GWM Cannon vs Nissan Navara

What's the difference?

The GWM Cannon XSR is a twin-locked 4WD ute that’s reasonable on-road (it’s getting better all the time) and very capable off-road.

It certainly has enough gear onboard – including front and rear diff locks, a snorkel and all-terrain tyres – to be taken seriously as a 4WD, but it could still be better and more refined in other aspects, even at this price-point.

There are some issues with the Cannon’s general driveability but ultimately it has plenty going for it, not least its appeal as an impressive value-for-money purchase.

The D27 Nissan Navara represents badge engineering at its best or worst, depending on your point of view regarding platform sharing. However, when assessed purely on its merits as a standalone tool of trade, the entry-level SL is a competent and economical workhorse that’s worthy of at least cross-shopping with the major players.

The XSR is 5439mm long (with a 3230mm wheelbase), 1958mm wide and 1893mm high. Official kerb weight is listed as 2230kg.

This is a substantial ute that resembles an amalgamation of Ford Ranger, Isuzu D-Max and Toyota HiLux.

The wide wheel track gives the XSR a squat stance and its snorkel, sports bar, bash plates, chunky all-terrain tyres and red brake calipers add to this ute’s presence.

Inside, a steering-wheel design tweak (it’s now three spokes) and refreshed dashboard layout help to give the cabin a low-key classy look and feel.

It may lack the all-around polish of something like the Ford Ranger, but the XSR’s much lower price negates that perception.

The XSR holds its own in the looks department across the dual cab ute category.

It looks like a base model Triton GLX given the Navara SL’s modest front and rear styling tweaks, which are not as substantial nor convincing as platform-sharing rivals like Mazda’s BT-50 or Volkswagen’s Amarok in creating a clear visual distinction from its donor.

Nissan has been equally economical with interior changes. Even so, the work-focused cabin is functional and reasonably spacious for a dual cab, with splashes of satin chrome combined with white upholstery stitching and fake carbon-fibre surfaces providing a touch of style to predominantly grey tones.

The XSR’s five-seat interior is neat and spacious but there are parts, such as some buttons, dials and switches, that feel a bit flimsy and cheap.

Up front there are two USB ports, a wireless charging pad, a 12V plug and a deep centre console.

The new 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system includes wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and has been improved by increments.

The front seats are power adjustable (driver’s six-way, passenger four-way) and both are comfortable without being too plush.

Second-row passengers get a firm but comfortable seat and amenities include USB charge ports, a 220V plug, air vents, and a fold-down centre armrest (with cupholders). There’s plenty of head, knee and legroom, unless you’re stuck in the middle where knee and foot room is pinched.

The second-row seat base can be folded out of the way to make room for more gear if no one’s in the back seat.

The second-row seat has top-tether points and there are ISOFIX anchors on the outboard seats.

The XSR’s load space (1520mm long, 1520mm wide and 540mm deep) has a durable tub liner, four tie-down points, as well as a pop-out step hidden in the top of the tailgate, and a step-up indent at each corner of the rear bumper.

This Cannon offers just as much all-round practicality and load-space flexibility as the likes of Isuzu D-Max, Mitsubishi Triton and Toyota HiLux.

With its 2126kg kerb weight and 3190kg GVM our test vehicle has a useful 1064kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine one tonner.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6250kg GCM rating (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it would require a sizeable 440kg reduction in vehicle payload to tow its maximum trailer weight.

Not that many (if any) owners of utes this size would need to tow 3500kg but it’s important to be aware of these numbers when towing heavy trailers to avoid dangerous and illegal overloading.

The Navara’s load tub is almost square with its 1555mm length and 1545mm width. It’s also 525mm deep and with 1135mm between the rear wheel housings it can’t fit a standard Aussie pallet but will carry a Euro.

Our test vehicle does not come standard with a tub-liner so its painted surfaces are prone to scratches and dents. There’s four anchorage points for securing loads and the tailgate assist feature allows easier lowering and raising.

The driver and front passenger share good space and comfort, with storage that includes a bottle holder and bin in each door plus a large open shelf above the single glovebox and an overhead glasses holder. The centre console offers flat storage with two USB ports and a 12v socket up front, along with two cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back.

Rear seating is also comfortable and surprisingly spacious for tall people, given I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat when set in my position I have ample knee and headroom. However, shoulder room is tight for three adults, which is tolerable for short trips but a maximum of two would be preferable for longer drives.

Rear passenger storage includes a bottle holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. There’s another 12v socket in the rear of the centre console and the centre seat’s backrest folds forward to serve as an armrest with dual cupholders.

The bench seat’s base cushion is fixed, so unlike numerous rivals it can’t swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required.

The fifth generation Navara, which is available only in 4x4 dual-cab ute configuration, comes in four model grades comprising SL ($53,348 plus on-road costs), ST ($56,765), ST-X ($63,177) and Pro-4X ($68,418) designed to cater for commercial applications through to lifestyle/recreational use.

