What's the difference?
This is the new Chery C5.
Not a Chevy C5 Corvette, Citroen C5, Sinclair C5 city trike or even a Lockheed C-5 Galaxy bomber, but a facelifted Omoda 5, with a fresh nose and a few (largely) welcome upgrades underneath.
But do they address the old model’s flaws? Which, for many reviewers, made it difficult to recommend, even against other equally cheap and cheerless small SUV rival alternatives, including the previous-shape MG ZS and GWM Haval Jolion.
Read on to find out.
GWM has launched its first plug-in hybrid for Australia and in comes in the form of their mid-size SUV, the Haval H6 GT Ultra PHEV.
There's been a growing coolness towards EVs and their middle-ground counterparts of late but with a class-leading electric driving range of 180km, the new H6 GT Ultra may just warm you up.
Can a new name, fresh face and suspension update save Chery’s sleek SUV coupe from the ignominy of being one of the least pleasant options in its ultra-competitive class?
Sadly, not enough has been done for us to recommend the new C5.
As an affordable, stylish, roomy and zoomy SUV, the Chery definitely provides showroom appeal, especially given the decent warranty.
But, with lots of little niggles still present to distract and frustrate, the C5 is far from A1. Plus, with prices now creeping up, it doesn’t even have the cheap pricing of the old Omoda 5 to get it over the line.
Heading into 2026, Chery still needs to do better than this.
The new GWM Haval H6 GT Ultra PHEV has got to be one of the few plug-in hybrids that makes sense to me, given I live in a regional area. The longer electric driving range and DC charging capability offers far more convenience and practicality than the usual plug-in hybrids I’ve sampled.
It’s well-priced and has enough features for the average family. So, while I don’t love everything about it, it offers decent value for money.
The new and narrower nose treatment is better, banishing the Omoda 5’s insectoid face straight into the bin. As an example of coupe-SUV design, the unaltered silhouette remains contemporary and is a defining signature for the series.
But, as before, the C5’s styling is hobbled by its narrow-gutted track width and highish (at 184mm) ground clearance, that give it a muffin-top and tippy-toed appearance respectively from most angles. Flashbacks to a Holden VN Commodore. Stance be damned.
Let’s look at the newcomer’s dimensions, compared to the Tiggo 4 for perspective: length is 4351mm (plus 44mm), width is 1831mm (+6mm), height is 1662mm (+2mm) and wheelbase is identical at 2610mm.
Still, there’s a positively Pollyanna-esque perspective to be gained here as well, since the C5’s extra size translates to a biggish small SUV inside a cabin that seems stylishly minimalistic. Or fairly basic. It all depends on your point of view.
Let’s take a closer look.
The H6 GT is the better-looking cousin to the regular H6 SUV because the swoopy rear end adds some much-needed personality.
It's the 19-inch alloys, Michelin tyres and red brake calipers that add to the sporty vibe.
It looks quite large for the segment and while I’m not a massive fan of the heavy plastic moulding around the base of the car, it’s got enough charm to appeal to a wide audience.
Head inside though and you're immediately hit by a strong plasticky presence, whether it be from actual plastics in the dash and door panels or the synthetic feeling of the upholstery itself.
The sunroof and red-stitched 'GT' on the seats add something but its all rather plain and lacks some personality inside.
I do like though that there’s no transmission tunnel, which means more legroom for middle seaters in the rear.
Three things struck me the moment I stepped inside the C5.
Firstly, though the silhouette suggests a low-slung car, the tall stance means getting in and out isn’t a drama at all, with the seats being up high enough for this to deserve its SUV/crossover status.
Secondly, the Chery emits a somewhat repellent plastic off-gas odour, a bit like a cheap toy. The smell never goes away. Perhaps it was just our test car? Unlikely though, as it reminds me of pre-2000s Kias and Hyundais.
And in stark contrast, thirdly, there’s an arresting elegance to the dashboard’s minimalist layout and presentation. Nothing’s changed visually and nothing needed to.
Let’s concentrate on the many positive points first.
There’s plenty of space around you for a comparatively small and narrow SUV, including ample legroom and head room for your 178cm tester front and back. It doesn't feel cramped at all.
Finding the ideal driving position is easy, with most of the (available) switches and controls where you’d need them to be without having to stretch to reach. Helping things out here is an adjustable steering wheel for rake as well as reach. Unlike in an MG ZS.
