conventionally angular - yet still rounded-edged - GLC SUV.

While it is a nicely styled gizmo, I found there are some things that could be annoying.

For instance, I was trying to plug in at night in a dark area, and while there is a small light above the charge port, other EVs have a light that actually illuminates the area where you’re plugging in. 

And also, the plug port is on the driver’s side. If, like me, you had to charge up with the car on the street, it just adds a little bit more anxiety to the whole situation. I shudder to think what could happen if the charger was hit by a passing car - folding the mirrors in is one thing, but you can’t fold the power cable! The lead for the charger is long, thankfully. 

I know, most people (maybe even all people!) who buy and EQC are going to have undercover parking in a garage or carport, but it’s still worth remembering that the filler isn’t on the kerb side like a number of other EVs. 

It has almost identical dimensions to that car: 4774mm long on a 2873mm wheelbase, with a width of 1884mm and a height of 1622mm. For context, GLC is 4669mm long, same wheelbase, a bit wider (1890mm) and just a little more height (1639mm).

What about interior design? Well it’s also familiarly different, with a number of changes to the materials used but still the same tech and comfort you’d expect. Check out the interior images in the section below.

At just over 4.6m long, a little under 1.9m wide and a fraction more than 1.6m tall the Ioniq 5 comfortably fits the medium SUV profile.

But arguably its most significant dimension is a 3.0m wheelbase which is huge for a car of this size as evidenced by the wheels pushed out to the corners.

What that means is plenty of space inside, but before you can even get in the capacitive touch power door handles may look cool and help aero performance with their flush fit design but I’m not a fan. They’re hard to grip most of the time and don’t work well from an ergonomic point-of-view.

That said, once inside the front seats are adjustable six ways to Sunday and at 183cm tall I have plenty of head space and breathing room in general.

In terms of storage there are big pockets in the doors with room for bottles and thanks to the ‘shift-by-wire’ gear controller located on the steering column there’s room between the seats for a substantial console including a pair of cupholders, a slot for devices and a lidded tray (which doubles as a centre armrest) with that whole rear section able to swing up to allow access to a large lower shelf underneath.

In fact, the entire console unit easily slides fore and aft to liberate more legroom for the centre rear position. There’s also an oddments cubby in the lower part of the dash and a decent glove box.

Then, for connectivity and power there are three USB-C sockets (one in the dash switchable to streaming), a wireless device charging pad and a 12-volt outlet.

In the back that long wheelbase comes into its own. Sitting behind the driver’s seat set for my position I have loads of foot, leg and headroom.

Storage runs to door pockets with room for bottles, a fold-down centre armrest with a pair of cupholders, there are netted map pockets on the front seat backs and pull-up sun shades on the rear windows.

There are controls for the front passenger seat on the inner edge of the front passenger seat backrest which allows rear seaters to adjust its position. Thoughtful.

For power there’s a pair of USB-C sockets and individual ventilation controls in the back of the B-pillars is welcome. 

Then, not only is the electrically-adjustable rear seat split 60/40 in the backrest, it’s in the cushion, as well, which adds extra flexibility in terms of a balance between rear passenger space and room in the boot.

The boot is generous at 527 litres (VDA) with the rear seat upright and 1587L when it’s folded down.

There’s also a handy 24L ‘frunk’ under the bonnet, a decent portion of which is devoted to the (included) charging cable.

Interestingly, the Ioniq 5 AWD is rated to tow a 1600kg braked trailer with a trailer pre-wiring package standard. 

There’s a repair/inflator rather than a spare tyre, which is never a good thing, but there is a ‘smart’ power tailgate and a ‘Vehicle-to-Load’ function that allows you to power and/or charge three-pin appliances from the car. Handy.

If you’re thinking the EQC looks like a seven-seat SUV, you’re wrong. It’s a five-seater, with a decent sized boot, too.

The luggage capacity is 500 litres, which is decent for a car of this size, but bear in mind there is no spare wheel under the boot floor. 

Rear seat space is reasonably spacious for someone my size (182cm) sitting behind their own driving position, with decent knee and toe space. Headroom is not terrific, though, and anyone taller will need to watch their head as they get in and out of the car as the top sill eats into space quite a bit. 

Any middle-seat passengers might find the room a little less likeable, as the transmission tunnel intrudes quite a bit. Those with big feet might find shoehorning themselves in and out a bit of a challenge as the sills are quite large, and our car even had optional ($1200) “aluminium-look running boards with rubber studs” - side steps, essentially. They get in the way, too.

