Lexus UX250H vs Mercedes-Benz EQB

What's the difference?

Most cars get worse as they age as their makers try and save pennies by scrimping on quality and features. But the reverse seems to be true for the Lexus UX.

The 250h Luxury 2WD we tested is the car that the brand should have launched with back in 2018, with an appealing balance of performance and economy, comfort and sporty handling, as well as refinement and features. The UX has finally come of age.

I really liked the combustion version of this car, the GLB, for its funky style and flexibility and I was pleased to find how easily Mercedes has made the conversion to a fully-electric layout for the EQB.

Despite a tall price, the EQB 350 is a compelling option for those seeking something a bit more luxurious than the Tesla Model Y, something a bit larger than the Volvo XC40 Recharge, and something a bit smaller than the Audi e-tron or the EQC.

The main trade-off for this 350 variant is the loss of the seven-seat layout in favour of more performance. Instead it offers a huge boot, has a sufficient range for city-based buyers, and offers surprising levels of fun, too. 

Just make sure you’ve considered its rivals which may potentially offer more range or features for the same money.

A hefty portion of the UX’s engineering underneath is shared with the popular Toyota C-HR. Not that you would necessarily know that by glancing at it.

Even five years on from launch, the current model looks slick and contemporary, and it seems to have informed the styling of newer, larger Lexus SUVs like the latest NX.

Not that you’d call the UX an SUV – it’s very much a higher-riding hatchback, with a ho-hum 160mm of ground clearance.

To put that in perspective, other crossovers are taller: the GLA has 213mm, while Subaru’s new Crosstrek boasts 220mm. At least the UX’s is loftier than the C-HR and its pitiful 137mm.

That said, the angular wheel arches and wide-track stance serves the Lexus well.

The EQB has a very predictable design in that it doesn't stray from the combustion car’s formula. At all.

The only evidence from the outside this is the electric version is the blanked out grille, and closer observers might notice the rear light bar which cuts across the boot lid is different from the split tail-light design which appears on the combustion car.

Still, to my eyes, the GLB is a cool design with its upright boxy look bucking the curvaceous trend of most EVs, and, indeed, the rest of the Mercedes line-up. 

Its rebellious streak makes it one of the most appealing SUVs in Mercedes’ current range, and it comes with a bit of toughness which is missing from the EQA. 

If nothing else, it’s a completely different look from Tesla’s amorphous Model Y, and this may be enough to appeal to some.

Inside is identical to other Mercedes models which sit on the MFA2 small car platform, immediately setting itself apart with the big high-resolution screens, glitzy ambient lighting, as well as an abundance of chrome and gloss black.

It’s designed to impress from the first time you hop in, and there’s no doubt it does, but it may be a bit over-the-top for some, particularly fans of the more conservative Mercedes designs of eras past.

The chrome in particular becomes a bit of a problem, as it has an annoying habit of catching the reflection of the sun and sending it directly into the driver’s eyes.

It all feels as plush as a circa-$100,000 luxury car should though, with the ‘Artico’ seat trim being one of the better synthetic options on the market, and soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin selling the Mercedes promise. 

The GLB toughness is even reflected in the chiselled out finishes in the door, dash, and centre console, helping to set it apart from the tamer EQA.

The software is also fast, high resolution, and well presented, which bodes well given the amount of screen real-estate, and the amount of customization is impressive, too.

Again, there are many who will prefer its look and feel to the Apple-store chic of the Tesla Model Y, or the pared back Scandinavian approach of the XC40 Recharge, but also those who won’t. Like many new Mercedes products, it continues to polarise buyers.

The UX’s compact crossover-esque hatchback proportions have implications inside. Inevitably, this is no larger than the (related) Toyota Corolla, despite having the higher seating position.

Beyond that, though, the 2023 model highlights how Lexus has made its so-called ‘gateway’ model better than before.

For starters, despite being the base grade, this UX has a properly premium ambience, backed up by exceptional fit and finish.

From a sensory perspective, the UX looks, smells, feels and sounds like a Lexus should. And by the latter, we mean the cabin is pleasingly isolated from the outside world.

