Toyota GR Corolla vs Ford Puma

What's the difference?

The GR Corolla had a lot to live up to before, given the likes of the GR Yaris and GR86 fit their briefs so well.

Now, with a little more daily useability and a little more performance, the GR Corolla is even better at both sides of its Jekyl and Hyde personality.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

If a minimum price and maximum interior space are your priorities, then the Puma is not for you. Especially so in the flagship ST-Line V, which may seem too small and a tad cramped compared to, say, a Seltos, C-HR or ASX.

Where the Ford excels, typically, is in the way it encourages the keen driver while cosseting four occupants (and a surprising amount of their cargo). There's a poise and maturity to the way the Puma moves that puts it on a par with or even beyond some premium compact SUVs. Even the styling is a statement. If the badges (and dashboard) were covered, you might be convinced this cat is actually a Jag.

If all that is more important, then the ST-Line V is for you. The very antithesis, then, of the unassuming and unloved EcoSport the Puma usurps.

The Corolla already looks more sporting than most hatchbacks even before the GR treatment, but a few tweaks up front, some wider wheel arches and a third exhaust exit at the back have this thing looking almost ready for a rallycross.

The only downside to that is the changes are relatively minor from some angles. If you weren’t aware of the GR version, you'd need to see the GR Corolla from the front or spot that exhaust to know something was up.

The update has, however, ushered in a change at the front bumper, where the air intakes have been adjusted for improved airflow “to the radiator, intercooler, brake ducts, sub radiator and automatic transmission fluid cooler”

In part, this was necessary to help cool the new automatic gearbox, though it does generally help with overall cooling.

While the GR Corolla looks the part, there’s more function to it. The air that passes in through the side intakes at the front is vented to a duct in the wheel arch that also cools the brakes.

It’s the same as the GR Yaris sibling in terms of the philosophy behind aerodynamics and cooling in many ways, though much of the Yaris is bespoke, where on the Corolla, parts have been attached to the standard body.

Like the outside, the inside of the GR Corolla is mostly the same bones as its non-hot-hatch relatives, but the aforementioned sports seats, leather trim and aluminium pedals are all fairly strong hints this isn’t quite ‘hire car spec’.

If you search for the 1998 Puma coupe, you'll see some vague similarities with its modern SUV namesake, especially in their anthropomorphic face. It's in the eyes. There are also hints of Aston Martin (DBX), Porsche (Macan) and – let's face it – Mazda (CX-3).

Yet the real achievement lies in the way Ford has managed to make a 4.2-metre-long by 1.8m wide by 1.6m high crossover look so svelte, with the resulting balanced proportions, flowing lines and taut surfacing giving the Puma quite an athletic visual presence. After the EcoSport failure, head-turning looks were deemed paramount.

The extra girth gained by widening the Fiesta's platform allowed Ford's designers to create a muscular body that could also accommodate a metre-wide tailgate opening, while beneath the cargo floor is an exceptionally deep storage box, bringing better-than-expected practicality to boot.

As far as hatchbacks to build a daily-useable hot hatch upon go, the Corolla is a relatively solid starting point in terms of ergonomics.

Physical buttons and controls for things like climate are within reach for most functions of the car, though the multimedia touchscreen itself isn’t the most up-to-date.

The seats are comfortable but hold you firmly in place, and the steering wheel, pedals, and shifter are all in the correct positions for engaging driving - particularly important in the manual version.

The storage space is where the GR Corolla disappoints a little. There’s door card space for a water bottle, cupholders, the wireless device charger, but not really anywhere for larger items.

Behind the front row, adults will find themselves a little cramped in terms of kneeroom, while dark interior materials make the second row feel poorly lit.

Further back in the Corolla is the 213-litre boot, which is pretty small even for a hatchback, although Toyota lists a maximum 503 litres with the seats folded down.

Under the boot floor is a tyre repair kit, rather than a spare tyre. Keep that in mind if undertaking a road trip.

Compact yet spacious, the ST-Line V's interior has strong as well as weak points.