But if you’re just sitting two abreast in the back the seat comfort is really good, the trim quality is excellent, and there is a flip down armrest with the storage bin and pop out cupholders. There are rear air vents (no climate control adjustment in the back, though, and no USB charging either), and there are two map pockets, plus bottle holders in the doors. Up front you will find a mix of familiar elements if you’ve sat in any recent Benz model, but a few unique finishes and trim elements that might be new to you.

There’s a beautiful horizontal fin theme that runs around the cabin, as well as the now-traditionally audacious looking Burmester sound system speaker covers. They don’t quite gel with the aesthetic, to my eye. 

The dash-top material - “fine surface texture”, as Benz calls it - is unlike anything else we’ve seen from the brand, it’s kind of like a soft silky slippery fabric trim. While there are lovely copper trim elements that just add something visually entertaining and appealing to the space.

There is a large covered centre console bin with 2x USB-C charge points and there is an additional USB-C upfront next to the wireless phone charger. The Mercedes touchpad system that aligns with the MBUX media screen is reasonably easy to get used to, but being a Benz there are plenty of options for usability - the centre screen is a touch-capacitive unit, or you can use the steering wheel-mounted controller on the left side of the wheel to control the middle screen. The right thumb controller manages the driver info screen.

It was mostly very easily managed, although the menus did get stuck at times for me - mainly in the section around the energy consumption. Plus I tried the whole “Hey, Mercedes” command thing, and it failed on numerous occasions. 

The EQC is available in two separate lines at the moment. The first is the standard EQC 400, which has a list price of $137,900 plus on-road costs, and then there’s the Art Line edition for $143,800.

There’s no haggling, either. The EQC is part of Benz’s standardised pricing model, and there are nine dealerships/retailers Australia-wide that handle orders for the EQC. Or you can buy it online, if that’s more convenient! However, as we reported at the Australian launch of the EQC, the wait time can be long - up to seven months from clicking ‘order’ to the car arriving in Australia.

What will you get if you do order an EQC? It’s hardly an affordable midsize SUV, but you’re paying for new technology - and you’re getting a pretty well kitted-out car, too. 

The standard equipment list includes the AMG Line exterior package, 20-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights and daytime running lights, and a sunroof. 

The interior gets the AMG Line treatment with leather upholstery, as well as a 13-speaker Burmester sound system, keyless entry, push-button start, electric tailgate, a head-up display, Mercedes-Benz’s MB-UX media system with twin 10.25-inch screens including Apple CarPlay and Android Auto smartphone mirroring tech, DAB digital radio, sat nav and the option of augmented reality navigation instructions. That system also incorporates Mercedes-Me Connect online capability, including web search. 

There’s also an ambient lighting system with 64 colour choices, dual zone climate control, and heated front seats with electric seat adjustment and memory settings. 

Thrown in for nix is a five-year Chargefox subscription. Chargefox is Australia’s largest car charging network, with fast charger stations stretching from Cairns to Adelaide (and there’s a cluster in WA as well). 

There’s also a comprehensive safety technology suite included. All the details are covered off in the safety section below.

How about rivals? Well, its most natural competitors include the Jaguar i-Pace (from $124,100) and Tesla Model X (from $133,900), and there'll be an Audi e-tron electric SUV on sale in Australia by the end of 2020.

You might also think about the not-quite-fully-electric likes of the Volvo XC60 T8 plug-in hybrid (from $98,990), or even the plug-in hybrid Mercedes GLC 300e (from $83,500). 

The Ioniq 5 Epiq AWD is powered by a permanent magnet synchronous electric motor on each axle, both powerful, but the rear unit packs a bigger punch.

And combined peak outputs of 239kW and 605Nm are substantial with especially the latter delivering eye-widening acceleration.

Drive goes to all four wheels via a single-speed, reduction gear auto transmission on both axles. And a ‘Disconnector Actuator System’ is able to disengage the front wheels to reduce drag losses from the front motor and improve energy efficiency.

The EQC has a power output of 300kW and it has 760Nm of torque, which is enough to see its claimed 0-100km/h acceleration pegged at just 5.1 seconds.

The EQC’s top speed is 180km/h (limited for the sake of the batteries), and it has an 80kWh lithium-ion battery pack.

It uses a pair of asynchronous motors - one front, one rear - and they can alternate to do what’s best in the situation - be it working in 2WD (RWD or FWD), or in AWD. 

If you’re thinking about an EQC as a towing option, the towing capacity is 750kg for an un-braked trailer and 1800kg for a braked trailer.

