Ford F150 vs Ford Puma

What's the difference?

This update to the F-150 is long overdue and while it does a lot to address previous faults, Ford is going to have a hard time winning back the public’s trust on this vehicle.

Given the pre-update car was subject to so many recalls and stop-sales, it’s hard to shake that somewhat tarnished reputation.

In saying that, the F-150 is arguably the pick out of its rivals. It’s bold with lots of nifty features, has acres of space, plenty of towing capabilities and is surprisingly efficient.

Just be prepared for your hip pocket nerve to ache when you see the price tag, especially if you opt for the flagship Platinum trim.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

If a minimum price and maximum interior space are your priorities, then the Puma is not for you. Especially so in the flagship ST-Line V, which may seem too small and a tad cramped compared to, say, a Seltos, C-HR or ASX.

Where the Ford excels, typically, is in the way it encourages the keen driver while cosseting four occupants (and a surprising amount of their cargo). There's a poise and maturity to the way the Puma moves that puts it on a par with or even beyond some premium compact SUVs. Even the styling is a statement. If the badges (and dashboard) were covered, you might be convinced this cat is actually a Jag.

If all that is more important, then the ST-Line V is for you. The very antithesis, then, of the unassuming and unloved EcoSport the Puma usurps.

The F-150 has a very typical, American pick-up silhouette. It’s boxy, large and long, especially in long-wheelbase guise.

The fundamentals of this pick-up's overall design have carried over but the update has helped to improve the visual appeal, especially at the front. It’s great to see LED headlights now feature as standard across the line-up.

XLT and Lariat trims still feature a lot of chrome highlighting which looks somewhat tacky in 2026.

Thankfully the new Platinum gets blacked-out accents instead, along with a slightly different front fascia which is more contemporary. However, I don’t know if this flagship version of the F-150 necessarily looks like it’s worth more than $160K.

Inside the design is more unified across the line-up. Notably the entry-level XLT finally picks up the larger 12.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system which fits the expansive dashboard better.

A 12.0-inch digital instrument cluster is also standard across the line-up now. Previously the XLT had analogue dials with a small screen sandwiched between.

Although there are a range of high-end and plush touches around the cabin, it’s harder to justify on the higher-end Platinum as there is a sea of black finishes. It would be nice to have some different finishes to create some more contrast.

If you search for the 1998 Puma coupe, you'll see some vague similarities with its modern SUV namesake, especially in their anthropomorphic face. It's in the eyes. There are also hints of Aston Martin (DBX), Porsche (Macan) and – let's face it – Mazda (CX-3).

Yet the real achievement lies in the way Ford has managed to make a 4.2-metre-long by 1.8m wide by 1.6m high crossover look so svelte, with the resulting balanced proportions, flowing lines and taut surfacing giving the Puma quite an athletic visual presence. After the EcoSport failure, head-turning looks were deemed paramount.

The extra girth gained by widening the Fiesta's platform allowed Ford's designers to create a muscular body that could also accommodate a metre-wide tailgate opening, while beneath the cargo floor is an exceptionally deep storage box, bringing better-than-expected practicality to boot.

The F-150 is an incredibly practical vehicle that has inherent American touches throughout. The most obvious are the front seats which are cushy and comfortable, though they’re very broad, meaning you can slide about on winding roads.

The driver’s seat offers plenty of electric adjustment across the line-up, while the Platinum adds a massage function that not only works on the backrest, but also the seat base. This feels a little weird on the move.

Ahead of the driver is a big and chunky steering wheel that feels substantial in the hand, plus there are large and obvious buttons that are easy to interact with.

This is complimented by the 12.0-inch digital instrument cluster which is clear, high-res and easy to understand. There are a range of different layouts and menus that you’re able to cycle through.

Moving across, the 12.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system is similarly high-res and has a user interface that’s clean and hard to get lost in thanks to the shortcut buttons at the bottom of the screen.

There’s wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard, along with satellite navigation.

When you adjust the front-seat lumbar or turn on the massage function, it takes over the entire touchscreen display. This isn’t ideal if the driver is trying to use the screen at the same time.

Looking around the cabin, it’s great to see so many physical buttons and switches for key functions, like the climate, media and four-wheel-drive controls. So many of these are now getting integrated into the touchscreen.

Like before, the F-150 XLT has a column-mounted gear selector, while the Lariat (and now the Platinum) gets an electronically folding gear selector. When folded, this allows you to fold out the centre console lid to create a desk-like space to work on.

