Chery Omoda5 vs Smart 3

What's the difference?

The GT AWD successfully adds a performance spark to the city-sized Chery Omoda 5 SUV formula. It’s sprightly and stacks up well in terms of value and practicality. It’s also space-efficient, safety’s great and the ownership package is hard to beat.

That said, despite the shift to a multi-link rear suspension, ride comfort and the steering could be better. But overall, no rotten tomatoes here. This is a worthy contender that shows how far and how quickly Chery has progressed.

The #3 Brabus is very nearly one of the great bargains of 2024, with the sort of style, luxury, features, performance and grip you’d expect from the much-more-expensive GLA AMG 45. It’s that good.

What would make it great is a sunblock for the hot glass roof on a sunny day, Australian road tuning for the infuriating ADAS tech and a revised steering tune that didn’t make it feel inconsistent at times.

See past these, though, and the #3 Brabus exceeds expectations.

We’re glad Smart is back.

The Omoda 5 GT is a re-tuned version of the standard car, mechanically and visually.

We’ll cover the oily bits shortly, but from a design point-of-view, it retains the sweeping, diamond pattern grille and overall mix of intersecting surfaces and angular details from the entry models.

On three of eight available colours the GT shares red accents on the gloss black 18-inch alloys, exterior mirrors, lower part of the doors and underneath the roof spoiler also available on the Omoda 5 EX, but it somehow seems more appropriate here.

A car’s appearance is always a subjective call but I think the Omoda 5 looks contemporary in a sharply defined, Lexus kind of way, especially at the rear. The red highlights aren’t my cup of tea, but you might love them. 

The interior tone is set by the dual 10.25-inch LCD screens installed together across a sleek flat panel, one is touch-sensitive for multimedia and other functions and the second for instrumentation and drive information. 

Worth noting the GT’s centre console finish is gloss black rather than the standard car’s matt metallic-style treatment.

It all flows together nicely, the materials used look and feel good while the dash and front console layout looks sleek and works well from an ergonomic point-of view… with the exception of USB ports located low down on the passenger side of the console. Handy for the front passenger but likely a hangover from left-hand-drive production that’s uneconomic to change.

Smart says Mercedes designed the #3 and it shows.

In silhouette, or when glanced peripherally, it could be the love child of the A-Class and EQA. Only the friendly face betrays its non-Benz heritage.

Longer and wider than the #1, it is also 80mm lower – achieved via a lower ride height, flatter seats and a thinner floor.

Helped by a 35mm wheelbase stretch, it provides a nicely-balanced and proportioned crossover, with a decent drag coefficient of 0.27. The Brabus’ big wheels also fill out the arches very nicely.

Key length/width/height/wheelbase dimensions are 4400mm/1844mm/1556mm and 2785mm, respectively.

Unusually for a coupe/crossover mash-up, there’s slightly more room inside compared to the upright donor model.

Let’s take a longer look in there.

At a fraction under 4.4m long, just over 1.8m wide and close to 1.6m tall, with a roughly 2.6m wheelbase the Omoda 5 GT fits within the typical small SUV footprint.

At 183cm I’ve got more than enough breathing room in the front, the away slope of the twin screen array helping to open up the space.

For storage, there’s lots, including a decent-size, cooled lidded box between the seats, which doubles as a centre armrest, two cupholders, a generous glove box, a large area underneath the centre console and big bins in the doors with enough room for large bottles.

And in the back, sitting behind the driver’s seat, set to my position, I’ve got adequate foot room, plenty of legroom and heaps of headroom as well as adjustable ventilation. Big tick.

Storage options include map pockets, decent door bins and two cupholders in the fold-down centre armrest.

Power and connectivity runs to a 50-watt wireless charging pad as well as two USB-A sockets (one in the interior mirror housing ready for a dash cam) a USB-C and 12-volt socket in the front, a USB-A in the rear and another 12V in the boot.

Speaking of which, with all seats up the Omoda 5 GT offers 300 litres of storage space, which is relatively modest, but you have more than 1000 litres with the 60/40 split rear seat folded.

The upside is a full-size alloy spare sits under the floor (the 2WD has marginally more boot space but cops a space-saver) and the tailgate is power-operated. But those keen on towing are out of luck as the Omoda 5 isn’t rated.

On first approach, you ask yourself whether the #3 is a crossover or a small-to-medium SUV. The low roof and cool frameless doors certainly suggest the former, as do the comparatively small apertures.