The dash layout looks great, given that this car is of a 2022 vintage, with the large, twin 10.25-inch integrated displays for both the electronic instrumentation and the multimedia system seamlessly presented. Both are fairly clear and easy to work out and operate. And, despite being an older-generation vehicle (it’s now well into year four of production), the instruments still look fresh.
And though the C5 runs a software-based operating system for vehicle functions, climate, audio, multimedia and other settings, the few buttons provided are well integrated and mostly work logically.
Below the touchscreen is a row of haptic switches for the main heating and cooling elements, meaning just one touch is necessary and with no complicated and time-consuming sub-menus to navigate. That's good.
You do need to dive into sub-menus for some drive settings and modes, though, and that's disappointing, but at least the C5’s is not as complicated as some others we’ve experienced of late.
Other plus points include excellent ventilation and loads of storage, including a big old glovebox, a cavernous centre console bin, a vast lower area to hide things on, deep cupholders and a ‘wall’ to lean two phones or a tablet while still being visible for the driver to glance at, with one side providing wireless charging on the Ultimate grade.
Along with pleasant cloth seats that are surprisingly comfortable, all show a reassuring degree of thoughtfulness.
Additionally, the poor side and rear vision is at least aided by large side mirrors and a crisp reverse-camera views.
However, there are some serious downsides too, starting with the C5’s aforementioned phone/tablet wall. The rubber backing in our test car was misshapen and dog-eared, undermining the otherwise exemplary build quality.
Until you learn its weird ways, the gear shifter can be unfathomable. It looks like it would operate as per a regular T-bar, but pressing the side button to engage Drive or Reverse instead locks them out, meaning the uninitiated will inevitably find themselves panicking manoeuvring in traffic with impatient drivers wondering why a Chery is blocking the road during a cheeky three-point turn. Embarrassing and, yes, super frustrating.
In the Ultra at least, the lofty front passenger seat has no height adjustment. The digital radio did not work for the entire week we had the C5. Maybe it was just our car, but even in inner Melbourne, reception proved elusive.
And the touchscreen-based secondary climate settings that aren’t supported by physical buttons are a stretch away, including temperature adjustment, meaning these and other items are arranged for left-hand-drive access.
This means it is fiddly to operate, as concentration is not on the road ahead, resulting in the driver monitor sounding off, leading to more frustration. An unvirtuous circle of distraction ensues, highlighting the folly of software-based vehicle systems that have not been tailored to Australian road conditions. Fail.
But nothing is as aggravating as the Chery’s voice control system. Like we said earlier, when turned on, it mishears or misunderstands words to almost a comical degree… if it wasn’t so constantly intrusive. As with paranoid and/or trigger-happy ADAS warnings, you end up switching off such irritating tech. Which beggars the question: what is their point?
Moving to the back seat, things look up again, with sufficient space for most smaller families to settle into.
The bench is fine, offering adequate comfort for shorter journeys. Legroom is generous, helped out by room for boots to tuck underneath the front cushion. And most amenities are present for a base model car, including a folding armrest with two cupholders (again, unlike in an MG ZS), as well as one-touch electric windows, overhead grab handles, coat hooks, decent size door bins, a USB port and face level ventilation.
All those go towards making the C5 well-packaged, small family transport.
Further back, Chery has managed to liberate an extra 10 litres of cargo capacity compared to the old Omoda 5, so 360 litres is available – which is not bad for a small SUV. That rises to 1075L in two-seater mode.
It’s also a practical and easy boot to use, with a space saver spare wheel.
The most practical aspect of the H6 GT's cabin is its sheer size. It's a spacious cabin for the class and that translates to lots of passenger room in each row. Which is only let down by the relatively small boot capacity of 392L (when all five seats are in use).
The boot does feature a level loading space, a 12-volt power socket, retractable cargo cover and a powered tailgate. The latter I always appreciate with kids in tow.
There are lots of individual storage options with the front featuring a glove box large enough for an owner's manual, a middle console, two cupholders and two drink bottle holders. There's also a large shelf underneath the centre console, a dedicated phone cradle and a sunglasses holder.
In the rear there are two drink bottle holders, two map pockets and a couple of cupholders in a fold-down armrest. So plenty of choices for passengers.
Surprisingly, the most comfortable seats are in the rear which feature thick padding, good lumbar support and long seat beds. The electric front seats have heat and ventilation functions, as well as adjustable lumbar support but the lumbar sits too low and the seat backs curve in too far for them to be called comfortable on a longer journey.
