Ford Mustang vs Alfa Romeo 4C

What's the difference?

Obviously we can't speak to the whole of this new, seventh-generation Mustang range having only experienced the Dark Horse. But that's enough to make you appreciate just what a special car the Mustang is, even after all these years.

The company has managed to find new ways to improve arguably its most iconic model, keeping it fresh for a new generation. The Dark Horse is a worthy addition to the line-up, for however long it lasts, bringing a higher level of dynamic capability that will appeal to both long-time muscle car lovers and anyone who appreciates a good sports car.

The truth is, this is no mid-life crisis for the Mustang, it's actually ageing very gracefully, taking on new dimensions as it does. The bigger question is how much longer it has left in it, at least with an internal combustion engine. But that's a question for another day, for now we should just eagerly anticipate its arrival in Australia in 2024.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

People might wonder if there’s a reason to buy an Alfa Romeo 4C. It has some great dollar-for-dollar competitors - the Alpine A110 does most of the things the Alfa does, but in a more polished way. And then there’s the Porsche 718 Cayman, which is a considerably more, well, considered option.

But there is no doubt the 4C stands alone, a sort-of cut-price alternative to a Maserati or Ferrari, and nearly as rare to spot on the road as those cars, too. And just like the rollercoaster at Luna Park, it’s the sort of car that’ll leave you wanting another go.

Ford figured out with the fifth-generation model that what customers want is a Mustang that retains the silhouette of the original 1960s Fastback, so ever since the design has been evolutionary rather than radically different.

That's no different with this seventh-generation model, which features a more modern look, with crisper lines, but still is unmistakably a Mustang from every angle.

There have been some more significant design changes though, the most obvious one being the decision to have a clear visual difference between the V8-powered GT and four-cylinder EcoBoost at the front-end of the car.

So, the GT gets a larger, more aggressive front grille and a vented bonnet, whereas the EcoBoost has a more subtle appearance, but both have a clear family resemblance.

The Dark Horse elevates this edgier look even further, with a more aggressive appearance that includes a racier bodykit, with a sizeable rear wing, that speaks to its more serious intentions.

The Dark Horse also includes a first for the Mustang in seven generations - a forward facing horse badge. While the now iconic striding 'Stang profile badge remains for the GT and EcoBoost, the Dark Horse gets its own unique badge that shows Ford isn't afraid to try new things even after all these years to keep the car fresh.

The forward facing view is meant to signify a dark horse in a race, sneaking up from the rear to take victory, with its flared nostrils meant to connect to the dual throttle bodies of the Mustang Dark Horse.

Slap a Ferrari badge on it, and people would think it was the real deal - a pint-sized performance hustler, with all the right angles to get plenty of glances.

In fact, I had dozens of punters nod, wave, mount ‘nice car mate’ and even a few rubber-neck moments - you know, when you drive past and someone on the footpath can’t help but forget they’re walking, and they stare so hard they might well collide with the upcoming lamp-post. 

It really is a head-turner. So why does it only get an 8/10? Well, there are some elements of the design that make it less user-friendly than some of its rivals.

For instance, the step-in to the cabin is enormous, because the carbon-fibre tub sills are huge. And the cabin itself is pretty tight, especially for taller people. An Alpine A110 or Porsche Boxster are much more amenable for day-to-day driving… but hey, the 4C is markedly better than, say, a Lotus Elise for ingress and egress.

Also, as smart as it still looks, there are elements of Alfa Romeo design that have moved on since the 4C launched back in 2015. The headlights are the bit that I dislike most - I had a real thing for the spider-eyes lights of the launch edition model.

But even if it isn’t unmistakably Alfa Romeo, it’s unmistakably a 4C. 

The interior of this latest Mustang sums up where Ford was at with this new-generation model, as it introduces some attention-grabbing technology but also carries over large amounts of the previous model's design.

For example, the interior doors look nearly identical to the old model, with the same handles, window buttons and even trim elements.