In terms of storage, there is acres of it. Under the centre console is one of the biggest spaces I’ve ever seen in a new vehicle, plus there are two cupholders, large door bins, as well as dual gloveboxes on the passenger side. You’ll definitely find a place for all of your stuff.

The second row of the F-150 is incredibly spacious, even for adults, and regardless of which wheelbase option you choose, it stays the same. This is because the extra wheelbase length is specifically for the tub area.

At 182cm tall, I have oodles of legroom behind my own driving position, though headroom is a little tight in the F-150 Lariat and Platinum due to the panoramic glass sunroof.

You’ll easily fit three people across the rear bench seat, plus the floor is completely flat.

In terms of amenities, there are air vents on the back of the centre console, heated outboard seats (Lariat and Platinum only), a 12V socket, USB outlets, as well as cupholders galore on the centre console, door pockets and fold-down centre armrest.

At the back, the F-150 XLT retains a manual tailgate with a fold-out step ladder and while the Lariat and Platinum still have a power tailgate, they also pick up a new party trick.

There’s a new central section that’s side-hinging, allowing you to more easily access the tub from ground level. It’s a similar set-up to what GWM offers on the Cannon Alpha.

In the SWB, the tub measures 1700mm long, 1650mm wide (1285mm between the arches) and 543mm tall. The LWB gains 300mm of length, bringing the total tub length to 2000mm.

Payload varies depending on the wheelbase length and trim level. It has received a slight bump compared to the pre-update model, however it’s still only between 704kg and 878kg. The smaller Ranger, for example, overlooking the beefy Super Duty, has higher payload figures.

Where the regular Ranger can’t match the F-150 though is with its 4500kg braked towing capacity. This is something that has been addressed with the Ranger Super Duty.

Compact yet spacious, the ST-Line V's interior has strong as well as weak points.

Let's start with the latter. The most obvious connection with the Fiesta is in the Puma's dashboard, which is largely shared between the two. After all the effort expended on the design and chassis, this is somewhat disappointing. There's nothing wrong essentially with the fascia's aesthetics or functionality – it's just that the look is humdrum and dated. What's needed is something with the visual wow factor as found in the latest Peugeot 2008, especially at this price point.

Yet Ford has at least tried to put some tinsel inside this most expensive version of its smallest SUV.

Stitched perforated leather seat facings, carbon-fibre-look trim and soft vinyl coverings in key touchpoint areas bring an upmarket look and feel, backed up by a now-familiar digital instrumentation layout, a lovely flat-bottomed three-spoke steering wheel, easy and intuitive multimedia interface and a wireless phone charger. That electronic cluster, by the way, changes colour and markings but doesn't have the scope of multimedia displays of, say, Audi's Virtual Cockpit. It's comparatively rudimentary.

Conversely, there's a solidity and quietness as well, offering a level of refinement that's usually found in more-premium Euro alternatives. We weren't expecting that, though of course this is a German Ford product.

Our test car also boasted a vast glass opening sunroof, adding to the opulence. With all this gear, the ST-Line V's cabin is properly appealing.

On the practicality front, entry and egress is pretty good, the driving position is excellent (thanks in no small part to a big amount of adjustability for both the steering column and seats), the front cushions themselves are sumptuously enveloping, while wide door pockets and a big glovebox obviously come in useful. And there's a USB-C outlet in the centre cubby between the seats. How modern.

However, rear vision out is poor, there are no seat warmers and some of the lower-lying plastics are a bit drab.

The back seat isn't really suitable for people over 175cm, as kneeroom is limited and taller scalps may scrape the ceiling with the twin-pane sunroof in situ. The latter also means no overhead grab handles.

But the backrest angle and cushions themselves are fine, even for longer journeys. Just don't expect to squeeze a third adult in the back unless rubbing shoulders won't bug you. Note, too, that the rear cushion does not slide or tilt forward to allow for a lower load area when the backrest is folded down. Pity.

There is a receptacle in both doors for small bottles but no cupholders whatsoever (how can Ford call itself an American company?), or face-level air vents – though the large dash vent outputs do reach the rear. Amenities such as USBs and cupholders are AWOL; and vision out from back there is limited by the high shoulder line. Tough if you're trying to peer out. Sorry, Fido.

The Puma's overall compact footprint and rear packaging clearly suggest that this is aimed at singles, couples, or couples with smaller kids/pets to transport around.

