Ford Escape vs Nissan Qashqai

What's the difference?

The Ford Escape PHEV is a good option for a customer who knows they’ll live within the parameters set by the car. That’s the case with any plug-in hybrid, really, so in that regard, this new model is hardly a standout.

And it isn’t particularly outstanding in any other way either. I personally would have appreciated it if Ford had decided to add the plug-in powertrain to the Vignale flagship model instead - that model is more about luxury than sportiness, and would better fit the character of this powertrain in my opinion.

It’s a decent addition to the brand’s SUV range, and a welcome one to the segment, though it won’t be on its own for long.

So, should you give up on the Qashqai e-Power, or surrender to its many and varied charms? Well, when the Japanese brand really tries, as it clearly has here, Nissan can be as imaginative and as innovative as any carmaker on the planet.

And given the latest Qashqai out of Europe is so advanced and unique within its SUV category, this deserves to be on everybody’s shortlist. With e-Power under that pretty bonnet, this Ti is a leader, not a follower. This underdog could win best-in-show!

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.

I haven’t really warmed to the “I wish I was a hatchback” styling of the Escape, which has a softer-edged look to it than most of its rivals. I mean, compared to a Hyundai Tucson or Toyota RAV4, the Escape looks like a blob.

That mightn’t be an issue for you, and it’s hardly a reason not to buy the car, but I was also a bit disappointed that there’s no real specific highlights to make you realise you’re buying the PHEV model, which - at $15,000 more than the equivalent petrol version - should have something to differentiate it other than the addition of a small badge and the additional filler cap on the front quarter panel for the plug.

Even a different set of wheels would have sufficed. Alas, it’s an identical looking Escape to the petrol. That means the ST-Line trimmings, such as black highlights on the grille and bumper, side skirts, a rear spoiler, and those 18-inch wheels and lowered sports suspension.

The interior, as mentioned in the pricing section, does have a few changes over the petrol version, but they’re hardly game-changing additions.

There’s nothing radical or ground-breaking about the third-gen version’s styling, other than it’s pretty and unmistakably a Qashqai. Even from tens of metres away. That’s a hallmark of good design.

But, like an Oscar’s worthy red-carpet outfit, the familiar lines remain classy on this third imagining, with a particularly strong front-end LED lighting graphics presence against a modern grille treatment, pleasing classical proportions and an elegantly executed posterior.

Unless you’re a train spotter-type or work for Nissan PR, it’s easy to miss the very minor details setting this particular Ti apart. Nissan dubs the extra glossy black lipstick up front as its ‘premium grille’ appearance. There’s a smattering of e-Power badges. And ground clearance drops 5.0mm, to 175mm. That’s it.

As with all current Qashqais, the e-Power offers larger packaging compared to before, as a result of adopting a fresh “global Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance platform”. The upshot is a longer, wider and taller small SUV, to the tune of 31, 30 and 29mm, respectively.

And, for the benefit of rear seat occupants, the wheelbase has also been stretched by 19mm.

It’s worth noting that, despite Nissan’s best efforts to keep the kilos down by deploying aluminium for the doors, bonnet and front guards (resulting in a commendable 60kg saving while body stiffness rises by 41 per cent), the e-Power attracts a hefty 200kg penalty over the ICE Ti.

Does this adversely affect efficiency? Please keep reading to find out.

The Ford Escape looks like it has all the bits to make a midsize SUV buyer happy. And while a fair few of the boxes are ticked, there are some elements that could be better. 

The big party trick is that the second row is on rails, so you can slide it forwards or backwards to improve the space for receipt occupants or improve your boot space. The maximised cargo area is 556 litres to the ceiling, while if prioritise second-row occupant space there is easily enough room for a 182cm / 6’0” adult to fit behind someone of a similar size.

In the boot there are remote levers for the second row seats to fold down, a 12 V outlet, and a soft parcel shelf which is easy to remove, too.

During my time with the car I had the seats slid back as far as they go to maximise cabin space, though I did test out whether it was worth having them forward and the boot space was appreciably better especially for a pram and some baby stuff.

The second-row is a 60:40 split for the backrest, with the smaller portion on the driver’s side. That may sound trivial, but we had our baby seat set up behind the passenger, and had to move it to the driver’s side when we picked up a large parcel as it wouldn’t fit with the smaller portion folded down. There are dual ISOFIX child seat anchor points for the outboard positions, and three top-tether hooks.

