Chery Tiggo 4 vs Alfa Romeo Junior

What's the difference?

If you’re just looking for an affordable hybrid which will save you money at the pump, the Tiggo 4 will do the trick, but there are so many little things which could be better here, it’s evident you’re getting what you’re paying for.

This makes the Tiggo 4 hybrid a bit of a let down, because the other Cherys I’ve driven recently have been pleasantly surprising given their price-points, not to mention the price-gap between the Tiggo 4 and many of its rivals is nowhere near as large.

Our day with the Junior Ibrida MH left us wanting more.

Striking design, an inviting cabin, rorty performance and immersive dynamics are what people want and expect from an Alfa Romeo, and its smallest SUV does not let the side down.

That the mild hybrid also delivers (on paper at least) noteworthy economy, in a well-made, generously equipped and (anticipated) keenly-priced package is nothing short of a blinder.

The Junior Ibrida MH might be the most competitive and compelling Alfa Romeo for mainstream Australia… ever!

We cannot wait to confirm this on local roads. Roll on September.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

On the outside, I think the Tiggo 4 Hybrid is pretty generic and inoffensive. It shares its 'box-on-wheels' aesthetic with cars like the outgoing Mitsubishi ASX and Hyundai Venue, which, to be fair, have been strong sellers.

It might not be an eye catcher, then, but there’s something to be said for not trying anything controversial, and this is pretty consistent across Chery’s range. In fact, compared to some brands in the market, Chery is doing a solid job of design consistency for its mainline SUVs.

Highlights on the outside include the enormous grille and contemporary LED light strip across the rear.

On the inside things also look pretty swish for this compact SUV category. The seats immediately jump out as a highlight, big and lavishly trimmed in comparatively soft synthetic stuff. The glitzy steering wheel and dual-screen layout continues from other Chery products and the dash design is tidy, if a little generic.

Sharing much with other small crossovers in the Stellantis fold, including the second-generation Peugeot 2008 and Opel/Vauxhall Mokka, as well as the Jeep Avenger and Fiat 600 (that share the same production line in Poland), the Junior sits on the lightweight 'STLA Small' platform.

Checking in at 4.17 metres long, 1.78m wide and 1.5m high, the Junior (though only after a post-unveiling name change from Milano due to that illegally inferring it is built in Italy) was engineered by the same team behind the transcendental Giulia QV, which is a BMW M3 for the heart and soul.

Dimensionally, the Junior lives up to its badge, and is really replacing two Alfas – the Toyota Corolla-sized Giulietta (from 2010) and more-belatedly the Mini Cooper-chasing Mito supermini. As both competed in rapidly contracting classes, going a light SUV instead seems sensible.

And you know what? This looks and feels correct for the brand.

Alfa’s nose treatments have long been provocative and so is the Junior’s. Two interpretations of classic grille themes are available – the cursive ‘Alfa Romeo’ script evocative of pre-war racers or a bold reimagining of the red-cross/snake-and-child logo that is associated with the city of Milan.

More conventional are the neat proportions and Mazda CX-3-esque silhouette, which are spot-on for its intended SUV-seeking clientele. And still obviously on-brand, even if the boomerang tail-light treatment is more Maserati 3200. A lovely wink to the past is the Alfa 156-style pillar-mounted door handles.

And credit where it is due. The Junior looks nothing like its 2008, Avenger, Mokka or Fiat Seicento corporate cousins. Inside or out!

I can see this car having a lot of wow factor on a dealer forecourt but up close things are less good. The software on the screens is pretty ordinary; hardly the sharpest, fastest or most logically laid-out. There’s a selection of clumsy-looking themes, and while the multimedia portion has a logical smartphone-style main menu, beneath lies an array of confusing and inconsistently-labelled sub-menus.

The digital dash could be smoother and better looking and it’s a bit confusing to use with the poorly labelled buttons on the steering wheel.

The centre console area is finished in a gloss finish, which is easy to scratch or smear with fingerprints. Up front underneath the main screen is an entirely separate dot-matrix style climate control panel with actual physical buttons. It looks a bit clunky compared to some other solutions on the market, but at least it’s clearly labelled and straightforward to use.

Somewhat infuriatingly, though, interacting with this climate panel brings up a menu on the touchscreen which you don’t need and it takes several seconds to go away. Why?

