What's the difference?
Finding a half-decent small SUV for less than $30,000 has become quite challenging in the past couple of years. But as mainstream brands march further upmarket, some Chinese manufacturers are happy to grab sales at the lower end of the market.
One such brand, Chery, re-emerged with the Omoda 5 compact crossover about 18 months ago with keen pricing and loads of standard features.
Further pushing the value point, Chery recently added a new base grade of the Omoda 5, the FX. It sits under the Omoda 5 BX and EX with the same powertrain and it only loses a handful of features from the BX.
At $27,000 drive-away, it looks like a steal on paper. But how does the new cut-price Omoda 5 handle urban duties? And does this small SUV offer more than just a solid standard features list?
Electrified utes are growing in popularity in Australia and carmakers have been paying attention.
While the BYD Shark 6 plug-in hybrid (PHEV) ute is by far the best-selling as it stands, there hasn’t really been any electric ute to go up against the poorly received LDV eT60, until now.
South Korea’s KGM (formerly known as SsangYong) has just launched the Musso EV, which is a purely electric dual-cab ute. It’s unrelated to the existing, turbo-diesel Musso and is more closely related to the current car-based Actyon and Torres SUVs.
Read along to see how this ute stacks up against its growing set of competitors.
There’s little argument that Chery is focusing on value-for-money when it comes to its model range, and that’s absolutely the case with its new range opener - the Omoda 5 FX.
The spacious, flexible and neat cabin also get a tick.
Purely looking at this car on paper, it is hard to beat for $27,000 drive-away. And if you stick exclusively to urban areas without hitting the open road, you might be happy with your purchase.
However, the overall drive experience, including the behaviour of the advanced driver assistance tech, is well off the pace of mainstream rivals from Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, VW and more.
If that price is too good to look past, then be sure to do back-to-back test drives with other similarly priced rivals to compare.
Despite having the Musso name, this electric ute is a completely different beast which is much more lifestyle-oriented than the older and unrelated turbo-diesel Musso workhorse.
There really isn’t much competition out there right now in the electric ute space but this makes a compelling case, especially for those looking in the fleet space. It has an appealing price, adequate range, SUV-like comfort and decent payload capacity.
The Omoda 5’s design is bold, certainly more so than its larger Tiggo 7 and Tiggo 8 stablemates.
At the front the narrow daytime running lights integrate into the busy-looking grille that is surrounded by vertical headlights.
Tall wheel arches, narrowing rear three-quarter windows, creases, a boot lip spoiler and a perky rear help it stand out, but when you look at it front on or rear on, it seems oddly proportioned. Like it’s on stilts or something.
The cabin design is smart and restrained with a high-set centre console, piano black inserts, attractive three-spoke flat-bottom steering wheel with clear dials and minimal use of buttons.
Soft-touch materials adorn the top of the dash but the doors make do with hard plastics, which I have no issue with. The passenger side dash is upright but that doesn’t impact functionality.
You’ll either love or hate the exterior design of this ute. I’m not the biggest fan as the front is busy and likely won’t age well.
Regardless, you can’t deny that it stands out, especially with the yellow paint of our test car.
It’s hard to call this ute a Musso as it’s very clearly an Actyon or Torres from the B-pillar forwards. It’s like a Frankenstein as the rear tub section doesn’t look like it fits the aesthetic of this car.
Between the cabin and the tub area is a large slab of body colour with a rhino emblem, which looks tacky, plus there is an oversized grab handle section which serves no purpose.
At the back I like how ‘KGM’ is prominently embossed into the tailgate as no one will know what this vehicle is, at least for now.
However, I’m not convinced by the ‘X’ motif in the rear tail-lights. Like the split front LED headlight set-up with the full-width light bar, it looks too over-the-top for this kind of vehicle.
Inside, it's virtually identical to the Actyon and Torres.
While I like the look of the hexagonal steering wheel and the wraparound screen set-up combining the digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system, the copper dashboard trim looks out of place in a work-oriented type of vehicle. Good thing this is more of a lifestyle ute than something like a HiLux.
Pair this with the large amounts of glossy piano black around the gear selector and the window switches on the door cards, it’s a recipe for fingerprints, smudges and scratches.
The cabin offers enough space for a small SUV. It feels wide across the front seat and there’s plenty of headroom, too.
The driver’s seat is power adjustable and while the fabric and stitching look cool, there’s almost too much padding under your bottom.
There are clear controls on the comfy door armrest and on the lovely looking three-spoke synthetic leather, flat bottom steering wheel.
