Volkswagen Golf 2006 Problems

VW claims responsibility for the hot hatch, which is a fair-enough boast when you remember that the Golf GTi kick started the movement back in the 1970s. Given its history it's not surprising then that VW pushed the hot hatch boundaries as other carmakers joined in the party with their own GTi clones. The R32 was VW's attempt to build the ultimate luxury hatch, one that would offer a very different, but still exhilarating driving experience to the GTi.MODEL WATCHThe Golf GTi has always been the hot hatch benchmark; it was the first and remains the one that comes to mind first when the chat turns to hot hatches. But in the wake of the GTi's success other carmakers have jumped into the fray with their own versions of the VW formula and the class has become rather saturated with choices.While the sizzling hot turbocharged front-wheel drive GTi retains pole position in the class, and delivers the sort of performance petrolheads lust after, the R32 offered a more refined driving experience. It actually irked VW that the R32 was described as a hot hatch; it saw it as a ‘luxury class saloon’, one that offered a unique blend of performance and refinement. Unfortunately for the company to most eyes it looked like a hot hatch, so that's what it was. Badges aside there were few visual clues to identify an R32 from a distance; it looked pretty much like any other Golf.VW, however, was of the view that the unique aluminium-look grille, extra air intakes in the front bumper, and twin polished stainless steel exhaust outlets were enough to make it stand out. If the skin appeared little different from the rest of the range what lay under the skin was quite a different story.For starters the engine was a 3.2-litre double overhead camshaft V6 that put out 184kW at 6300 revs along with 310Nm between 2500 and 3000 revs. To put that into some sort of context a turbocharged GTi at the time boasted 147kW and 280Nm. The R32 also differed from the GTi in the drive it employed. Whereas a GTi was conventional front-wheel drive, the R32 used VW's 4Motion all-wheel drive system. 4Motion used a Haldex mechanical coupling that was controlled electronically to give the best possible grip in all conditions. VW also reset the suspension to cope with the extra zip of the R32, which sat lower than a GTi, had uprated springs and shocks, and rolled on larger, 18-in, alloy wheels.In line with VW's pitch that the R32 was a luxury sedan it came with automatic air-conditioning, leather seats, rain-sensing wipers and bi- xenon headlamps.IN THE SHOPVW build quality is generally of a high standard with good fit and finish inside and out. Few issues concern R32 owners, the car's mechanical package is sound and well proven, including the 4Motion drive system. The main issue that eventually surfaces on this, and most other Euro cars, is brake wear. European cars are renowned for the rate of wear on both discs and pads and owners get quite a shock when presented with a bill that is usually quite substantial, and often at quite kays. Servicing is important so check for a credible service record that confirms regular oil and filter changes.ON THE ROAD The R32 faced an uphill battle to convince buyers to spend the extra dollars needed over a GTi when the GTi was such a great car. That wasn't to suggest that the R32 couldn't hold its own on the road; it could do the 0-100km/h sprint in a creditable 6.5 seconds. Given its head it would cover ground very quickly, with a finely balanced chassis and great grip on the road. But being more luxury focussed the R32 did the job with little fuss; it was smooth, refined and comfortable.IN A CRASHThe R32 packed plenty of safety gear with front, side and curtain airbags for the ultimate protection in the event of a crash. Before the crunch came there were electronic stability control, anti- skid brakes, traction control and electronic diff lock to stave off trouble at the wheel.AT THE PUMPLike all performance cars the fuel consumption of the R32 is highly dependent on the way it's driven. Road testers tend to be rather heavy on the throttle, using up whatever performance is available under the right foot. With that in mind road testers at the time of the R32's launch reported average fuel consumption of 11.5-12.5 L/100km.LOOK FORSizzling performanceAll-wheel drive gripCompact dimensionsLuxury refinementThirsty V6Innocuous looks.THE BOTTOM LINE: Great driving hatch, but why bother when the GTi delivers more thrill for less money.RATING: 70/100

The soaring price of petrol in the past year or so has had motorists looking at every possible alternative, including diesels that might save them a few bucks at the pump. If LPG has become the champion of used car buyers, the diesel has become one of the most popular alternatives for new car buyers.Increased sales of new diesels, like the VW Golf TDi, in recent times means that there are more used diesels coming on the market. The diesel is now a used buy worth considering by anyone wanting to save on their fuel bills.MODEL WATCHDiesel sales have soared in Europe in recent years as motorists have been slugged with higher fuel prices. The ugly phenomenon has recently reached Australian shores as local motorists have copped a similar whack at the pump. VW is a leader in diesel engine technology in Europe, boasting a range of diesel engines right across its entire model range from humble Polo to the prestigious Passat. In the middle of the range sits the