That said, with the windows down, those sash-less doors help entry and egress.

Once ensconced inside a long if slightly narrow cabin, the #3 offers ample room for even the tallest adults up front, as well as a reasonably spacious back seat area, though you’d call that more of a '2+1' seater given the lack of girth for three. Most folk shouldn’t struggle to find the right driving position, either.

Presumably keen to impart a generic Mercedes vibe, the #3’s interior is somewhat reminiscent of a GLA’s, albeit from last decade – down to the pronounced T-shape dash featuring a trio of circular vents in the middle, a standalone screen above and (unconvincing) metal-look plastic trim below.

Understandably, like so much of the Brabus, this might appeal to aspiring A45 AMG owners, but it seems oddly dated, given the advanced electrification going on underneath.

Likewise, none of the minimalism cleverness of the ForTwo city-car original is referenced, even digitally. A lost opportunity, really. The OG Smart is an icon.

Meanwhile, ahead of the driver, a narrow digital strip looks twee and cheap, as if ripped from a Japanese 'Kei' car. It’s a strange design detail for a $71K SUV.

Still, the #3’s cabin layout is largely a success, and much of that is due to the first-class quality and finish. Unlike some of the aforementioned Benzes of the previous decade, squeaks and rattles are notable by their absence.

Depending on your body, the racy sports seats up front are either perfectly bolstered or far-too snug, but they provide a decent level of comfort and support. And they position you just right for controlling the centre display, which dominates all.

The 12.8-inch touchscreen feels slick, responsive and right-sized for the car. At first, it can also seem like info-overload and perhaps a bit cheesy with its animal animations, but real thought has gone into it to provide an extraordinary level of functionality.

Across the top are icons for access to media, sat-nav, apps and camera view settings, while the bottom row is for various climate and trip info. While somewhat logically presented, the charging-station list seemed outdated and/or at-times incorrect in our test car.

Mercifully, the Smart has a row of short-cut buttons for 'Vehicle Modes' (including turning off the infernal lane assist and one-pedal accelerator/braking), 'Driving Mode' ('Eco'/'Comfort'/'Sport'/'Brabus'), glass demisters, climate and display-off.

Annoyingly, the latter is closest to reach, revealing the #3’s left-hand drive market bias, as the driver must stretch across to access the first two (and more important) settings.

There are also several handy screen-activated modes including 'Entertainment Mode' that temporarily leaves the accessories and climate control on; 'Rest Mode' reclines the driver’s seat down flat and dims the interior lights; 'Energise Mode' is designed to pep you up; and 'Pet Mode' keeps a climate-controlled atmosphere while deactivating all buttons that a stray paw might press. Clever.

There’s lots more besides, and using the touchscreen is better in this than most other Chinese vehicles, but it remains fiddly and distracting.

It’s also worth pointing out that the fixed glass roof needs a blockout for Australia. A Smart spokesperson said an aftermarket cover is available, but as supplied to us, sitting under it over a run of hot days is almost unbearable without a hat. This is not good enough.

Thankfully, the other basics are all A-OK.

The climate system coped well the hot sun bearing down through the glass, plenty of useful storage makes up for the disappointingly shallow glove box, while the chilled centre console and massive door bins proved especially handy.

USB access is easy, the wireless Bluetooth/Apple CarPlay performed more consistently than in any recent test vehicle and the standard Beats audio brings brilliant sound.

Out back, most people under 180cm should at least avoid scraping that glass ceiling, and there’s a reasonable amount of room for boots and long knees if the front occupants are sympathetic, but you’d be stretching the truth calling the rear seat packaging SUV-esque.

On the other hand, it’s beautifully presented, boasts a comfy and supportive backrest/cushion for outboard passengers and even a do-able centre pew for shorter-distance riders.

And it provides every expected amenity, including air vents, USB-C ports, door storage, a folding centre armrest with cupholders, and overhead handles/lighting/coat hooks.

And while we’ve already complained about the glass roof, it floods the cabin with light, to make it seem airier than it is. Narrow front seats with a see-through slit further enhance this feeling.

Further back, the 370-litre boot is reasonably long and surprisingly deep thanks to a removable upper floor that’s good for stuffing the optional home charging cables in.

And, of course, it can be extended to 1160L via the split-fold backrests to provide extra loading practicality. And there’s even a small (15L) amount of storage under the bonnet.