The Ioniq 5 Epiq AWD is powered by an 84kWh liquid-cooled lithium-ion battery, borrowed from the high-performance Ioniq 5 N.

Thanks to 800-volt compatibility it can accept a 350kW DC charge which translates to an up to 80 per cent charge time of around 18 minutes, which expands to just over an hour using a more typical 50kW charger.

Connect to AC at the Ioniq 5’s maximum 10.5kW capacity and quoted charge time is just over six hours.

Official energy consumption on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle is 19kWh/100km and claimed range is a useful 495km.

Over a mix of urban, suburban and freeway running on test we saw a real-world average of 16.8kWh/100km, which is impressive for a car with this much performance potential.

With an 80kWh battery pack and a Type 2 CCS plug (up to AC 7.4kW / DC 110kW) the charge times vary pretty greatly depending on what output you’re powering up from.

Mercedes-Benz says a DC fast charging station should be able to replenish the battery bank in 1 hour 22 minutes (at a maximum of 110kW, though some Chargefox stations offer charge rates up to 350kW) while an AC charging station (like you’d find in car parks) or Mercedes-Benz’s own Wallbox system should take about 12 hours 13 minutes.

Charging from a regular household powerpoint is a last resort option. It is claimed to take 46 hours 40 minutes from empty to full (230-volt outlet, 10-amp/2.3kW). I plugged in to a powerpoint in my house and the car’s info display was stating it would take 9.5 hours to achieve the remaining 16 per cent of charge. It didn’t get to 100 per cent before I had to unplug, however.

My not-so-urban test drive loop commenced with 97 per cent of battery charge and an indicated range of 363km available. The idea was to get a feel for the “range vs reality” of the situation, so I did it in Comfort drive mode with the climate control active and no intent to either thrash the vehicle or baby it to save battery.

My drive ended with 36 per cent indicated charge remaining, after I’d covered 231.6km. That means, based on the car’s own algorithm, that it would have covered 315km before the battery was depleted, which is a long way short of the claimed 434km range.

The indicated energy consumption was 20.8kWh/100km, which is ‘thirsty’ for an EV. On our recent electric car comparison test, the most efficient of our EVs - the Hyundai Ioniq Electric - used just 13.0kWh/100km. Yes, I know the EQC is a lot heavier (2425kg kerb weight), but even the Tesla Model 3 was notably more efficient (18.5kWh/100km) than the EQC over very similar terrain and driving.

However, our testing saw us return an even better consumption rate than Mercedes-Benz’s claimed figure, which is 21.4kWh/100km.

In terms of straight line performance we’re talking 0-100km/h in a tick over 5.0 seconds and I see anything in the five-second bracket as properly quick.

With more than 600Nm of peak pulling power at your disposal there’s always plenty of pulling power for efficient in-traffic moves and safe highway overtaking.

The shift-by-wire gear selector on the steering column takes some getting used to but once you’re in tune with it, it’s surprisingly convenient, especially during slow speed parking or turning manoeuvres. 

There are multiple modes - ‘Eco’, ‘Normal’, ‘Sport’ and ‘Snow’. Sport mode spices things up a bit with more urgent responses and the ‘HTrac’ AWD system uses multiple sensors to manage potential wheelspin and optimise drive in wet conditions or on loose dirt surfaces.

Suspension is by struts at the front and multi-links and the rear and the Ioniq 5 in this configuration is ultra-smooth and comfortable.

Even hitting pretty aggressive speed bumps and ruts in the road and the car soaks them up without fuss. You’re used to EVs being a little harsh in terms of ride compliance thanks to their relative weight, but that’s not the case here.

As part of a model upgrade introduced earlier this year Hyundai says it undertook a “comprehensive revision to the suspension tune”, which includes high-performance dampers on this N Line. And despite low-ish profile (255/45) Michelin Pilot Sport EV tyres on the 20-inch rims it remains comfortable and quiet.

The upgrade also included body reinforcements in the B- and C-pillar, door surrounds and under the body for a stiffer platform overall.

That pays off in the dynamics. Despite its 2.1-tonne weight the Ioniq 5’s steering is accurate and nicely weighted. It doesn’t feel lumbering or ponderous despite its relative heft.

The physical brakes are ventilated discs front and rear with regenerative available through four levels, the most aggressive setting being ‘i-Pedal’ which allows single-pedal driving.

It will slow the car to a full stop, harvesting the most energy possible in the process, although you might need a dab on the brake pedal if things are tight.

Miscellaneous observations include a 12m turning circle, so be ready for three-point turns where you didn’t think you’d have to.

