Toyota C-HR vs Kia K4

What's the difference?

There’s not much in terms of practicalities that are going to convince you the C-HR is a better option than Toyota’s other small SUV, the Corolla Cross.

Even other ‘stylish’ small SUVs like the Mazda CX-30, fuel savers like the electric MG ZS EV, or performance small SUVs like the Hyundai Kona N are more affordable than the GR Sport version of the C-HR.

In the case of this car, unlike most of its Toyota stablemates, buyers will likely be making a decision from the heart based on exterior styling and its interior rather than value or practicality.

And who would anyone be to tell you not to buy a car you like for its styling?

The new Kia K4 GT-Line has a lot to offer - an interesting design, lots of features and a pleasant driving experience. It’s not without its quirks and there are times when a more powerful engine may have improved it for me as a long-term prospect as I do some big kays every year but it ticks the boxes as a friendly urban dweller.

There’s a fair bit going on here compared to most of Toyota’s other products, much like the first generation, but being designed with Europe as the key market and Australia as a secondary means the styling team needed to take on some fairly fashionable brands.

All three variants of the C-HR are relatively close in aesthetics, with major differences being two-tone paint or specific trim elements for the top-spec GR Sport.

It uses new Toyota design elements that have been seen on some models already, the ‘c-shape’ lights have been used on the new Prius, which we no longer get in Australia, for example.

The black roof was also available on the previous generation, where this car has carried over the ‘egg-like’ silhouette from.

The overall relatively aquatic styling and shape must be for aerodynamic advantage - its chief engineer told us the drag coefficient is just 0.318Cd - but the removal of the rear wiper to lower drag might have been unnecessary for a city-focused small SUV.

The cabin isn’t as wild as the outside, which may be a let-down in some ways, though it’s still a little more visually interesting than its more mainstream stablemates.

The 64-colour ambient lighting changes based on settings including time of day or drive mode, but can be set to a specific single colour if you wish.

The centre stack on the dash is gently angled towards the driver with a small separation between it and the passenger, creating a slight ‘cockpit’ feeling.

Seats are made from different materials depending on the grade, though no real leather is used even in the GR Sport, where synthetic suede and leather are the main upholstery.

The cloth textiles are made from entirely recycled materials, while the synthetic suede is made from a little less than half recycled materials.

They don’t look cheap, but they also don’t look particularly luxurious.

Have to admit I wasn’t convinced on the design of this new sedan at first as it can look a little out of sorts from certain angles. But the more time I spend with it, the more I appreciate its sharp lines and sporty rear shaping.

The small sedan market doesn't have a lot of options now because SUVs are so popular but it's nice to see a design that stands out and the fang-like LED light design at the front and rear, as well as the 18-inch alloy wheels make the K4 look very cool.

The rear doors look sleek because the handle has been hidden in the C-pillar and the K4 is particularly striking in our test model's 'Wave Blue' ($600 RRP) paint colour.

Head inside and you'll find a cabin that looks slick with a two-tone synthetic leather upholstery that feels supple underhand and a plethora of soft touchpoints under all the bits that touch.

The black headliner creates a posh space but the sunroof helps the cabin to feel airy when you need it to.

The dashboard isn't too wide, preferring a sharply linear shape and is headlined by a massive display panel that houses dual 12.3-inch screens and a 5.0-inch climate panel.

There is still a strong presence of plastics inside but you don’t tend to focus on them.

Unlike some other new cars hitting our market, the K4 hasn’t done away with its buttons and dials - and there’s enough to satisfy those who don’t like to rely on a screen for everything. The extra traditional element of the physical gear selector adds to its charm as well. 

When it comes to interior layout and ergonomics, there’s never much to criticise in a Toyota, unless playing it safe is a downside for you.

The buttons you’re most likely to use regularly, across the climate control, centre console and steering wheel, are all very obvious and easy to find, if a little uninspiring, as is wheel design itself - form definitely doesn’t sacrifice function here.

Welcome are the two large screens, the multimedia touchscreen a large 12.3-inch unit and the driver display either 7.0-inch or another 12.3-inch version depending on variant.

Toyota’s software is simple and accessible, using a few main menu sections, though many will likely bypass this with wireless phone mirroring.

Everything’s in a sensible place: a tall bottle in the cupholders won’t block access to anything, the phone charging pad is tucked away to minimise distraction, and Toyota has kept things like the gear selector and stalks behind the steering wheel relatively traditional.

While the interior feels a little dated by its many buttons and some of its simple graphics, there’s certainly something to be said for a welcome change from distracting screens and menus - if the aim was to not exclude Toyota’s older market, it seems like mission accomplished.

In terms of comfort and space, the C-HR makes pretty good use of its interior from the front, the seats are relatively comfortable and visibility is fine, though the back seat starts to feel a bit cramped.

While cupholders and door bottle storage is plentiful in the front, there’s no armrest and no bottle storage in the rear, only relatively shallow cupholders on the armrests in the doors.

Visibility is also relatively poor with high windows, a narrow rear window, and not a lot of light unless there’s a sunroof.