Maximum towing capacity is 1600kg for a braked trailer.

Though originally brought to market by Mercedes, Smart was never pitched as a premium brand, as it is now.

Back in the late ‘90s, Smart was an early attempt at better urban mobility. The ForTwo was a tad over 2.5 metres long by 1.5m wide and 1.5m tall.

Today, the #1 and #3 share their modular EV platform with Geely’s other small crossovers, including the Volvo EX30 and Zeekr X, while a stretched version underpins the related Polestar 4.

While the #1 starts from a sharp $54,900 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the Pro+, at the other end of the spectrum, the #3 Brabus flagship, with dual motors for all-wheel drive (AWD) and Porsche 911-style acceleration, will set you back $70,900.

Not bad, given it also includes a body kit, extra driving modes, beefier suspension, stronger brakes and retuned traction controls.

Now, that might sound steep against the growing choice of more-affordable EV alternatives out there, but consider that most of the cheaper ones are significantly slower, less sporty and/or not as highly equipped, including the Hyundai Kona Electric, Jeep Avenger and Mini Countryman.

The #3 Brabus’ fiercest foe, the bestselling Tesla Model Y in top Performance guise, is more powerful but costs $12K more and is slightly slower from 0-100km/h.

The $70K Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance Ultra costs $1K less and matches the Smart performance-wise as they share the same tech, but it’s considerably smaller.

Meanwhile, the closely-related Zeekr X is $6K cheaper but looks bizarre and is still largely unknown in Australia. At least Smart has that long-time Merc association to fall back on.

In fact, it is distributed by the latter’s biggest dealer group globally, LSH Automotive.

Speaking of which, how does the #3 Brabus stack up against the similar Mercedes EQA and other luxury EV rivals? The less-powerful Merc 250+ is $14K more, has less kit and is nowhere near as powerful. Same goes for BMW iX2, Lexus UX300e and Volvo C40 Recharge (alias EC40).

The #3 Brabus seems to be in a goldilocks zone of premium, performance EV SUVs. The most expensive Smart offers thoughtful value for money. For a change, the car actually lives up to its name.

Predictably, it’s also well stocked, with matrix LED headlights, electric heated/vented front seats, a 12.8-inch touchscreen, head-up display, 640W Beats audio, a foot-actuated powered tailgate, 360-degree camera views, the full advanced driver-assist safety enchilada, auto parking assist, 20-inch alloys and a panoramic glass roof.

Unfortunately, fitted on every Smart, that last one does not come with a factory built-in sunblock, which is completely unacceptable under our hot Australian sun. And no crossover or SUV should be without a spare wheel, either.

These are the #3’s only real deal-breakers.

The GT swaps out the Omoda 5 BX and EX’s 1.5-litre turbo-petrol four sending drive to the front wheels through a CVT auto for a more powerful 1.6-litre turbo-petrol four pushing 137kW (at 5500rpm) and 275Nm (from 2000-4000rpm) to the front, or as here, all four wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch auto.

That means power is up 27 per cent on the standard car and torque is boosted by no less than 31 per cent.

The all-alloy engine is an in-house design produced by Chery’s Acteco powertrain subsidiary and features direct-injection and dual variable valve timing, while the dual-clutch auto comes from a collaboration with German transmission specialist Getrag.

The #3 Brabus employs one permanent magnet synchronous electric motor per axle, for dual-motor, all-wheel drive performance via a single-speed ‘transmission’. 

They provide plenty of poke, totalling 315kW of power (115kW front, 200kW rear) and 543Nm of torque (200Nm front, 343Nm rear).

Tipping the scales at 1910kg, this means the Brabus delivers an impressive power-to-weight ratio of 165kW/tonne – enough for it to scoot from zero to 100km/h in 3.7 seconds, on the way to a 180km/h top speed.

To put those figures in perspective, the similarly-priced VW Golf R only manages 156kW/tonne and 4.8sec to 100.

Chery’s official combined cycle fuel-economy figure for the Omoda 5 GT AWD is 7.4L/100km, the 1.6-litre turbo four emitting 176g/km of CO2 in the process.

Idling stop-start is standard and over a week covering mainly urban and suburban driving, with a hint of freeway running thrown in, we recorded an average of 10.2L/100km which is on the thirstier side of the spectrum.