Still, for a small SUV, the cargo area isn't bad at all. The standard floor depth is fairly generous, with a long and flat loading area, but below that is a narrower yet deeper waterproof area, while under that again is a space-saver spare wheel. Clever. Also intelligent is the luggage cover that lifts automatically with the tailgate, as per Mazda's CX-5.

For the record, cargo capacity is rated at 410 litres with the 60/40 split-fold rear seats erect – or 1170L with them folded down flat. These figures far outstrip the CX-3.

To sum the cabin experience… it's far-better than its Fiesta-sourced dashboard may suggest, while the ST-Line V treatment goes a long way in helping justify the premium. That's a win.

In Australia, the Puma plays in the burgeoning 'Light SUV' segment, so goes up against the ageing yet athletic Mazda CX-3 as well as Honda's HR-V, along with more recent challengers like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic, Nissan Juke II, Toyota Yaris Cross and Volkswagen T-Cross. All are ready to pounce on the bestselling Hiroshima crossover.

What every one of these baby SUVs have in common is that they're based on B-segment – or supermini – platforms. However, prices and sizes do blur in this corner of the class, with larger small-car-derived rivals from the 'Small SUV' segment above, led by the Mitsubishi ASX, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona, also in the Ford's crosshairs.

Formidable opponents indeed, and just like that, the first big hurdle appears for the Blue Oval hopeful. Puma is Light SUV-sized but Small SUV-priced, with the entry-level grade kicking off from a tenner under $30,000, and before on-road costs. That's even more expensive than the VW.

This instantly eliminates it from many buyers' radars.

In contrast, a CX-3 Neo Sport starts from just $22,890. But that's with a manual gearbox, plain interior and steel wheels, whereas the Puma includes a ripper turbo engine/auto combo, climate control, a smartphone app that allows for remote vehicle location/ locking/unlocking/starting, voice-activated sat nav, wireless smartphone charging, lane-departure warning and assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver impairment monitor, 17-inch alloys and a leather steering wheel.

Along with other goodies like AEB with pedestrian alert, reverse camera, Bluetooth audio and telephony, Apple CarPlay/Android auto, digital radio, live traffic updates, fuel-saving engine stop/start, auto headlights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cornering fog lights, powered folding mirrors, push-button start and puddle lamps, the Puma looks and feels up-spec inside. To match most of that stuff in the CX-3 you'll need a Maxx Sport auto from $26,890.

Rising to the $32,340 ST-Line drops the Puma's ride height by just 2mm (to 164mm), but adds firmer suspension, a body kit, glitzier alloys, sports seats, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottomed steering wheel, paddle shifters and racier trim for a racier experience, though it loses the climate control for a manual air-con set-up. Strange. This grade might just be the sweet spot in the Ford's range, though it does sit about $1300 higher than the CX-3 sTouring equivalent.

Finally, the subject of this test, the ST-Line V, scores privacy glass, lashings of chrome, keyless entry/start, leather upholstery, climate control, premium audio, a powered tailgate and 18-inch alloys. All for $35,540, it's about on a par with CX-3 Akari, but lacks the latter's powered driver's seat and heated front cushions, among other items. The Mazda also goes one better with a $2000 AWD option from all mid-level grades up, as well as manual availability.

We recommend the $1500 Park Package, which ushers in adaptive cruise control with full stop/go and lane-centring tech, as well as blind-spot detection and auto parking. Premium paint adds $650, a panoramic roof $2000, roof rails $250 and a black roof $500.

Against compelling alternatives costing less, like the high-flying Seltos Sport+, CX-30 G20 Touring and Toyota C-HR Koba, the ST-Line V struggles to make sense on paper. Can the Puma's cabin and driving experience claw back its obvious price disadvantage?

Although there are a wide range of other engine options available in the US, including hybrid and V8s, the sole engine available in Australia continues to be a 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 petrol. It produces 298kW and 678Nm which is competitive among its rivals.

This is mated to a 10-speed automatic transmission as standard with drive sent through a four-wheel-drive system The XLT gets a part-time system with a shift-on-the-fly function, whereas the Lariat and Platinum get a full-time system which allows for ‘4A’ functionality on sealed surfaces.

A multiple international engine-of-the-year winner, the compact and lightweight, 999cc 1.0-litre twin-cam three-cylinder turbo petrol unit is the sole choice for now. Driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT), it delivers 92kW of power and 170Nm of torque.

