Renault Kadjar vs Renault Arkana

What's the difference?

The Renault Kadjar Intens ticks a lot of the urban boxes. It’s small, which is good for navigating narrow city streets and parking in tight spaces, but it’s also spacious and practical. The Kadjar is fuel efficient for a four-cylinder petrol engine and it has that sophisticated French styling.

The Intens is expensive, though, and unless you absolutely have to have leather seats, a glass roof, and the Bose stereo I’d go for the mid-range Zen grade and save yourself $5K but still have all the same safety tech. That said the Intens has auto parking as standard which is a nice convenience for the city.

Safety could be better. The AEB system doesn’t have pedestrian and cyclist detection, rear cross traffic alert, or reverse emergency braking.

Finally, the dual-clutch automatic and 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engine while a fuel efficient combination, isn’t all that easy to live with and can make driving a less-than-smooth experience. The Nissan Qashqai’s combination of CVT auto and four-cylinder naturally aspirated engine is better suited to the urban jungle - something to think about there. 

Now the scores, the Kadjar Intens gets the same mark for daily driving and its urban talents – it could be smoother to drive, but there’s still lots to like. 

The Renault Arkana Esprit Alpine mild-hybrid combines some serious design flair with a reasonable amount of practicality for a smaller family, but it’s hard to ignore the lack of improvement in efficiency following the addition of the mild-hybrid system. That said, it still succeeds on some fronts. It just does it quietly.

People talk about French design being good. Well if you want to see just how good take a look at the Nissan Qashqai, because the Kadjar is fundamentally the same SUV with Renault’s design spin applied.

Yep, as I mentioned about 15 seconds ago, Renault and Nissan are part of an alliance that allows them to share the same cars, but each brand has room to ‘make it their own’ with styling that delivers a very different look, inside and out.

Now, the Qashqai is not an ugly car, but I think the Kadjar is more stylish and premium looking in the same way the larger Renault Koleos SUV is gorgeous compared to the relatively straight-laced Nissan X-Trail it’s based on.

There’s no doubt the Kadjar is a Renault thanks to the giant diamond logo on the plunging grille. I like the way the front bumper rises up into the bonnet like it’s all one piece, but I’m not completely sold on the rear of the car which looks a bit like its shirt is tucked into the back of its pants, which makes no sense unless you look at the images.

Still, the tail-lights have a prestige feel and the Kadjar model name spelled out across the tailgate is a confident statement, also adopted recently by other brands such as Volkswagen (T-Cross) and Ford (Puma).  

Telling the Intens apart from the other two grades is fairly easy, it has 19-inch wheels (the others have 17-inch rims), there’s the enormous glass roof, and it also has a chrome effect on the front and rear bumpers, side skirts, and around the fog lights. It’s a more premium look.

That higher-end feel goes into the cabin as well with the Intens’ black leather upholstery and colourful ambient lighting. The touchscreen is tiny, though, and there isn’t a great deal inside that you don’t get in the entry-grade Kadjar’s cabin, which is also almost as stylish.

The Kadjar is classified as a small SUV, which means nothing really when it comes to wondering if it’s going to fit in your garage or in the tiny parking spaces we’re faced with in the city.

So, I’ve mapped it out for you. The Kadjar’s dimensions are, 4449mm long, 2058 mm across (including the wing mirrors), and 1612mm tall. 

Another interesting thing – each B-pillar is adorned with a little French flag. I’m not sure if they're a sign of Gallic national pride or to remind everybody that meets the Kadjar that Renaults are French.

Either way, you don’t see this type of thing on other cars and for many buyers the appeal of a Renault is having a car that’s not like everybody else’s.

I’d describe the Arkana as muscular and sporty, with its strong body lines, twin exhausts and 19-inch alloys. The Satin Grey matt paintwork only enhances this grunty exterior styling.

From the outside, the biggest differences between this and its mid-spec sibling come down to the darker accents across the body and grille, along with the Alpine badging. And while that pronounced rear-end won’t be to everyone’s taste, it certainly gives the Arkana a defined personality on the road.

The Esprit Alpine shines inside the cabin, with synthetic leather and synthetic suede liberally used throughout, while contrasting blue stitching on the seats and blue seatbelts highlight Renault’s Formula 1 ‘Alpine’ racing roots.

There’s some real flair inside that this segment can sometimes lack, and I love how many physical controls there are, from the traditional gear shifter and rotary sunroof dial to the satisfyingly clicky buttons. It’s very ASMR-coded.

The Kadjar is a big-small SUV, in that it’s longer than many in the same segment at 4.4m with a wheelbase of more than 2.6m, which means more space inside for people and their stuff.

