Browse over 9,000 car reviews
What's the difference?
These days, all the cool kids are buying utes that look like they’ve been working out.
They stand out with their toned bodies, muscular stance, rugged boots and ready-for-action names, like Warrior, Rogue, Thunder and – of course – Raptor.
Such suffixes are far sexier than just Navara, HiLux, BT-50 and Ranger, respectively.
Now, Australia’s third best-selling ute, the Isuzu D-Max, joins the club with the Blade.
Is it fit enough to run with the other pumped-up utes?
Let’s find out.
Some of my favourite television shows or movies are flawed. When I talk to people about those films and about those flaws, there's a pattern - they don't know what they are and are therefore a bit confused. I don't know why that appeals to me, it just does.
Cars can be like that. There are some cars that aren't sure what they are. One of the exemplars of this is the Toyota C-HR - a small SUV aimed at young get-up-and-go types but bought almost exclusively by baby boomers, attracted to the badge. Young folks want more performance, lower cost and Apple CarPlay.
Hindsight suggests that the less-than-stellar sales performance of the much-heralded Mercedes ute, the X-Class, might be down to confusion. Mercedes thought it would be one thing and it turns out the market thinks it's another.
As with so many Australian-enhanced utes that rely on local expertise steeped in our once-flourishing automotive industry, the Blade improves the D-Max breed.
In fact, there is no doubt that it is the best D-Max ever sold in Australia – Holden-badged Rodeos and Colorados included.
Is the Blade class-best? Maybe not. But it does not seem to be far behind on first acquaintance. It also looks great and offers decent value for money.
What Walkinshaw has done to the D-Max's on-road dynamics as well as off-road capability quantifiably elevates the Isuzu ute. We’re impressed.
The X was an opportunistic shot at a market segment new to Benz. With even apprentices able to afford to buy a well-specced Hilux, it's become harder to separate the foreman from the kids. I, like Mercedes, thought this would be the boss's car. Mercedes saw the gap and went for it, thinking it could grab sales from top end utes from VW, Toyota and Ford, while maybe saving a few folks from buying a RAM or an F150.
The problem is, the target market knows its utes. And in a rough-and-tumble workplace, the perception is that if you've spent up big on this Merc, you've actually just paid too much for a Nissan Navara. Still, like those flawed movies I enjoy, the X-Class is a fine thing - and I don't blame Mercedes for trying. It just costs too much, and yet isn't Mercedes enough to justify that price.
Dating back to 2019, the current, D-Max range underwent a fairly robust facelift for the 2024 model year, with a restyled bonnet, grille, bumpers and tail-lights amongst other alterations.
Walkinshaw was privy to the changes during the Blade’s development many months out from its global debut, designing a larger and more protruding front grille featuring a hexapod motif and bigger badge.
It also adds black cladding on the bumper and side steps, and a curved 112-Watt light bar for dramatically improved nighttime illumination.
Those wider wheels and tracks, as well as that raised ground clearance, have also necessitated new, 23mm-wider wheel-arch flares, complete with additional cooling. The ones over the rear wheels are lower, too, to provide a more balanced aesthetic given the relatively modest wheel size.
The Blade’s rear sports bar is also a Walkinshaw design.
Satin black replaces chrome where appropriate, including on the door handles, mirrors and badges, while Isuzu brands the Blade with Japanese ‘Katana’ motifs across the doors and tailgate.
Finally, stepping inside the cabin, you’ll find ‘Blade’ embroidered on the headrests and floor mats, and etched into the door sills, while a numbered plaque is fitted in the console.
Otherwise, it’s all LS-U in there. Which is no bad thing.
Despite being a Japanese ute in drag, the X-Class isn't immediately rumbled as resembling a Nissan, which certainly should count in its favour. Everyone who asked about it had little idea it wasn't a Daimler from the ground up, until you pointed out various details. Up here in the higher reaches, it's a really quality-looking thing, with beautiful paint and enough differentiation to make it look like a Merc. The headlights do seem a tad small next to the rest of the Mercedes range, but the whopping great three-pointed star in the grille leaves no one in doubt.
It's fairly tasteful in silver, too, and with a few carefully chosen options it looks pretty tough.
Once you're inside you see where it starts to get confused about itself. The hard, scratchy plastic dash pokes out from behind a huge slab of metallic trim. The centre console is clearly a brother from another mother, as is the overall dash layout. The cabin lacks the thoughtfulness and quality of a Mercedes design - you can't just slap on those signature air vents and expect to get away with it. Every piece that comes from Mercedes appears glued on, and it's jarring.
This might have been less of an issue if the car was significantly cheaper and not likely to be purchased by people who are familiar with the brand.
