Citroen Berlingo vs Mercedes-Benz GLB

What's the difference?

Given Citroen’s proud heritage of innovation, the Berlingo has a few unique and quirky features, but is overall quite conventional in its design and performance (though in a well thought-out and practical package).

With sub-$20K run-out pricing, it should have plenty of appeal for commercial customers, as it costs much less than its major rivals yet offers a superior payload.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB is an oddball. While it isn’t my definition of beauty, it's a surprisingly capable and spacious small-to-medium SUV.

The entry-level GLB200, while comfortable, feels a bit underdone in the engine department. Therefore the mid-spec GLB250 with the more-powerful 2.0-litre turbo and mild-hybrid assistance plus all-wheel drive grip is the better pick.

The smallest Berlingo rides on a front-wheel-drive, 2728mm wheelbase with an overall length of 4380mm and width of 1810mm. Compared to the Caddy, the Berlingo is 46mm longer in wheelbase, 28mm shorter and 37mm wider.

Suspension features MacPherson struts up front and a tidy trailing arm arrangement at the rear, which is well designed for carrying heavy loads. Steering is via power-assisted rack and pinion and four-wheel disc brakes provide reassuringly strong braking. The turning circle is a compact 11.0 metres.

The cabin and cargo bay are separated by a removable grey vinyl screen, with a large clear section in the upper half to allow rear vision for the driver. Citroen says this screen is primarily to reduce air-conditioning requirements, which in turn reduces the A/C load on the engine to optimise performance and fuel economy. 

It’s also claimed to (slightly) reduce noise intrusion from the cargo bay, which is mostly caused by tyre roar through the rear wheel arches. However, Citroen has taken a commendable step in trying to muffle these noise paths by surrounding each wheel arch with large plastic mouldings which are claimed to contain sound-absorbing material.

Glazed rear barn doors with wiper/washer and 180-degree opening, plus solid sliding side doors, are standard issue. The barn doors also feature an asymmetrical design (one wide, one narrow) to off-set the centre pillars and reduce the large blind spot they create in the rear-view mirror. 

The cabin layout is simple and functional with decent-sized door mirrors, although the kerb side would benefit from a wide-angle lens due to a big blind spot for the driver created by the solid side door. The fold-down inboard arm-rest is a nice touch and the cabin is quite spacious, although tall drivers will find the left footrest too high for a comfortable leg position.

This isn’t the prettiest car ever. It has the Mazda CX-8 or CX-80 effect where you can tell a smaller car has been stretched and extended to create more interior space. It just looks a little awkward as a result.

The rear section of the GLB in particular is much higher and boxier than the GLA which makes it look rather back-heavy. Thankfully roof rails are standard which toughens the look somewhat.

The facelift that was introduced in 2023 brought an updated front bumper, as well as tweaked LED headlight and tail-light signatures. The changes aren’t wildly different from the original car that launched in 2019 but it’s still fresh enough.

Inside is where this car is starting to look its age. While Mercedes-Benz was one of the first to introduce a wraparound screen set-up combining the digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system into a single unit, many have copied this and it no longer looks unique.

It doesn’t help that the dual 10.25-inch screens are small now in comparison to newer rivals. It’s standard for a digital instrument cluster to be closer to 12.3-inches in diameter now.

A main interior change with this facelift included the removal of the touchpad controller on the centre console. In its place is now a shallow storage area which doesn’t really serve a purpose.

There’s also a new AMG-style steering wheel as standard which has fiddly gloss black touch sliders that get grimy upon use.

While the changes are welcome, the ageing roots are still present. You can’t escape the blingy touches that just end up looking cheap and tacky.

A key example of this are the air vents which have obnoxious interior ambient lighting in them to try and make the cabin look cool.

I’m also not a huge fan of the star pattern trim on the dashboard and the swathes of stainless steel-looking inlays.

The Berlingo’s 1433kg kerb weight and 2150kg GVM would normally result in a 717kg payload. However, Citroen’s official payload figure is 133kg higher, at a class-leading 850kg, because PSA calculates kerb weights differently to the norm (typically French). So, 75kg of that can be carried on the roof when shared across three racks with the mounting points provided.

Its robust 3250kg GCM allows up to 1100kg of braked trailer to be towed without any reduction in payload. Citroen states that this GCM applies up to a maximum altitude of 1000 metres above sea level, with a 10 per cent reduction for each additional 1000 metres. So keep those stats in mind if you’re heading for Mount Kosciuszko.

The cargo bay, which offers 3.3 cubic metres of load volume (or 3.7 with passenger sear folded), has a floor length of 1800mm and a roomy 1229mm between the wheel arches. This means it can carry one 1160mm-square standard Aussie pallet, easily loaded with a forklift through the rear barn doors and held in place by six tie-down points. There’s also internal lighting, a 12-volt outlet and sturdy ladder-frame cargo barrier behind the driver. Nothing for the passenger, though.

Cabin storage options include two pockets and a combined cup/bottle holder in each door. There’s also a large lidded compartment and two open bins set into the dash-top, two circular storage slots in the centre display plus two smaller pockets below and beside the gearstick; the latter a slim-line 'holster' complete with USB port.