The boot space is good too, considering it has some extra hardware to contend with under the body, there is also a space-saver spare wheel under there which is nice. However, there is no dedicated hidey hole for the charge cable, and it doesn’t come in a nice stowable bag either - just a plastic ziplock thing. 

Perhaps the biggest letdown of the interior is the fact that you still get the tiny little tablet-style 8.0-inch touchscreen media display, despite there being a big 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster. The two screens almost look at odds with one another, and what’s even more frustrating is that the driver information screen cannot be configured to include the energy flow screen that you see on the smaller tablet style unit. 

That means you can’t watch what’s happening between engine, electric motor and battery, or a combination where you might expect to see that - instead it can only be seen in illustrative form on the smaller central screen. Big issue? Maybe not, but if you’re an eco-conscious customer who wants to know what their car’s high-tech powertrain is doing, while also wanting to use sat nav, or Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, or change the radio station… Well, you’re out of luck.

There is a much more basic and rudimentary display on the driver info screen that shows a small icon of an engine and battery and illuminates them when each part is in use, but really, Ford should have used the real-estate of the big driver info screen better. Toyota, Kia and Hyundai know how to do it better.

The material quality is okay, but it certainly doesn’t feel like a very special environment.There are rubberised liners on the doors which don’t look terrific or feel fantastic, and why there are soft plastic elbow pads, and up high on the dashboard, it is not of the most pristine quality. 

Storage is pretty good. There are bottle holders in the doors and two cupholders in the centre console, and the storage nook in front of the shift dial houses a wireless phone charger and two USB ports, plus a 12-volt plug. There is a strange little shelf section in front of the centre console bin, which is not fantastic in terms of size. There are rear bottle holders in the doors, map pockets and a flip-down arm-rest with cup holders.

That rotary dial shifter which does take a little bit of getting used to. Unlike some others, there is no ‘P’ for park button - instead you have to dial it all the way left. 

Being bigger than before brings benefits.

The Qashqai’s doors open super-wide. Great for entry/egress, winning over SUV sceptics and inflicting damage on adjacent vehicles.

Once sat inside, the people-pleasing presentation continues in this sumptuously-presented Ti grade, with eyes immediately drinking in the pleated leather-faced seat patterns, subtle colour-coded trim, attractive dashboard architecture and the surprising depth of quality in the materials deployed.

As we discovered to our delight, all are further flattered when drenched in the dappled rays of an early autumnal afternoon sun, courtesy of that panoramic hole in the roof.

If you’re expecting the common-sense dullness of some less-ambitious Nissans, a significant mindset reset is required, highlighting the European aspirations of this cosy yet comfy British-built SUV.

In our comparatively brief time in the Qashqai, we also noted the excellent driving position, enveloping support of the fine front seats, user-friendliness of the digital displays (including the head-up dials), clear instrumentation that still manages to convey as much, or as little, data as you need without bamboozling you with info-overload, generous storage and an effective climate-control system.

Plus, that vast sunroof includes a full-sunblock screen – a feature sorely missing in many European and Chinese branded alternatives. Others, take heed.

Our main objection is obstructed over-the-shoulder and rear vision, that’s very obvious when parking in tight spots. Those cameras are essential.

Moving out the back, it’s fairly spacious for most people though knee room remains tight for longer-legged passengers. Most expected amenities are present, such as face-level air vents, USB-A and -C outlets, a centre armrest with cupholders and overhead lighting. And the upmarket ambience carries through, too.

But don’t go expecting any sliding or reclining back-seat versatility, as you might find in some rival SUVs.

Now, here’s an interesting fact. Nissan says there’s no drop in cargo capacity between the e-Power and the regular ICE-powered version of the Qashqai. Indeed, the figure increases, from 418 litres to 452L and, if you lower the back seat, from 1513 to 1518L.

So, how does this magic work? The location of the battery underneath the front seats (rather than under the rear bench) helps, as well as the elimination of the ICE Ti’s 19-inch alloy spare wheel for that infernal tyre-repair kit.

Win some, lose some!

Right now, there’s only the single, Qashqai Ti e-Power grade for Australia.