Let's start with the latter. The most obvious connection with the Fiesta is in the Puma's dashboard, which is largely shared between the two. After all the effort expended on the design and chassis, this is somewhat disappointing. There's nothing wrong essentially with the fascia's aesthetics or functionality – it's just that the look is humdrum and dated. What's needed is something with the visual wow factor as found in the latest Peugeot 2008, especially at this price point.

Yet Ford has at least tried to put some tinsel inside this most expensive version of its smallest SUV.

Stitched perforated leather seat facings, carbon-fibre-look trim and soft vinyl coverings in key touchpoint areas bring an upmarket look and feel, backed up by a now-familiar digital instrumentation layout, a lovely flat-bottomed three-spoke steering wheel, easy and intuitive multimedia interface and a wireless phone charger. That electronic cluster, by the way, changes colour and markings but doesn't have the scope of multimedia displays of, say, Audi's Virtual Cockpit. It's comparatively rudimentary.

Conversely, there's a solidity and quietness as well, offering a level of refinement that's usually found in more-premium Euro alternatives. We weren't expecting that, though of course this is a German Ford product.

Our test car also boasted a vast glass opening sunroof, adding to the opulence. With all this gear, the ST-Line V's cabin is properly appealing.

On the practicality front, entry and egress is pretty good, the driving position is excellent (thanks in no small part to a big amount of adjustability for both the steering column and seats), the front cushions themselves are sumptuously enveloping, while wide door pockets and a big glovebox obviously come in useful. And there's a USB-C outlet in the centre cubby between the seats. How modern.

However, rear vision out is poor, there are no seat warmers and some of the lower-lying plastics are a bit drab.

The back seat isn't really suitable for people over 175cm, as kneeroom is limited and taller scalps may scrape the ceiling with the twin-pane sunroof in situ. The latter also means no overhead grab handles.

But the backrest angle and cushions themselves are fine, even for longer journeys. Just don't expect to squeeze a third adult in the back unless rubbing shoulders won't bug you. Note, too, that the rear cushion does not slide or tilt forward to allow for a lower load area when the backrest is folded down. Pity.

There is a receptacle in both doors for small bottles but no cupholders whatsoever (how can Ford call itself an American company?), or face-level air vents – though the large dash vent outputs do reach the rear. Amenities such as USBs and cupholders are AWOL; and vision out from back there is limited by the high shoulder line. Tough if you're trying to peer out. Sorry, Fido.

The Puma's overall compact footprint and rear packaging clearly suggest that this is aimed at singles, couples, or couples with smaller kids/pets to transport around.

Still, for a small SUV, the cargo area isn't bad at all. The standard floor depth is fairly generous, with a long and flat loading area, but below that is a narrower yet deeper waterproof area, while under that again is a space-saver spare wheel. Clever. Also intelligent is the luggage cover that lifts automatically with the tailgate, as per Mazda's CX-5.

For the record, cargo capacity is rated at 410 litres with the 60/40 split-fold rear seats erect – or 1170L with them folded down flat. These figures far outstrip the CX-3.

To sum the cabin experience… it's far-better than its Fiesta-sourced dashboard may suggest, while the ST-Line V treatment goes a long way in helping justify the premium. That's a win.

In Australia, the Puma plays in the burgeoning 'Light SUV' segment, so goes up against the ageing yet athletic Mazda CX-3 as well as Honda's HR-V, along with more recent challengers like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic, Nissan Juke II, Toyota Yaris Cross and Volkswagen T-Cross. All are ready to pounce on the bestselling Hiroshima crossover.

What every one of these baby SUVs have in common is that they're based on B-segment – or supermini – platforms. However, prices and sizes do blur in this corner of the class, with larger small-car-derived rivals from the 'Small SUV' segment above, led by the Mitsubishi ASX, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona, also in the Ford's crosshairs.

Formidable opponents indeed, and just like that, the first big hurdle appears for the Blue Oval hopeful. Puma is Light SUV-sized but Small SUV-priced, with the entry-level grade kicking off from a tenner under $30,000, and before on-road costs. That's even more expensive than the VW.

This instantly eliminates it from many buyers' radars.