ever-popular Golf, and it’s the Golf that VW has used to power its push into the growing oil-burner market here.The company hit the ground running in 2004 with the release of the 1.9 TDi in two trim levels — the Comfortline and the Trendline — and a 2.0-litre TDi Comfortline. Outwardly the diesel Golfs look like any other Generation 5 Golf. It’s only the TDi badges that distinguish them from their petrol cousins.Modern diesels shouldn’t be confused with the oil-burners of old, which were noisy, smelly, usually followed by clouds of thick black smoke, and generally holding up the traffic. The only time they came into their own was when they rattled past a servo as their petrol-powered cousins stopped to replenish their tanks.Today’s diesels are quiet, don’t smell or belch out clouds of black smoke, and aren’t left standing when the lights go green. Even better news is that they are still economical. The 1.9-litre TDi engine was a single overhead camshaft four cylinder turbo diesel that delivered 77 kW and 250 Nm — compare that to 75 kW and 148 Nm for the 1.6-litre petrol Golf model — while the 2.0-litre TDi was a more modern double overhead camshaft four cylinder turbo diesel that punched out 103 kW and 320 Nm at its peak. Compare the latter to the 2.0-litre FSi engine VW also offered that gave 110 kW and 200 Nm.The key to the diesel performance, and achieving the best fuel economy, is the massive torque that it offers. Drive to make best use of the torque and you will not only realise its potential to save fuel, but you will also realise its performance potential. Both diesels were available with VW’s DSG six-speed auto and a six-speed manual gearbox.On the road the diesel’s low-end and mid-range performance was easily able to account for its petrol equivalent. It was really only the petrol car’s top-end performance that out-gunned the diesel.IN THE SHOPVW build quality is generally high, as high as any other brand and higher than some. That said they can still have issues with build quality, but with VW handling the local distribution now those problems that do occur seem to be handled more effectively than they might have been in the past. Make sure your used car choice has a good service record with regular oil changes.IN A CRASHThe diesel Golfs have the same array of airbags as their petrol cousins so the crash rating is the same. An agile chassis and powerful braking provide plenty of active safety in avoiding a crash.AT THE PUMPThe diesel Golf will return fuel economy numbers in the region of 6.0 L/100 km. That’s about 20 per cent less than you would see from an equivalent petrol engine. The fuel economy equation gets a little tricky here because diesel is usually a little more expensive than regular unleaded, but the gap varies so it’s a moving target. At the time of writing diesel was three cents per litre more expensive than regular unleaded, but 10 cents per litre less expensive than 98-octane premium unleaded.Compared to a car running on regular unleaded it would take almost 90,000 km before the lower economy of the diesel would bring you to a break even point, but if you compare it to a car running on 98-octane unleaded you would gobble up the diesel’s average purchase premium in around 65,000 km.OWNERS’ VIEWSKeith Sanders and his wife tested the diesel Golf soon after its release and were quickly convinced it was for them. They chose the 1.9 TDi Comfortline with DSG gearbox because it was a willing performer and adequate for their needs. Now, after four years and 62,000 km they say it was a great choice. They have had a few issues with a faulty cruise control switch and a water leak through the windscreen, which have been fixed under warranty, but overall they’re happy with the diesel Golf and would buy another one without hesitation. Typically they get 6.3 L/100 km in average daily driving and low to mid-fives on the highway.Roland Nicholson drives a 12-month-old Golf TDi GT Sport with DSG, leather and sunroof. He was looking for better fuel economy when he bought it, but still wanted to have a sporty feel. He says it’s satisfying to see the trip computer showing 4.9 L/100 km on the freeway, and still have the quick acceleration when needed. The downsides to owning a diesel, he says, are the high price of diesel fuel and the lack of decent, clean refueling facilities at some service stations. His only complaint is that off the line the diesel/DSG combination is a bit hesitant and jerky. The vehicle itself is excellent, he says, the finish is very good and things like heated front seats are a great option.Nick Smithwick bought a 2006 2.0-litre TDi Comfortline brand new and loves it. He acknowledges that diesel is more expensive than petrol, but says 85 per cent of his driving is in traffic and around the city and he still gets over 850 km to the tank. On the highway he gets more than 1100 km.Stephanie Harris owns a 2007 2.0-litre TDi Golf and says its fuel economy is really good. She is not happy with the price of diesel, but on a trip she can get between 1100 and 1200 km and 900 km around town. She adds that it is very comfortable and has plenty of get up and go when needed.LOOK FOR• Good Golf build quality• Fuel economy savings• Higher purchase price a downer• Good performance• Ace drivability• Dirty refueling facilitiesTHE BOTTOM LINE• Diesels drive and perform well, but their higher purchase price has to be covered before any economy benefits can be enjoyed and that can rule them out.RATING• 85/100