Starting from $51,590, before on-road costs, it adds $4200 to the price of the regular 1.3-litre turbo-petrol Ti, and is gunning straight for more conventional hybrids like the Hyundai Kona N-Line HEV, Honda’s superb ZR-V e:HEV and the new, second-gen Toyota C-HR Koba.

Now, they’re all conventional hybrids with their internal combustion engine (ICE) doing the driving, so the Nissan has a point of difference – and possibly an advantage – over those.

Note, though, that both the C-HR and Kona hybrids also come in grades costing under $45,000 – something the Qashqai e-Power won’t match until the lower-spec versions arrive in Australia sometime later on.

At least Nissan sees fit to stuff the Ti with luxuries like adaptive LED headlights, a head-up display, panoramic sunroof, hands-free powered tailgate, a 10-speaker Bose audio system, heated front seats with massaging function, pleated leather trim, front and rear USB A/C outlets and 19-inch alloys.

These come on top of expected goodies like dual-zone climate control, a 12.3-inch central touchscreen, satellite navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay, wired Android Auto, digital radio, a wireless phone charger, a surround-view camera, auto on/off headlights and wipers, auto-folding exterior mirrors and ambient lighting.

There’s also a host of welcome driver-assist tech. More on those in the Safety section below.

However, the e-Power loses the essential temporary spare wheel for the fiddly and often-useless tyre repair kit. Not good enough, Nissan.

That aside, they make for a finely-crafted and properly fully-equipped small hybrid SUV out of Europe, that, when considered in that light, offers strong value-for-money against technically less-intriguing alternatives.

Advantage, Qashqai.

The Escape PHEV is the only model in the range to get a 2.5-litre petrol engine, which runs on the more efficient Atkinson cycle, and has a continuously variable transmission feeding power to the front wheels - that’s right, this Escape is 2WD/FWD.

The tricky bit is that it also houses a clever electric motor and generator, which is teamed to a 14.4kWh battery pack - which is big for a plug-in hybrid car. 

The electric motor is capable of 96kW of power, while the petrol engine can produce up to 112kW. All told, the combined system output is pegged at 167kW, though there is no peak torque output figure. Even so, that amount of power is a sizeable number for any midsize SUV, even if this particular one weighs in at more than 1800kg.

Speaking of weight, the PHEV is the least capable towing vehicle in the Escape range. It has a maximum braked towing capacity of 1200kg, where all the others can tow up to 1800kg. Unbraked capacity is unchanged, at 750kg.

Under the e-Power’s bonnet is a 1.5-litre three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine featuring a unique and intriguing, efficiency-enhancing yet performance-boosting, variable compression ratio.

It produces 116kW of power and 250Nm of torque on its own, and is mated to a small-ish 2.1kWh lithium-ion battery and inverter, powering an electric motor that sends drive, via a single-speed reduction-gear transmission, to the front wheels. A set-up Nissan calls 'e-CVT'.

Combined power and torque maximums are 140kW and a considerable 330Nm, respectively. Tipping the scales at 1728kg, the Ti e-Power’s power-to-weight ratio is a healthy 81kW/tonne.

Along with 'Sport' and 'Eco' modes, there’s also a one-pedal driving option that provides electricity-saving regenerative braking that washes off a good deal of speed to substantially slow you down. It's a stepping stone between a hybrid and full EV and you never need to plug it in anywhere.

Nissan made myriad changes to the MacPherson-style strut front and multi-link rear suspension design to accommodate all the additional electrification tech.

Remember towing capacity is half that of the regular Qashqai’s 1500kg (braked trailer), dropping to the latter’s 750kg unbraked figure.

Beware the PHEV fuel consumption figure. That’s a great thing to keep in mind if you’re shopping for one of these cars.

That’s because the combined cycle official figure only takes into account a mix of conditions across 100km of driving. That’s right - only the first 100km. So the best case scenario, for a car that is designed to use its battery to run emissions free until it runs out, before sparingly using the petrol engine to keep going.

As such, it is no surprise that the official combined cycle fuel consumption is just 1.5 litres per 100 kilometres, with CO2 emissions claimed at just 33g/km. That takes into account the WLTP battery range of 56 kilometres stated on Ford’s website.

For reference, I completed my test of the car with a total of 462.7 kilometres travelled, of which, the trip computer stated 292.3km was fully electric. Meaning the remaining 170.4km was driving using petrol.