In contrast, a CX-3 Neo Sport starts from just $22,890. But that's with a manual gearbox, plain interior and steel wheels, whereas the Puma includes a ripper turbo engine/auto combo, climate control, a smartphone app that allows for remote vehicle location/ locking/unlocking/starting, voice-activated sat nav, wireless smartphone charging, lane-departure warning and assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver impairment monitor, 17-inch alloys and a leather steering wheel.

Along with other goodies like AEB with pedestrian alert, reverse camera, Bluetooth audio and telephony, Apple CarPlay/Android auto, digital radio, live traffic updates, fuel-saving engine stop/start, auto headlights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cornering fog lights, powered folding mirrors, push-button start and puddle lamps, the Puma looks and feels up-spec inside. To match most of that stuff in the CX-3 you'll need a Maxx Sport auto from $26,890.

Rising to the $32,340 ST-Line drops the Puma's ride height by just 2mm (to 164mm), but adds firmer suspension, a body kit, glitzier alloys, sports seats, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottomed steering wheel, paddle shifters and racier trim for a racier experience, though it loses the climate control for a manual air-con set-up. Strange. This grade might just be the sweet spot in the Ford's range, though it does sit about $1300 higher than the CX-3 sTouring equivalent.

Finally, the subject of this test, the ST-Line V, scores privacy glass, lashings of chrome, keyless entry/start, leather upholstery, climate control, premium audio, a powered tailgate and 18-inch alloys. All for $35,540, it's about on a par with CX-3 Akari, but lacks the latter's powered driver's seat and heated front cushions, among other items. The Mazda also goes one better with a $2000 AWD option from all mid-level grades up, as well as manual availability.

We recommend the $1500 Park Package, which ushers in adaptive cruise control with full stop/go and lane-centring tech, as well as blind-spot detection and auto parking. Premium paint adds $650, a panoramic roof $2000, roof rails $250 and a black roof $500.

Against compelling alternatives costing less, like the high-flying Seltos Sport+, CX-30 G20 Touring and Toyota C-HR Koba, the ST-Line V struggles to make sense on paper. Can the Puma's cabin and driving experience claw back its obvious price disadvantage?

The GR Corolla’s 1.6-litre three-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine is now a little torquier than before, with outputs now 221kW (at 6500rpm) and 400Nm (between 3250 and 4600rpm) thanks to an extra 30Nm.

The G16E-GTS engine can now drive the Corolla’s four wheels through a choice of gearboxes, either the existing six-speed manual or an eight-speed torque converter automatic.

As well as the usual drive modes, Eco, Normal and Sport, the Corolla’s GR-Four all-wheel-drive system can split the torque to the front or rear wheels via its limited-slip diffs.

Normal, Track and Gravel modes can distribute drive either 60:40 front/rear in Normal, 53:47 in Gravel, or variably depending on conditions and need for acceleration in Track.

Toyota hasn't provided a 0-100km/h time for the 2025 GR Corolla in either variant, but the auto should knock it over in under five seconds, with the manual taking a little longer.

A multiple international engine-of-the-year winner, the compact and lightweight, 999cc 1.0-litre twin-cam three-cylinder turbo petrol unit is the sole choice for now. Driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT), it delivers 92kW of power and 170Nm of torque.

With no all-wheel drive option, there are instead five driving modes – Normal, Sport, Slippery (for snow) and Trail (gravel) applications, working on the traction, stability and transmission algorithms to mimic some of the benefits of AWD. In the ST-Line V, a set of paddle shifters are fitted in lieu of the sadly-absent manual gearbox.

Owners of the previous-shape Fiesta S and EcoSport would be familiar with the 1.0T's smooth and strident performance, though these 2010s models used a completely different type of DCT. This was the highly-publicised Powershift, which consisted of a dry-clutch system, and was prone to a multitude of problems and failures in the petrol-powered auto versions.

In contrast, the Puma adopts a next-generation transmission dubbed 7DCT300; related to the item found in some smaller Mercedes-Benz, Renault and Nissan models, it instead employs a more-robust wet-clutch system with a higher torque threshold, so promises to be far more durable and reliable than the problematic old dry-clutch unit.

Toyota’s claimed fuel consumption for the GR Corolla with a manual gearbox hasn't changed from the previous 8.4L/100km, which isn’t bad for a sports car.