Worth noting the minimum fuel requirement is the pricier 95 RON premium unleaded and you’ll need 51 litres of it to fill the tank which translates to a theoretical range of around 690km (roughly 500km using our real-world number).

All #3s headed to Australia for now are fitted with the larger of the two battery packs available – a 66kWh lithium nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) item.

In the Brabus, it is rated to average up to 415km of WLTP-certified range, which is between 20-40km shy of the mid-spec Premium version.

Smart says the WLTP average energy consumption is 17.7kWh/100km. Our 3000km-old test car’s trip computer displayed a life-cycle average of 14.6kWh/100km since delivery.

During our week with the Brabus, we managed an average of 19.4kWh/100km, and that was over a 95km period of sustained highway driving at 114km/h with cruise control on and climate control set at 18 degrees (to combat the radiant heat from that glass roof).

With a big 22kW AC charger and 150kW DC charger capability, the former will replenish that 66kWh battery in about 32 hours using a home plug or 10 hours with an optional 7.0kW Wallbox, while the latter will need just over an hour from 10-80 per cent with a common 50kW DC charger.

Chery doesn’t quote a 0-100km/h figure for this car but expect a time in the mid-seven-second range, and it feels quick. Particularly urgent in the mid-range.

That’s because maximum torque is delivered across a broad plateau from 2000-4000rpm, right where you want easy pulling power for safe lane changes and drama-free overtaking.

This car tips the scales at around 1.5 tonnes (100kg more than 2WD), which is par for the small SUV course and it feels nimble in traffic and on the open road. 

As is often the case with relatively small capacity turbo-petrol engines, you need to ease into the throttle gently for smooth take-offs. And once underway there are multiple modes available, the default ‘Eco’ setting, then ‘Sport’, ‘Snow’, ‘Mud’ and ‘Off-road’.

While we didn’t explore the loose surface modes, in Sport the seven-speed dual-clutch auto holds onto gears that little bit longer and changes down more readily. In fact, the transmission’s first few ratios feel quite low, so even in Eco the Omoda 5 GT has an eager, sporty personality.

Although the central shifter easily transitions to sequential ‘manual’ mode a pair of wheel-mounted paddles, sadly missing, would be even better for direct gear control.

Suspension is by struts at the front and multi-links at the rear, the latter a change from the ‘standard’ car’s torsion beam set-up.

The 18-inch alloy rims are shod with 215/55 rubber and that 55 aspect ratio makes for a relatively comfy tyre sidewall. But beware the ride is firmer than the standard car with high-frequency bumps making their presence felt, although it’s far from extreme.

In fact, the car is refined in terms of engine or any other noise with standard acoustic front side glass playing its part.

No surprise the steering is electrically assisted and it can be swapped through ‘Sport’ and ‘Comfort’ modes. The latter is relatively light and road-feel is okay.

Switch to Sport and the weight increases noticeably but road feel remains the same. Not the best in the business but not the worst, either.

Given this GT’s get up and go and sporty pretensions you’re likely to enjoy a drive on your favourite twisty backroad and this AWD version grips securely through the bends.

On the highway, with the active cruise engaged, it’s worth noting steering wheel inputs from the lane-departure function are constant and relatively abrupt even in sweeping, well-marked bends.

Braking is by discs all around, ventilated at the front with the GT featuring bigger rotors front and rear (308mm vs 283mm fr - 313mm vs 263mm rr). Aside from the fact it’s unusual to have a larger disc at the rear they’re pretty smooth but you need to be firm with the pedal to wash off speed effectively.

Under the heading of miscellaneous observations, in 3D mode the ‘AVM’ panoramic view system plays with your mind. It’s literally an out of body experience thanks to four external cameras providing an exterior view of the car on the road on the central media screen.

At just over 10 metres the turning circle is agreeably tight while vision for parking, supported by the reversing camera and panoramic view, is clear.

The driver’s door armrest is kinda firm and the media system, complete with ‘Hello Chery’ voice recognition, is quick to respond and easy to navigate. 

Whatever notions ‘Smart’ might evoke, the #3 Brabus obliterates them. This is no buzzy little city-car runabout, but a surprisingly mature and athletic driving machine. This is a seriously rapid performer.

A trio of driving modes give you a hint of what you’re in for. Eco is lightness and fluff. Not very Brabus, but smooth and calm enough for relaxed commuting. And it’s far from slow, scooting off the line with zip and zest. Enough for most.

