Mazda MX-5 vs Toyota HiLux

What's the difference?

Ultimately, the design and tech changes to the ND MX-5 will be the biggest day-to-day advantages of the updated model, because the mechanical changes don’t make themselves hugely obvious on the road.

If you’re into track days, it’s still a satisfying car to hustle as fast as you can, but it’s at its most accessible on winding roads for weekend drives, where the new differential and track DSC mode won’t come into play as much.

But in a world where accessible sports cars are becoming a rarity, there’s only one rear-drive convertible with a sticker price appropriate for financial mortals, and it’s a pretty damn good thing that it’s the ND MX-5.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

It might be a new generation HiLux but we get the (oh what a) feeling that Toyota has adopted a that-will-do approach with this one, based on its cautious view of the ute market.

Although it’s still a competent load-hauler that will no doubt continue to attract Toyota loyalists, even a major facelift and tech upgrades can’t hide its decade-old origins.

Alright, we’ve all seen ND MX-5s, you don’t need me to tell you about its proportions or explain its design elements to you in too much detail, so I’ll give you the headline changes.

At the front and rear are new pairs of LED head- and tail-lights, respectively… obviously, fitting into the spaces the old ones took up.

The DRLS and reverse lights have come off the bumpers for both, and are now part of the main lights at each end - no more DRLs in the front bumper, and the reverse lights have been replaced by reflectors.

There are new 17-inch wheel designs for the base and GT trim levels, too, and there’s a new colour - Aero Grey.

Inside, it’s a shame that the tan Nappa leather interior of the RF Black Roof can’t be had in a manual roadster, because it’s gorgeous, even though the inside still looks refined enough for a simple sports car in its base cloth trim.

Toyota states this was the first time in HiLux history that a new exterior design was spearheaded by the company's Australian design team, with its confronting appearance claimed to be inspired by the stance held by Japanese sumo wrestlers at the start of a fight. Really?

Regardless of its inspiration, there’s no denying the imposing new-look front with its high slimline headlights, gaping body-coloured grille and trapezoidal side air intakes polarised opinion among passers-by we spoke to during our week of testing.

The cabin and doors are carried over from the previous generation but the rear styling has also been refreshed, with a more hard-edged appearance that incorporates concave rear side-steps for load tub access plus ‘TOYOTA’ lettering stamped into the tailgate like the good old days.

The squared-off styling theme inspired the HiLux’s interior design featuring new dash and centre console layouts, plus tasteful blending of soft-touch and hard-wearing surfaces to create a visually appealing cabin environment.

One thing Mazda has significantly changed for the ND is the multimedia screen, now a larger 8.8-inch touchscreen running Mazda’s updated software.

It brings the MX-5 up to date without sacrificing simplicity and makes it a little easier to use. The physical dial and buttons for controlling the screen also remain. The USB-C ports are also new.

Oh, and the MX-5 is the first Mazda model to get Connected Services, which is coming to other Mazda models eventually.

Connected Services allows owners to find, lock, and get alerts for their cars from a phone app, even letting them set curfews to notify them if the car is started during certain hours.

Aside from that, another small tweak is the simplified instrument cluster, which aims to be easier to read even when the roof is open and the sun is bright.

The cabin isn’t built to be plush, it’s built for ‘Jinba Ittai’, Mazda’s philosophy that applies most strongly to the MX-5 which means ‘horse and rider as one’.

And trust me, you feel one with the horse- er, car, when there’s not ample room to move. It’s not restrictive, but it’s cosy. 

Everything’s quite well-placed and it’s not busy with buttons or features in here though, it’s made for focusing on driving. 

One downside is the lack of storage, not even a glovebox, in front of the passenger, and the central storage spot under where your elbow sits is tiny, good for keeping the key fob snug though. Also, the cupholders are able to be removed or swapped between the space behind your elbow, or above the passenger footwell.

There’s also a small storage space between the seats behind where your elbow would sit, though it’s tricky to access while you’re driving.

Then there’s the boot, which is usable for a small amount of luggage at 130 litres in the Roadster and 127L in the RF hardtop.