The layout of the centre console is largely the same, too, with a pair of cupholders and a lidded centre console box making up the bulk of the small item store space.

The materials used have improved in some areas and stayed the same in others, with the softer touch plastics introduced on the mid-life facelift of the sixth-gen used again here.

However, the Dark Horse also gets a new carbon-fibre effect trim that features prominently around the dashboard for a fresh and sportier look.

But far and away the biggest difference between the old model and this new one is the instrument panel. Gone is the iconic 'double brow' design and in its place is a huge digital display that combines two screens into one long, plank-like element.

It's a 12.4-inch digital instrument panel and a 13.2-inch media touchscreen integrated together to try and help the Mustang appeal to a younger, more tech-savvy audience that wants its car to integrate with a digital lifestyle.

Unquestionably it makes a statement, whether you like the statement it's making will depend on your point-of-view.

If you love technology and the personalisation it offers you'll love it, but if you pine for the days of analogue dials you'll likely think it looks too much like a giant smartphone.

What you can't deny is the capability it brings, with a variety of virtual instrument displays to suit each of the driving modes the car has, including 'Normal', 'Sport' and 'Track', as well as the fun 'Fox Body' layout that harkens back to the '80s Mustang.

The central media screen has also been utilised for the Dark Horse with extra auxiliary gauges - for g-force, oil temperature, oil pressure, etc - able to be displayed, as well as the 'Track Apps' feature that allows you to record lap times, start times and controls the launch control and drift brake settings.

Unfortunately, the screens also control virtually everything, including the air-conditioning, so trying to make small temperature adjustments is more complicated than just pressing a physical button.

As for the seating, the Dark Horse is available with two seating choices up front in the US (and likely in Australia), with a standard six-way power adjustable leather sports seat or an optional Recaro racing-style seat trimmed in suede and mircofibre.

As for the rear seats, they remain incredibly tight for space and are better for storing bags rather than carrying people without severely compromising front seat leg room.

Despite the largely carried over body and interior, the boot is slightly smaller than the previous model, with the coupe measuring 376 litres compared to the 408 litres offered previously.

The Dark Horse we drove in the US was fitted with a tyre repair kit under the boot floor.

You can’t get into a car this small and expect a lot of space.

The dimensions of the 4C are tiny - it’s just 3989mm long, 1868mm wide and only 1185mm tall, and as you can see from the pictures, it’s a squat little thing. The Spider’s removable roof could be great for you if you’re tall.

I’m six-feet tall (182cm) and I found it to be cocoon-like in the cabin. You feel almost as though you’re tying yourself to the tub of the car when you get into the driver’s seat. And getting in and out? Just make sure you do some stretches beforehand. It’s not as bad as a Lotus for ingress and egress, but it’s still hard to look good clambering in and out of. 

The cabin is a cramped space. There’s limited head room and leg room, and while there is reach and rake adjustment for the steering wheel, the seat only has manual slide and backrest movement - no lumbar adjust, no height adjust… almost like a racing bucket. They’re hard like a race seat, too. 

The ergonomics aren’t terrific - the controls for the air-con are hard to see at a glance, the buttons for the gear select take some learning, and the two centrally-mounted cup holders (one for your double-shot mocha latte, the other for a hazelnut piccolo) are inconveniently positioned exactly where you might want to put your elbow. 

The media system is rubbish. It’d be the first thing to go, if I bought one of these, and in its place would be an aftermarket touchscreen which would: a) actually let you pair to Bluetooth; b) look like it was from sometime after 2004; and c) be more fitting for a car of this price tag. I’d upgrade the speakers, too, because they’re poor. But I can totally understand if those things don’t matter, because it’s the engine you want to hear.

The materials - aside from the red leather seats - aren’t great. The plastics used are similar in look and feel to what you find in second-hand Fiats, but the sheer volume of exposed carbon-fibre does help you forget those details. And the leather pull straps to close the doors are nice, too. 