The tech is made up of a 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system and 10.25-inch digital instrument panel and while they look nice, they're basic at best. The multimedia system is simply laid out but lacks any real customisation and doesn't have sat nav.
The touchscreen can be laggy and there is wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. GWM has confirmed that wireless phone mirroring is due sometime later this year.
Charging options include four USB-A ports (but no USB-C ports), two 12-volt sockets and a wireless charging pad but the pad didn't always work for my iPhone 15 Pro Max (whether that is a user or software issue, I'm not sure).
In its latest guise, Chery’s small SUV coupe range has been reduced to just two grades, Urban and Ultimate.
This one’s the Urban. At $29,990 drive-away at the time of publishing, it undercuts the Ultimate by $5000, but does cost $2000 more than the old base Omoda 5 FX. And the competition is becoming fiercer by the month.
Consider, for example, the redesigned and vastly-improved MG ZS, facelifted Jolion and all-new Suzuki Fronx, as well the less expensive if smaller rivals such as the Mahindra 3XO, Kia Stonic, Hyundai Venue, Mazda CX-3, Nissan Juke and Chery’s own Tiggo 4.
Frankly, the Omoda 5 needed to improve.
To that end, the C5 ditches the old torsion beam rear suspension for a multi-link independent set-up that promises better comfort and control. That’s a big step in the right direction.
And while long-term durability and reliability remain unknowns with such gearboxes, a switch from a continuously variable transmission (CVT) to a six-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT) may be a nod to driving enthusiasts. Let’s see about that.
The entry-level Ultra includes a nicely integrated electronic display and central touchscreen at 10.25 inches apiece, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, rear air vents, powered folding mirrors, noise-cutting acoustic front door glass and 17-inch alloys.
There’s also “Hello, Chery” voice control, that can thankfully be silenced as our example’s inability to differentiate 'Chery' from 'Cher', 'chair' and 'care' fast became a pain in you-know-where, since it insisted on constantly butting in.
Seven airbags and a decent level of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are also standard – more on those in the safety section below.
For the record, the $35K-drive-away Ultimate adds better audio, a powered tailgate, heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, a 360-degree monitor, sunroof with sunshade, wireless charger, imitation leather, bigger wheels and more.
However, they are also necessary sweeteners against sophisticated rivals like the Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid, Mazda CX-30, Subaru Crosstrek, Hyundai Kona, Nissan Qashqai and Renault Duster.
More importantly for some, the closely related and virtually identically sized Chery Tiggo 4 costs several thousand dollars less, and mostly matches the C5’s spec at each corresponding grade, undermining the newcomer's value. A strange own-goal, Chery.
Oh well. For some buyers, this swoopy crossover is all about image. At least the facelift addresses the old Omoda 5’s odd appearance from some angles.
There is only one grade available for the H6 GT, which is the Ultra and it's available with two powertrains - a 2.0L turbo-petrol engine or the 1.5L turbo-petrol plug-in hybrid powertrain of our test vehicle.
Its sharp drive-away pricing of $53,990 makes it very competitive against its rivals. The BYD Sealion 6 Premium sits at $52,990 MSRP and you have to jump into the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Exceed ($69,290 DA) if you want to match on some of the standard equipment of the H6 GT Ultra.
While the PHEV offers a class-leading electric driving range of up to 180km, it features pretty much the same equipment as it's non-hybrid sibling but is $9000 more expensive.
The premium features include a panoramic sunroof, synthetic leather and suede upholstery, electric front seats with heat and ventilation functions, a heated steering wheel, a powered tailgate, powered and heated side mirrors and rear tinted glass.
Technology includes a keyless entry/start, 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster, dual-zone climate control, 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system, coloured head-up display, four USB-A ports, two 12-volt sockets, a wireless charging pad, FM/AM radio, Bluetooth, and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
However, it doesn't have a spare tyre (just a repair kit) or sat nav and there's no wireless phone mirroring. At least, not yet but GWM has confirmed that they are working on getting the phone functionality up and running sometime later this year.
The C5 is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine, delivering 108kW of power at 5500rpm and 210Nm of torque from 1750-4000rpm.
As part of the MY25 facelift, the Chery swaps out the old Omoda 5’s CVT for a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, complete with a handy manual mode. It drives the front wheels only.