The overhauled touchscreen and multimedia system is a huge step forward for the series. The larger new display looks great and works well – what a monumental improvement over the infuriatingly fiddly old set-up. It’s difficult to see how they’ll improve it. Dependable and glitch-free. Are you listening, all European manufacturers?

Meanwhile, the carryover parts that worked well enough before continue to impress.

The UX’s front seats are sumptuous in their cushy softness and comfort, yet provide sufficient support over longer driving distances.

There’s also the excellent driving position, with most switchgear within grasp. There’s just enough space for taller people to settle in nicely up front. And the basics like ventilation and storage are thoughtfully executed. The climate in the UX is always fine.

Negatives? Don’t worry, we’ve identified several.

As mentioned earlier, the now-better-equipped Luxury does have all the essentials. But for a car that’s approaching $60K-drive-away, we’d expect kerb-side mirrors that dip down when reversing to avoid damaging alloys against gutters; we couldn’t get ours to auto-fold when locking up, either.

Driver vision out isn’t great. Thick pillars and that rising shoulder line make changing lanes and reversing a technology-reliant affair, as it’s difficult to see objects that are too-easily obscured. For the same reasons, a front camera would be useful in this grade.

Others might expect a sunroof, or cooled seats that massage, or a head-up display for the instrumentation, but we’d argue that they’re hardly necessities. Lexus has to upsell buyers to something.

Moving on to the back-seat area betrays the UX’s compactness most.

The back doors have small apertures. Entry/egress is challenging for folk with long legs. Legroom is tight, and three adults abreast would be a struggle, so it’s best to treat the littlest Lexus crossover as a four-seater.

Yet headroom is fine, the appearance and finish remain first class as it is up front, and the basics are all present – air vents, grab handles, coat hooks, overhead lighting, one map pocket, centre armrest with cupholders, two USB outlets, and windows that wind all the way down. Narrow front seats aid with light, vision and ambience, too.

Further back, the luggage area is pretty petite for an SUV, though the boot is (slightly) larger than the Corolla and Mazda3’s. That powered tailgate is useful if your arms are full, but the loading lip is high.

Normal boot floor depth is shallow but most of that flooring can be removed to reveal a hidden compartment underneath.

Small side pockets are also useful. You’ll find a 240V outlet. Bag hooks and floor tie-down hooks are fitted.

And – being a hybrid – there’s no spare wheel, just a tyre inflation kit. And the flimsy cargo cover is there only to keep prying eyes out.

Not big on utility, then, but the UX is true to its role as a Lexus in concentrate form.

This should be the GLB’s calling card. It’s a car with an ideal footprint, not as wide or as long as most mid-size SUVs, whilst also offering a larger cabin and boot.

The big drawback for this variant in particular is the lack of a seven-seat option, as the all-wheel drive requires the under-floor space which is required to give rear occupants legroom. 

It’s a shame, too, because I found the two rear seats in this car’s GLB combustion equivalent to be surprisingly accommodating for even adults.

As a result of these missing seats, though, the full volume can be exploited in the boot, which comes in at a whopping 495 litres.

It’s rivalled by the Model Y, which also has a cavernous boot, although it has a much larger storage area than the Volvo XC40. 

As an added bonus, there is a decent under-floor storage area which has enough space for all your charging cables, although there is no so-called ‘frunk’ with what is normally the engine bay taken up by cooling and auxiliary hardware. 

At first glance there’s so much going on under there, you’d be forgiven for thinking the EQB has an actual engine!

The cabin is also enormous as well as configurable. The EQB has massive rear doors (as it’s designed to be a seven-seater) to make it easy to get in and out of, and once you’re settled in, the amount of space for me (at 182cm) behind my own driving position is very impressive, with ample leg, arm, and headroom.

Rear passengers score the same nice synthetic leather seat and door trim as the front passengers, a bottle holder in each door, as well as two in a flip-out caddy on the drop-down armrest, two nets on the backs of the front seats, dual adjustable air vents, and power outlets on the back of the console. There is also a separate section of the split sunroof to benefit those in the back seat.