Our test vehicle is the entry-level SL with its list pricing in the same ballpark as workhorse equivalents from major players including the Ford Ranger XL 2.0L auto ($51,130), closely related Triton GLX 2.4L auto ($51,640), Isuzu D-Max SX 2.2L auto ($52,200) and Toyota HiLux Workmate 2.0L auto ($53,990).

Like its Navara siblings it's available only with a 2.4-litre bi-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine and six-speed automatic transmission. 

The SL's work-focused standard features include 17-inch steel wheels with 265/65R17 all-terrain tyres and a full-size spare wheel, LED headlights/daytime running lights/tail-lights, tailgate assist, 360-degree camera and front/rear parking sensors to name a few.

The interior is also designed with hard work in mind with its wipe-clean vinyl floor and black fabric trim but there’s also creature comforts like remote keyless entry, single-zone climate control, second-row air vents, power-adjustable lumbar support for the driver’s seat, multi-function steering wheel controls and more.

There’s also multiple USB ports and 12v sockets, a 7.0-inch instrument cluster display and a 9.0-inch touchscreen to control the four-speaker multimedia system which includes wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity and DAB+ digital radio.

The new 2.4-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine produces 135kW at 3600rpm and 480Nm at 1500-2500rpm. It's tractable and well suited to the demands of 4WDing.

Don’t get me wrong, the previous-gen Cannon’s 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine (120kW/400Nm) was no slouch, either. It’s just that this bigger and more powerful engine is better.

The new engine can easily muster more than enough power and torque on- and off-road when needed. However, there are enough instances of substantial lag at crucial moments – punching off the mark from a complete stop to safely merge into traffic, for example – that when compounded threaten to mar the overall driving experience.

Another thing. The automatic transmission, now a nine- rather than eight-speed, while generally okay, proves patchy in daily driving, not upshifting as slickly as it should and sometimes hunting for the sweet spot, rather than hitting it.

In terms of all-round powertrain performance, the XSR is on par with four-cylinder, turbo-diesel rivals such as the Ford Ranger 2.0L (125kW/405Nm), Isuzu D-Max 2.2L (120kW/400Nm), Mitsubishi Triton 2.4L (150kW/470Nm) and Toyota HiLux 2.8L (150kW/500Nm).

The Navara’s 2.4-litre four-cylinder ‘bi-turbo’ diesel engine is equipped with two turbochargers which work in sequence to boost efficiency, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one optimising response at higher rpm.

It produces 150kW of power at 3500rpm and its sizeable 470Nm of torque is served at full strength between 1500-2750rpm. It’s also Euro 6B emissions compliant using AdBlue.

This is paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic, offering the choice of sequential manual shifting which can be preferable when hauling and/or towing heavy loads particularly in hilly terrain.

The 4x4 system is dual-range, part-time offering 2H (2WD High Range), 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) selected by a dial on the centre console, where you’ll also find a button to engage the locking rear diff.

The most significant differences between the Triton and Navara are in suspension design and tuning, with the D27 Navara replacing the previous D23 generation’s coil-spring rear end with the Triton’s more traditional leaf-spring arrangement.

Nissan has also collaborated with Melbourne-based engineering partner Premcar in developing three unique suspension tuning packages focused on damper (aka shock absorber) refinement, aimed at enhanced steering response, handling stability and ride comfort.

The premium Pro-4X and mid-grade ST-X each have unique settings while the work-focused SL and ST share the same calibration designed for hauling loads, including heavy-duty four-leaf rear suspension. All model grades also feature electric power steering.

Listed fuel consumption is 8.4L/100km on a combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, which is better than the 9.4L/100km offered by the previous 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine and eight-speed auto.

I recorded on-test fuel consumption of 10L/100km which is ahead of the 11.2L/100km I recorded in a Cannon XSR with the 2.0-litre four and eight-speed.

The XSR has an 78-litre tank, so, going by my on-test fuel figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 780km from a full tank of diesel.

Nissan claims combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km but the dash display was showing 9.4 at the completion of our 496km test, which included our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a near maximum payload.

Our own consumption figure, based on fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, came in slightly lower at 9.1L/100km which is comfortably within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer claims and real-world consumption and excellent economy from mostly metro driving.

So, based on our test results, we estimate the Navara SL has a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its 75-litre tank.

As noted above, there are some issues with the Cannon’s general driveability, but all in all it’s not atrocious. And if it’s a potential buy for you, you’ll always come back to the value-for-money rationale.

On- and off-road, the new engine has plenty of punch about it, but patchy delivery through the transmission sometimes works against it.

It’s a not a dynamic vehicle. No surprise, it’s a ute after all. But that point has to be made here because some people still drive these vehicles expecting sports car-like ride and handling.

The good news is the XSR’s touchy throttle and too-loose steering of days gone by have been mostly sorted out. But its thrashy transmission, stiff ride and unwieldy 13.7m turning circle remain.