Behind that, with the seats up, the C-HR’s boot has a claimed VDA capacity of 388 litres in the GXL and Koba, or 362L in the GR Sport. Total volume with the seats down is 1154L and 1490L respectively.

The K4 feels big for the class, especially compared to its nearest rivals and that translates to a cabin that feels adult-friendly in both rows. An impressive feat for a small sedan.

Access is the only time you will have moments of 'I should have opted for an SUV'. That's because you will get in your daily squats sliding in and out of the K4 due to its 140mm ground clearance.

The rear doors also feature a wide wing that juts out from the door handle and it catches your hip almost every time you go to close the door.

The wide front seats offer lots of comfort with thick padding and long under-thigh-support. The driver's side is powered with adjustable lumbar support but the passenger seat only offers manual adjustments, which is surprising for a top-grade model. However, both front seats enjoy heat and ventilation functions.

The back bench seat offers similar comfort to the front with seat padding and length but it's not terribly wide and two adults (or child car seats) will fit best.

Amenities and storage is decent for the class with each row enjoying four drink holders and two USB-C ports. Front rowers also get a wireless charging pad and 12-volt socket.

In the front there is a large glove box that fits more than just an owner's manual, a mid-size middle console and a centre console that features retractable cupholders to open up the space if you need to. A dedicated phone cradle with small spaces on each side rounds up individual storage for the front.

In the rear there are two map pockets, a small item cubby next to the USB-C ports and a pair of directional air vents, reading lights and a fold-down armrest.

The boot space is massive for the class at 508L (that's nearing mid-size SUV territory) but the aperture is narrow and I couldn't fit my big booster seat through the opening.

The boot is quite deep as well and you may find yourself climbing into it to retrieve items that roll into the back.

The rear bench seat has a 60/40 split which can help with storage and there is a temporary spare tyre underneath the floor.

While you don't get a powered tailgate in this model, the lid isn't heavy to operate and has a proximity opening function that keeps it practical when you have your hands full.

This just means when you approach and stay near the boot with the key fob on your person the boot lid will pop open for you.

The 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system looks great with crisp graphics and a responsive touchscreen. The menus are in an easy-to-understand layout which you'll get accustomed to in no time. The 5.0-inch climate display sits to the right of this system and it's nice to have it on display all the time.

The 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster isn't all that customisable but it's easy to read with large text and a small menu screen that shows nav directions, trip info or a compass.

The built-in satellite navigation system is easy to get going and to cancel a route guidance, it's a one button affair which is great for when you're on the go.

The system features wired and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The CarPlay is simple to connect to and retained a steady connection this week with feedback from my callers that my voice was clear on calls.

The new K4 sedan is offered in four grades - the base-model S which has an optional 'Safety Pack' available, the mid-spec Sport and Sport+ grades and the flagship GT-Line, which is the model on test for this review.

The GT-Line is sharply priced at $42,990, before on road costs. This positions it in the middle of its small sedan rivals, the Hyundai i30 N Line Premium ($41,500 MSRP) and the Mazda3 Astina ($43,310 MSRP).

What the K4 GT-Line has going for it over its peers is a standard specification list that features some heavy-hitting technology.

This includes dual 12.3-inch displays, a 5.0-inch climate display, built-in satellite navigation with 10-years' of map updates, wireless/wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and dual-zone climate control.

Charging is taken care of by two USB-C ports for each row but the front row also enjoys a 12-volt socket and fast wireless charging pad in the dedicated phone cradle.

There's also an eight-speaker Harman Kardon sound system, over-the-air updates, digital radio, AM/FM radio, Bluetooth connectivity, and a 'Sounds of Nature' soundscape for added ambience.

The Kia Connect app is also included and this allows user access to the emergency call functionality (e-Call), remote control functions for the vehicle, as well as vehicle status monitoring.

Premium equipment includes a tilt and slide sunroof with electric sunshade, two-tone synthetic leather upholstery, heated and ventilated front seats, an electric drivers seat (with two-position memory function and adjustable lumbar support) and a heated steering wheel.

For a small sedan, it comes packed with features!

The difference in boot space is likely because the hybrid-only C-HR comes with two drivetrain options, depending on which variant you have.

The GXL and Koba both use Toyota’s 1.8-litre four-cylinder engine aided by a front-mounted electric motor to produce a 103kW output at the front wheels via a continuously variable transmission.

The GR Sport, however, gains a rear electric motor (taking up some boot space) and a more powerful front motor, helping a larger 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine make a total 146kW - still via a CVT.

Don’t expect to be getting to 100km/h from a standstill in any less than 8.0 seconds in either variant, but both have a claimed top speed of 170km/h.

The flagship grade is front-wheel drive and has a 1.6-litre four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine that produces up to 142kW of power and 265Nm of torque giving this a more powerful presence than its non-turbo siblings (which only produce up to 112kW/192Nm).

However, while the power is adequate for the GT-Line there are times when the engine sounds like it's working a bit too hard.

The eight-speed torque-converter automatic transmission can also become flustered as it moves through the lower gears, especially when you’re accelerating quickly.

On the whole, the power delivery and outputs are more than enough for a city environment and the odd road trip.

