Nissan Z vs Porsche 718

What's the difference?

The Nismo turns up the wick just enough to justify its $20K premium over the brilliant regular Z.

Visual changes inside and out are one thing, but with tangible boosts in performance, handling and braking – with no detriment to ride quality or comfort – as a result of properly engineered upgrades, the RZ34 version deserves its place in Nissan’s sports car hall of fame.

Note, though, that good as it is, the Nismo is also a potent reminder of how solid a foundation the standard Z also is… especially in manual gearbox guise.

If this is to be the end of the 718 as we know it, then it is an end to be remembered. Porsche has produced something special in the Spyder RS, a sports car that can compete with the 911 on any stretch of road - which is something so few cars can claim. The focus on performance has driven the entire concept of the car, but all the elements work in harmony, with form and function coming together.

Reinterpreting a classic via retro styling isn’t always successful – hello, 2001 Ford Thunderbird ­– but what Nissan has achieved with the RZ34, given it’s a pastiche of several Z greatest hits from the ‘70s, ‘80s, ‘90s and today, is truly masterful design.

Take the cab-backward silhouette, long nose and short wheelbase; it somehow manages to deftly capture the spirit of previous Z generations, without looking like a bad caricature.

Points especially go to the stunning nose and tail treatments that evoke both the ‘70s 240/260/280 as well as the sadly long-forgotten Mid-4 II concept car of 1987.

Slightly longer than the regular model, the Nismo’s nose is meant to evoke the early ‘70s Japan domestic market Fairlady ZG, with the G denoting “Grand Nose”. Fun fact: Fairlady first appeared on the 1960 Datsun roadster as deference to the Broadway musical (and later Audrey Hepburn film, presumably) ‘My Fair Lady’.

Anyway, besides scraping speed humps and driveways, the Nismo’s elongated front bumper promotes improved engine cooling and better aero flow, as do the side sills, larger wraparound three-piece spoiler and redesigned rear bumper/diffuser. The wider-yet-lighter back wheels are 10mm wider. And a glossy red stripe runs along the underside like Anna Nicole Smith’s lipstick.

Does it all look better than the simpler, purer regular Z? No. But they perform better. And isn’t that the point of a Nismo?

As the pinnacle of not only the current 718 range, but potentially the entire combustion engine era of the Boxster, Porsche has pulled out all the stops for the Spyder RS.

This includes major changes to the design, but none are purely for aesthetic reasons and instead are driven by the search for performance; and the fact they make the 718 look tougher, meaner and more purposeful than ever before is just a bonus.

It’s a comprehensive redesign that starts at the bumper with a new front lip spoiler to enhance downforce. Then there’s a pair of NACA ducts on the lightweight bonnet to improve brake cooling without compromising aerodynamic drag. The lightweight front fenders include wheel arch vents to stop any potential for front-end lift at high speeds.

And the fenders aren’t the only component that’s gone on a diet, there’s a lighter exhaust, lighter wheels, lighter bonnet, lighter roof, lighter door panels and even lighter carpets on the inside. All up, the Spyder RS tips the scales at 1400kg, which is 40kg lighter than a standard 718 Boxster.

If it’s still not light enough, you can opt for the optional 'Weissach Package' (which was fitted to our test car), which brings even lighter 20-inch forged magnesium wheels and carbon-fibre reinforced plastic for a range of parts including the front luggage compartment, rollover bars and ducktail spoiler on the Gurney flap – plus some cosmetic enhancements.

And we still haven’t even touched on the biggest design change yet - the rear half of the car. Starting with the roof, which Porsche actually calls a ‘sunshield’ and ‘weather guard’ because it’s a stripped down version of what the brand usually uses, to save weight and let the glorious engine noise into the cabin uninterrupted.

But it’s also necessary because the entire rear engine cover has been redesigned to accommodate the larger engine that Porsche has installed in the Spyder RS, a 4.0-litre six-cylinder instead of the usual turbocharged four-cylinder ‘boxer’ engines.

While the Spyder RS looks great with the roof/sunshield on or off, frankly the removal process is much too complicated and requires repeated viewings of a YouTube tutorial to still get it wrong.

While owners will (likely) eventually get the hang of it, it will always be a clunky and awkward process and that’s just the price of being so focused on performance, which you can accept or not.

Inside that ethos of performance over practicality continues, with sports seats, an Alcantara-wrapped steering wheel and even the previously mentioned lightweight carpet floor mats.

It’s a purposeful, rather than luxurious, cabin, but that perfectly suits the nature of the Spyder RS. Our test drive included several long stretches behind the wheel and at no stage did it feel uncomfortable or impractical, despite its stripped-down design.