Just in case you missed it, more features including additional USB ports, fresh trim materials and new displays headlined the MY24 D-Max facelift inside.
The most obvious mods centred around redesigned instrumentation and a new 9.0-inch touchscreen. Both gained significantly upgraded functionality, clarity (especially the now-digital reverse camera) and improved graphics, making them better and easier to understand and use.
While not quite as large or roomy inside as, say, a Ranger, the D-Max has stood the test of time well inside, with sufficient space, a good driving position and inviting front seats that provide good support over long distances.
Meanwhile, in the rear of the D-Max’s cabin, the three-person bench is adequately comfortable, while most expected items like USB ports, air-con vents and some under-cushion storage are provided. It’s all pretty civilised inside.
Out back, though, beyond a tub-liner, you will need to pay extra for a tonneau cover, while there are no extra side steps into the bed as per a Ranger, nor power points or surround lighting.
But then, again, this is meant to be a no-nonsense workhorse with extra 4x4 abilities.
It's also worth keeping in mind that the Blade has slightly lower payload capacity, down to 896kg from 985kg. However, it does maintain a 3500kg-braked/750kg-unbraked towing capacity.
I really can't imagine how anyone signed off on the most annoying features of the X. Front-seat passengers get a solitary, shallow cupholder (the second one is unusable), and big door bins that could hold a bottle if you didn't mind it getting smashed from sliding around (they're unlined), and nowhere to put your phone. Like, nowhere, except maybe the glove box. Even the centre console bin is shallow and not much good for anything, apart from as an armrest.
The front seats are reasonably comfortable but the rears are way too high (in the name of a better view) and rammed hard against the rear bulkhead. The rear doors are also pretty narrow, so entry and egress can be a bit of a challenge if you're large or toddler small. Once you're in the seats, legroom is limited and headroom marginal. At least you get air-conditioning vents, but you don't get an armrest in the rear. On a nearly $80,000 ute. Even the dark-ages Colorado has one of those.
Anyway, that's enough said about the interior flaws.
The tray is a big boy, but it's worth knowing that the roller cover does rob a bit of space, as it does on any ute. The optional tray liner looks good and with Mercedes-Benz stamped in it, reminds you again what you've got. All told, it's 1581mm long, 1560mm wide (1215mm between the wheelarches) and you can load up nearly a tonne of people and things into the X350. You can also tow a massive 3500kg braked and still be able to carry a payload of 490kg. Gross vehicle mass is 3250kg (tare is 2190kg).
Sitting at the very top of the D-Max range, the Blade starts at $76,990 drive-away. Now, that’s some $9000 more than the previous flagship, the continuing X-Terrain.
Keep in mind, though, that the Blade is actually based on the mid-range D-Max LS-U, that starts from almost $15,000 less.
And, as with the Warrior, Thunder, Rogue and Ford Ranger Tremor that Isuzu is chasing, you don’t get any more performance.
To refresh, the LS-U includes auto bi-LED headlights, keyless entry/start with auto walkaway locking, dual-zone climate control, leather/leatherette upholstery, heated and powered front seats, a 7.0-inch driver display, a 9.0-inch central touchscreen, a reverse camera, DAB+ digital radio, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a tub liner, tailgate assistance and a full-sized spare alloy wheel.
So, what does that extra $15K buy you?
Walkinshaw – formerly of HSV fame but more-recently responsible for the remanufactured (in Melbourne) Ram 1500, Chevrolet Silverado and Toyota Tundra full-sized utes – has brought some significant upgrades to the Blade, in an Australian-exclusive program that’s spanned three years, more than a dozen prototypes and over 100,000km of local testing.
Much of that was in the outback as well as the ex-Holden proving ground at Lang Lang.
Over the regular D-Max, changes include uprated suspension, better clearances, improved underbody protection and bolder visuals.
Kicking things off is a 22.5/25mm front/rear lift (though the coil spring rates remain) due to 16mm-larger Monroe 35mm MTV twin-tube dampers with lifted spring seats. Ground clearance is now 244mm (front) and 215mm (rear axle low point); approach, departure and breakover angles are 29.2 degrees, 19.2° and 25.2° respectively. Wading depth remains at 800mm.
The Blade debuts Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT 275/65R17 all-terrain tyres, new 17x8.5-inch flow-formed alloy wheels. As they incorporate a +17-degree offset, tracks are 32mm wider (to 1602mm).
Under the D-Max’s nose is a steel underbody protection bash plate that is double the thickness of the original at 3mm, while the revised load-rated recovery point system includes an integrated cross-member, which braces both chassis rails together for improved torsional rigidity and reduced deflection when under the maximum eight-tonne load from an angle of up to 35 degrees.
