Renault Kadjar vs RAM 2500

What's the difference?

The Renault Kadjar Intens ticks a lot of the urban boxes. It’s small, which is good for navigating narrow city streets and parking in tight spaces, but it’s also spacious and practical. The Kadjar is fuel efficient for a four-cylinder petrol engine and it has that sophisticated French styling.

The Intens is expensive, though, and unless you absolutely have to have leather seats, a glass roof, and the Bose stereo I’d go for the mid-range Zen grade and save yourself $5K but still have all the same safety tech. That said the Intens has auto parking as standard which is a nice convenience for the city.

Safety could be better. The AEB system doesn’t have pedestrian and cyclist detection, rear cross traffic alert, or reverse emergency braking.

Finally, the dual-clutch automatic and 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engine while a fuel efficient combination, isn’t all that easy to live with and can make driving a less-than-smooth experience. The Nissan Qashqai’s combination of CVT auto and four-cylinder naturally aspirated engine is better suited to the urban jungle - something to think about there. 

Now the scores, the Kadjar Intens gets the same mark for daily driving and its urban talents – it could be smoother to drive, but there’s still lots to like. 

If you're a grey nomad with a massive caravan searching for something to do the big lap in, or a big boater seeking an effortless weekend getaway machine, then this sort of ute makes sense. The HD series shows just how much more muscle is available, for those who genuinely need it.

But if towing or hauling to the max isn’t your priority, then the far-more dynamic – and class-leading – Ram 1500 series does everything else with much-greater aplomb.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

People talk about French design being good. Well if you want to see just how good take a look at the Nissan Qashqai, because the Kadjar is fundamentally the same SUV with Renault’s design spin applied.

Yep, as I mentioned about 15 seconds ago, Renault and Nissan are part of an alliance that allows them to share the same cars, but each brand has room to ‘make it their own’ with styling that delivers a very different look, inside and out.

Now, the Qashqai is not an ugly car, but I think the Kadjar is more stylish and premium looking in the same way the larger Renault Koleos SUV is gorgeous compared to the relatively straight-laced Nissan X-Trail it’s based on.

There’s no doubt the Kadjar is a Renault thanks to the giant diamond logo on the plunging grille. I like the way the front bumper rises up into the bonnet like it’s all one piece, but I’m not completely sold on the rear of the car which looks a bit like its shirt is tucked into the back of its pants, which makes no sense unless you look at the images.

Still, the tail-lights have a prestige feel and the Kadjar model name spelled out across the tailgate is a confident statement, also adopted recently by other brands such as Volkswagen (T-Cross) and Ford (Puma).  

Telling the Intens apart from the other two grades is fairly easy, it has 19-inch wheels (the others have 17-inch rims), there’s the enormous glass roof, and it also has a chrome effect on the front and rear bumpers, side skirts, and around the fog lights. It’s a more premium look.

That higher-end feel goes into the cabin as well with the Intens’ black leather upholstery and colourful ambient lighting. The touchscreen is tiny, though, and there isn’t a great deal inside that you don’t get in the entry-grade Kadjar’s cabin, which is also almost as stylish.

The Kadjar is classified as a small SUV, which means nothing really when it comes to wondering if it’s going to fit in your garage or in the tiny parking spaces we’re faced with in the city.

So, I’ve mapped it out for you. The Kadjar’s dimensions are, 4449mm long, 2058 mm across (including the wing mirrors), and 1612mm tall. 

Another interesting thing – each B-pillar is adorned with a little French flag. I’m not sure if they're a sign of Gallic national pride or to remind everybody that meets the Kadjar that Renaults are French.

Either way, you don’t see this type of thing on other cars and for many buyers the appeal of a Renault is having a car that’s not like everybody else’s.

You can spot the HD facelift by the bi-LED headlights and bulgier bonnet, while chrome’s been replaced by black trim inside and out, including in the restyled grille, alloy wheels and side steps, for a more-modern appearance.

Both models are identical bar the badging. However, while they share a tri-link solid front axle system, the 2500 HD features coil-spring rear suspension, while the super heavy-duty 3500 HD relies on leaf springs. That’s for it to achieve maximum pulling and hauling capability.

Inside, the already-contemporary dashboard, with its 12-inch Tesla-esque portrait touchscreen, remains much the same as before, except for a few detail updates to accommodate the big new centre console, twin wireless charger housings, extra USB ports and restyled electronic instrument cluster.

Otherwise, it’s as vast as ever.

The Kadjar is a big-small SUV, in that it’s longer than many in the same segment at 4.4m with a wheelbase of more than 2.6m, which means more space inside for people and their stuff.

That said, don’t expect limousine legroom, but at 191cm (6'3") tall, I can sit behind my driving position with my knees only just touching the front seat back, which is pretty darn good for a small SUV.

Making life a bit more comfortable back there, too, are directional air vents, two USB charging ports and a 12V power outlet. There are another two USB ports and a 12V up front, too.

