MG U9 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS

What's the difference?

I can’t give you a definitive verdict on the U9 based on our limited time behind the wheel. However, what I can say with certainty is MG is serious about making its first ute a success. The price alone demonstrates how motivated the brand is to win buyers over. Undercutting the likes of the Ranger and HiLux with a physically larger ute is a strong opening move from MG.

The clever features, spacious cabin and smart technology will also help to win over buyers, as will the choice of a conventional diesel engine. But none of that guarantees success. As the dominance of the Ford and Toyota demonstrates, ute buyers are loyal and drawn to the most popular options, so MG will need to fight hard for every sale to ensure the U9 isn't lost in the increasingly crowded ute market.

It’s unquestionably fast, certainly luxurious, but I’ll be honest, I don’t think the EQS is going to be for everyone. The styling will be challenging for some and the glittery interior tech offering might be a bit much, even for the more rusted-on Benz traditionalists.

Then again, shouldn't an electrified flagship be all about challenging the status quo, trying new ideas, and bringing new fans to the brand? If anything, I think that might be what the EQS does best.

While the fancy tailgate step and the Smart Hatch are the most obvious changes between the LDV and MG utes on the surface, arguably the biggest change is what’s underneath. MG has opted to buck the conventional leaf spring, live rear axle set-up and has instead opted for a more SUV-like independent, multi-link rear suspension.

This explains why such a big ute has a sub-one-tonne payload, but it speaks to MG’s aspirations to try and lure ‘urban’ ute buyers. There is no doubt a large group of ute owners who don’t go off-road regularly and instead use their vehicle as a family transporter.

To that end, opting for a more SUV-like suspension set-up should be beneficial to its on-road manners and unladen ride. Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier, we couldn’t test that because our drive was limited to unsealed roads. But it was enough for us to get an initial impression of how the U9 drives and the early signs are positive.

The engine sounds like a traditional ute, with the gruff diesel ‘chug’ and smooth pulling power. The towing test provided was well below the 3500kg maximum rating, only 1500kg, so naturally the U9 has little trouble pulling the horse float along.

As for the ride on the suspension, it's fairly well composed on a gravel road and offers no obvious signs of struggle on more challenging muddy trails and creek crossings. So there are promising signs that the U9 should be able to hold its own against the more established ute contenders.

We’re going to start with design, because from the outset it is a topic which simply must be addressed.

Mercedes has flipped the script when it comes to its next-generation design language worn by its dedicated range of ‘EQ’ electric cars. It follows a trend we’re seeing across the industry of larger, more amorphous vehicles which need the space to accommodate batteries, but also the aerodynamic traits to extend driving range and keep energy efficiency as high as possible.

The issue when it comes to the EQS is it essentially puts the iconic S-Class shape, refined over generations, in the bin, and replaces it with something a bit more challenging to the eye.

Gone are the angles, louvres, and deeply three-dimensional grilles, replaced by sleek rounded edges, wheels which reach to the very edges of the chassis, a blank, almost plasticky grille and a more liftback-like profile than one of a traditional sedan.

You’d better get used to it, too, because the smaller EQE is near identical in shape, a trend which will no doubt continue across other EQ models.

It’s the finer details that add character, particularly for the 53 with its AMG-leanings. The lack of shapeliness down the side makes the massive 22-inch wheels stand out more, and the rear three-quarter might be this car’s best angle, with a colour-matching spoiler flicking up off the small bootlid, and delicate badgework illustrating this car’s place in the world. Our car, which appeared in a silver shade timeless on Mercedes-Benz models, made the black AMG highlights on the front and rear bumpers shine, and some of the usual Benz shape is claimed back through the EQS’s LED light profile, both at the front and rear.

There’s no doubt it’s a step into the future, and an overall shape which is a marriage of both form and function. While looks are always subjective, I still think it may be a hard sell, even to some of the most committed fans of Mercedes design.