The single glovebox has two-tier storage, and there’s a full-width cabin shelf overhead. The centre console, which is a module that can be unlocked and removed if you want floor space between the seats, has a cup holder at the front, a big internal storage area with sliding lid in the centre and two cup/small bottle holders at the rear. There’s also lots of vacant space for additional storage under both seats.

Up front the driver’s seat is comfortable, offering electric adjustability and lumbar support, extendable thigh support and heating. Some extra bolstering on the seat base would be nice though as it’s a little flat for my liking.

While the glossy piano black touch sliders on the steering wheel aren’t the most intuitive, I love holding this leather-wrapped wheel as it straddles the line of being thick enough but not too thick. BMW should take note…

The thin stalks behind the steering wheel are a joy to use and have a nice thwack to them. I appreciate the column-mounted gear selector as this frees up more space on the centre console, though it could be utilised better. More on this in a bit.

The digital instrument cluster offers a range of different themes to select from, though the standard version looks the nicest and offers the most customisation. It’s nice being able to put a full-width map display on the instrument cluster.

The touchscreen multimedia system offers a clean and intuitive interface that’s hard to get lost in. For the most part, however, I ended up using smartphone mirroring. Thankfully this update brought wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

It’s nice having the row of physical climate control switchgear within easy reach especially as carmakers are now integrating these into the touchscreen interface. Even Mercedes-Benz is guilty of this in its newer cars.

There isn’t a tonne of general storage on the centre console beyond the deep central box which has a split-opening lid. The wireless charger barely fits my iPhone 15 Pro Max, the cupholders are on the small side and the aforementioned storage section where the touch slider once was is useless from a storage standpoint.

Moving to the second row, it’s rather spacious for a small-ish SUV. At a leggy 182cm tall, I have plenty of leg and headroom behind my own driving position.

You’re able to slide and recline each individual seat in the second row to prioritise second-row comfort or allow more space for third-row passengers. It’s needed because third-row space is tight!

Second-row amenities include air vents mounted on the back of the centre console, various storage spaces, two USB-C ports, as well as a fold-down armrest with cupholders. Also if you stare at the back of the centre console it looks very much like a screaming face.

As already mentioned, the third row isn’t the most spacious ever, although this is a small-ish SUV so best not to expect palatial levels of room. It’s likely more for occasional use by children and it’s good to note there is airbag coverage back there.

Amenities are few and far between in the third row, limited to just a few storage spots and a USB-C port on both sides. Unfortunately there are no air vents.

At the back there’s a handsfree power tailgate which is handy if you’ve got your hands full. It opens swiftly, though with all three rows of seating upright there isn’t much room at all. Mercedes-Benz doesn’t even quote a boot capacity figure, but it’s only enough for a bag or two.

Thankfully if you’re not using the third row the benefit of this car is there’s much more boot space than the GLA. Mercedes-Benz claims there’s a generous 565L of boot space, which can further expand to 1800L with the second row folded.

Unfortunately there is no spare wheel in the GLB200 as it has run-flat tyres as standard, though regular tyres with a tyre repair kit is a no-cost option.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB200 is currently priced at $67,600 before on-road costs.

There aren’t many premium seven-seat SUVs that are this compact out there. The closest rivals would be the mid-size Volkswagen Tayron and related Skoda Kodiaq.

But for this price you can easily get something larger like a Kia Sorento, Hyundai Santa Fe or Mazda CX-80. You do have to ditch the premo badge though.

For your money you do get a generous amount of standard equipment. This includes 19-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, dual 10.25-inch screens, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, interior ambient lighting, as well as heated front seats with electric adjustment.

However our tester was optioned with a panoramic glass sunroof ($1900) and black leather upholstery ($1539), bringing the as-tested price to $71,039 before on-road costs. This is still around $18,000 off the cheapest GLC.

A nifty reason for opting for this car over the GLA is because there’s a third row of seating. It's not the most spacious row, but when folded there is more boot space. More on this later.

The Euro 6-compliant 1.6-litre multi-point fuel-injected four-cylinder petrol engine is conspicuously rev-happy for a commercial vehicle, as evidenced by its tachometer which displays rpm increments all the way up to 7000rpm - with no redline.

The needle has to reach 6000rpm to access the engine’s relatively modest maximum power of 72kW (less than Kangoo/Caddy, which are both turbos), with peak torque of 152Nm (also less) at a relatively high 3500rpm. It also requires 95-octane fuel.

The five-speed manual gearbox has useful spread of ratios for both city/suburban delivery work and load hauling on the highway.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB200 is powered by a 1.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine which produces 120kW and 270Nm.

This engine also features in ‘200’ versions of the A-Class, CLA and GLA, plus versions of it also feature in the Renault Arkana, Captur, Duster, and Kangoo, as well as the Nissan Qashqai and now the new Mitsubishi ASX.

It’s mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission with drive sent to the front wheels only.

Unlike the more powerful GLB250 and AMG GLB35 all-wheel drive trims, the GLB200 is the only model to go without 48V mild-hybrid assistance in Australia. It was originally promised when this facelifted model was announced in 2023.