Cabin storage is okay. The door pockets in the back are big enough for a 500ml bottle, while there are larger ones in the front, along with two cupholders and another circular hole, which looks like it’s for coins, if anybody still uses those?

The centre console bin is pretty decent in size and so too is the boot which has a cargo capacity of 408 litres with all seats up and 1478 litres with the second row folded flat.

As with all Walkinshaw Automotive Group utes (that includes the Silverado), the Ram HD’s fit and finish seem exemplary, with an insider suggesting the quality may exceed the North American factory original.

This is no small feat. Ateco Automotive, the instigator and original importer of over 35,000 (and counting) remanufactured left-hand to right-hand-drive DS, DT and DJ full-sized utes in Australia since the first 2500 HD rolled off the Melbourne production line in 2015, says “between 400 and 500” unique engineering pieces are necessary.

Compared to the pre-facelift versions, the DJ Series II sees a switching out of the old front bench seat, which meant the earlier versions were six seaters, to shapelier individual items. Apparently, comfort and convenience are what buyers prefer, since a large centre console with armrest is now included. It’s certainly seems plush and luxurious inside.

Along with greater storage, the Ram’s electronic instrumentation is new and the multimedia system has been updated, with extra USB ports as well as twin phone chargers.

The driving position might be compromised for some by a lack of reach adjustability for the steering column (unlike in the DT 1500), and the foot-operated park brake seems like an anachronistic nowadays, but otherwise everything is easy to reach and operate – despite being scattered all about – after you’ve learned what all the buttons and switches do.

Meanwhile, the now-fixed seats can accommodate a trio of burly occupants no problems due to the sheer width of the cabin.

Included are air vents, extra USB ports, a sliding back window and storage underneath the seat cushions and within a special floor compartment.

Owners can also create a raised floor section, by tilting both cushions up and folding down two corresponding bases for a flat and even load area, with additional hidden storage within the now-covered footwells.

Overall, the Ram’s cabin balances convenience and utility quite well.

Further back, the tub length is 1938mm, width is 1687mm and 1295mm between the wheel arches and height is 511mm. This compares to the Silverado 2500’s superior corresponding figures of 2089mm/1814mm/1317mm/533mm, respectively.

A swing-away step is provided to help tub access, as well as a spray-in bedliner, strut-assisted tailgate-close and 12-pin towbar fitted as standard.

Maximum towing capacities vary from 3.5 tonnes to an unmatched eight tonnes with the correct accessories. The 2500’s payload is 785kg while the 3500 more than doubles that. And standard exhaust brakes help with braking on long descents when fully laden.

Which brings us to the heart of the matter. Muscle.

Coded as the DJ, the 2500 and even heavier-duty 3500 differ significantly compared to the DT-series 1500, and use many of the body, chassis and mechanical components from the previous-gen DS-series 2500/3500 HD. Hence the unique model code.

Only launched in North America earlier this year, the DJ Series II kicks off from $172,950 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the 2500 HD. That’s the same old retail figure as before, despite the newcomer ushering in a minor facelift, major muscle boost and more kit, although the Silverado 2500 HD is still cheaper, at about $5K less, while the old runout versions now start from under $170K driveaway.

It’s also worth keeping in mind that the Ram 3500 HD has no direct rival in Australia.

As you’d expect, many luxury features are standard, such as heated and vented front seats with driver’s side memory, leather upholstery, retractable exterior mirrors, a surround-view monitor and adaptive cruise control. Upgraded driver-assist safety systems have also been added. More on those later on.

The newly-added items include a sunroof, centre console bisecting the front seats, a 12.3-inch instrument display, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, dual smartphone chargers, eight USB ports and traffic sign recognition.

So, no more three-person front bench. And it seems the reclining rear seat has been binned for a fixed-position item.

While the Renault Kadjar and Nissan Qashqai are essentially the same car, they don’t share the same powertrain. The Kadjar has a smaller but more powerful engine – a 1.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder making 117kW/260Nm.

Shifting gears is a seven-speed dual-clutch auto. There’s no manual available, and all Kadjars are front-wheel drive.

Frankly, the Qashqai four cylinder with less grunt and CVT are a smoother combination. The dual-clutch auto and turbo lag means power delivery and acceleration are delayed, while low-speed gear shifts can be jerky.

Under the now-bulgier bonnet may be the torquiest engine money can buy, at least in something that does not require a special driving license. Or pilot's licence.

Completely overhauled with a redesigned engine head, larger intake and exhaust valves, a new turbo, heavier-duty pistons, a higher-pressure fuel system and upgraded intake manifold amongst other changes, the Cummins-sourced 6.7-litre in-line six-cylinder turbo-diesel unit now delivers 313kW of power at 2800rpm and 1458Nm at 1800rpm.