The cabin is reasonably practical from there, though. There are decent bottle holders in each front door and a further two atop the console. There’s a pass-through beneath, good for handbags and the like. There are some strange additions, like an upright holster with rubberised sides which seems to be for a phone, and behind the shifter there’s a key fob-sized cut-out, but it’s gloss finished, so it will scratch if you actually use it.

The wireless phone charger is tucked away underneath, which makes your phone hard to get at in a pinch, and easy to forget when you exit.

Ergonomically, this car is a bit strange. The seat base is very high, so for me (at 182cm tall) even with the driver’s seat set to its lowest position, my head feels close to the roof. Plus, I’m peering down on the instruments, rather than have them at a comfortable height.

However, there are soft-touch surfaces adorning the doors, which can’t be said for every car in this segment and the rear seat hasn’t been forgotten, either.

I fit pretty comfortably behind my own driving position in terms of knee and headroom and the plush seat trim continues.

There’s a nearly flat floor, so while it’s a reasonably narrow vehicle, at least someone in the centre position will have somewhere to put their feet.

On the amenity front for rear passengers, there’s a small bottle holder in each door, pockets on the backs of the front seats, a weird storage tray and USB port on the back of the centre console and a drop-down armrest with two shallow cupholders. There’s just a single adjustable air vent for rear passengers, so they’ll have to fight over who gets the airflow.

The boot surprised me. It looks tiny, but the brand claims it weighs in at 470 litres. On top of this, the floor is a strange shape because the 12-volt battery is under the floor and doesn’t quite fit level.

However, when I went to load the full three-piece CarsGuide test luggage set, I was surprised to find it fit snugly, with the tailgate able to shut without a problem. I was also impressed to find a space-saver spare wheel and not just a repair kit under the floor.

Forget every tired old cliché about Italian-car packaging and quality. Though a tad smaller inside than many small SUVs, the Junior is far from flawed.

Stepping inside, you’re greeted by a cossetting and supportive set of front seats, facing a smartly designed and executed dash that ably melds brand heritage with modernity.

The former is found in the deeply-hooded double-binnacle digital instrumentation (echoes of the company’s 1300 Junior of the ‘60s) and circular outboard vents, while the driver-angled 10.25-inch touchscreen is a nice contemporary touch. No issues with its layout or operation, either. It’s fast and logical.

The point is, with sound build quality and pleasing little details that elevate the experience, this is a classy cabin execution, juxtaposed with all the practical stuff.

That is, an excellent driving position, handsome multi-configurable instrumentation, easy reach of most controls, physical buttons for the (effective) climate system, sufficient storage including cupholders, handy USB outlets, wireless CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity… that sort of thing.

Complaints? The touchscreen is set a bit too low, meaning a glance down is required instead of eyes up on the road. In the black-trimmed test car there may be a sense of claustrophobia for some. And vision out is quite restricted as a result of the swoopy styling and slim side glass areas.

The Junior is a city-friendly crossover with more than enough space up front, but a fairly cramped rear-seat area, as its diminutive 2557mm wheelbase suggests. Most adults may need the front-seat occupants to slide forward a tad, and the centre position won’t be joyous for anybody. But at least they sit low so headroom isn’t a problem and on quite comfy cushions to boot.

As with most small SUVs, rear air vents aren’t fitted, but there are cupholders and USB ports, in line with every other small SUV out there.

And at least the Ibrida has a sizeable luggage capacity for one so small, measuring in from 414 litres to a hungry 1280L.

Of course, the lack of a spare wheel helps, but then again, this is a hybrid with extra electrification compared to a petrol-only alternative, so that’s pretty smart packaging going on right there.

Pricing remains under wraps, but we understand the Junior Ibrida mild hybrid (MH) will start from under $50,000, making it Australia’s least-expensive new Alfa.

It will join the Junior Elettrica electric-vehicle (EV) version, also due soon.

That sub-$50K kick-off means the Ibrida is out to lure one of the few premium small SUV hybrids (Lexus LBX), but in reality, it’s keenly priced enough to also pull buyers away from the petrol-powered Audi Q2, BMW X1, Mercedes-Benz GLA, Mini Countryman and Volvo XC40.

To highlight its value credentials, there’s plenty packed inside, including keyless entry/go, LED matrix headlights, twin 10.25-inch display screens, wireless connectivity and phone charging, powered and heated front sports seats, a powered driver’s seat with massage function, rear privacy glass, paddle shifters, aluminium trim bits, a hands-free/powered tailgate, a body kit, two-tone paint and 18-inch alloys.