Mercedes-Benz claims the GLB200 can do the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds and top speed is 207km/h.

Our Berlingo achieved a combined figure of 7.2L/100km over a distance of 422km on a variety of roads and with different loads, including near-maximum GVM. Impressively, that was line-ball with the official combined figure of 7.1. With its 60-litre tank, you could expect a realistic driving range of 580-600km.

Mercedes-Benz claims the GLB200 has a combined fuel consumption of 7.5L/100km.

During our urban and metropolitan-based testing, however, we saw an average of 9.0L/100km according to the trip computer which isn’t great but also not the worst I’ve seen. Expect this figure to balloon out further if you load more people onboard as the engine will have to work harder.

There is a 52L fuel tank which requires a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded petrol.

Using my as-tested fuel consumption figure, this means the GLB200 has a theoretical range of up to 578km.

The first thing we noticed was the relatively low cargo-bay noise, combined with low wind and engine noise. The ride quality was firm but acceptable without a load, and the steering responsive and linear in weight, with a strong self-centering effect ensuring good directional stability. 

The slick-shifting manual gearshift was nice to use, with well-defined gates and a light clutch action. Braking response was strong, but four discs designed to cope with a 3250kg GCM could bite hard if you pressed too firmly without a load.

With maximum torque at 3500rpm and peak power at 6000rpm, the 1.6-litre non-turbo engine responded best around town when kept revving freely between those two numbers. Although torque started to fall away sharply below 1800rpm, a useful amount remained between 1800-3500rpm, as evidenced by 2750rpm at 100km/h and 3000rpm at 110km/h in top gear on the highway.

With 600kg in the cargo bay plus a 100kg driver, our 700kg payload was 150kg below GVM. Handling and ride quality with this load was excellent, particularly over large bumps and on heavily patched bitumen roads. Braking was also reassuringly strong and it continued to track straight in cross-winds at highway speeds.

The engine’s rev-happy nature was noticeable on our 2.0km, 13 per cent gradient set climb with this load, finding its sweet spot in second gear at 3750rpm - which it happily pulled all the way to the top. Engine braking on the way down was non-existent, but the powerful brakes easily covered this shortfall.

While this 1.3-litre turbo engine may be sufficient in the smaller A-Class and GLA, it barely scrapes by in the GLB200.

Even with one person onboard the engine has to rev out the first few gears to around 3000rpm to keep up with traffic from the lights. It doesn't have the nicest engine note either.

It doesn’t help that the dual-clutch automatic can be a little vague from a standstill, taking a beat to kick into action. This is most noticeable when doing low-speed manoeuvres or reversing.

Although initial acceleration can be on the thrashy side, rolling acceleration while at speed is a lot more linear and calm thanks to peak torque coming on tap from 2000rpm. This means the car will only downshift when it needs to.

There are a few different drive modes you can select from, but the default ‘Comfort’ mode feels the most natural. ‘Eco’ does quell some of the rev flares during initial acceleration, though the engine feels much more tardy in general.

Linked with these drive modes are the adaptive dampers. This is a very comfortable car, especially on the standard smaller 19-inch alloy wheels as there’s plenty of tyre sidewall to absorb bigger bumps.

Coupled with this is sporty steering that’s direct and makes the car feel nimble despite its 1.7-tonne kerb weight.

It really is the best of both worlds because you get the fun and sporty characteristics from the steering, plus the comfort and supple feeling from the suspension. It’s hard to fault this set-up.

In terms of noise, vibration and harshness (NVH), if you look beyond the sometimes shouty engine, this car is quiet and refined. There’s some tyre roar at higher speeds, but many European vehicles have this trait.

It’s also a benefit that this car is a little older as there aren’t many safety system-related bings and bongs that distract from the cabin ambience.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB received a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on Euro NCAP testing conducted in 2019.

It received 92 per cent in Adult Occupant Protection, 88 per cent in Child Occupant Protection, 78 per cent in Vulnerable Road User Protection and 76 per cent in Safety Assist.

As standard there are nine airbags, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera.

A nifty safety feature is the Pre-Safe system which tightens the seatbelts and plays a tone when it detects an imminent crash.

There are ISOFIX child seat anchor points on the outboard second-row seats, as well as on the two third-row seats. All three second-row seats, plus the two third-row seats also have top-tether points.

A three-year/100,000km warranty includes roadside assistance, plus there’s a five-year anti-corrosion warranty. Scheduled servicing is 12 months/20,000km, whichever occurs first. There is also fixed pricing for the first three scheduled services of $416 (12 months/20,000km), $777 (24 months/40,000km) and $416 (36 months/60,000km).

The GLB200 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, like the rest of the Mercedes-Benz line-up.

Logbook servicing is every 12 months or 25,000km, whichever comes first, which is good if you do a lot of driving.

You can purchase a three-, four- or five-year service package which costs $3495, $4650 and $6185, respectively. With the latter this equals $1237 per service, which is expensive, although it is cheaper than the slightly larger GLC.