Toyota says the C-HR uses just 4.0L/100km on the combined cycle test, which is 0.3L less than the previous generation’s claim, but it should be noted the 2.0-litre in the GR Sport drinks a claimed 4.1L/100km.

During testing on the launch drive, but without being able to measure properly from fill to fill, one quite spirited leg of driving netted a 6.9L/100km reading on the trip computer, while a more sedate drive returned 5.4L/100km.

With an official combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle fuel usage figure of 6.7L/100km and a fuel tank size of 47L, this model has a theoretical driving range of 701km. That does sit around 80 kays less than some of its rivals but it’s still sufficient for those wanting to do the odd road trip!

My on-test fuel usage has popped out at 9.2L/100km, which is based on figures achieved at the pump (32.05L) and my km travelled (348km).

I’ve done mostly urban trips this week with one longer open-road drive and overall I’m not too surprised by that figure because I’ve been pushing it hard but it could be better.

The K4 is a simple gal because Kia recommends a minimum 91 RON unleaded petrol to be used for all models.

There’s nothing particularly offensive about the way the new C-HR drives, but there’s nothing riveting either.

If you’ve driven anything on the Toyota TNGA platform, this will feel familiar to you - and that’s not a bad thing, it’s generally pretty stable, comfortable and controlled.

The modified Corolla platform it rides on is a very good thing, but the C-HR doesn’t have anything in the way of sporting tendencies its styling might suggest.

The hybrid drivetrain in the two 1.8-litre versions of the small SUV don’t offer up a whole lot in terms of keen acceleration, but even the GR Sport and its 146kW drivetrain need a push to get things feeling properly quick on a twisty road.

The added stability of the all-wheel drive in the top variant is noticeable, the front-drive variants feeling a little less planted when pushed.

Steering is on the slightly lighter side of still being well-weighted - it doesn’t wow, but Toyota’s engineers know what they’re doing and it does everything it needs to in terms of communicating feeling to the driver.

Some particularly rough roads on the test drive showed the suspension to handle short, sharp bumps well and not feel crashy over larger imperfections.

The suspension has been retuned in this TNGA-C platform to be stiffer for more control but also more compliant in terms of comfort.

But it’s around urban and suburban streets where the C-HR will spend most of its time, and neglected streets, speed bumps, or tram lines won’t shake you too much from in the cabin.

As mentioned earlier, the power is adequate to move this car around on the open-road but you have to be a little aggressive on hills to keep your speed consistent.

It’s not always quick off the mark, though, and you’ll notice that when you have to cross traffic or enter a roundabout - so allow for extra car lengths. Once you get going, it’s responsive in the city.

The steering is sports-stiff and so is the suspension. This makes the handling feel nimble in turns and sure-footed when doing quick lane changes but you hear and feel every bump in the road. 

On-road comfort is okay around the city but the road noise is very loud inside the cabin and is particularly noticeable at higher speeds. You’ll have to raise your voice to chat to passengers in the back when you're on the highway.

The K4 has a small turning circle of just 10.7m and you can easily do a U-turn in spaces that others might have to do a three-pointer. This made the K4 feel friendly in small car parks and on ramps.

The direct steering makes it easy-enough to park, as does the reversing camera and front/rear parking sensors but I’m pretty disappointed that at the top grade-level, you miss out on a 360-degree camera system (tsk, tsk, Kia).

The Kia K4 has just been launched and hasn’t been tested by ANCAP yet, so is unrated but Kia is hustling to get it tested so it can join in on their strong five-star performance record. The K4 has seven airbags, including a front centre airbag.

The K4 GT-Line has all of the bells and whistles when it comes to safety equipment and includes the big-ticket items like blind-spot monitoring and collision avoidance, intelligent seatbelt warning (all seats), rear cross-traffic alert, front cross-traffic alert, lane keeping aid, lane departure alert, leading vehicle alert, emergency call functionality, side exit warning, rear occupant alert, traffic sign recognition, driver monitoring and alert, LED DRLs, dusk-sensing LED headlights, front/rear parking sensors and a reversing camera with dynamic guidelines.

The K4 GT-Line has AEB with forward collision warning, car, pedestrian, cyclist, and junction crossing detection.

The rear seat has two ISOFIX child seat mounts on the outboard positions and three top tether anchor points but two seats will fit best.

Kia has become well-known for having annoying sound alerts in their cars and while the K4 has them too - you can easily disable the most annoying one, the traffic sign recognition, by holding the steering wheel volume button in for a few seconds.

Toyota has a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty which covers the C-HR, as well as capped-price servicing for the first five years or 75,000km, whichever comes first, with each 12-month/15,000km service costing $250.

The C-HR also comes with a 12-month subscription to Toyota Connected Services, with features accessible through the myToyota Connect smartphone app.

The K4 GT-Line is offered with Kia’s seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty. That’s a pretty good term for the class and there is a seven-year capped price servicing program for a flat $3877 (averaging $554 per service), which is slightly more expensive than others in the class.

Servicing intervals could get annoying if you do big kays every year as they're spaced at every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever occurs first.