The indicated energy efficiency was 20.0kWh/100km, which isn’t great against a claimed EV driving efficiency figure supplied by Ford, of 14.8kWh/100km to 15.6kWh/100km. 

While the indicated fuel consumption average was 3.1L/100km, so more than double the windscreen sticker’s indicated economy. 

However, when I did the maths, I used a real-world average of 3.9L/100km of petrol ($36.15 worth of petrol) and 43.2kWh of electricity (meaning a cost of $9.82 based on the NSW average energy price of $0.2274c/kWh).

So, to do 462.7km I paid $45.97. I think that’s okay, but bear in mind I included several longer trips (Sydney to Glenbrook, Glenbrook to the Southern Highlands and back, and Glenbrook to Sydney and back). 

As is always the case, if your intended operation for a PHEV is to use it primarily for urban running within its EV range capabilities, you will be better off than if you push it beyond and use the petrol engine excessively.

For reference, the fuel tank size is 45 litres, which is 12L less than the petrol-only versions. It can run on E10, but only if you can find E10 that is also 95RON premium unleaded.

If you wish, there’s also an app called Ford Pass Connect, which allows you to monitor your car’s state of charge, adjust its start and finish times for recharging and even works as a key for the car to allow remote access, too.

Worth noting the maximum charge rate on a 10-amp plug at home is 2.3kW, while on public charging (which typically runs a higher amperage rate) the max rate is 3.7kW.

Nissan reckons the Ti e-Power should average around 5.2L/100km on a combined urban, extra-urban cycle, which equates to a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 117 grams/km.

We managed a still-commendable 5.8L as indicated by the trip computer, but we did not have a chance to test it at the pump.

Note, as with all Qashqais, the e-Power needs more-expensive 95 RON premium unleaded petrol. Brimming the 55L fuel tank, expect a range of up to around 1050km between refills. That's 150km up on the regular 1.3L turbo versions.

Being the ST-Line grade, you - like it or not - have to deal with the lowered ride and sportier suspension, which makes this car ride a bit more firmly than you might want.

I found the suspension to be the biggest detracting element in terms of the drive experience – the suspension picked up a lot of the small inconsistencies in the road surface and transmitted them into the cabin. It was fidgety a lot of the time, and on road surfaces with very poor quality, it could be a bit uncomfortable.

The steering was also bit too tuned for sportiness for a car that doesn’t really need to be quite so aggressively angled that way. It took a bit of getting used to – it was somehow both twitchy on centre but not quite as responsive across the radius of lock to lock as I’d thought it might be, given the initial steering response.

Having said all that, I threw it through a couple of twisty corners and there was a nice handling balance from the chassis and decent grip from the tyres, but I did notice that - being front-wheel drive, with all that power going through the front tyres, there were some instances of it scrabbling for traction, notably on wet roads and looser surfaces but also out of offset driveways.

Other gripes included brake pedal response that was quite abrupt and very sensitive to stopping inputs.

Now, let’s consider the driving modes.

There are different drivetrain setups depending on what you plan to do. EV Auto does the thinking for you, dipping between EV, hybrid and petrol modes. EV Now prioritises electric driving. EV Later saves your battery charge for when you think you’ll need it. And EV Charge means you’ll use petrol power to drive, and also to replenish the battery pack.

The throttle response was decent in EV mode, and in hybrid mode it is nice and quiet, and it drives in a very smooth way unless you really plant your foot hard, then it can be a bit vocal - but less raucous than a RAV4 under full throttle. 

The transition between the different drive modes was relatively seamless, as it will readily go between petrol or electric as required, and the four-cylinder is mostly hushed enough so that you won’t hear it too much, especially if you’re driving at higher speeds when it does.

Indeed it was relatively quiet for the most part, though the tyre noise was quite excessive at higher speeds on very coarse-chip surfaces. And in those instances I noticed I could feel the road surface through the steering wheel and the suspension, as it was quite jittery at times.

There is a low speed warning sound that is omitted below about 25km/h and it was quite handy while driving in enclosed car parks - no more accusations of creeping around silently at the shops.

Further, there are multiple drive modes, including Normal, Eco, Sport, Slippery, and Snow/Sand Assist, all of which are designed to make different situations easier to deal with. They will adjust engine transmission and steering response as well as stability and traction control limitations. I kept it in Normal, though a dabble in Sport showed that you’re allowed a bit more aggression from the powertrain in terms of acceleration.