Note, though, the spare wheel has been usurped by a tyre inflation kit.

There’s also a whole suite of advanced driver-assist safety (ADAS) technology, including adaptive cruise control, autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and lane-support systems. More on that in the Safety section below.

Alfa parent Stellantis will reveal further information closer to the Junior’s arrival in the third quarter, but the specs look promising, particularly for the money.

And, speaking of looks…

The Tiggo 4 hybrid variants pair a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a relatively large electric motor housed in a transaxle-style unit driving the front wheels. In effect, it's continuously variable without being a much-derided CVT auto.

Weirdly, Chery doesn’t state combined power figures, just separate ones for each power source, with the engine producing 72kW/120Nm and the electric motor producing 150kW/310Nm.

You’ll note the electric motor is much more powerful than the engine, which has an effect on the way this car drives.

Under the Ibrida MH’s stubby bonnet is Stellantis’ evergreen 1.2-litre three-cylinder petrol engine, delivering 100kW of power and 230Nm of torque. It features a variable-geometry turbo and Miller Cycle combustion process, to maximise efficiency.

Though there is also a Junior Ibrida Q4 all-wheel drive option that adds a second, rear-mounted electric motor available elsewhere, for now in Australia, it’s only the front wheels that are driven, via a 21kW electric motor built into a six-speed dual-clutch transmission and 48-volt/0.89kWh lithium-ion battery pack.

The electric-motor/MH system provides extra torque during acceleration to help boost speed and save fuel simultaneously, and there’s limited round-town electric-only low-speed driving available, or engine-off coasting when off-throttle at speed.

With a credible kerb weight of just 1305kg, the Ibrida clocks in with a power-to-weight ratio of a sparkling 76.6kW/tonne, resulting in an 8.9 second 0-100km/h sprint-time and a top speed of 206km/h.

The whole point of this plugless hybrid set-up is fuel efficiency and on paper it’s not as good as some rivals.

The official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) economy number is 5.4L/100km, but we easily beat that claim on test with a figure of 4.5L/100km. Worth noting that average came primarily from urban and expressway driving. It seems the hybrid transmission might require significantly more combustion input in freeway scenarios, hence the higher official claim.

A 51-litre fuel tank translates to a 944km range using the official economy figure and around 1100km based on our on-test average.

Unlike many regular mild hybrids, the self-charging Ibrida MH allows for brief pure-EV driving that Stellantis claims makes 50 per cent of emissions-free city-commuting possible in certain circumstances. Okay, we’ll need to experience that in Australia for confirmation.

The Alfa’s MH set-up aids a WLTP-rated fuel-consumption average of 4.9L/100km, for a carbon-dioxide emissions rating of 110 grams/km.

Using those figures as a guide, an average of about 815km between (premium-unleaded petrol) refills of the 40L tank is possible.

Our test car’s trip computer displayed an average of under 7.0L/100km, with mostly motorway driving near the maximum speed limit.

The full-hybrid Lexus LBX, by the way, averages 3.8L/100km and around 100g/km.

The Tiggo 4 is a strange one. This hybrid one in particular has me in two minds.

My initial impression was not a good one. The high seating position makes you feel as though you’re sitting on the car rather than in it, and the overly electrically-assisted steering removes you from feeling what’s going on at the front wheels.

Even the pedal feel is wooden, with the car having to modulate the electric and combustion drive components and blended regenerative braking at arms length, leaving the driver with little in the way of feedback.

The ride isn’t one of the worst I’ve had in recent years, with an overall soft enough edge to it, but it also doesn’t feel very sophisticated, and harsher over the rear than it is in the front, giving it an unbalanced character. On top of this, our test car had a couple of intermittent rattling noises in the B-pillar (around where the belt retainer is) as well as somewhere in the rear.

Acceleration is pretty impressive at speeds under 80km/h, however, with plenty of power instantly available from the electric motor, although this has the side-effect of being able to easily overwhelm the Sailun tyres this top-spec Tiggo 4 ships on.

One thing I quite like about the Tiggo 4, however, is how smooth it is. The seemingly primarily electric drive is excellent, particularly at lower speeds where this car is at its best, surging forward largely in silence with no annoyances from a fiddly transmission.