With no all-wheel drive option, there are instead five driving modes – Normal, Sport, Slippery (for snow) and Trail (gravel) applications, working on the traction, stability and transmission algorithms to mimic some of the benefits of AWD. In the ST-Line V, a set of paddle shifters are fitted in lieu of the sadly-absent manual gearbox.

Owners of the previous-shape Fiesta S and EcoSport would be familiar with the 1.0T's smooth and strident performance, though these 2010s models used a completely different type of DCT. This was the highly-publicised Powershift, which consisted of a dry-clutch system, and was prone to a multitude of problems and failures in the petrol-powered auto versions.

In contrast, the Puma adopts a next-generation transmission dubbed 7DCT300; related to the item found in some smaller Mercedes-Benz, Renault and Nissan models, it instead employs a more-robust wet-clutch system with a higher torque threshold, so promises to be far more durable and reliable than the problematic old dry-clutch unit.

Ford claims the F-150 consumes an average of 13.4L/100km, according to ADR 81/02 testing. During our testing on regional and rural roads at the launch we recorded between 11-12.5/100km, which is surprisingly good for a ute this big.

There’s a mammoth 136L fuel tank as standard. Using the claimed fuel consumption this means the F-150 can theoretically travel more than 1000km on a tank.

A minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol is required.

The Puma's official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.3 litres per 100km, which works out to 121 grams per kilometre. Fitted with a 42-litre fuel tank, the potential range averages out to almost 800km between refills.

Out in the real world, we managed an exceptional 6.2L/100km, no doubt helped by an ever-eager stop/start system (which, annoyingly, kills the air-con when it extinguishes the engine; we found ourselves constantly pressing that 'off' button as the days wore on). This figure was achieved in motorway-heavy driving scenarios, albeit loaded with holiday gear and with the air-con blaring.

So, we took another, urban-focused test, in lots of slow-moving traffic situations, and averaged a still-solid 8.0L/100km.

Note, that while the Puma requires 95 RON premium unleaded, it's also perfectly happy on – and is even recommended by Ford for – the cheapest petrol currently offered in Australia, 94 RON E10 unleaded. Either way, the ST-Line V is a frugal small SUV.

Although the F-150 retains the same 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 engine as the pre-update model, this is no bad thing as it’s a sweet and perky unit with plenty of rolling acceleration.

It gets this large, lumbering pick-up moving with no problems and makes you wonder why you wanted a V8 engine in the first place.

In the Lariat and Platinum some fake engine noise is pumped into the cabin through the speakers. I don’t hate it as it adds an almost V8-like gargle to the note.

Like before there’s a 10-speed automatic transmission which has a lot of ratios to choose from and sometimes can take a beat to kick down if you punch the accelerator harder.

It also feels like the transmission is constantly changing gears when you’re accelerating and as a result it almost sounds like a vehicle equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

In saying this though, the transmission is just keeping the engine within its torque band so acceleration is punchier.

With this update Ford was required to change the steering rack fitted to the locally converted F-150. Previously it was a Ranger unit and while Ford hasn’t detailed what the new steering rack is, it said it’s an amalgamation of existing Ford parts.

It’s hard to say definitively how different the steering feels from the pre-update model without driving them back to back, however, it does feel just a touch heavier than before. This isn’t bad as the F-150 is a big unit and it makes steering feel more substantial.

While you may be lulled at times into thinking this is just an overgrown Ranger on the open road, if you start driving with more intent and on twisty roads, this is far from a dynamic car. It also fills the lane quite generously, leaving minimal space between the painted lines.

The suspension, especially at the front end, is rather American and feels floaty, taking multiple movements to settle over bumps or undulations.

Thankfully this is where the flagship F-150 Platinum’s adaptive dampers come to save the day. In the Tow/Haul and Sport drive modes, the dampers are stiffened to create a more compliant ride and in reality they do iron out road imperfections better.

I particularly like how the ride in the Sport drive mode feels from behind the wheel, however there’s no way to split out the Sport suspension from the Sport engine calibration. This means you’re always driving around with the revs flared.

I wish there was a custom drive mode where you could pick and choose the engine, transmission and suspension calibrations. This would be a game changer for F-150 Platinum buyers.

In terms of towing, it’s the F-150’s bread and butter. With a 4500kg braked towing capacity, you can tow virtually anything without the pick-up breaking a sweat.