Up front the cabin is equally flexible, although it immediately seems odd that the front seats are manually adjustable. Almost unforgivable in a $100,000 car. 

At least the trim is comfortable, and again, the space is configurable for people of all shapes and sizes. 

Storage options include large bins in each door, a split-opening armrest console with USB-C outlets inside, a slide-open area underneath the climate unit, which houses a wireless phone charger and additional power outlets, as well as the usual glove box arrangement. 

Soft trims continue into the doors, although one small annoyance is the excess of chrome trim which has the unfortunate habit of reflecting harsh Australian sun into your eyes if it hits at the wrong angle.

The software is nice and quick, but can be cumbersome and over-complicated to operate at times, particularly when using the centre touchpad, or adjusting the dash with the small touch elements on the wheel. 

It is also notable the Apple CarPlay as-tested only took up a centre portion of the screen, and is not set-up for widescreen mode to take full advantage of the hardware.

Minor complaints aside, though, the EQB follows its combustion GLB twin in having by far one of the most flexible and configurable cabins in its class.

The EQB range kicks off from $87,800, before on-road costs, for the base 250, but the car we’re looking at for this review is the top-spec 350 4Matic, which wears a price-tag of $106,700.

There’s no doubt it’s a hefty price, even for an EV, and especially for a sort-of ‘small’ SUV. There’s more to consider, too. As I mentioned in the intro, the all-wheel drive system precludes the seven-seat layout in this top-spec car, and it has less range than the front-wheel drive model, too, dropping from 371km to 360km.

On the upswing, the dual-motor powertrain is far preferable to the so-so front-wheel drive option, and the 350 also gains an AMG-spiced bodykit and flat-bottomed steering wheel, as well as a panoramic sunroof.

Outside of the extra flair, the EQB 350 is almost as well equipped as you could hope, with the flashy dual-10.25-inch 'MBUX' screen set-up, Nappa leather steering wheel and interior appointments with Mercedes’ signature 'Artico' synthetic seat trim, LED headlights, ambient interior lighting with fully customisable RGB controls, dual-zone climate, a wireless phone charger, 20-inch alloy wheels, as well as keyless entry and push-start ignition.

Given the EQB’s dimensions it would seem its most direct rival is the Tesla Model Y, although it may not be a favourable comparison. 

At over $100,000 the EQB 350 is still more expensive than the top-spec Model Y Performance, which is even more powerful than our Merc here.

Other more indirect rivals include the Volvo XC40 Recharge (from $74,490 in twin-motor form), or less performance-oriented Lexus UX300e ($80,691 for the top-spec Sports Luxury), although neither are as large as the EQB, and the Lexus has about half the performance.

The UX’s Corolla/C-HR connection continues with its 2.0-litre (1987cc) twin-cam four-cylinder petrol engine, delivering 107kW of power at 6000rpm and 188Nm of torque between 4400 and 5200rpm.

The 250h Luxury pairs that with an 80kW/202Nm permanent magnet motor and 1.4kWh Ni-MH battery, for a combined power output of 135kW. A second, rear-mounted motor is available in higher grades, providing all-wheel drive. But not in this Luxury guise.

As with most Toyota and Lexus hybrids, charging is only via the petrol engine and recuperated energy from braking. Electric-only drive is only offered during brief spells of low-speed light-throttle driving, or off-throttle coasting where conditions allow.

Drive is sent to the front wheels via an electronically-controlled continuously variable transmission (CVT). Three modes are offered – 'Eco', 'Normal' and 'Sport'.

Tipping the scales at 1625kg (kerb), the 250h Luxury offers a power-to-weight ratio of nearly 83.1kW per tonne. That’s a hefty output for a hybrid. Top speed is 177km/h, with 0-100km/h needing 8.5 seconds.

Underpinning that performance is a MacPherson-style strut-front and a multi-link rear suspension set-up.

While the EQB 350 loses its valuable third-row seats, it gains a much more impressive drivetrain than the lesser EQB 250 variant. 