Two things are obvious soon after the driver presses the starter and silently whooshes away in a Qashqai Ti e-Power.

Firstly, there’s a real weight to it, highlighting this as a solid (as well as heavy) vehicle of substance. And, secondly, once over this initial impression, everything then seems completely normal and intuitive. There’s nothing alien going on here.

Despite the mass, acceleration is brisk, with throttle response becoming even livelier once on the move, since you can feel all that instant torque on tap, even with a light flex of your right foot.

Pushing down harder, it should soon become clear this is a fast machine, so keep an eye on that digital speedo display. It caught us out a couple of times during our test drive through central Victoria.

Using the driving modes reveals varying behaviour according to the settings. In Eco mode the e-Power has a smooth and relaxed gait; performance is Normal seems more spirited while in Sport responses are appropriately stronger and more urgent.

It’s worth keeping the latter in mind, because the chassis is set up for a sporty, Euro feel, meaning there’s a tautness to the suspension that's a little at odds with the plushness of the interior. This isn’t a soft, bouncy ride.

Rolling on a 235/50 R19 wheel and tyre package, there’s a pleasing balance of steering feel, handling agility and roadholding grip, resulting in a dynamically athletic and reassuringly controlled vehicle, even at speed through tighter corners. However, as with the e-Power’s acceleration delivery, the keener driver has to first push through a level of inertia to discover this.

One trait worth keeping in mind is that the tail can become loose and even slide out a little before the ESC quickly yet calmly reels it back in, if you attempt to take a bend too fast. Beware, though, that as the roads were hot and dry during our drive, we cannot attest to how this behaviour will manifest in the wet. Should be fun if you’re a keener driver. We weren’t expecting that.

What else? The easy e-Pedal function works well, providing significant braking up to a point, without bringing the vehicle to a full stop. It soon feels second nature.

Plus, unlike most Toyota hybrids, many EVs and even the X-Trail Ti e-Power we tested recently, the smaller-brother Qashqai avoids that oddly wooden brake-pedal feel, though again, a test in inner-urban traffic may reveal something else.

And, finally, over coarse-chip surfaces, there’s a bit too much tyre or road-noise intrusion coming inside, though over the smoother stuff, you’ll also feel blissfully cocooned in the comfort the Ti packaging provides.

Overall, then, the Qashqai e-Power is a swift, agile and entertaining drive, as well as safe and secure, revealing a further depth to Nissan’s engineering talent and capability.

The e-Power is included with the rest of the existing Qashqai range in scoring a five-star ANCAP crash-test result in 2021.

It features seven airbags including front-centre and front-to-rear curtain coverage.

You’ll also find front and rear Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) with pedestrian, cyclist and back-over detection, blind-spot warning, lane-keep assist systems, adaptive cruise control with full stop-go function, a driver fatigue monitor, auto high beams, traffic sign recognition, front and rear parking sensors, ABS with brake assist, Electronic Brake-force Distribution, hill-start assist, stability control, traction control and a surround-view monitor.

There’s also a vehicle approach sound for pedestrians.

Note that Nissan’s AEB kicks in from 5.0-130km/h, pedestrian and cyclist AEB from 10-80km/h, and the lane support systems work between 60-250km/h.

ISOFIX child-seat latches are fitted to outboard rear seat positions, while a trio of top tethers for straps are included across the rear bench.

As with the rest of the Ford range, you get a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the car, while the battery pack has its own eight-year/160,000km warranty plan.

And just like most other models in Ford’s range, there is a lifetime capped-price servicing plan, with the first four maintenance visits (due every 12 months/15,000km, whichever occurs first) incurring a $299 fee, which is cheap for the class.

You also get up to seven years of roadside assist if you service your car with Ford’s dealers.

Like all Qashqais, the Ti e-Power offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty that also includes roadside assistance. Nothing unusual there.

Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km. The latter is 5000km sooner than in the ICE equivalent, by the way.

Nissan also offers a choice of servicing options, starting with the Capped Price Servicing that is nearly a thousand dollars cheaper than the regular ICE versions of the Qashqai over the six-year period as published on the company’s website, at around $2850.

Pay in advance and there’s an additional 10 per cent discount. Of course, terms and conditions apply.