So, just as the exterior is an anthology of past Z car stylings, the same also applies inside.

A mishmash of new and old as well, they also marry together harmoniously – after you’ve bent and contorted yourself inside nice and snug, on the racy yet not-too-unforgiving set of Recaro bucket seats.

The Z’s signature sloping roof and rising window line; a trio of dials that have been a hallmark of the series since the 240Z, a thin three-spoke steering wheel; a physical hand brake and a pair of old-school seat base angle adjuster knobs just like in sports cars from 20 years ago betray the Nissan’s ageing DNA.

But they set the mood, like hearing a favourite old track, though one remixed by a contemporary DJ to a modern beat.

Which means that you’ll be able to view whichever artist you like through the 8.0-inch touchscreen, either via Bluetooth audio streaming, Spotify or some such app.

Easy to decipher and simple to navigate (though no imbedded GPS is fitted), the Z’s dashboard also offers the essential surround-view parking camera (given how limited vision is as you’re sat so low with not much glass to peer out through), amongst a host of vehicle functions. You’re also privy to extremely useful blind-spot alert thoughtfully placed inside the car by the mirror mounts, four cupholders if you count the door-sited ones and surprisingly generous storage. Practicality, thy name is Fairlady.

For lightness and sensible packaging, we understand why Nissan’s sports coupe is strictly a two-seater proposition – and certainly a roomy enough one for the lucky pair at that.

However, it’s a shame Nissan doesn’t offer a 2+2-seater option in the form of a pair of occasional jump seats behind, as per the old Datsun days, as there seems to be just enough space for smaller folk – though as a pair of shelves, that area did prove very useful during our week with the Nismo.

Issues? Along with a sheer lack of grace entering and exiting the Z, poor overall vision and 350Z-era switchgear that are now old enough to drive themselves, finding the right driving position eluded this particular 178cm tester. The seats do a great job keeping you firmly fixed in place, and of course the wheel tilts and telescopes, but those pair of knobs were forever being twirled and fiddled with.

Oh, and simultaneously unlocking and opening the doors was also confounding, due to exterior door handles and pressure sensor not designed for Homo Sapien hands.

Further back, and as in the two previous generations Zeds, a brace bisects the luggage area. Rated at 241 litres VDA, it is wide and flat but a wee bit shallow. At least it adds another level of practicality and is big enough for those weekends away.

There’s no cover (though seeing what’s inside isn’t easy) and no spare wheel of any size is fitted.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the Nismo…

One area where the 718 range is starting to show its age quite dramatically is the in-car technology. While Porsche’s native system is relatively user-friendly, the lack of wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto in any capacity is deeply out-dated; and was frustrating for this Android using reviewer.

Given the age of the current 718 platform, and the impending arrival of the new model, it’s understandable that the multimedia system didn’t get an overhaul, but for a $350K car it does feel a bit behind the times.

In practical terms the Spyder RS is a bit of a struggle if you plan to go away with it. We managed to get a small suitcase and backpack in the under bonnet storage, but that was at capacity. While the addition of the larger engine removes any meaningful rear storage space.

The bad news is, the Spyder RS costs just over $200,000 more than the entry-level 718 Boxster, which is not a small sum of money. The good news is, for that $200K, Porsche has overhauled the 718 from nose-to-tail and enhanced it in nearly every aspect.

There’s a raft of mechanical changes that we’ll get to later on, to help justify the $334,200, plus on-road costs, asking price, but from a specification perspective there are some notable inclusions. 

For starters it comes with the 'Porsche Communication Management' (PCM) multimedia system, which includes in-built navigation and Bluetooth connectivity, as well as a 110-watt sound system.

But Australian delivered cars get an even higher level of standard equipment than other countries, with LED headlights including 'Porsche Dynamic Light System' (PDLS), cruise control, digital radio, rear 'ParkAssist' with reversing camera, 'Light Design Package', tyre fit set and windscreen with grey top tint, plus a no-cost optional Bose Surround Sound System all included.

It may be $200K more than 718 but compared to a 911, it actually makes a pretty compelling value argument. A 911 Cabriolet Carrera S starts at $342,700 (plus on-road costs), making that Spyder RS $8500 cheaper and a genuine alternative to its ‘big brother’.

Then, when you compare it against similar mid-engine European sports cars, such as the Maserati MC20 (from $510,000) or McLaren Artura (from $477,310) the Porsche looks like a bargain; relatively speaking, of course.

Nissan sure knows how to make a great six-cylinder engine.

The Nismo’s internal combustion engine in question is the VR30DDTT – a twin-turbo V6 making four per cent more power and around 10 per cent more torque compared to the one found in the regular Z.