That said, don’t expect limousine legroom, but at 191cm (6'3") tall, I can sit behind my driving position with my knees only just touching the front seat back, which is pretty darn good for a small SUV.

Making life a bit more comfortable back there, too, are directional air vents, two USB charging ports and a 12V power outlet. There are another two USB ports and a 12V up front, too.

Cabin storage is okay. The door pockets in the back are big enough for a 500ml bottle, while there are larger ones in the front, along with two cupholders and another circular hole, which looks like it’s for coins, if anybody still uses those?

The centre console bin is pretty decent in size and so too is the boot which has a cargo capacity of 408 litres with all seats up and 1478 litres with the second row folded flat.

The front is roomy enough that you don’t feel penned in, and the seats hug you nicely into place. The armrest sits a little too high for me, but I like that it slides forwards. The heated function is welcome, and the seats remain supportive on a longer trip.

Storage is best up front, with a couple of cupholders, plus decent space and drink bottle holders in each door bin. The glove box is quite deep, although I reckon you’ll pop a rib if you’re on the shorter side trying to access it from the driver’s seat!

In front of the gear-selector is where all of the charging options are and its easy to have them all in one place, with two USB-A ports, a 12-volt socket and a wireless charging pad, although it’s easy for your phone to slide off while you’re driving. For a flagship grade, it's a little disappointing we're not seeing any faster USB-C ports.

At 9.3 inches, the multimedia display isn’t the largest, but it looks more considered than the usual ‘tablet-stuck-on-the-dash’ styling we’re seeing lately. Overall, the touchscreen is responsive and the system is simple to use. The wireless Apple CarPlay also starts up quickly and maintains a reliable connection.

One small gripe is that the volume controls are tucked away on an easy-to-miss stalk that sits behind the steering wheel. I wish they were on the steering wheel itself... because you forget they’re there.

The back seat is a little awkward to access as an adult, with a relatively small door aperture that makes it easy to knock your head on the way in. There’s also not a stack of legroom behind my driving position, and I’m only 168cm. It should suit two kids reasonably well, although my nine-year old notes the armrest sits too high and the seats are quite firm.

Amenities are decent, with two USB-A ports, map pockets and multiple drink holders.

There are two ISOFIX child-seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points, but two seats will fill this space best. You’ll also need to be careful of knocking your head when buckling any tots in.

The boot is the standout, with up to 485L of capacity when all seats are in use and that can jump up to 1268L when the rear row is folded flat.

Its capacity is more than some mid-sized SUVs, and it's handy that you can adjust the floor to two positions. It’s been more than enough for all of my family’s errands this week.

This grade also gets a powered tailgate and a temporary spare tyre.

There are just two variants available for the Renault Arkana, and we’re testing the Esprit Alpine (pronounced AL-peen for any non-Formula 1 fans), which now sports a mild-hybrid powertrain and comes with a relatively modest $990 price increase. That takes this flagship grade to $45,990, before on-road costs.

Our test vehicle is finished in Satin Grey, a matt finish that adds another $1150 to the price tag, but it’s arguably money well spent as it does some serious heavy lifting in the style department.

It’s also priced about on par with its closest hybrid rivals, with the Hyundai Kona Premium starting at $45,950 and the Honda HR-V RS from $44,400, both before on-road costs. Their full-hybrid powertrains are important to consider, though, if you're after outright efficiency.

The Esprit Alpine has the following features:

• LED headlights
• AM/FM/digital radio
• Eight-speaker Bose sound system
• Bluetooth connectivity
• Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
• Four USB-A ports
• One AUX port
• One 12-volt socket
• Satellite navigation
• 9.3-inch touchscreen multimedia display
• 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster
• Powered tailgate
• Keyless start
• Dusk-sensing headlights
• Rain-sensing windscreen wipers
• Temporary space-saver tyre
• Electric front seats
• Heated front seats
• Heated steering wheel
• Sunroof
• Alpine Blue stitching on seats, gear shift and central armrest
• French ‘tricolore’ blue, white & red stitching on the steering wheel and door trims

While the Renault Kadjar and Nissan Qashqai are essentially the same car, they don’t share the same powertrain. The Kadjar has a smaller but more powerful engine – a 1.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder making 117kW/260Nm.

Shifting gears is a seven-speed dual-clutch auto. There’s no manual available, and all Kadjars are front-wheel drive.

Frankly, the Qashqai four cylinder with less grunt and CVT are a smoother combination. The dual-clutch auto and turbo lag means power delivery and acceleration are delayed, while low-speed gear shifts can be jerky.