While that car has a so-so front-motor set-up producing 140kW/385Nm, the top-spec 350 sports a much more capable 215kW/520Nm dual-motor system.

This allows a 0-100km/h sprint time of 6.2 seconds, and while it’s not as fast as the entry-level Tesla Model 3, it’s still impressive for a 2153kg SUV.

The all-wheel drive capability also adds a level of confidence which can’t be matched by a front-drive, more on this in the driving section of this review.

Officially, the 250h averages an impressive 4.5 litres per 100km on the combined cycle, which is just 103 grams per kilometre of carbon-dioxide emissions.

Now, out in the real world, with plenty of inner-city and urban driving as well as a spell of fast highway runs punctuated by some very heavy-footed acceleration, we managed just under 7.4L/100km pump-to-pump.

That’s not too bad given how hard our UX was caned. The trip meter showed 5.6L/100km over the same distance (nearly 400km).

This is one Lexus hybrid that will happily sip from the standard 91 RON unleaded petrol pump. With a fuel tank capacity of a smallish 43 litres, expect a range of between 930km and 1000km.

For a luxury small crossover, these are economical figures.

Regardless of which version of the EQB is chosen, the SUV has a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack, and in the case of our all-wheel drive 350, this grants it a 360km WLTP-rated driving range between charges.

My car was reporting around 350km of range at or near a full charge, while my week of testing produced a dash-reported consumption figure of just 18.2kWh/100km.

This is surprising for two reasons. Firstly, I subjected the EQB 350 to a significant amount of freeway testing during my time with it, which usually produces worse consumption numbers for EVs, but it actually bested its official 21.0kWh/100km official figure by a decent margin.

Secondly, I’m puzzled to find this car outperformed the smaller and lighter EQA 250 I had on test in 2021 in terms of overall consumption, and by a significant margin. Very odd.

When it comes to charging up, the EQB can be charged at a rate of 100kW on a fast DC charger, for a 10-80 per cent charge time in a claimed 30 minutes. 

On the slower but cheaper-to-install AC standard, the EQB has an 11kW inverter, allowing a convenient ‘slow’ charge time of 4.1 hours. Expect between 25 and 30 hours on a standard wall socket.

Before driving the 2023 UX250h hybrid, there was some trepidation.

All versions of the original series from 2018 were tested previously, and in every one bar the base 200 on small wheels and tyres, none lived up to the promise of a premium Lexus crossover. A harsh ride, excessive noise intrusion and dull handling made this model a disappointment.

That’s all in the past, thankfully, thanks to a sustained program to save the UX from mediocrity. The company really got the basics wrong the first time around with the horrid CT200h predecessor back in 2011, so we imagine that it would be damned if this was going down the same sorry path again.

In the 250h Luxury, as reviewed here, it is difficult to objectively fault the way everything works and drives.

Let’s start with performance. Even in Normal or Eco mode, the UX steps off the line briskly, and initially at least, it’s the electric motor and battery that silently whooshes the car forward.

If you’re gentle, you can reach speeds of up to about 40km/h before the petrol engine chimes in unobtrusively.

Beyond that, there’s a stream of electric power you can feel, keeping the acceleration coming on strong, even as speeds rise above 100km/h.

This is also true for Sport mode, except that it all happens a bit quicker and earlier, and with extra urge.

And the welcome news here is that the CVT doesn’t really make the engine sound too droney, unless the driver is mashing the pedal to the metal.

Travelling along at normal urban speeds, there’s a seamless transition from electric-enhanced petrol propulsion back to electric-only if the conditions are right – such as when coasting off-throttle.

This is most common in heavier traffic, and the resulting smoothness and quietness adds to a refined and relaxed experience.

About our only objection is when you apply the brakes. In our test car, they felt a little on/off, like a switch. At times, they seemed too grabby for smooth stopping.

That said, the driver can downshift using the gear lever to provide powertrain braking, to help minimise snatchiness.

Road noise seems to be more muted than before, supporting Lexus’ claims that retuning the suspension and beefing up the structure/chassis has helped with refinement.