The Tow/Haul drive mode makes it feel even easier, plus having the Pro Trailer back-up assist takes the hard work out of reversing with a trailer.

Around town and even out on the highway, the F-150 is an incredibly quiet and serene car to drive, despite its heft. The transmission usually opts for the highest gear possible and you can barely hear it whirring away under the bonnet.

Surprisingly there’s barely any wind or tyre noise present in the cabin. Ford seems to have done an excellent job at insulating the F-150.

The only note I’ll make is the lack of noise makes you pick up on minor interior creaks and rattles more obviously. This isn’t ideal in a brand-new car.

If the Puma's pricing is complicated, its cabin surprising accommodating and its real-world efficiency particularly parsimonious, then the upward trajectory of pros over cons continues with performance that's downright spirited.

Around town first. A small-displacement engine plus a turbo plus a DCT usually spell interminable spells of lag when all the driver longs for is an instant and measured response to a right foot flexing down onto the throttle.

But the Ford largely sidesteps such pitfalls. Though momentarily hesitant at take-off, the three-pot turbo does then get down to business in no time, with a sustained and satisfying surge of thrust as the revs grow, accompanied by a lusty and raspy thrum that's entirely in keeping with the Puma's track-pants appearance. And it doesn't let up either, with speed building up strongly through the gears, and much more so than the mere 999ccs suggest. Great for overtaking, or taking over a rapidly diminishing gap in the peak-hour derby.

Selecting Sport (a fiddly action that's located too far from the driver for safe eyes-on-the-road operation) lights an even bigger fire in the Puma's belly, with punchier acceleration and a very attentive transmission tune, slicing seamlessly through the seven ratios, leaving you in awe that a heart so small can possess such deep lungs.

Where the Ford really leaves an indelible mark is its enthusiasm to corner just as keenly, armed with brilliantly slick steering and a planted chassis that is set up to both encourage and interact with the driver. Minimal body roll and lots of grip from a quality quartet of Continental tyres ensure the Puma can be punted about like a sporty little hatchback, while the electronic safety tech allowing just enough leeway for lots of fun before they gently reel everything back into line.

We cannot think of a more enjoyable small SUV. And, by the way, those same driver-assist systems provide exceptionally nuanced lane-keep and adaptive cruise-control intervention – certainly they're right up there with the premium SUV brigade.

Given that our Puma wore 215/50R18 rubber, on a 'sports' suspension tune, the ride around town is commendable, with ample cushioning from the rough stuff. There is some tautness to the ride, but it isn't hard or rough; the ST-Line V walks a fine line between urban-agility and surface-decay isolation. In other words, it's commendably relaxing to travel in.

At higher speeds, some road and tyre noises do permeate through inside, and those Dumbo door mirrors do create some wind whoosh, but overall, given how dynamic the chassis is, the Puma feels grown up and sophisticated.

Tested under the 2019 Euro NCAP crash-test regime, the Puma scores a top five-star ANCAP rating.

However, this means it does not meet the more stringent frontal offset crash, side impact crash and far-side impact crash-test criteria introduced by ANCAP for 2020 model-year vehicles – despite launching in September of that year.

Safety items include dual front, front-seat side and side curtain airbags (six in total), AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection (working between 7km/h and 80km/h), lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver fatigue alert, rear parking sensors, tyre pressure monitors and emergency assistance. These come on top of anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control and traction control.

As mentioned earlier, adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, front parking sensors and blind-spot detection are part of the $1500 'Park Package'. Do it.

The F-150 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty which is fairly average now for mainstream brands, however in the world of American pick-ups this is still generous.

There’s also 12 months of complimentary roadside assistance which gets extended every time you service the car when required.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. 

You can purchase a five-year pre-paid service package for $1968, which averages out to just under $400 per service.

This is considerably better than its rivals which typically don’t offer any form of capped-price servicing.

Ford has an expansive dealer network across urban, regional and rural Australia. It currently has around 180 sites.

Ford offers the industry-average warranty of five-years/unlimited kilometres. Services intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km.

There is also a capped-price servicing scheme under the 'Ford Service Benefits' banner, with the first four years/60,000km of 'A and B' logbook services pegged at $299 per visit, and then between $320 and $560, for up to 12 years.

There is also a Ford loan car program, SYNC 3 map updates and Motoring Club Membership included during that time frame.