That SUV-like interior and the larger dimensions make for a very pleasant cabin with loads of space. We didn’t get too much time to experience the multimedia system, but the 12.3-inch touchscreen looks good and operates smoothly, while the inclusion of large physical buttons for the air-conditioning and audio system is a positive for those who value ease-of-use.

There’s a generous amount of room up front, but it’s the back that really impresses. Unlike the sometimes cramped back seats in a conventionally-sized dual-cab ute, the U9 has plenty of legroom and headroom for four or even five adults to fit in comfort.

There’s also plenty of small item storage, including a wireless charging pad (but only on the high-grades) and USB outlets just ahead of the gear selector.

As for the tray out the back, that is so important to ute buyers, it measures 1600mm by 1600mm at the top, but narrows to 1230mm between the wheel arches. Despite its big size, the payload is only rated at 870kg for the Explore, 835kg for the Explore X and just 770kg for the Explore Pro.

However, MG has introduced a party trick no-one else, not even LDV offers, in the tray. At the press of a button, the rear tailgate opens and then with another press a section of the tailgate drops down, revealing a step. While not the quickest way to climb into a tray, it might be the nicest and is definitely the easiest this reviewer has experienced locally.

The even more elaborate party trick the U9 offers is what MG calls a ‘Smart Hatch’. This allows for the rear glass to retract and the bottom of the cabin to recline into the interior, creating a direct connection between the tray and the cabin for especially long items. While MG is, rightfully, very proud and keen to promote the Smart Hatch, it must be noted it is only available as an option on the Explore Pro and costs $5500 (which is nearly 10 per cent of the total cost of the car) so you’ll want to really need the extra space.

The EQS is enormous, so it’s a good thing there’s huge amounts of interior space, even for what is ostensibly an S-Class, and with its bespoke electrified underpinnings, it also scores the kinds of innovations we like to see from electric cars.

These include things like a huge cutaway under the floating dash for extra storage, which the brand has seen fit to add elastic tie-downs so your objects don’t go flying in corners!

Storage up front is otherwise excellent with decent bins in the doors with height-limited sections for bottles, a flip open tray which houses the wireless charger and a set of fold-away bottle holders, and split-opening armrest console box which is deep and features yet another set of USB-C outlets.

Adjustability is great for front passengers, but ergonomically I found something a little weird about the digital dash. For me to rest my arms and hold the wheel, I had to set it so low the top of the wheel obscured the instruments, and if I set it high enough to see the full cluster, to comfortably hold the wheel my elbows would need to float above the armrests. Weird.

It doesn’t end there for the entirely touch-based controls either. While the (admittedly very cool-looking) wheel is packed full of buttons and touch sliders, they require near-surgical precision to operate with your thumbs, distracting while you’re driving, and the enormous centre screen’s main drawback is the fact CarPlay, for example, was not designed for the buttons and functions on the far left to be a metre away from where the driver’s hand is. Again, it’s distracting to have to lean out of your seat to hit the ‘back’ button on most context menus.

I would like to tell you at this point the Mercedes-Benz menus are mercifully simple to aid you with such an overwhelming system, but this isn’t true either. For some reason, there’s a ‘vehicle settings’ menu accessed easily through the main panel, or another menu with a separate set of key functions activated by a car-shaped shortcut button on the floating console. Why? Why aren’t these menus the same? I discovered this in my attempts to use the ‘raise vehicle’ function when faced with a steep driveway. You’re going to need to use this function often in a car measuring over 5.2 metres long, so hiding it in a confusing menu is an interesting choice.

The back seat is where the EQS should shine, and in terms of space it’s stellar. I can barely touch the seat in front of me when set to my own (182cm tall) driving position. It comes with some soft pillows which attach to the headrests, the sunroof extends back there nicely while not impeding on the great headroom, and the lavish trims all continue into the doors and seat bases, too.

The drop-down armrest has a trick pop-out bottle holder in it, and there are a further two on the doors. Amenity-wise rear passengers score four adjustable air vents with two climate zones adjusted via their own touch-panel, but I was interested to see there was a lack of screens back there.