Comfort is actually a good all-round setting to be in, with an eager yet controlled level of performance. Strong acceleration and instant accelerator reaction show you mean business – if you’re in the mood. Still civilised and serene otherwise.

Sport ups the ante, as you’d expect, providing a decent whack of speed and immediate response. Actually, this is enough to keep up with most sports car costing thrice the price, while maintaining the driver-assist safety net. Fun without the fear.

Brabus mode is off-the-leash fury, turning the #3 into a convincing AMG alternative thanks to blistering thrust and a powerful punch across the spectrum. More (artificial) noise, more drama, more speed, more fireworks. The 'Launch Control' pins you to your seatback.

Yet even in the latter setting, the Smart behaves with a maturity beyond the brand’s reputation, capable of quick corners with exceptional (AWD-enhanced) body control and roadholding grip, without a punishing ride.

Underneath, a unique suspension tune for the MacPherson-style struts up front and multi-link rear end keep the Brabus hunkered down more effectively at speed.

And even in pouring rain, there are no complaints about the Brabus’ assured and confident handling. Yes, the suspension is firm, but it’s far from uncomfortable, so, an acceptable trade-off.

Plus, though not strictly one-pedal driving, the regenerative braking pressure is enough for slowing down and speeding up in the ebb and flow of traffic in its strongest mode.

Where we’re less happy is in the #3’s steering. It brings three weight modes to the table – but only two are useful, 'Light' and 'Standard'. Super-easy yet not totally devoid of substance, Light is great for around town and general commuting.

But when you lean on it at speed, the steering, whilst crisp and reactive, is not always linear in feel or motion, especially when accelerating at the same time, as you might when coming out of a fast corner.

Depending on how hard you are on the accelerator, there can be a visible step when turned from the straight ahead that can be quite disconcerting. It’s a bit like when slurping in a lumpy bit in a smoothie.

So, what about 'Sport' mode? Here, the steering is just as described above, but with added weight and not much more. Not worth it. Best is Standard mode.

Another disappointment is the advanced driver-assist safety (ADAS) tech’s state of tune. It’s in a state, literally.

The intrusive and apparently non-permanently switch-off-able lane-keep systems, especially, end up resisting what the driver intends, and even fight to steer the car where it thinks it needs to be. This is frustrating and potentially dangerous.

It’s been reported that Geely, and not Mercedes, undertook the development of these ADAS systems. We’re getting sick of (mostly Chinese) manufacturers rolling the arm over and imposing this sort of nannying and ultimately counter-intuitive driving interference tech.

This needs to be fixed. It stops the #3 Brabus from being a great performance bargain.

The #3 range scores a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test safety rating. It managed high-80s to 90 per cent in all disciplines – Adult Occupant Protection, Child Occupant Protection, Vulnerable Road User and Safety Assist systems.

A full suite of ADAS is fitted, from Autonomous Emergency Braking (operable from 5.0-150km/h car-to-car) with junction, cross-path, pedestrian, cyclist and motorcyclist detection (5.0-85km/h), lane-keep assist (from 65-180km/h) and cross-traffic alert (front and rear), to blind-spot warning and traffic-sign recognition tech.

You’ll also find adaptive cruise control (with stop/go function), highway and traffic jam assist, automatic parking assist, front and rear parking sensors, 360-degree camera and adaptive high beam assist.

Included, too, are seven airbags (dual front, side chest, side head and front-centre), along with two ISOFIX child-seat fixtures and child-seat anchorage points in the back seat.

Chery covers the Omoda 5 with a seven-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is two years up on the majority of the mainstream market.

Roadside Assist is complimentary for the first year, renewed annually for up to seven years if you have your Omoda 5 serviced at an authorised Chery dealer. 

The main service interval is 12 months/10,000km, which is a bit short on kays relative to most of the competition at 15,000, however, Chery offers capped-price servicing for up to 10 years/150,000km, the average cost for service over the seven-year warranty period being just over $350, which is in the ballpark for the category.

The #3 offers a (decidedly-average) five-year or (disappointing) 130,000km warranty, whichever comes first. There is also roadside assistance available for free during this period.

Given other EV manufacturers are going seven and even 10 years in the case of MG, with most including unlimited kilometres, this could be better.

Scheduled maintenance is every 12 months or every 20,000km.

Smart provides a pre-paid four-year/80,000km service plan for $3120, which comes to $780 annually. This seems quite expensive for an EV, even a premium one.