Even the way it blends the combustion power in is seamless, even compared to a Toyota, for example, with the engine distantly buzzing away only when required.

It's impressive that unlike the MG3 and MG ZS which have similarly powerful electric motors but run out of juice and lose a bit of punch when the hybrid battery is low, the Tiggo 4 does a better job of managing its battery reserve level, making sure the strong electric power is always available. This might mean the engine idles higher and longer, but with decent sound deadening, it’s not something you notice much.

Overall the Tiggo 4 is okay to drive. The hybrid components impressed me enough, but these are tarnished by sub-par driver feedback and inputs, handling, tyres and some ergonomic issues.

In a word, superb.

This isn’t always a given for an Alfa Romeo, as too many models in the past have suffered for being based on mundane machinery following Fiat’s takeover in the latter 1980s.

Today’s exceptions are the brilliant Giulia and Stelvio, and to this list we can add the Junior Ibrida MH. It feels closely-related to these, despite using so many parts shared with other, different Stellantis models.

As we touched on earlier, the 100kW/230Nm Ibrida enjoys a healthy power-to-weight ratio, which translates to strong off-the-line acceleration and pleasingly eager throttle response once on the move.

The electric motor seems to do a great job topping up power and torque, so – during our 200km-odd drive through rural Spain – we didn’t experience hesitation or lag associated with small-capacity turbo engines and dual-clutch transmissions. This felt spirited yet smooth all the way.

And this was in the 'Normal' drive setting. In 'Dynamic' mode, which proved to be our favourite, the Junior Ibrida MH’s performance is sparkling.

That Alfa seems to have given the exhaust a bit of a spicy note is a nice nod to the brand’s sports-car heritage, but even more so is the light yet precise steering that is perfectly weighted. The driver feels connected to the front wheels – this is a hybrid, remember – and the chassis seems in-tune with what the enthusiast wants.

Suspension is via the usual MacPherson-style struts up front and a space-saving torsion beam rear end, though the Q4 Ibrida swaps the latter out for a multi-link arrangement.

At all times there were three people on board and each with luggage, but the all-too-few times we managed to slice through a corner or race up a ragged rural road, the Junior’s handling and road-holding seemed exemplary for a small SUV.

We were also impressed with the ride quality, but the chosen Spanish route featured beautifully-maintained roads, so we’ll need to confirm whether the sporty chassis tune interferes with suspension comfort on Aussie roads. Likewise, the quiet cabin experience at speed may differ from our isolated Euro experiences.

We can confirm, however, that the ADAS tech is helpful and nuanced, offering subtle intervention in a way that felt seamless after weeks of wrestling with recalcitrant Chinese SUVs back home.

As such, it is clear the Junior Ibrida MH’s basic dynamic set-up is sound, providing pleasure and control as well as stability and reassurance. This behaves like a sophisticated and very grown-up premium SUV should.

We’re very impressed.

There are no ANCAP or Euro NCAP scores for the Junior, though this may change by the time Australian sales commence later in the year.

Final local specifications are also yet to be confirmed, but a hefty suite of ADAS tech is fitted, including AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection, lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, Drowsy Driver Alert, adaptive cruise control with lane centering and traffic-jam assist and traffic-sign recognition.

Additionally, six airbags are fitted, along with tyre pressure monitors, light-sensing LED headlights, automatic high beams, rain-sensing wipers, 360-degree parking sensors with 'Active Park Assist' and 180-degree rear camera with overhead view and front/rear parking sensors.

Two rear-seat ISOFIX points as well as a trio of top tethers for straps are included.

The Tiggo 4 Hybrid is offered with a seven-year/unlimited km warranty, seven years of roadside assist and seven years of capped price servicing with an eight year and unlimited kilometre warranty for the high-voltage battery.

The servicing is required once a year or 15,000km, with each service costing $299 for the first five years. It jumps from there, with a particularly expensive service at $736.62, dragging the yearly average for the warranty period up to $360 a year.

It’s a little pricier than Toyota, for example, but very reasonably priced compared to most.

Alfa Romeo offers the premium-manufacturer standard of five years with unlimited kilometres. Whether this continues unchanged when the Junior range arrives during the third quarter of 2025 is not yet known.

All other information, including service intervals, capped-price servicing costs and road-side assistance availability will be revealed closer to the Australian launch.