We wouldn’t say the UX is at the top of the class for quietness, especially on Australia’s coarse-bitumen highways, but now things have hushed sufficiently enough for a crossover purporting to be a premium.

Where the suspension changes really transform the UX, at least on the 215/60R17 tyres the Luxury wears, is how much softer and comfier the ride is.

Where before there was suddenness there’s now suppleness, substantially improving the experience. We wonder whether the bigger-wheeled rubber the richer grades receive are as well-resolved.

As the 250h Luxury is not trying to be a hot hatch, the resulting body lean through fast corners is a happy trade-off, though it’s not so roly-poly that handling composure is adversely affected.

Plus, the steering – while light and easy at parking speeds – still offers enough response and feedback for most drivers to enjoy taking the UX for a cross-country blast once in a while.

To that end, the steering’s weighting does increase in Sport mode… though you won’t be selling your Peugeot 205 GTi for one just yet, but that previous dullness is history. In fact, whether behind the wheel or ensconced in one of the inviting outboard seats, the UX250h as a whole is a much sunnier experience all-round than before.

This is where the 350 version of the EQB shines. This car is a beast to drive with plenty of power available at your right foot, and incredible amounts of traction to match from its torque-vectored all-wheel drive system. 

This lets it be rapid, but not scary, and despite its square and upright body, might surprise you when it comes to carving a few corners.

Like many EVs, the EQB’s weight feels low and centred, but it appears the suspension has been adjusted to remove any bouncy quality, which might come with the additional weight added over the combustion variants, with nearly 500kg of lithium batteries under the floor.

In fact, the ride is also one of the things which impressed me most about the EQB. It even has huge 20-inch AMG wheels, yet it dealt with bumps of all shapes and sizes in an impressive manner, keeping the body under control, and communicating remarkably little in terms of vibration or unpleasantness into the cabin.

The steering offes a nice balance of feel and electrical assistance, a trait which combines with the EQB’s convenient size to make for an easy SUV to park and manoeuvre.

When it comes to the EQB’s traits as an electric car, there are several modes available to alter the experience. 

Using the paddle shifters, there are several regenerative braking settings to choose from. While none of them are a ‘single pedal’ mode, the D- mode is pretty strong, and clearly contributed to the EQB’s surprisingly good energy consumption in my time with the car.

Activating D+ mode, which can be combined with a sporty driving setting, tones down the regenerative setting almost completely and feels as though it unleashes more potential from the potent electric motors. 

While the sportier settings made the 2WD EQA I tested last year feel a little twitchy and prone to wheelspin, the all-wheel drive system keeps this well under control in the larger EQB for impressive acceleration characteristics.

The breadth of this SUV’s ability is perhaps its most impressive attribute. It can feel comfortable and tame around town, with alarming speed and tenacity when attacking the open road should you so desire. 

Sure, it’s not as whiplash-inducing as some of its rivals, particularly the Volvo XC40 Recharge or Tesla Model Y, but for a luxury SUV like this it’s more than what you could ask for. 

The EQB scores a thorough suite of active safety equipment including freeway-speed auto emergency braking (7.0-200km/h), lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, as well as one of the best adaptive cruise systems on the market.

In the event of an impact, the EQB scores dual front, side, and head curtain airbags (the side and curtain bags cover both rows) as well as a driver’s knee airbag. There are the usual dual outboard ISOFIX child seat mounting points on the rear row, as well as three top-tether points.

The EQB scored a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the current 2022 standards, but this rating only covers the base 250 variant. It scored highly across all criteria.

Lexus offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are at 12 months or 15,000km.

The first three scheduled services are capped at $495 each, with the work carried out detailed online.

Mercedes offers a five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with five years of roadside assist. The high-voltage battery components are also covered by a separate and industry-standard eight-year and 160,000km warranty.

Service intervals are once every 12 months or 25,000km and the service plan costs an average of $440 a year for the life of the warranty which is expensive for an EV, especially considering Polestar offers free servicing for the first five years, and Volvo’s electric offerings are around half the cost over the same period.