Kerb weight jumps to 2204kg, which is a 99kg increase over the LS-U.
With many being ex-Holden, Ford, Toyota and IVECO during their local full-vehicle manufacturing era, Walkinshaw’s 60-strong team of engineers, designers and automotive specialists in Clayton have modified a ute in a similar way, then, that Premcar has turned the Navara into the Warrior.
But does the Blade meet Isuzu Ute Australia’s (IUA) brief for improved or upgraded off-road ability, ground clearances, underbody protection, approach angles, lighting and aesthetics?
Keep reading.
The X-Class range starts at the $45,450 X220D manual dual-cab and reaches all the way to the $87,500 X350d Edition 1. One step back from that is the $79,415 X350d Power dual-cab with all-wheel drive. That nets you 19-inch alloy wheels, an eight-speaker stereo, climate control, around view camera, reversing camera, keyless entry and start, front and rear parking sensors, electric front seats, sat nav, auto LED headlights, fake-leather interior, heated and folding rear vision mirrors, power windows and a full-size alloy spare.
An 8.0-inch screen hosts Mercedes COMAND system, complete with rotary dial and the weird scratchpad. COMAND is not as good as its German rivals and for some reason doesn't have Apple CarPlay and/or Android Auto, which is a mammoth oversight for a car of this type and cost.
Our car also had the lockable roll cover for $3295, the $1551 styling bar, a tow bar ($836) and, presumably, tow-bar wiring ($462).
Now, if you want more performance in your D-Max, the bad news is the Blade is no more powerful or torquier than the regular version with the same engine.
That, by the way, means it maintains the 3.0-litre four-cylinder direct-injection turbo-diesel engine, delivering 140kW of power at 3600rpm and 450Nm of torque between 1600-2600rpm.
Actually, given that the 2204kg (kerb) Blade seems to be about 100kg heavier than the LS-U equivalent, its power-to-weight ratio slips to 63.5kW/tonne (versus 66.5 in the donor ute).
But, while there aren’t any fancy new electronic AWD systems as per some rivals such as the Ranger, the newcomer continues with the same, trusty old six-speed automatic and part-time 4WD set-up.
Of course, the D-Max is also conventional in its body-on-frame construction, complete with (three-layer) leaf spring rear suspension set-up.
That said, the Blade behaves quite a bit differently both on and off road.
The X350d has something very Mercedes about it - the engine and transmission package. With 3.5-litres of turbo-diesel V6, you get 190kW at 3400rpm and a thumping 550Nm between 1400 and 3200rpm. These kind of figures at least put it up there with the brawnier VW Amarok.
Feeding the power to all four wheels is Mercedes' own seven-speed automatic. A centre diff apportions power front to rear and you have a choice of three modes - automatic, high range and low-range.
Despite weight and body airflow differences, the Blade still uses the same amount of fuel as the regular D-Max, according to Isuzu.
This means 8.0L/100km in the combined average cycle, or 9.8 in the city and 6.8 on the highway runs. This translates to 207, 254 and 180g/km of carbon dioxide emissions respectively.
Or, seen another way, expect a theoretical range of about 950km from each 76-litre tankful of diesel.
What did our fuel trip meter read during the launch event? Around 11L/100km.
The X350d did pretty well in the week I had it - the official figure of 8.8L/100km was never going to happen but with a long motorway run to the Blue Mountains and the rest bashing about town, the 10.5L/100km I did achieve without trying was not bad at all. The 80-litre tank should give you a decent range of 750km, or thereabouts.
Ever since the current-gen D-Max surfaced back for the 2021 model year, it's been widely regarded as a massive improvement over the previous version, especially in refinement, safety and dynamic behaviour.
You’d never call the 3.0-litre four-pot turbo-diesel quiet or sophisticated, but it is comparatively smooth and very gutsy. Strong off the line, it pulls hard and tows with effortless ease thanks to all that torque. The auto is also a good match, and rarely puts a foot wrong. As the Blade carries on with exactly the same powertrain, nothing changes here.
But, despite leading the class with its standardisation of advanced driver-assist safety tech, the regular D-Max is only a middling effort in terms of on steering, handling and ride qualities.
While light to use and easy to place, the steering has long felt remote compared to the class best, lacking feedback and precision; the suspension helps keep the ute grounded and in control, but the ride is too bumpy and jittery, which can become tiresome.
Plus, the adaptive cruise control and lane-keep safety systems have lacked precision and nuance in their operation, with the latter pin-balling from one side of the lane to another.
Now, the 2024 facelift aimed to address some of these criticisms with a raft of electronic driver-assist and traction-control upgrades, as well as continuous Australian-road tuning, to improve the D-Max’s dynamics.