Finally, as a huge positive, probably the biggest advantage of the ND over any other convertible is how easy it is to open and close the roof in the Roadster. You can do it single-handed, which is great if it starts raining and you’re at a traffic light or able to quickly pull over.

The RF hard-top has a switch that automatically opens and closes the roof section.

With its 2125kg kerb weight and 3090kg GVM, our test vehicle has a useful 965kg payload rating.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6300kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) the payload would need to be reduced by 290kg to tow the maximum trailer weight without exceeding the GCM.

Even so, that still leaves a practical 675kg of payload capacity, so these are useful numbers for any number of working roles given that few owners (if any) would need to tow 3500kg with a HiLux.

The load tub is 1570mm long, 1645mm wide and 495mm deep, offering an enclosed load volume of more than 1.2 cubic metres. However, with 1105mm of load floor between the rear wheel housings, it can’t carry a standard Aussie pallet but can fit a Euro.

The SR does not come standard with a spray-in or slide-in tub liner so its painted surfaces are vulnerable to load damage. There’s a sturdy front bulkhead that provides rear window protection and is fitted with pivoting load retainers on the top rail for securing long lengths of timber, conduit, PVC pipe, etc.

The load tub is also equipped with four load anchorage points mounted at mid-height (not ideal for low loads) and hydraulic struts provide lowering/raising assistance for the tailgate. Externally there are also new concave rear steps on each side to provide easier access to the load tub.

There’s ample cabin space for the driver and front passenger, and storage that includes a bottle holder and bin in each door, along with two cupholders, upper and lower gloveboxes in the new dash and an overhead glasses holder.

The front of the new centre console includes a wireless phone charging pad and two USB-C ports, plus a single cupholder in the middle (why not two?) and a lidded box at the rear which also contains a 12V socket and AC220V inverter socket that’s compatible with devices or appliances that use a domestic three-pin plug.

Rear seating for tall people (I’m 186cm) is still as restrictive as it’s always been, with minimal knee/shoulder/head room combined with a notably short distance between the top of the base cushion and floor creating a steep thigh angle that concentrates body weight on your lower back.

It’s worse in the slightly higher centre position, with my head pressed firmly into the roof lining, knees squeezed together between the front seat backrests and feet either side of the transmission tunnel. So, for any trip longer than the local shops, the HiLux rear bench is strictly a two-seater.

Even so, there’s a bottle-holder and bin in each rear door plus pockets on both front seat backrests and two USB-C ports and a storage slot on the rear of the centre console. The centre seat backrest also folds forward to provide an armrest with two cupholders.

Only the narrower driver’s side of the 60/40-split rear seat base cushion can swing up and be stored vertically as the passenger side is now fixed, given the V-Active’s 48V battery resides beneath it.

The SR is a more upmarket version of the base-grade WorkMate and available in 4x2 guise as a dual-cab ute, or as a 4x4 in either extra cab/dual-cab chassis or dual-cab ute body styles.

Our test vehicle is the 4x4 SR dual-cab ute, which comes standard with a 2.8-litre turbo-diesel (with 48V mild-hybrid assistance that Toyota calls 'V-Active') and six-speed automatic transmission for a list price of $59,490 (plus on-road costs). Our example is finished in Eclipse Black which is a $675 premium paint option.

This list pricing is in the same ballpark as higher grade work-focused rivals offering similar features and load ratings including the Ford Ranger XLS 2.0L ($57,888) and Isuzu D-Max X-Rider 2.2L ($59,500).

The SR comes standard with 17-inch alloy wheels and 265/65 R17 tyres with a full-size alloy spare (although buyers can opt for the WorkMate’s 17-inch steel wheels), silver-painted lower front bumper, black-painted doorhandles, side mirrors and bonnet moulding, black plastic wheel arch flares, LED front fog lamps, side steps, locking tailgate and choice of six exterior colours.

Inside the cabin (with smart entry and start), the SR adds greater front seat bolstering and high-grade fabric upholstery, leather-accented shift knob and steering wheel, AC 220V inverter, wireless phone charging and eight-speaker sound.

This is in addition to the WorkMate’s standard equipment, which still adheres to rear drum brakes with a mechanical lever handbrake plus LED headlights, body-coloured front bumper and grille and tailgate damper with lift-assist.