This is particularly notable as most S-Classes are bought to be driven in rather than to drive, and the screens are so much in the front, I was expecting a matching offering for rear travellers. Not so.

You also can’t adjust the rear seats at all, and unlike some EVs coming out in this space, there’s no recliner mode for the full business-class experience.

The boot is much larger than in the smaller EQE, with the EQS making use of its extended dimensions nicely. The floor is fully flat, and has a secret compartment underneath for the storage of both your included Type 2 to Type 2 public AC charging cable, and Type 2 to wall-socket converter for garage charging.

With a total space of 580 litres, the EQS comfortably consumed our entire CarsGuide luggage set with space to spare.

At a whopping $328,400 before you start ticking options boxes or apply the necessary on-road costs, the EQS 53 is at the pointy end of the price scale, even for an electric car.

Dig a little deeper though, and there are some surprises. For example; this top-spec EQS still manages to be more affordable than the top-spec combustion S-Class ($335,100) and when compared to its rival from Porsche, the Taycan Turbo S ($351,000), it comes out with a cost-advantage.

It is significantly more expensive than BMW’s electric flagship, the upcoming i7 sedan, which starts at $297,900 before on-roads for the xDrive60.

Still, falling between BMW’s core EV offering and the Porsche Taycan is a fitting sweet-spot for our Mercedes EQS.

Equipment is out-of-this world, with the EQS not only having ridiculous performance figures we’ll talk about later, but also standard four-wheel steer, all-wheel drive, adaptive suspension, full leather interior trim with multi-way adjust for the front seats, complete with heating, cooling, and several message programs.

It also has the (again, completely over-the-top) 1.4-meter long MBUX ‘Hyperscreen’, which is made up of two large screens for the instrument cluster and passenger touchscreen, as well as an enormous centre panel for the climate and multimedia functions, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity with matching wireless phone charging bay, augmented reality sat-nav, a panoramic sunroof, LED headlights, LED interior lights with selectable RGB settings, and an auto tailgate.

Enough stuff for you? Wait! Says Mercedes, there’s more! The Dynamic Plus package ($7690) boosts performance even more and adds an extended cooling system and launch mode, an aesthetic Night Package ($3990) which adds mainly black and chrome trim pieces as well as 22-inch wheels, ceramic composite brake package ($9990), augmented reality head-up system ($2690) and a wall box home charger ($1450).

Plenty for buyers to work with then. For now though, they’ll only be able to choose the top-spec AMG-tinged 53 version, as lower grades are yet to arrive in Australia. It will be the same for the smaller but near-identically specified EQE 53 when it arrives in Australia, so the message is pay big or go home to get on the latest EQ tech early.

MG has plenty of hybrid knowledge, but has opted to keep it simple for the U9. It’s powered by a 2.5-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine, which should be popular with the ute crowd.

It produces a solid, if unspectacular, 160kW and 520Nm, enough for it to offer a 3500kg maximum braked towing capacity, which is also something that should be popular with potential buyers.

The engine is paired with an eight-speed (torque-converter) automatic transmission and 'Super Select' 4WD system capable of sending drive to all four wheels.

Like so many new brands in the ute market, MG was keen to highlight that the transmission is built by ZF and the 4WD system is from BorgWarner, both brands with a long history in their respective areas.

In the electric era, do performance figures matter? AMG would argue a resounding ‘yes’ although I would argue the art for premium automakers like Mercedes is now in producing suspension setups that can handle the weight of batteries.

Regardless, the EQS has a dual-motor setup, capable of providing a whopping 484kW/950Nm in its standard form, or an even more incredible 560kW/1020Nm with the Dynamic Plus package. Look, you’re spending over $328,000 already, what’s an extra $8k or so to put pretty much any other four-wheeled object in your rear-vision mirror? With the Dynamic Package, a sprint time of 3.4 seconds is… brutal.