Power jumps 11kW and torque a handier 45Nm to 309kW @ 6400rpm and 520Nm between 2000rpm and 5200rpm respectively, providing extra punch as well as a slightly superior power-to-weight ratio of around 184kW per tonne.

That’s up 2kW/tonne, despite the Nismo gaining around 50 kilos, to 1680kg.

This has been possible thanks to extra turbo boost, revised ignition timing, improved cooling systems and updated engine management software.

Driving the rear wheels is a Mercedes-Benz based nine-speed torque-converter auto. Upgraded and retuned for track use, it includes a Sport+ mode providing speedier shift responses. Aided by the new launch control function, we managed a tidy 4.5 seconds from standstill to 100km/h.

Sadly, though, there’s no manual option as per the regular Z.

What else is unique here? Underneath, the platform might date all the way back to the 350Z of 2003, but Nismo has really worked some of its magic.

Along with the retuned dampers, everything else has been stiffened up – including the anti-roll bars, springs, bushes and even the steering rack mounts – to help deliver more controlled and linear steering. There’s extra underfloor bracing at the front, centre and rear of the car, thicker brake rotors and model-specific Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT600 tyres that are wider at the back, on gloss-black RAYS alloys.

Continuing to use a double-wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up, the Z’s front/rear weight distribution is 56/44 front/rear.

Now, the Nismo was our favourite version of the previous 370Z by some margin. How does it all square up in RZ34 guise?

The key stat for the engine is the cylinder count. Gone are the four cylinders and instead it’s a return to Porsche’s iconic flat-six.

Specifically, the same 4.0-litre six that Porsche uses in its 911 GT3, which is a lot of engine to squeeze into the middle of this lightened sports convertible.

In order to keep the 718 in its place (beneath the 911), Porsche has slightly detuned the engine, so it makes 368kW/450Nm (compared to 375kW/460Nm in the 911 GT3), but the German brand has never worried about a kilowatt contest and instead prefers to focus on driveability and the other elements that make a drive great.

To that end the combination of air-intakes next to the headrests and the lightweight stainless steel exhaust (which gets titanium tips on the Weissach Package) helps the Spyder RS sound like a Carrera Cup racing car when you really wind it up to its 9000rpm redline.

Not that the performance isn’t spectacular, though, with Porsche claiming it takes the Spyder RS just 3.4 seconds to run 0-100km/h, only 10.9 seconds to get from 0-200km/h and will hit a top speed of 308km/h.

The engine is paired to a seven-speed dual-clutch auto transmission (or PDK in Porsche-speak) that the company claims has “short-ratios”, but with peak power not hitting until 8400rpm and peak torque from 6750rpm, you don’t have to rush the ratio changes.

Not surprisingly, the Z Nismo needs to drink from the 98 RON premium unleaded petrol fountain.

Nissan reckons owners should expect to average 10.4L/100km (for 242 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions) on the combined cycle (and 15.0 and 7.7 L/100km for the urban and extra-urban ratings respectively.

This figure is almost half a litre worse than the non-Nismo Z’s 9.8L/100km result, but still substantially better than the six-speed manual base grade’s 10.8L, despite the latter being some 33kg lighter.

With a sizeable 62L tank, you might be able to average just under 600km between refills.

For the record, we achieved 11.9 litres per 100km in a mix of urban, freeway and performance driving which is not too bad at all given how often we fanged this thing.

Porsche says the 4.0-litre engine in the Spyder RS uses 13.0L/100km, which is a big number for what is a relatively small car. But that engine is highly-tuned and built for performance not efficiency, so it’s something owners will need to accept.

Our test drive included some long highway stretches, as well as some spirited driving and urban commuting, so a good mix across all conditions, and we saw consistent returns around the 15-16L/100km range.

It has a 64-litre tank, which means a theoretical driving range of around 490km, assuming you can hit the official claim.

Nissan does plenty of things really well, and the Nismo is no exception.

Firing up the VR30DDTT 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 is also a reminder of how brilliant the brand’s six-cylinder engines are. They tingle all the right sensory areas, starting with the baritone rumble at idle.

What a portent of what’s to come!

Nismo’s massaging of the engine, combined with upgraded clutch packs and a retune of the nine-speed auto’s software, results in stronger, hungrier and angrier acceleration, no matter which of the three driving modes you’ve selected. Even in Normal, the Nissan leaps off the line. In Sport, its appetite for speed is palpable. In Sport+, this thing is eating up the tarmac. Somehow, in an EV era where 4.5s to 100 is ho-hum, the (electronically enhanced but who cares) guttural exhaust bellow seems to amplify the action and thrills.