With the auto, Toyota says it burns through the fuel faster at a rate of 9.5L/100km.

In either case, the Corolla’s 50-litre fuel tank needs to be filled with premium 98 RON petrol, and theoretically could provide more than 500km of driving if conditions and your driving style are both perfect for efficiency.

Chances are, however, you’ll feel the need to put your right foot down a little harder than they did during WLTP testing, if for no other reason than to hear the turbo flutter when you lift off.

The Puma's official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.3 litres per 100km, which works out to 121 grams per kilometre. Fitted with a 42-litre fuel tank, the potential range averages out to almost 800km between refills.

Out in the real world, we managed an exceptional 6.2L/100km, no doubt helped by an ever-eager stop/start system (which, annoyingly, kills the air-con when it extinguishes the engine; we found ourselves constantly pressing that 'off' button as the days wore on). This figure was achieved in motorway-heavy driving scenarios, albeit loaded with holiday gear and with the air-con blaring.

So, we took another, urban-focused test, in lots of slow-moving traffic situations, and averaged a still-solid 8.0L/100km.

Note, that while the Puma requires 95 RON premium unleaded, it's also perfectly happy on – and is even recommended by Ford for – the cheapest petrol currently offered in Australia, 94 RON E10 unleaded. Either way, the ST-Line V is a frugal small SUV.

The GR Corolla isn’t as engaging to drive as the GR Yaris, it’s not as honed as one particular rival, the Honda Civic Type R, and it’s not as ‘nice’ as the Golf R.

But the GR Corolla is still an excellent car to drive, and it’s better for its update. In fact, the two major gripes I had with the pre-facelift car have been addressed.

I was in a unique position to be able to compare the old and new versions of the GR Corolla as I drove a MY 2024 version a week prior to the media launch for the 2025 model.

The first and probably biggest issue I had was that the Corolla’s suspension seemed like it must have been rather stiff and the body bracing quite rigid for a car riding on 19-inch wheels to let that much road noise and that many harsh bumps into the cabin.

Though it wasn’t mentioned before the on-road drive loop, the car felt more compliant without sacrificing ability and seemed much more suited to daily duties.

Toyota’s product team confirmed there had been tweaks made to the rear suspension geometry and that I wasn’t just imagining it.

The second issue is more for the sake of passengers who may be less agreeable to the three-pot thrum resonating along the exhaust underfloor.

Toyota has solved this by putting a slight mute on the pipes in the Eco drive mode, so the car is now just ‘a bit’ lairy rather than full boy racer.

Generally, it’s hard not to compare the GR Corolla to the smaller (but original) GR hatch, the Yaris. Especially having driven them back-to-back at the media launch.

Without leaning too much on that, I will say that while the Yaris feels like a rally car that's been modified to be road-legal, the Corolla feels more like a road car that was tweaked for rallying.

The Corolla stops just short of being too ‘raw’ for everyday use in most aspects, but it’s still very capable when it comes to driving fast. 

Like its suspension, the steering feel is dialled in for feedback without being too rough, and allows you to corner accurately without feeling like you need to second-guess or adjust inputs.

When it comes to handling, it doesn’t feel like the Corolla is entirely leaning on the Yokohama Advan tyres for grip, as it feels tied-down and doesn’t pitch and roll through corners.

The duality of the GR Corolla is helped by its drive mode and differential settings and even on track can help you lean into your own driving style.

While the rear-biased 30:70 setting previously made for a slightly tail-happy hot hatch, the new variable Track setting does a fabulous job of keeping the drive where it needs to be, though it turns out it’s also rather handy for sliding the Corolla around a wet skid pan.

Another neat trick is the GR’s handbrake, same as the Yaris, which can disconnect the rear diff when engaged so you don’t need to dip the clutch pedal in the manual version when indulging in handbrake turns.

It will set you back to 2WD mode when the drivetrain overheats, however, or at least when its sensors suspect the drivetrain has overheated - something that only happened after a lot of handbrake turning and spinning wheels as the hatchback slid sideways.