The console sits up high, presumably to give the cabin a sports car look, and the dash is neat and clean, largely due to a lack of physical buttons. There are two phone holders that dominate the lower part of the dash and they double as device chargers in higher grades, but not in the FX.
There is space under the console to fit a bag or other items but the USB-A and USB-C ports are on the passenger side so you have to reach over to connect a cord if required. Thankfully, the Apple CarPlay is wireless. It connected easily and did not require reconnection while I had the car.
Two smallish cupholders are found near the gear shifter, and a sizeable central bin will store a number or items. The doors can stow a tall and wide bottle as well as other flat items.
Chery’s dual-screen set-up looks nice and not a world away from Kia’s integrated screens. The driver instrument display is not customisable in this grade and many of the items on the display are quite small. It would help if these were a little larger.
The multimedia side is simple to use with iPhone-like icons for functions like vehicle settings and more. There’s even a cute little bubble face on the side that you press to dictate commands. I asked the system to perform a few basic tasks like turning the air con off and on and it did it immediately without fault.
Air con controls are housed in the screen as well but it’s not as fiddly as some systems from other manufacturers. The only complaint is that it doesn’t appear to show the exact temperature, and the air flow could be stronger for a hot climate like Australia.
Taller passengers will probably need to duck their heads getting in and out of the Omoda 5’s rear seats, because of the low roofline. Once in the rear, there is a decent amount of knee and legroom, and headroom is good too despite the roofline.
Those rear seats are flat and not the most comfortable but fine for urban drives, and they feature ISOFIX points on the two outboard seats and three top tether points for child car seats.
In terms of amenities, there’s one USB-C port in the second row, lower air vents - something too many small SUVs go without - a centre fold-down armrest with two (shallow) cupholders and enough space for big bottles in the doors.
All petrol Omoda 5s have a cargo capacity of 360 litres, which increases to 1075L when you fold the 60/40 split rear seats down. This is more than the GWM Haval Jolion petrol’s capacity (337L).
It has a manual tailgate, a high loading area and some under-floor storage, but there is more than enough space for some luggage or a large amount of groceries in the boot.
It has a temporary spare wheel which is essential in Australia if you’re driving beyond urban areas.
The only negative is the flimsy parcel shelf. It struggles to stay in the groves that are designed to hold it. I had to re-fit it every time I opened the boot.
You sit up high in the Musso EV’s driver’s seat, allowing for a clear and commanding view of the road ahead. This is something that buyers of these kinds of vehicles seek as it provides more confidence behind the wheel.
While the hexagonal steering wheel looks cool, it can take a while to get your head around it, especially when turning quickly. Thankfully there are plenty of physical buttons on the wheel for key functions, so it doesn’t entirely reinvent the wheel (pardon the pun…)
Ahead of the driver is a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster which looks clear and bright. You can cycle through a range of informative pages and while this is good, I’d love to see more customisation and configurability.
The same can be said for the central touchscreen multimedia system. It’s a rather basic system, but that’s not a bad thing because it also means that it’s easy to use. Frustratingly however, the screen takes a while to boot up when you start the ute.
Even though the touchscreen is basic, the majority of owners will likely be using smartphone mirroring for the majority of their time behind the wheel. It’s for this reason that it’s disappointing there’s only the wired form of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto available.
On the flip side though, the wired connection is flawless and it actually charges your phone rather than overheating it like some wireless chargers do.
I’d love to see some more physical switchgear and buttons around the screen because you’re forced to use it for a number of key functions, like the climate control and volume.
Up front the Musso EV is fairly practical. There are two cupholders, plenty of phone slots, a large open section under the centre console, as well as dual bottle holders in the doors.
Moving to the second row you can tell this is a ute that’s based on an SUV. There’s much more space and thought put into the second-row comfort.
At a leggy 182cm I have plenty of room behind my own driving position. In the default position it’s a comfortable spot to be, however you can recline the backrest even further, although you sacrifice legroom as a result. You don’t get features like this in every ute.
In terms of second-row amenities there are two USB-C ports and air vents on the back of the centre console, a fold-down armrest with cupholders, as well as lots of seat-back pockets and bottle holders in the doors.
The tub of the Musso EV is where things get interesting. There’s a damped tailgate with two gas struts that allows for effortless opening and closing.
Once the tailgate is open, the space is decent but not standout for a dual-cab ute. The tub area measures in at 1345mm long, 1515mm wide (1100mm between the arches) and 510mmmm tall. This notably means a standard Australia pallet is a bit too wide for the tub.