Tipping the scales at 1462kg (kerb), the C5 Ultra offers a power-to-weight ratio of 73.9kW/tonne – which is slightly less than, say, a Haval Jolion, but quite a bit behind a Mazda CX-3.
With a slight helping hand from a strong northerly wind, we managed to record a 0-100km/h sprint time of 9.9 seconds. This figure suggests the Chery feels faster than it is.
The new H6 GT Ultra has a plug-in hybrid powertrain that combines a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with three electric motors, two at the front and one at the rear.
Together they produce a combined power output of 321kW and 762Nm of torque. That gives this 4WD a 0-100km/h sprint time of 4.9 seconds. So it's a quick SUV but somehow it doesn't manage to feel 'blow-your-hair-back' quick.
The engine is paired with a two-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (DHT) and the switch between the electric and engine components is practically seamless.
The C5’s combined average fuel consumption figure is 6.9L/100km, for a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 160 grams/km. And that’s on regular 91 RON standard unleaded. Topping the 51-litre petrol tank should result in nearly 740km of range between refills.
During our week with the Chery, we managed 9.0L/100km, which is very disappointing, though that did include highway and performance driving.
The new H6 GT has a ternary lithium battery with a large 35.43kWh capacity. It also has a Type 2 CCS charging port, which is pretty rare but welcome on a plug-in. This system can accept up to 6.6kW on an AC charger and up to 48kW on a fast DC charger, which is great.
It means you can plug in at a DC fast charger during a road trip like a normal EV and that improves overall efficiency.
The combined fuel cycle figure is just 0.8L/100km and with the 55L fuel tank, you’ll get a theoretical driving range of over 1000km. That’s just something to consider right there. The considerable pure electric driving range of up to 180km also ensures that you can do your daily errands and school run without really touching the fuel tank.
Which I totally proved this week after doing 469km of open-road driving and my daily 'urban' errands and only using 2.3L of fuel all week. I had two full charges during my week and that means my real-world usage beats the claimed figure at 0.49L/100km. Haval H6 GT for the win.
Chery has made some pretty fundamental changes underneath, so we had higher hopes of the C5 compared to the preceding Omoda 5. However, expectations ought to be tempered here.
Let’s begin with the Chinese SUV’s performance.
After a moment’s hesitation, the C5 feels punchy from the get-go, with a decent amount of muscle as the revs rise. Throttle response is brisk, even at higher speeds. And the brakes do a great job. This is quite the rapid little runabout.
Some of that initial lag is down to the dual-clutch transmission, since it needs time for the turbo to spool up. Once sorted, it shifts swiftly and smoothly, and without delay. Only the aforementioned gear selector complication will catch out new drivers, as the operation is needlessly complicated.
But the engine is never really quiet, and can even feel coarse when extended under hard acceleration, betraying this Chery’s station as a cheap SUV. And the stop/start tech is especially jerky.
The steering, meanwhile, is a mix of disgruntle and delight.
When driving on the motorway, it can feel lumpy, with the driver-assist system tugging away endlessly at the wheel. The sudden jolts make it feel like a pinball as the vehicle feels like it is ricocheting off the white lines. Such constant correction is both tiring and irritating, leading to fatigue and, if your fuse is really short, aggravation.
For steering smoothness or linearity, you need to dive into a sub menu and opt out of several ADAS modes. Or otherwise pull over and wonder why Chinese car companies especially seem to have such disdain for Australian drivers. If this sounds like a nightmare, the C5 is not for you.
Furthermore, there’s no point choosing a steering setting. Comfort is light enough for easy driving and weighty enough for the driver to feel in control, but feedback and feel are absent. And selecting Sport just adds needless heft and makes it all feel way too heavy.
Now, that said, the C5 offers some dynamic compensation, and likely courtesy of its multi-link suspension upgrade.
At higher speeds, the steering, for instance, is pleasingly direct and precise, meaning it turns exactly where you choose it to. The handling feels controlled and the tyres grip well, for some unintentional scrappy fun through really tight corners, to a certain extent anyway. It’s a side to the Chery the Omoda 5 never seemed capable of delivering.
But, inevitably, this comes at a price, and that is a busy and at times agitated ride, with the suspension failing to soak up bumps and irregularities on anything other than smooth roads, despite its new-found independence, adding to further fatigue. For the record, our test car rode on 215/60R17 Giti tyres.
