What's the difference?
Toyota's HiLux is feeling the heat from Ford's (PXII) Ranger in Australia's hotly contested 4x4 ute market. Recent national sales figures show the Ranger is outselling the former undisputed champion of this segment and closing the gap on the Toyota's long-standing dominance of the 4x2 ute segment, as well.
Ford is obviously in a buoyant mood, celebrating the Ranger's success in early 2017 with the first XLT dual cab 4x4-based special edition called the FX4. Fans of Ford's US pick-ups will be familiar with this moniker. It was first applied to Ford's best-selling F-150 as a special off-road option package with heavy duty suspension, underbody protection and unique body accents.
The Aussie version gets the body accents but no mechanical upgrades. However, Ford Australia has form in this area from decades past, so it's no surprise to see a new millennium reprise of special editions which offer the same cake with different icing.
When Nissan launched its all-new NP300 Navara range in 2015, it certainly raised eyebrows with its bold decision to equip all of its dual cabs except cab chassis with coil-spring rear suspension.
This was a notable departure from the long accepted wisdom of leaf springs, which since the horse-and-cart days have (in most cases) been the preferred method for suspending heavy payloads.
Nissan argued that coil springs provide superior ride quality to leaf springs particularly when unladen, which is the majority of time for most ute owners. Even so, in late 2016 the company released a Series 2 Navara range which amongst numerous changes included a locally-engineered suspension revision based on feedback from customers and dealers.
The major goals were to provide a firmer ride and less of a tail-down-nose-up stance under load without sacrificing unladen ride quality. These changes included revised front and rear shock absorber bump and rebound valving, 10 per cent stiffer rear coil springs and reshaping of the rear rubber cones (or second stage suspension) to provide more progressive engagement with the chassis rails under heavy loads.
Nissan claims this has resulted in more refined ride and handling, with improved lateral stability when carrying loads, but we have to admit the changes are subtle.
To be honest, we're not big on 'special editions' in which the only thing special or unique about them is purely aesthetic. If the FX4 was true to Ford's US traditions and included some special equipment for improved off-road performance, then we'd probably be more excited about it. Fact is, it's just an XLT in a different costume. If that's worth an extra $3500, only you can decide.
The S2 ST-X is a stylish, competent and well-equipped vehicle that will meet the diverse requirements of many premium dual cab ute owners. The only possible exception is if they need to regularly carry maximum payloads. We could see merit in Nissan's two-stage system first time around, reasoning that typical ST/ST-X owners would favour coil-spring handling and ride quality over a rare requirement for maximum payload hauling. And that probably still rings true.
However, the unladen handling and ride qualities of the ST-X and numerous leaf-spring rivals are now so similar we have to question if the coil spring case can still be defended given the compromises that still exist under heavy loads.
Fact is, if you want a premium grade ute that can lug its maximum payload on springs alone - and maintain a more level ride height while doing it - there are numerous alternatives with a horse-and-cart heritage. We hope Nissan will at least offer this option in future top shelf dual cabs, because it must be a deal breaker for some.