Payload in the 2WD is up to 905kg which isn’t too bad for a dual-cab ute, however it drops to 805kg in the AWD.
Towing capacity is where this electric ute suffers the most. It has a braked towing capacity of only 1800kg, which is down considerably over the benchmark 3500kg many of its top-selling rivals can do. There’s also only a maximum towball down load of 180kg, which is limiting.
While this isn’t great, electric utes typically aren’t the most efficient for towing rigs. As a result this limits the Musso EV to more light-duty and lifestyle applications.
Disappointingly there’s no spare wheel at all in this ute. Instead you have to rely on a tyre repair kit which isn’t helpful if you have a proper puncture and not a slow leak.
At the time of publishing, the only non-Chinese-branded model in the mainstream small SUV category available for less than $30K drive-away is the 14-year-old Mitsubishi ASX. The only other sub-$30K small SUVs are from Chery, GWM Haval and MG - all from China.
Since launching the Omoda 5, Chery has placed value at the heart of its pitch to buyers, and that has only sharpened with the launch of the new base FX grade, tested here.
The FX kicks off at $27,990, drive-away, which lowers the price of entry to the Omoda 5 range by $6500. Not bad at all.
The only other models that compete on price are the GWM Haval Jolion Premium from $26,990 drive-away, the soon-to-be replaced MG ZST Vibe at $26,490 drive-away and the Mitsubishi ASX GS which is $26,740, but that doesn't include on-road costs.
Spec wise, the FX is not missing much from the next grade up, the $34,490, drive-away, BX. You get halogen headlights instead of LEDs, and it loses acoustic glass, soft-touch upper door inserts, ambient lighting, a wireless device charger, a 12-volt outlet in the boot and a frameless rear-view mirror.
Compared with the BX the FX suffices with single-zone instead of dual-zone air conditioning, the audio system drops from eight speakers to six and it has fabric rather than synthetic leather seat trim.
Out of these missing items, you’ll miss some more than others. Offering halogen instead of LED headlights is increasingly rare these days, even on base grades, and halogens are just not as strong, especially on regional roads at night.
But I am yet to encounter a truly effective device charging pad in a car so that’s no great loss.
The safety list is solid (see Safety section below) and it still has a good level of standard gear, especially for the price.
The FX comes with rear passenger air vents, keyless entry and start, a proximity key, a six-way power driver’s seat, dual 10.25-inch screens (multimedia and driver instrumentation), digital radio, an intelligent voice command as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
There are three trim levels in the local KGM Musso EV line-up.
Pricing starts at $60,000 drive-away for the 2WD trim, which is what we have here. While this is around $7000 more than the top-spec diesel-powered Musso, it’s around the same price as the popular BYD Shark 6 PHEV ute.
Electric dual-cab utes are thin on the ground right now, with the only notable rival being the lacklustre LDV eT60 which is priced at a hefty $92,990 before on-roads.
However, electric versions of the Toyota HiLux and Isuzu D-Max are due to launch over the next few years in Australia and will likely be priced similarly. In this respect, it makes the Musso EV seem like a bargain.
Do note however that this is based on car-like monocoque platform rather than more rugged ladder frame of many utes. While these models are not sold here in Australia (yet), the US-market, SUV-based Ford Maverick and Hyundai Santa Cruz are more logical competitors for this ute.
Standard kit includes 17-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, dual 12.3-inch screens, wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and interior ambient lighting.
There are even niceties like eight-way power-adjustable front seats with heating and ventilation, plus heated outboard rear seats on all models which isn’t common in the ute space.
It’s disappointing there’s no wireless smartphone mirroring available across the line-up, especially in a brand-new car that was only revealed earlier this year.
A 2WD Black Edge trim is available that, as the name suggests, brings a range of blacked-out finishes. It’s priced from $62,000 drive-away.
At the top of the line-up is the AWD, which is priced from $64,000 drive-away. It’s configured identically to the base grade but gains an extra electric motor for more power and torque.
There are two petrol engine choices for the Omoda 5. The FX, BX and EX use a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbocharged unit delivering power and torque outputs of 108kW and 210Nm, respectively.
These grades are front-wheel drive and the powertrain features a continuously variable transmission (CVT).
Those outputs are inline with the GWM Haval Jolion petrol but offer more punch than the MG ZST.
The Omoda 5 GT grades use a more powerful 137kW/275Nm 1.6-litre turbo, but they also come with a higher price tag.