The visibility from the driver’s seat is decent - for this type of car. It’s low, and the rear window is small, so you can’t expect to see everything around you at all times, but the mirrors are good and the forward vision is excellent.

Look, no-one considering an Italian sports car is likely to be wearing their common sense hat, but even so, the Alfa Romeo 4C Spider is an indulgent purchase.

With a list price of $99,000 plus on-road costs, it isn’t affordable. Not considering what you get for your money.

Standard inclusions consist of air conditioning, remote central locking, heated electric door mirrors, leather sports seats with manual adjustment, a leather-lined steering wheel, and a four-speaker stereo system with USB connectivity and Bluetooth phone and audio streaming. It’s not a touchscreen, so there’s no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, and there’s no sat nav… but the thing about this car is going the fun way home, so forget maps and GPS. And there’s a digital instrument cluster with a digital speedometer - believe me, you’ll need it.

The standard wheels are a staggered set - 17-inch at the front and 18-inch at the rear. All 4C models have bi-xenon headlights, LED daytime running lights, LED tail-lights and dual exhaust tips. 

Of course, being the Spider model, you also get a removable soft top and you know what’s neat? You get a car cover included as standard, but you’d want to put it in the shed, as it takes up a bit of boot room!

Our car was even further up the pay scale, with an as-tested price of $118,000 before on-roads - it had a few option boxes ticked. 

First there’s that beautiful Basalt Grey metallic paint ($2000), and those contrasting red brake calipers ($1000).

Plus there’s the Carbon & Leather package - with carbon-fibre mirror caps, interior bezels, and a stitched leather instrument cover panel. It’s a $4000 option.

And finally, the Racing Package ($12,000), which includes a staggered set of 18-inch and 19-inch wheels with a dark paint finish, and those wheels are fitted with model specific Pirelli P Zero tyres (205/40/18 up front, 235/35/19 at the rear). Plus theres the sports racing exhaust system, which is awesome, and a racing suspension setup. 

Despite plenty of rumours that Ford was preparing to electrify the Mustang, either as a hybrid or full battery EV, in the end the company has stuck to the tried and tested formula.

That means an updated version of the 5.0-litre V8 and a 2.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder 'EcoBoost' engine, similar to the one offered in the previous generation.

The range-topping Dark Horse features the most powerful naturally aspirated engine Ford has ever installed in a Mustang, making 372kW (which is 500-horsepower) and 566Nm.

However, Australian models may not quite hit that figure due to our older emissions regulations, but a final number hasn't been released by Ford Australia.

The 5.0-litre V8 is paired to either a six-speed manual or 10-speed automatic transmission and a Torsen limited-slip differential.

The manual gearbox is specific to the Dark Horse, the Tremec unit is the same one used in the Mach 1 and features the same ability to 'flat shift' - change up gears without lifting off the accelerator if you have full throttle applied.

The GT features a slightly different version of that same 5.0-litre V8, and as mentioned earlier, it's available with or without an active-valve performance exhaust.

Australian GTs will get the improved exhaust system, meaning it will make 362kW/566Nm; instead of 358kW/562Nm with standard exhaust. It too is available with a 10-speed auto or a six-speed manual Getrag gearbox.

Finally, the EcoBoost engine is an all-new version of the same engine featured in the last model, featuring the same capacity and format but upgraded performance. The 2.3-litre four-cylinder unit makes 235kW/474Nm, up from 224kW/441Nm the previous engine produced.

The Alfa Romeo 4C is powered by a 1.7-litre turbocharged petrol four-cylinder engine, which produces 177kW of power at 6000rpm and 350Nm of torque from 2200-4250rpm. 

The motor is mounted amidships, and it is rear-wheel drive. It uses a six-speed dual-clutch (TCT) automatic with launch control. 

Alfa Romeo claims a 0-100km/h time of 4.5 seconds, which makes it one of the quickest cars at this price point. 

As final specifications haven't been locked in for the Australian market we're basing these numbers off the US Environmental Protection Agency's claims.