How much of these contribute to the Blade’s enhanced driveability is not certain, but the net effect is considerable and palpable. Clearly, Walkinshaw’s touch has been transformative.
The new dampers make the driver feel more connected to the road, with better steering feel and response; the suspension rides over bumps with more suppleness for improved comfort, and it feels a little bit more controlled to boot. All this translates to a more enjoyable driving experience.
The Blade brings the D-Max closer to the class-best Ranger, if not quite close enough to be considered amongst the leaders. Still, it's a much better compromise than before.
But, what’s the newest Isuzu like off-road? After all, this is what the mods have been designed for.
Tested out at a 4x4 track in Adelaide, the Blade builds on the D-Max’s already impressive off-road ability, with that little bit of extra lift and ground clearances allowing for the ute to go that much further over challenging terrain.
Though it lacks some of the fancier features you find in some more-expensive machinery like under-vehicle camera views and automatic electronic 4WD mode selection, the basics are all there for serious 4WDing.
Where the Blade stands out compared to regular D-Maxes is in its more comfortable and controlled ride, since the suspension seems to do a better job in dealing with the rough stuff while isolating its occupants from it.
This is quite remarkable considering that proper off-road tyres are not fitted, just Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT all-terrain rubber. They feel like an effective compromise for on- as well as off- road use.
All-up, then, the Blade is a better D-Max from behind the wheel.
One of the weirder things to make it into the X-Class is the world's second most irritating column stalk, which is asked to pack in indicators, headlights and wipers. Thankfully, the world's most irritating column stalk, the Mercedes automatic shifter, wasn't inflicted on the X-Class. But the obvious problem is the key, which clearly isn't a Mercedes unit - even the star is ill-fitting and will probably fall off after a while. This is not a premium experience.
Thankfully, the big turbo-diesel wipes away a lot of the complaints about this car not being Mercedes enough. Brawny and super quiet (twin balance shafts will do that), the X is a very easy car to live with. While not especially lively, it's easygoing in the city and very refined.
On the open road it cruises almost silently and the ride is way above what you might expect from an unloaded tradie-mobile. It doesn't feel as high as some utes, which makes it feel a bit more car-like, and will no doubt appeal to some who might have to swap in and out of a traditional SUV and into the X, for whatever reason.
It is by far the most civilised ute I've ever driven and was worlds away from the Colorado I drove last week, to the point where I could almost - almost - see a justification for the unbelievably hefty price tag.
Credit for the refined ride and handling goes to the coil-spring rear end, much maligned in some quarters. While that style of suspension is not the ultimate in load-lugging, it's way more comfortable for passengers and, given the likely buyer profile, probably more agreeable than a cart-sprung rear-end.
I would cheerfully drive long distances in the X and it feels like it could go anywhere.
The Blade hasn’t been tested for an ANCAP crash-test rating, but the rest of the D-Max range scores five stars.
Remember that the Isuzu was first ute in Australia with a wide suite of advanced driver-assist tech as standard.
For 2025, it now includes autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian, cyclist and backover detection, as well as turn-assist and forward collision warning. This operates between 8-160km/h.
You’ll also find lane-support tech as part of the advanced driver-assist systems, that works between 60-130km/h. Included here are 'intelligent' adaptive cruise control, lane-departure alert/keep, emergency lane keeping, blind spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert and brake.
Like all D-Maxes, the Blade also comes with traffic sign recognition, trailer sway control and eight airbags, as well as ISOFIX latches and child-seat tether points in the back seat.
The Mercedes-Benz finally starts to puts its nose ahead of its competitors on the safety front.
The X350d has seven airbags, ABS, stability and traction controls, forward collision warning, low speed forward AEB, pedestrian detection, lane-keep assist and around-view cameras, trailer-sway control and hill-descent control.
It also has three top-tether and two ISOFIX points.
Its five-star ANCAP safety rating was awarded in 2017.
Like all D-Maxes, the Blade offers five years of capped-price servicing, a six-year warranty with a 150,000km distance limit, and seven years of roadside assistance chucked in. IUA likes to call this its 5/6/7 plan.
Finally, service intervals are every year or at 15,000km intervals, with a capped-price servicing offer of $449 per visit.
Mercedes offers a three year/200,000km warranty for the X, which isn't too bad. It also throws in roadside assist for the duration. Also worthy are the 12 month/20,000km service intervals.
A basic capped-price service scheme will hit you for $1950 (pre-paid) or $2,555 if you pay when you front up for each of the three services covered. The servicing isn't super-cheap, as you can see, but at least you know what you're up for.