Two-wheel-drive versions of the Musso EV are powered by a single, front-mounted electric motor producing 152kW and 339Nm. Yes, that makes this ute front-wheel drive.
It’s worth noting this is the exact same set-up as the KGM Torres EVX which has also just launched in Australia.
The all-wheel-drive version adds a second electric motor to the rear axle, bumping up total system outputs to 266kW and 630Nm.
Chery says the official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel use figure for the Omoda 5 1.5L is 6.9 litres per 100km and the CO2 emissions are rated at 164g/km from the Euro 6-compliant engine.
After a week of urban, freeway and outer suburban driving we recorded a figure of 10.3L/100km which is well off the official figure.
It has a 51-litre fuel tank and runs on 91 RON petrol. Based on our calculations you can expect a theoretical range of about 765km.
All KGM Musso EVs have a BYD-sourced 80.6kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery.
It allows for up to 420km of claimed range in the 2WD and up to 380km of claimed range in the AWD, both according to WLTP testing.
The official energy consumption is 23kWh/100m in the 2WD and 26kWh/100km in the AWD. However, in our largely unladen urban testing of the 2WD we saw an average of 20kWh/100km, which is fairly decent for a larger EV, but not outstanding.
Using this, the Musso EV 2WD has a theoretical range of 403km.
The Type 2 CCS combination charge port is on the passenger-side front wheel arch, which is great because it’s kerbside.
Maximum DC charging is 120kW, allowing for a quick charge from 10 to 80 per cent in 36 minutes, whereas maximum AC charging is 10.5kW, allowing for a 0-100 per cent charge in 10.5 hours.
Vehicle-to-load (V2L) is available through the use of an accessory which plugs into the charge port. This allows you to use the ute’s battery to power household appliances, among other things.
The Omoda 5 has two personalities depending how and where you’re driving. If you only drive in urban areas and rarely exceed 60km/h, it’s more than fine as a daily driver.
It’s when you’re on the open road or a freeway that its flaws are revealed.
The 1.5-litre engine is responsive enough, although there is some hesitation when accelerating under full throttle, and it’s slower to pick up pace when you’re already on the move at 60 or 80km/h.
The throttle is quite sensitive, however, and can be a little jolty when taking off. And light tyre chirp is also possible when accelerating hard.
Chery’s CVT is fine and doesn’t have the drone of other CVTs, but the manual mode toggles on the side of the shifter are in a confusing spot. When I first got in the car, I mistook this for the button that allows the shift between drive and reverse that many other cars have. I only made that mistake once, though.
The engine is rowdy when accelerating hard but not unpleasant, and Chery could do more to keep noise out of the cabin. Wind noise is particularly noticeable.
The Omoda 5’s ride can be jittery, particularly on uneven or pockmarked roads. The tyres seem to soak up road reflectors and smaller bumps but the suspension tune is on the firmer side which means it’s crashy over bigger bumps.
It also leans a lot when cornering, feeling top heavy in bends. This is not the sort of dynamically capable crossover you can have fun with on a twisty road, like the sadly departed Ford Puma, or the Mazda CX-30 or VW T-Roc.
Some general impressions - the brakes are a little slow to respond but you learn to adjust. The steering feels artificial and twitchy and you’re constantly fighting with the lane keeping aid. More on that in the ‘Safety’ section below.
On sunny days a distracting reflection of the top of the dash appears on the inside of the windscreen. It’s not great. But another general impression is that the proximity key works a treat. Which is not often the case.
As previously mentioned, the Musso EV we tested is a front-wheel drive. Its electric motor doesn’t have the highest outputs, although like all electric motors, peak torque comes on tap from a standstill.
In everyday traffic the acceleration is decent, yet does not stand out when unladen. Load the ute up with stuff in the tub or hook a trailer on the back and it might struggle. Thankfully if you’re after more oomph there’s the all-wheel drive.
There are two drive modes available – Eco and Sport. The former dramatically nerfs initial acceleration to make progression feel naturally tapered and to ensure there’s no front-wheel slip, but as a result it can feel a little sluggish. The latter however gives you everything and can create some light front-tyre spin if you’re too eager with the throttle.
You’re able to select from a number of different regenerative braking modes which feeds kinetic energy back into the battery pack. None of them offer a one-pedal driving mode, meaning you’ll still need to use the brake pedal to come to a complete stop.
This mimics the braking experience of a hybrid vehicle, which likely feels more comfortable and natural for drivers of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.