Cabin enhancements include a new 7.0-inch driver's digital instrument display, multiple USB-C ports and 12V accessory sockets plus a new multimedia system with 12.3-inch touchscreen, DAB+ digital radio, voice recognition and connectivity with mirroring for Apple and Android devices.

Up front, you get one option: a 2.0-litre naturally aspirated four-pot. It makes 135kW and 205Nm, and it’s a delightful little thing, driving the rear wheels only - as it should.

It used to be that the smaller 1.5-litre engine was the more revvy, keen option, rest its soul, but Mazda updated the 2.0-litre to be more eager (and deliver more power) at high revs and basically made the little 1.5-litre redundant.

Anyway, you can have it with a six-speed manual in any variant, or a six-speed automatic in GT guise if you find manual gearboxes difficult or a hassle.

The ubiquitous 1GD-FTV 2.8-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with V-Active 48V mild-hybrid assistance produces the same 150kW and 500Nm as it does without V-Active, driving through a six-speed torque-converter automatic that offers the choice of sequential manual shifting and three drive modes.

V-Active is claimed to improve fuel efficiency, acceleration and smoothness, along with enhanced off-road prowess, as it can send up to an additional 8.4kW of power and 65Nm of torque through its motor-generator to assist the engine.

The part-time, dual-range 4x4 system includes a switchable rear diff-lock and a choice of numerous multi-terrain driving modes to enhance off-road ability.

Mazda says the MX-5 uses 6.8L/100km as a manual Roadster, or 7.0L/100km with an automatic gearbox. Or, in the heavier RF 6.9L for a manual and 7.2L for auto.

Not great for a tiny car like this, but pretty good for a sports car!

It’s got a 45-litre fuel tank, takes premium 95 RON or higher, and while it should hypothetically be able to travel more than 600km with its on-paper claims, expect fuel use to sit closer to 8.0L/100km if you’re driving it anything like it deserves.

Toyota claims combined average consumption of 7.2L/100km which is aligned with rivals like the Ford Ranger XLS 2.0L (7.2L/100km) and Isuzu D-Max X-Rider 2.2L (7.1L/100km).

The HiLux’s dash display showed 9.5L/100km at the completion of our 457km test, which included the usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one quarter was hauling a near-maximum payload.

Our own figure calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings was slightly higher again at a neat 10L/100km. That’s just within the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between lab-based official and real-world consumption but thirstier than figures we’ve achieved in some rival 4x4 dual cabs like the JAC T9 with 8.3L/100km and Nissan Navara SL with 8.4L/100km.

So, based on our test consumption, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 800km from its 80-litre tank.

It feels like every motoring journo under the sun (literally if the roof is off) owns or has owned an MX-5 of some sort.

And the first time you drive one, you might understand why. 

If you spend your days testing and driving a bunch of different cars that aim to be many things at once, it’s refreshing to drive something that aims to be one: fun.

That’s it, the MX-5 feels like it was built to be fun. Not for convenience, not for power, certainly not for the school run.

And fortunately its simplicity remains with this update. All Mazda has done to change the way it drives is attempt to improve the rear limited-slip differential and improve the steering a little by reducing friction in the rack, as well as improve throttle response.

Has any of that changed the way it feels to drive on-road? No, not massively, but the ND was already such a delight that Mazda could have kept this update to purely design and interior tech changes and it would have still been one of the best-value buys around in terms of fun.

The MX-5 still feels relatively softly sprung while still being a dynamic and communicative sports car that’s engaging to drive even at low speeds, and rewarding (or frustrating) to drive fast.

On tight, winding roads, the MX-5 is at home, its soft suspension keeps you humble with its shifting weight and its relatively meagre outputs keep your licence safe.

In fact, despite being slightly compromised as a daily drive, the MX-5 is still plenty of fun even in traffic, there’s something about the satisfying click as the shifter slips into gear, or the little rev matches heading back down through the cogs when approaching a red light.