The Corolla’s brakes are ventilated 356mm front and 297mm rear discs, and doesn't lose stopping power even after plenty of tight, twisting road driving where the brakes and the sticky Yokohama Advan tyres copped a workout.

The new auto transmission is also a delight. It's calm during normal driving but snappy with shifts in Sport mode and set to manual gear selection. It won’t really cooperate on a rapid drive of its own accord.

The only criticism of the auto gearbox (aside from being less engaging than the manual, but that’s your own choice) is that the shift paddles behind the wheel feel a little plasticky, but I’m nitpicking at this point.

If the Puma's pricing is complicated, its cabin surprising accommodating and its real-world efficiency particularly parsimonious, then the upward trajectory of pros over cons continues with performance that's downright spirited.

Around town first. A small-displacement engine plus a turbo plus a DCT usually spell interminable spells of lag when all the driver longs for is an instant and measured response to a right foot flexing down onto the throttle.

But the Ford largely sidesteps such pitfalls. Though momentarily hesitant at take-off, the three-pot turbo does then get down to business in no time, with a sustained and satisfying surge of thrust as the revs grow, accompanied by a lusty and raspy thrum that's entirely in keeping with the Puma's track-pants appearance. And it doesn't let up either, with speed building up strongly through the gears, and much more so than the mere 999ccs suggest. Great for overtaking, or taking over a rapidly diminishing gap in the peak-hour derby.

Selecting Sport (a fiddly action that's located too far from the driver for safe eyes-on-the-road operation) lights an even bigger fire in the Puma's belly, with punchier acceleration and a very attentive transmission tune, slicing seamlessly through the seven ratios, leaving you in awe that a heart so small can possess such deep lungs.

Where the Ford really leaves an indelible mark is its enthusiasm to corner just as keenly, armed with brilliantly slick steering and a planted chassis that is set up to both encourage and interact with the driver. Minimal body roll and lots of grip from a quality quartet of Continental tyres ensure the Puma can be punted about like a sporty little hatchback, while the electronic safety tech allowing just enough leeway for lots of fun before they gently reel everything back into line.

We cannot think of a more enjoyable small SUV. And, by the way, those same driver-assist systems provide exceptionally nuanced lane-keep and adaptive cruise-control intervention – certainly they're right up there with the premium SUV brigade.

Given that our Puma wore 215/50R18 rubber, on a 'sports' suspension tune, the ride around town is commendable, with ample cushioning from the rough stuff. There is some tautness to the ride, but it isn't hard or rough; the ST-Line V walks a fine line between urban-agility and surface-decay isolation. In other words, it's commendably relaxing to travel in.

At higher speeds, some road and tyre noises do permeate through inside, and those Dumbo door mirrors do create some wind whoosh, but overall, given how dynamic the chassis is, the Puma feels grown up and sophisticated.

Tested under the 2019 Euro NCAP crash-test regime, the Puma scores a top five-star ANCAP rating.

However, this means it does not meet the more stringent frontal offset crash, side impact crash and far-side impact crash-test criteria introduced by ANCAP for 2020 model-year vehicles – despite launching in September of that year.

Safety items include dual front, front-seat side and side curtain airbags (six in total), AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection (working between 7km/h and 80km/h), lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver fatigue alert, rear parking sensors, tyre pressure monitors and emergency assistance. These come on top of anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control and traction control.

As mentioned earlier, adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, front parking sensors and blind-spot detection are part of the $1500 'Park Package'. Do it.

Toyota offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty plus an extra two-year warranty on the GR Corolla’s engine and driveline.

There’s also a capped price on the first three years of servicing for the GR Corolla at $310 per service.

The downside to the servicing arrangement is that intervals are six months or 10,000km, whichever comes first. That's more regular than a usual schedule and it means potentially pricier servicing for the seventh visit onwards.

Ford offers the industry-average warranty of five-years/unlimited kilometres. Services intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km.

There is also a capped-price servicing scheme under the 'Ford Service Benefits' banner, with the first four years/60,000km of 'A and B' logbook services pegged at $299 per visit, and then between $320 and $560, for up to 12 years.

There is also a Ford loan car program, SYNC 3 map updates and Motoring Club Membership included during that time frame.