Once you get your head around the hexagonal steering wheel, the steering feel itself is on the lighter side, but it still feels direct. As a result, it’s fun to chuck this ute around.
However, you can’t escape just how big this ute is, especially when parking and doing three-point turns. It measures almost 5.2m long, which is slightly shorter than a Ranger but still not compact.
Unlike many traditional dual-cab utes, this electric ute is based on a monocoque chassis, rather than a body-on-frame chassis. Additionally, the rear suspension is a multi-link set-up rather than a leaf spring set-up.
As a result, this makes the driving experience more like an SUV that prioritises passenger comfort than a ute that prioritises outright payload and towing capacity.
Around town the ride is supple but still has a firm edge, especially over the rear, even when unladen.
Smaller-than-average 17-inch alloy wheels wrapped in chunky tyres with thick sidewalls smooth out some bigger bumps.
A nifty feature this ute has is self-leveling rear shock absorbers. It’s able to pump up the rear end when you’ve got a heavy load in the tub, or if you're towing a trailer, in order to create a flat ride height. This is great as you won’t be dazzling oncoming cars with your headlights.
From a noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) standpoint, this ute is largely quiet around town. Despite this, there’s an annoying pedestrian warning sound that plays under 33km/h and can intrude into the cabin.
At higher speeds there is a fair bit of road noise which is amplified by the lack of ambient engine noise. There can also be occasional wind noise buffeting from the bonnet flourishes.
As mentioned earlier, Chery has a long list of standard safety gear for all grades of the Omoda 5 from the base FX to the top-spec GT AWD.
In fact, the only feature the FX and BX don’t get is a 360-degree surround-view monitor.
It comes with a centre airbag to help mitigate against injury during a side collision, front and rear parking sensors, multi-collision brake, forward collision warning, auto emergency braking (AEB), emergency lane keeping, lane departure warning and prevention, traffic jam assist, lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert and traffic sign recognition.
ANCAP gave it a maximum five-star crash safety rating in 2022.
There is no question you get a bucket load of safety gear for your money. However, some of the advanced driver assistance features let the car down.
We have written before about the poor performance of systems like the lane keeping aid when the Omoda 5 launched 18 months ago.
Chery was very quick to recalibrate some of these systems to ensure they are better suited to Australian conditions. But it’s still well off the pace of other more established small SUV rivals.
Despite the improvements, the active lane keeping system still isn’t great. On a freeway, the steering is incredibly jittery and it makes for an unpleasant driving experience. The car ping pongs between the line markings and sometimes it feels like it’s going to steer you into the next lane.
At one point I had the indicator on to change lanes and even then the steering was fighting me to stay in the lane I was in.
It feels like one of the first examples of lane keeping systems from several years ago. Many other brands have sharpened these systems to the point they are barely noticeable.
The blind spot monitor beeps a lot and at inappropriate times. It is quite frustrating. You can turn off some of these systems in the settings menu, but you shouldn’t have to do that. They should just work without distracting from the task at hand - driving.
Chery’s driver attention alert is infuriating. I lost count of the number of times the ‘You’ve been distracted for a long time’ warning flashed up when I was looking straight ahead at the road. At one point the display flashed when I was at a roundabout trying to turn. So I was distracted by what? My own driving?
The adaptive cruise control, however, is responsive and adapted to forward traffic without getting flustered.
Chery may have improved the ADAS calibration after the Omoda's launch, but the carmaker still has a lot of work to do in this area to be anywhere near its mainstream rivals.
The KGM Musso EV hasn’t been crash-tested by ANCAP or Euro NCAP.
As standard it receives eight airbags, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, front and rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, lane centring, adaptive cruise control, front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera.
The safety systems all do a good job of staying out of the way when you’re driving, though the lane-keep assist can be a little too hands-on at points if the lane is narrow.
Chery has a solid aftersales offer that includes a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, seven years of roadside assist as long as you service with a Chery dealer, and seven years of capped-price servicing.
The service schedule is every 10,000km or 12 months, whichever comes first. That’s off the pace of some rivals that don’t make you return to the dealership until 15,000km.
But the cost of the first five services is $280 a pop before increasing to $391 and then $295. That is well priced for the segment.
The Musso EV is covered by a seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty as standard, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered by a 10-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.
KGM is yet to confirm servicing intervals or pricing.
There are 66 KGM dealers and service centres around Australia. The majority are spread over the eastern seaboard, however, there is generous coverage in many regional areas.