The Esprit Alpine is now a mild-hybrid, combining a 1.3-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with a 12-volt hybrid system to produce up to 116kW of power and 270Nm of torque. But that’s only 1.0kW and 8.0Nm more than the previous iteration, and it doesn’t improve overall fuel efficiency, so the benefits of the new system are limited on paper.

The idea behind the mild-hybrid system is to improve power delivery off the mark, but a firmer commitment to a proper hybrid powertrain would have done more to improve the Arkana’s efficiency and competitiveness in this increasingly electrified segment.

It’s front-wheel drive and uses a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission, which can seem a little unsure of itself at lower speeds but settles into its rhythm and feels more confident on the open road.

Renault says after a combination of open and urban roads the Kadjar will have used 6.3L/100km. In my own testing I measured 6.5L/100km at the fuel pump. That’s outstanding.

Despite now being a mild-hybrid, its combined fuel consumption remains unchanged at 5.9L/100km. With its 50-litre fuel tank, that gives it a theoretical driving range of up to 847km, which is still a pretty great result for a family SUV.

My real-world result came in at 6.7L/100km after a mix of highway and urban driving, which is a respectable result and not too far off the official figure.

Renault’s Kadjar may be a better-looking version of Nissan’s Qashqai, but it doesn’t drive as well. This comes down to the engine and transmission Renault has gone with.

There’s turbo lag with that small four-cylinder and this delay is made more pronounced by a dual-clutch transmission that causes the vehicle to lurch during shifts.

This type of shemozzle is not uncommon, the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke behave in the same way with their similar powertrains.

There’s nothing wrong with them, it’s just that for a car that’s probably going to spend its life mainly in the city, the Kadjar won’t provide the smoothest driving experience.

The Qashqai has a CVT automatic and while these transmission aren’t as sporty feeling as a dual-clutch, they’re smooth and good for easy city driving.

The Kadjar does have a comfortable ride and good handling, so if you’re able to get used to the antics of the engine and transmission there’s more to like than not about the way this Renault drives.

The Arkana can access a decent amount of power once you’re up to speed, but it can feel underwhelming off the mark. It’s also surprisingly easy to lose a little traction when you need to accelerate quickly from a stop.

That said, once you’re up to speed on the open road, it’s more than capable of keeping up with traffic or overtaking when needed.

The suspension is on the firmer side, so you do feel some of the smaller bumps through the cabin, but otherwise I like the handling.

There’s not much body roll through corners and the steering feels responsive, making the Arkana reasonably enjoyable to drive.

The cabin is relatively quiet, although some road noise creeps in on the highway. There are three drive modes that are easy to cycle through, and Sport mode offers slightly sharper gear shifts at lower speeds, which helps give the powertrain a little more urgency.

Visibility is good from my driving position, with a fairly commanding view of the road through the front and sides.

The Arkana isn’t too difficult to park given it’s not a particularly large car, but the 360-degree camera system is underwhelming compared with some of its rivals. My husband reckoned he’d seen better graphics in 8-bit Tetris…

The Arkana’s previous maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating expired in 2025, and it hasn’t been tested since, so it’s currently unrated.

It has six airbags but does miss out on a front-centre airbag, emergency phone call capability, and front cross-traffic alert which we're starting to see become more common in this segment.

Safety equipment includes:

• Intelligent seatbelt reminder
• Two ISOFIX child seat mounts
• Three top-tether anchor points
• Mechanical child locks on rear doors
• Emergency warning lights activated under heavy braking
• Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) with pedestrian & cyclist detection
• Driver attention alert
• Forward collision warning
• Rear cross-traffic alert
• Lane keeping aid
• Lane departure warning
• Traffic sign recognition
• Adaptive cruise control with stop/go
• 360-degree camera system
• Front, rear and side parking sensors
• Tyre pressure monitoring
• Hill start assist

The Kadjar is covered by Renault’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 30,000km and capped at $399 for the first three services, followed by $789 for the fourth then back to $399.

There’s also up to five years roadside assistance, if you service your Kadjar with Renault.

The Arkana is offered with Renault’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is now considered a below-average term for the class, although you do get five years of complimentary roadside assistance.

Servicing intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 30,000km, which is great if you do heavy kays each year.

Renault also has an assured pricing structure for its scheduled services, with the Arkana averaging around $477 per service across its first five workshop visits, although the fourth is notably more expensive at $859.

Renault currently has 52 locations listed across Australia, although that figure includes some service and parts-only locations, so the network isn’t quite as extensive as some of the mainstream brands.