They have the trio of Mustangs rated at 13.8L/100km for the Dark Horse and GT with their manual gearboxes, the GT auto at 13.0L/100km and the EcoBoost at 9.0L/100km to make it the most efficient of the bunch - unsurprisingly.

Claimed fuel consumption for the Alfa Romeo 4C Spider is rated at 6.9 litres per 100 kilometres, so it’s no miser.

But, impressively, I saw real-world fuel economy of 8.1L/100km, over a loop that included urban, highway and ‘spirited’ driving on twisty roads.

While the final Australian specifications may not be locked in just yet, Ford did provide us with a comprehensive drive experience in the Mustang Dark Horse.

We spent three days with this new model, driving it across a variety of conditions including urban roads, highway stretches, winding country roads and even at the Charlotte Motor Speedway.

Across all conditions the Dark Horse demonstrated a more refined driving experience than the model it replaces. The sixth-generation was the first Mustang designed for the global market, rather than focusing on the USA, and that meant it couldn't quite match its more worldly rivals.

But Ford has clearly worked to make strides on that front, including adding the Dark Horse to the Mustang range to launch with a definitive flagship model.

The engine may be carried over rather than all-new but you won't care when you put your foot down. The roar from the V8 is truly a thing of beauty to anyone who appreciates an evocative exhaust note.

It's a deep, guttural growl at low revs and builds to a more high-pitched scream as it approaches its 7300rpm redline.

It packs a punch, too, with enough grunt to shove you back in your seat and had no trouble hitting 205km/h just halfway down the back straight at the Charlotte Motor Speedway circuit.

It's a joy to drive with the six-speed Tremec 'box, especially on the track as it has both the rev matching for downshifts and the flat shifting for upshifts, which make you feel like a racing pro.

The flat shifting does take some getting used to and requires a lot of faith the first time you try it, as you need to have more than 90 per cent throttle and more than 5000rpm to make the system work correctly and not crunch the cogs. But when you get it right it just feels so good.

Even without that, on the road it's a nice gearbox to use, with a short, mechanical throw. It may feel a bit heavy for some, but it's in keeping with the muscular attitude of the Mustang.

It also feels really well matched to the engine, on the track but also the road. The engine has enough torque to take-off in second (and probably third) gear, feels nicely spaced through the middle gears and will cruise along in sixth gear in a relaxed manner.

The automatic is a nice alternative if you really don't want a manual, but the 10 speeds feel like overkill at times.

It has a preference for looking for the tallest gear possible at any stage in order to save fuel. This included on the racetrack, where it felt like it still wanted to go to the highest gear it could if you left it to its own devices.

Using the steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters is the better choice when you want to go for a spirited drive, but it just doesn't feel as engaging or shift as crisply as the manual.

As for the handling, on the road the Dark Horse is a pleasure to drive, with a new level of poise and directness than even the Mach 1 possessed. The steering is excellent, with a directness to it that makes the Mustang feel responsive to your inputs.

It helps that the Dark Horse rides on Pirelli tyres developed specifically for it, which provide excellent grip on the road and add to that feeling of responsiveness and composure.

However, if you want to take that to the next level, then you'll need to speak to Herrod Performance about adding the Handling Package options.

However, it's not clear at this stage if that will include the amazing Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS tyres that are used in the USA. At this stage they're not approved for use in Australia, which is a shame because they provide immense grip and, once again, elevate the Dark Horse above any Mustang we've had so far.

The changes to the aerodynamics and suspension, along with the tyres, combine to make the Mustang Dark Horse with the Handling Package a genuine rival to the likes of the BMW M4 and Audi RS5 Coupe, in this reviewer's opinion. We'll stop short of saying it's clearly better, but it's definitely a rival on performance terms.

The other notable new addition to this generation Mustang in a nod to the younger audience is the addition of the 'drift brake' that allows you to slide the back of the car around.

Working like a rally car handbrake, the drift brake only needs you to dip the clutch and pull up on the lever/bar and the back wheels lock up and allow you to slide. It's a fun new addition that does add a new dimension to a car that was previously focused on straight line performance at the drag strip.