The 2.0-litre four-pot is a keen unit, and the six-speed manual is light and easy to work with, plus its steering is light without sacrificing road surface feedback - that feedback can quickly turn into cabin noise on a coarse highway which could become a little irritating on a long trip.

But the MX-5 can still be plenty of fun on track, where you’re more likely to get the most out of its new limited-slip differential and Track DSC mode.

It’s equally frustrating and satisfying to hustle the MX-5 around the East Circuit at The Bend in South Australia, where the track is twisty, busy, and unforgiving. Get it wrong, and the MX-5 lurches or slides to let you know you’ve made an error. 

Get it right, however, and the little roadster glides through the corners, camber changes and even over apex kerbs smoothly and carrying impressive speed.

Plus, the electronic assistance won’t usually kick-in until you really need it, a welcome change from cars that are constantly trying to keep you from having fun behind the wheel.

Big handles on the windscreen pillars assist climbing aboard the new interior where (in stark contrast to the rear seat) even tall drivers can find a comfortable position, with ample seat and steering wheel adjustments plus a large left footrest.

The new wheel design feels nice in your hands and Toyota’s switch to electric power steering provides good feel and more noticeable changes in steering weight compared to the previous hydraulic system, being light at parking speeds but increasingly firm as speeds increase like variable-ratio steering should.

The job-focused WorkMate and SR grades have a heavy-duty suspension tune not shared with other HiLux models, which is primarily designed for carrying and/or towing heavy loads. However, that comes with an unwelcome trade-off in unladen ride quality that is notably harsh and jiggly, particular on bumpy roads.

The diesel engine is relatively quiet with good refinement and all-round response, even though we can’t detect any noticeable gain in acceleration, braking or smoothness from the 48V hybrid system compared to the standard engine.

That’s not to say V-Active is not delivering up to 8.4kW of power and 65Nm of torque, as Toyota claims. It’s just that these gains are modest and delivered so seamlessly that they are undetectable in real-world driving.

By contrast, there is a noticeable spike in engine response using the ‘Sport’ drive mode. it’s also a low-stressed and quiet highway cruiser requiring only 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h without the need for raised voices.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 650kg into the load tub which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 830kg that was about 130kg under its legal limit. The stout rear leaf springs compressed about 50mm, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured there was no bottoming-out on our test route.

The HiLux always shines when it’s heavily loaded, as it maintains a sure-footed stance on sealed or unsealed roads, and the ride quality noticeably improves given the large increase in sprung weight that its heavy-duty suspension is primarily designed to support.

The drivetrain also made light work of this payload, particularly on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb at 60km/h where the six-speed auto promptly self-shifted down to fourth gear and 2300rpm (within its peak torque band) to easily haul this load to the summit.

Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually selected second gear, was not as robust but adequate given the large payload it was trying to restrain and well within the capabilities of the brake pedal to maintain the 60km/h speed limit. Overall, it’s still a competent load-hauler.

The HiLux comes with a fresh five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2025), eight airbags and the latest active safety tech including auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian daytime and cyclist detection, advanced lane-keeping, adaptive cruise control, rear cross-traffic alert, blind-spot monitoring, road sign recognition, tyre pressure monitoring, panoramic view monitor and more.

The rear seat has two ISOFIX and three top-tether child seat anchorages.

Mazda’s five-year, unlimited km warranty covers the MX-5, including five years of roadside assist.

Servicing costs are pre-set, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km up to seven years or 105,000km. They cost between $447 and $638, averaging out at about $544 each.

Toyota has a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty (which is short compared to Mitsubishi’s dealer-serviced 10 years/200,000km offer) that is extendable to seven years with exclusive Toyota dealership servicing.

The 48V hybrid battery has a separate five-year warranty which can also be extended for up to five years (so 10 years in total) subject to annual battery health checks.

Scheduled servicing is Toyota’s usual six months/10,000km whichever occurs first, with capped pricing of $395 for each of the first ten scheduled services up to five years/100,000km. That totals $3950, which is significantly higher than rivals like the Ranger XLS ($1995) or D-Max X-Rider ($2245) for the same five-year period.

Toyota currently has 275 dealers across its vast Australian network located in metro, rural and regional areas. Toyota dealerships are also service centres.