And spills. For five of our seven days together, the heavens poured. Now, in Normal mode, the Nismo was as benign and controlled as you’d hope in wet conditions, the driver-assist tech metering out just enough torque and braking to seamlessly keep the car humming along. Ever-present but always nuanced, they’ll help make your commute a safer and more relaxing one.

Selecting Sport loosened things up markedly, with the driver needing to be ready to counteract with steering, seating and throttle, though still with a safety net to keep the car from going totally out of whack; Sport+, meanwhile, is not for amateurs or the distracted. This is serious, tail-wagging waywardness that should only be fully explored with experience and care.

Later in the week, Launch Mode in Sport+ on cold but dry bitumen also requires super concentration, as we discovered attempting to extract the fastest acceleration time. Sideways in a straight line at 100km/h-plus is not for the faint hearted.

Beyond all-out performance and drama, the Nismo soars with weighty yet linear and precise steering, resulting in satisfying, hunkered-down handling that is the hallmark of a great sports car. Really tight turns can be taken at impressive speeds, but there’s about 1.7 tonne of muscle to manipulate, so the real fun can be found blasting along a snaking set of more open corners, where the Z’s inherent thrust, poise and grip come into play, all to the symphony of that bi-turbo V6.

That the suspension can feel both firm and supple at the same time is another arrow in the Nismo’s bow.

Nissan isn’t pretending this is anything but a rousing and rapid grand tourer with track aspirations, so the fact there’s also comfort and sophistication to be enjoyed just shows the sheer bandwidth of this particular Z.

Downsides? There’s always a wall of sound, be it mechanical or noise intrusion from the rubber and/or bitumen. The Nismo is rarely quiet. The extended front spoiler seems to summon up speed humps and bumps you never knew existed. The adaptive cruise control’s inability to resume in heavy stop/start traffic betrays this car’s 350Z-era tech. And the lack of a manual transmission, we reckon, is a missed opportunity for an even greater degree of interactive sports car driving.

Still, the Nismo delivers exactly what the brand promises, and continues to improve a firm favourite for speed and drama.

But the gap between Nismo and regular model is smaller than the one that existed in the preceding 370Z, which means that – if $100K driveaway is too steep – you’re already driving something elevated in the standard Z. Particularly if you yearn for a manual.

It’s all good.

I’m only giving it a nine out of 10 because perfection is hard for any car to achieve, but the 718 Spyder RS goes as close as any car I’ve driven. This is a masterpiece of modern sports car design, pushing the 718 closer to the 911 than ever before, which is something Porsche has clearly tried to avoid so as to not tarnish the image of its flagship.

But with the 911’s 4.0-litre flat-six in the middle of the 718, plus its more compact dimensions, the lightweight nature of the Spyder RS and the raft of chassis and handling enhancements, this really does leave you questioning ‘do I really need a 911?’

The steering is fantastically direct, the chassis responds to every input with precision and feedback and the braking is strong and consistent. Which helps because that engine is so good it launches you with ferocity and a glorious noise (as good as anything on the market today) whenever you squeeze down on the accelerator.

The highest praise I can give the Spyder RS is not that it was a dream to drive on winding, challenging roads, but that it was just as enjoyable on a trip to the shops or cruising down the freeway. Any drive in this car is a genuine pleasure.

This is another area where the 718 is showing its vintage, with very little in the way of active safety features. There’s the required stability control, as well as airbags for driver and passenger, plus the previously mentioned reversing camera. But that’s it, there’s no autonomous emergency braking, no lane-keeping assist or even adaptive cruise control.

While that may sound shocking to some, there’s never a moment where you feel unsafe in the 718. It feels incredibly stable and responsive on the road, as the onus falls back upon the driver to pay attention and make smart choices.

There’s no ANCAP rating for the 718, or any Porsche, so it is a question of putting your faith into Porsche’s in-house safety measures.

Your wallet’s pretty secure as well.

Like all Zs, the Nismo is subject to a warranty period of five years with unlimited kilometres, while service intervals are fixed at every 12 months or 10,000km – whichever occurs first. There is also five years of roadside assistance.

Nissan also provides pre-paid maintenance plans that can save up to $245 over three years, as well as capped-price servicing. At the time of publishing, the capped-price service appointments cost between $347 and $950 depending on the year of ownership.

It’s difficult to give the Spyder RS a clear score here because Porsche is cagey on the details. The public dealer websites indicate annual oil maintenance is required, with additional servicing every two years or 15,000km. 

How much that will cost is unclear, as despite the rest of the 718 range having publicly available prices, there were no such details for the Spyder RS (or even its Cayman sibling, the GT4 RS).

For reference, the 'standard' 718 requires oil maintenance ($895) for the first annual service and an inspection ($1500) the year after. Those costs continue to alternate annually out to eight years/120,000km.