Its bigger engine doesn’t carry over the previous-gen’s underdone feeling when pushed hard and it has a relaxed feel when you’re cruising along on the highway.

Some concerns have been raised over the years about driver-assist tech in Chinese-built vehicles. To the company’s credit, GWM seems to have addressed those issues… at least to some extent.

Suffice it to say, I’ve experienced a few tricky situations as a result of driver-assist tech in GWM vehicles. From annoyingly intrusive traffic sign recognition and jarring adaptive cruise control through to one particularly hair-raising AEB-related incident. (For more, read my yarn)

Overall, the XSR remains okay on sealed surfaces, but it’s not as refined or compliant as it could or should be.

As for off-roading…

On dirt tracks the XSR is jittery over corrugations and tends to thump through deeper potholes. Otherwise it is reasonably composed.

But with twin differential locks, decent underbody protection and Cooper Discoverer AT3 all-terrain tyres, this Cannon handles low-range 4WDing with ease.

The new bigger engine delivers on promised grunt in the dirt, giving the Cannon plenty of punch when the going gets tough.

Ground clearance of 228mm, wading depth of 700mm and off-road angles of 30 degrees (approach) and 26 degrees (departure; rampover is not listed) don’t hurt its 4WDing potential, either.

Off-road traction control and other driver-assist systems including hill descent control are adequate without being as smooth as the equivalent systems in more expensive vehicles.

It has 'Crawl Mode' (allowing for no-pedal, low-speed driving) and 'Turn Assist' (which brakes the XSR’s inside rear wheel to reduce the ute’s turning circle on traction-compromised surfaces).

While 4WDing, swapping between high- and low-range, changing off-road modes or switching diff locks on or off has been at times a clunky process, with the transition taking on a feeling not unlike shunting trains. No big deal, I reckon, but worth mentioning.

Wheel travel is adequate and this ute’s Cooper Discoverer AT3 all-terrain tyres perform well in the dirt and mud.

The Cannon XSR has towing capacities of 750kg (unbraked trailer) and 3000kg (braked).

All in all, off-roading is the one area in which the Cannon eclipses something like the BYD Shark 6 or Kia Tasman and matches, if not bests the Ford Ranger.

Large handles on the A pillars assist climbing aboard into a comfortable and spacious driving position, enhanced by steering wheel and seat adjustments (including power lumbar support) plus a left footrest, which ideally could be a tad wider.

The claimed ride and handling changes resulting from Premcar’s suspension tuning are so seamless they would be hard for most Navara drivers to define. All that matters is how it feels behind the wheel.

And I must say it’s a nice thing to drive, which is consistent with all the Premcar-enhanced D23 Navaras we've tested before it, combining excellent steering feel with supple yet responsive ride and handling whether unladen or loaded.

The switch to electric power steering also provides a noticeably light turning effort when parking which becomes increasingly firm with a stronger self-centering effect at highway speeds, like all variable-ratio systems should.

The six-speed auto’s gearing optimises performance in urban use by keeping the engine operating within its peak torque band most of the time, which ensures a consistently energetic response. It’s also a relaxed highway cruiser, requiring less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h where low noise levels allow conversations without raised voices.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 650kg into the load tub, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 830kg that was still more than 200kg below its legal limit. The heavy-duty rear springs only compressed about 30mm under this loading, which ensured ample bump-stop clearance and no bottoming out on our test route.

Its handling remained surefooted and predictable when hauling this payload, which, combined with the Navara’s hearty 470Nm, ensured it made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km long set climb. It also provided strong engine braking on the way down, so overall it proved to be a competent load hauler.

The only negative from a driver’s perspective is the Navara’s inheritance of the Triton’s annoying driver distraction monitor, which even beeped and prompted me to ‘please look forward’ when I dared to look at the central and passenger door mirrors when overtaking another vehicle. Seriously? It’s ironic that a driver distraction monitor can be distracting, but it is.

The Navara has a five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2024), and comes with eight airbags, auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian and cyclist detection and junction assist, front and rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping, front and rear parking sensors, 360-degree/reversing cameras, trailer stability assist and lots more.

The rear seat has ISOFIX child-seat anchorages on the two outer seating positions and three top-tethers.

The XSR is covered by a seven-year/unlimited km warranty and five years of free roadside assistance.

The first service is scheduled at the 12 month/10,000km mark, then services are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km.

Capped price servicing is available and for a Cannon with a warranty start date on or after January 1, 2026, the costs are $365, $470, $515, $520, and $685 per service. That’s a total of $2555 (and an average of $511 per workshop visit), which is more expensive than some of the Cannon’s rivals on the market.

The Nissan Navara comes standard with a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty but up to 10 years/300,000km with matching roadside assist is available if the car is serviced at Nissan dealers.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km with capped pricing applicable for the first five scheduled services totalling $2495, or an average of $499 which is competitive with numerous well established rivals.

Nissan Australia has a large network of around 180-200 dealers which includes every state and territory.