I said that it’s like a rollercoaster, and it really, truly is. The air doesn’t quite rush through your hair as much, sure - but with the roof off, the windows down and the speedometer constantly edging towards licence suspension, it’s a real hoot of an experience.

It just feels so tight - the carbon-fibre monocoque chassis is rigid and super stiff. You hit a cats-eye and its all so sensitive, you could mistake it for having hit an actual cat. 

Alfa Romeo’s DNA drive modes - the letters stand for Dynamic, Natural, All Weather - is one of those proper examples of this type of system done well. There’s a marked difference between how these different settings operate, where some other drive modes out there are more sedate in their adjustments. There’s a fourth mode - Alfa Race - which I didn’t dare sample on public roads. Dynamic was enough to test my mettle. 

The steering in Natural mode is lovely - there’s great weighting and feedback, super direct and incredibly in touch with the surface below you, and the engine isn’t quite as zesty, but still offers tremendous response on the move. 

It’ll be a difficult choice between this and Alpine A110 and a Porsche Cayman

The ride is firm but composed and compliant in any of the drive modes, and it doesn’t have adaptive suspension. It is a stiffer suspension setup, and though the damping doesn’t change in Dynamic mode, if the surface is anything but perfect you will tram-track and twitch all over the place, because the steering feels even more dialled in. 

In Dynamic mode the engine offers amazing response when you’re at pace, building speed incredibly and before you know it, you’re in licence loss zone.

The brake pedal requires some firm footwork - just like in a race car - but it pulls up strongly when you need it to. You’ve just gotta get used to the pedal feel. 

The transmission is a good thing at speed in manual mode. It won’t overrule you if you want to find the redline, and it sounds tremendous. The exhaust is exhilarating!

With roof on and windows up there’s very noticeable noise intrusion - lots of tyre roar and engine noise. But remove the roof and drop the windows and you get the full effect of the drive experience - you’ll even get some "sut-tu-tu” wastegate flutter. It doesn’t even matter that much that the stereo system is so rubbish.

At normal speeds in normal driving you do need to be considerate of the powertrain because it is finnicky and slow to react at times. There’s notable lag if you’re gentle on the throttle, both from engine and transmission, and the fact peak torque doesn’t come on song until 2200rpm means there’s lag to contend with. 

It’ll be a difficult choice between this and Alpine A110 and a Porsche Cayman – each of these vehicles has a very different character. But for me, this is the most go-kart like and it is, undeniably incredibly involving to drive.

You’re in the wrong spot if you want the latest in safety technology. Sure, it’s at the cutting edge because it has an ultra strong carbon-fibre design, but there’s not much else happening here.

The 4C has dual front airbags, rear parking sensors and an alarm with tow-away protection, plus - of course - electronic stability control. 

But there are no side airbags or curtain airbags, there’s no reversing camera, there’s no auto emergency braking (AEB) or lane keep assist, no lane departure warning or blind spot detection. Admittedly - there are a few other sports cars in the segment which lack safety smarts, too, but 

The 4C has never been crash tested, so there’s no ANCAP or Euro NCAP safety score available.

Again, this is one of those topics with limited confirmed details at this stage, but there's no reason to believe the Mustang won't be covered by Ford Australia's usual five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

If you’re hoping that a ‘simple’ car like the 4C will mean low ownership costs, you might be disappointed in this section.

The Alfa Romeo website service calculator suggests that over 60 months or 75,000km (with service intervals set every 12 months/15,000km), you will have to fork out $6625 total. For a breakdown, the services cost $895, $1445, $895, $2495, $895.

I mean, that’s what you get when you buy an Italian sports car, I suppose. But consider you can get a Jaguar F-Type with five years of free servicing, and the Alfa looks like a rip-off. 

The Alfa does, however, come with a three-year/150,000km warranty plan, which includes the same cover for roadside assist.