The four-wheel drive system is necessary to keep all that power under control. While some enthusiasts may be turned-off by the four-wheel steer function, I’d read on to the driving section to see why it’s not only worth having (try turning a 5.2-meter long sedan around without it) but also not as intrusive as you think it’s going to be in the corners.

As all three variants are powered by the same engine and all return the same fuel economy. Rated at 7.9L/100km on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle.

As our test drive was limited to off-road only we can’t assess its real-world usage, so that will need to wait until we can spend extended time behind the wheel.

Notably, with an 80-litre fuel tank the U9 has a theoretical driving range of more than 1000km, which is great for anyone looking to take their ute on a long road trip.

Even at the official energy consumption of 23kWh/100km, the EQS’ drivetrain is essentially the electric equivalent of wielding a massive V8 under the hood. It’s not by any measure impressive, but then, with 107.8kWh of lithium batteries under the floor, it’s perhaps impressive it’s not worse than an Audi e-tron, particularly since the EQS weighs in at nearly three tonnes.

The battery is one of the largest on the market in Australia, offering the EQS a driving range of 585km on the WLTP cycle. Very impressive.

On the charging front, the EQS can charge at up to 200kW on DC thanks to an advanced cooling system, and on AC charges at 11kW in its stock form or 22kW with an optional $2490 upgrade. Again, at $328k, why wouldn’t you want the best charging system you can get for so little extra?

You can also package in a Mercedes-Benz branded wallbox for your home garage, valued at $1450 before installation costs.

To give you an idea of charging times: Expect a little over two hours (from 10 per cent) on a common 50kW DC public charger, nearly ten hours from an 11kW AC public charger, and a number not even worth mentioning from a home wall socket.

The S-Class has always been a safety leader, and it appears the EQS is no different.

On the active front expect Autobahn-speed auto emergency braking with pedestrian and cyclist detection, lane departure warning with lane keep assist, blind spot monitoring with rear cross traffic alert, traffic sign recognition and driver monitoring.

The Mercedes semi-autonomous adaptive cruise control suite is just as good (perhaps better in some areas like distance control) as the stuff from Tesla in my experience, and this car also had a notably comprehensive 360-degree parking camera which is brilliant enough to show you the top-down and full rear view cameras all in one screen.

The EQS is yet to be officially rated by our local crash authority, ANCAP, but it received a maximum five-star Euro NCAP safety rating in 2021.

This is a crucial area for many ute buyers, so MG has tried to make itself as appealing as possible to discerning pick-up prospects.

However, the U9 is covered by MG’s seven year warranty, not the newer 10 year coverage from its passenger vehicles. And even then, that requires you to service the vehicle via an authorised MG dealer for the full seven years to apply.

However, this only applies to non-commercial use vehicles, so while tradies will be covered, fleet buyers are stuck with a five-year warranty.

Over the first five years, if you spend the $2395 capped price costs, you’ll get the extra two years of coverage. The first service is due after 10,000km, but the rest are at 12-months/15,000km.

MG has also worked on expanding its dealer and servicing network to respond to some growing pains and ensure owners aren’t burnt and are more likely to return for their next MG. There are currently 120 MG dealers across Australia with plans to gradually expand that footprint into regional areas following the launch of the U9.

Like many electric cars, the warranty on the EQS is twofold. Firstly, there is the whole vehicle warranty, which from Mercedes-Benz is five years and unlimited kilometres, but the high-voltage battery is covered by a separate, and quite healthy, ten-year, 250,000km promise.

Benz throws in a three-year subscription to ChargeFox, offering owners free charging for the duration (to give you an idea, it cost me about $30 to charge the EQS to nearly full from 20 or so per cent).

Service intervals are surprisingly standard, at 12 months and 15,000km, and the EQS’ pre-paid service program is $1750 for three years, $2750 for four years, or $3250 for five-years, working out to about $650 a year. Far from the cheapest we’ve seen for an EV, but chump change for owners considering the up-front cost of this vehicle.