Would higher-quality rubber help fix this? If you’re buying a sub-$30K Chery SUV, would you even care? Basically, unless you enjoy the occasional hoon, the C5 lacks dynamic sophistication as well as sufficient Australian road tuning. Much like its predecessor. Such a letdown.
The new powertrain took a few days to get used to because it doesn't behave like some of the PHEVs I've driven before. The emphasis is on EV driving rather than the ICE components. The pedals are quite stiff which takes a moment to adjust to, but the auto-hold braking and strong regenerative braking means it's difficult 'creep' forward like you can in a regular ICE car.
The one-pedal function is true one-pedal driving and if you time your deceleration right, you won't touch the brake pedal. You'll either like that or you won't but it's been nice to use this week.
The power delivery is prompt and there's a lot of power available. It doesn’t feel wicked quick like a performance EV but it certainly has enough punch to satisfy. You don’t notice when it switches between the engine or motor, which makes it a very smooth powertrain.
The steering is a little spongy but responsive enough to feel spry for quick lane changes. It's just not particularly dynamic on a winding road with the combination of the firmer suspension and soft steering.
Road noise can creep up at higher speeds and there is an annoying whirring sound from the motors that my son likened to a dull aeroplane engine roar.
The suspension is on the firmer side and you notice the bumps but you also don’t wince when you hit one. Visibility is okay but the thick A-pillar can get in the way when you're scanning the road at intersections, and the back window is narrow. A digital rear-view mirror would be a handy feature for the model.
The H6 GT Ultra PHEV is pretty easy to park because it has a clear 360-degree view camera system and parking sensors at the front and rear. The 12-metre turning circle makes it pretty friendly in a carpark, too.
Considering that it is merely a facelift with a new badge, the Chery C5 conveniently adopts the preceding Omoda 5’s five-star ANCAP crash-test rating.
Note that was conducted in 2022 using earlier performance parameters compared to today.
Anyway, there is little doubt that Chery has done its homework here, with a host of advanced driver-assist systems (ADAS) being fitted.
These include autonomous emergency braking (AEB), forward collision warning, emergency lane keeping, lane departure warning and prevention, blind spot detection, lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert and braking, adaptive cruise control with traffic jam assist, traffic sign recognition, speed control assist, a driver monitor and auto high beams.
This cannot be understated: most of this ADAS tech requires Australian road tuning, because they interfere and distract to the point of being a nuisance.
Note that the AEB (encompassing pedestrian, cyclist and back-over braking) operates from 4km/h to 65km/h, whilst the car-to-car braking is between 4km/h and 150km/h. The lane-support systems work between 60km/h and 150km/h.
Seven airbags are present (including a front-centre and full head/curtain coverage but no rear side airbags), as are anti-lock brakes, stability control and traction control systems.
Finally, a pair of ISOFIX child-seat latch points and a trio of hooks for tether straps across the rear seat are also part of the C5 package.
The Haval H6 GT has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing done in 2022 and scored 90 per cent for adult protection, 88 per cent for child protection, 73 per cent for vulnerable road users and 81 per cent for safety assist.
It features seven airbags, including a front centre airbag.
There are seatbelt reminders (all seats), hill-start assist, tyre pressure monitoring, front and rear parking sensors, surround-view camera system, adaptive cruise control with stop and go, rear cross-traffic alert, lane keeping aid, lane departure alert, rear collision warning, forward collision warning, traffic sign recognition and a driver monitoring system.
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with cyclist, pedestrian, car and junction turning assist is operational from 5.0 - 85km/h (up to 150km/h for car detection).
There are two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top tether anchor points and the rear seat is wide enough to accommodate three child seats side by side.
The driver assist features seem to work smoothly most of the time but I did find the driver attention monitor a bit annoying, as you get a few more chimes than you need and the lane keeping aid feels too jerky.
Very competitive if not quite as class leading as the conditional Nissan, Mitsubishi and MG 10-year warranty, the C5 comes with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.
Chery also offers seven years/105,000km of capped-price servicing and a year’s free roadside assistance, though up to seven years is available should owners choose to have their vehicle maintained at an authorised dealer during that period.
Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km, and cost $280 per visit for the first five, extending to nearly $370 and $290 for the final two.
GWM offers the H6 GT with a seven-year unlimited kilometre warranty, which is becoming the normal term for the class and you will enjoy five years of roadside assistance through Allianz.
There is also a five-year capped-price servicing program that costs $1680, which is competitive. The first service is at 10,000km but subsequent intervals are spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km.