Hyundai's (and Kia’s) default over-speed warning is present in full-force taking clicks through multiple screens to switch off and avoid its incessant audible alarm saying you've exceed what the car believes is the posted limit (every time you restart the car).

The recently released Tucson Hybrid features a short-cut function to do away with this issue and it would be welcome here.

The CPU underpinning the multimedia system is more powerful and response is speedy without a hint of lag.

And the camera based ‘mirrors’ take some getting used to. For many, they’re the answer to a question no one was asking. I mean, conventional mirrors work pretty well and any aero benefit from the smaller camera units has to be modest. But once you’re in tune with them the hi-def screens are excellent.

A flip of the switch on the interior rear view mirror allows you to side-step tall heads or loads in the back of the car but minimal depth of field is also (visually) awkward at first.

If you have a garage and a Wallbox connector, there’s no reason the Mercedes EQC couldn’t be a terrific option as a commuter, a second car, or even your primary vehicle. 

The thing with all electric cars is that it’s about settling into a rhythm. If you use the car to commute to work, maybe you can charge it there. Or you might have a solar array and charge at home.

No matter the situation, you’ll be getting a rather nice vehicle to live with, based on my week with the EQC.

It’s a plush car, that’s for sure. The silence it offers is truly relaxing, and there’s effortless torque to pull you away from a standstill. The way you can build pace to overtake, the rush of noise-free acceleration, is pretty astounding. Perhaps not as visceral as in a GLC 63 AMG, but it’s still an experience.

The steering is direct and doesn’t require much thought, though it does lack a little bit of feel. But it’s easy to predict and quick to respond, making for pleasant progress around town. It’s easy to park, as well, with a great surround view camera system, as well as front and rear parking sensors. And if you’re not confident, the car has semi-autonomous parking, too.

The brake pedal feel takes some acclimation, because it responds pretty well, but the action is hard to modulate at times. That is partly due to the brake regeneration system, which actively captures energy that would have otherwise been lost during braking. You can adjust the level of aggression of the regen brakes, too, by tapping either the up or down shift paddles. The most aggressive setting will almost pull you up to a halt from urban speed without any brake pressure required.

The suspension of the EQC feels more settled than the last GLC I drove, and that could be in part due to the extra weight and stiffness of the battery cell under the body. The centre of gravity feels low, and it feels stuck down to the road in most situations.

The ride is mostly fine, but with big 20-inch wheels and low profile tyres, it can jar on hard edges. I also noticed that it can feel a bit unsettled at higher speed, as the body moves around - from side to side - more than I would have expected. It deals well with undulation changes and big dips, and if the surface is good, so are the comfort levels in the cabin. 

It’s a Mercedes-Benz, so as you’d expect the safety offering is comprehensive and extensive. 

The EQC received a five-star ANCAP crash test rating in 2019, scoring highly for child occupant protection in particular. But it also has all the safety assist nannies you’d expect, too.

There is autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with forward collision warning that works from 7-200km/h, plus active lane keeping assistance from 60-200km/h and lane departure alert, along with active cruise control, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert, rear AEB, driver fatigue monitoring, auto high beam lights and tyre pressure monitoring. 

There are nine airbags (dual front, front side, rear side, curtain and driver’s knee), and the EQC has a pair of ISOFIX anchor points for baby seats and three top-tether points to affix child seats.

Hyundai covers the Ioniq 5 with a five-year/unlimited-km warranty, which is the mainstream market norm, with a separate eight-year/160,000km warranty for the drive battery; also an expected term.

Roadside assistance and sat-nav updates are renewed annually if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised Hyundai dealer.

Service interval is two years/30,000km which is appropriate for an EV given its relative mechanical simplicity and a ‘Lifetime Service Plan’ locks in scheduled maintenance costs for the life of the vehicle.

Service cost for the first five years is $1220, with each of the two services required in that time coming in at $610. Competitive for an EV in this part of the market.

It mightn’t have the same method of propulsion as a petrol or diesel Merc, but it has similar service requirements. You still need to take it to the workshop for maintenance every 12 months - or every 25,000km! - whichever comes first.

Owners can either pay as they go for servicing, or pay up front and bundle it into their finance. The upfront rate is $1350 for three years/75,000km. Pay as you go will peg you along at $450 (year one), $750 (year two), $450 (year three). 

When the EQC launched it came with a three-year/unlimited kilometre warranty plan, but that was recently updated to a five-year/unlimited km plan, bringing Benz inline with the likes of Korean luxury maker Genesis, not to mention the majority of mainstream car brands.