Formerly making 276kW and 1152Nm, the new figures are 13 per cent and 26 per cent better than before (respectively), reducing the power gap with the Silverado’s 350kW/1322Nm 6.6L V8 turbo-diesel, while easily leap-frogging it for torque.

At 3710kg (kerb), the HD’s power-to-weight ratio improves significantly despite putting on about 100kg, from 76.5 kW/tonne to 84.4kW/tonne.

Meanwhile, a ZF-supplied eight-speed auto replaces the old six-speed unit. It’s now a second faster to 100 at under 7.3 seconds and the spread of extra gears should improve highway fuel consumption, albeit slightly.

Drive is sent to the rear wheels in two-wheel drive (2WD) mode in most cases. However, 4WD High (4H) is also available via a part-time dual-range transfer case and is selectable on-the-fly, though it is not recommended for operation above 80km/h, while 4WD Low (4L) is for rougher terrain at very low speeds.

Renault says after a combination of open and urban roads the Kadjar will have used 6.3L/100km. In my own testing I measured 6.5L/100km at the fuel pump. That’s outstanding.

Ram says the Australian Government doesn't mandate an official combined fuel consumption figure for full-sized utes like these, so there is no average economy number for us to share.

But the trip meter in two of our test vehicles said it consumed between 15 litres per 100km and 15.6L/100km of diesel fuel, and both had not been towing a trailer or load since being reset.

Despite the new ZF eight-speed auto’s revised final drive ratio (now 3.42:1 instead of 3.73:1) to help improve efficiency, clearly this is no Toyota Prius.

Based on those trip computer numbers, expect the 117-litre fuel tank to provide about 760km between refills. Handily, the 28.4L AdBlue reservoir comes with its own tank display on the dash.

Renault’s Kadjar may be a better-looking version of Nissan’s Qashqai, but it doesn’t drive as well. This comes down to the engine and transmission Renault has gone with.

There’s turbo lag with that small four-cylinder and this delay is made more pronounced by a dual-clutch transmission that causes the vehicle to lurch during shifts.

This type of shemozzle is not uncommon, the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke behave in the same way with their similar powertrains.

There’s nothing wrong with them, it’s just that for a car that’s probably going to spend its life mainly in the city, the Kadjar won’t provide the smoothest driving experience.

The Qashqai has a CVT automatic and while these transmission aren’t as sporty feeling as a dual-clutch, they’re smooth and good for easy city driving.

The Kadjar does have a comfortable ride and good handling, so if you’re able to get used to the antics of the engine and transmission there’s more to like than not about the way this Renault drives.

The Ram HD’s column shifter and foot-operated park brake say it all. This is a big, floaty and, at times, old-fashioned American truck, and that is certainly how it feels from behind the wheel.

2500 HD first.

From the initial burble of the forced-induction in-line six diesel, you can feel the torque simmering restlessly within. Slot the awkward selector into Drive, and – depending on how much heft you’re hauling – the Ram will lurch off the line like a startled bull, and before you know it, you’re bounding along.

If lightly laden, you’ll even momentarily spin the rear wheels in the lower ratios – second (the start-off gear; first’s for lugging only), third and maybe even fourth if the surface is slippery enough, though the traction controls will quell anything more than a bit of a bum wiggle.

From there on in, on a straight piece of highway anyway, the 3.7-tonne ute just strides along effortlessly, picking up the pace with ridiculous ease as required. You’re soon aware that the cruise control is vital if you’re going to keep your licence.

If you’re wondering how different the HD feels compared to the related regular Ram 1500, the first corner will serve up some answers soon enough.

The steering is light and reassuringly measured in response, but also numb and less precise than expected, if not quite vague, meaning you need to feed in inputs carefully. Especially at speed. Rushing it in, or blundering through a tighter turn carelessly, will have the laws of physics reminding you of this truck’s length and girth, and not to mention maybe the long arm of the law on your tail as well before long. Anyway, other road users will soon let you know as well. Take it easy.

Over the varied and at-times tight rural roads of Victoria’s Gippsland region, the endless pitter-patter of the unladen suspension, combined with the constant pitching from the body and trigger-happy brakes, resulted in motion queasiness, if not sickness. We’ve been assured that with a load as intended, everything including our internal sense of balance should settle down. Which makes sense. A boat or caravan out back should provide the anchoring effect required.

Back on straighter and smoother ground, where the 2500 smothers and smooshes most things before it, you’ll be glad for the commanding vision aided by the massive mirrors and surround-view cameras, helping to boost driver confidence, particularly when weaving through traffic or in parking scenarios.

But the compromises demanded for the ability to haul up to eight tonnes means this is a very niche proposition.

Which is why Ram insisted on us testing the sole 3500 HD with a 3.5-tonne caravan hitched out back, on the ex-Holden speed loop at Lang Lang.

This was a test of acceleration and control, and – again – we managed to spin the rear wheels in the lower gears.

Likewise, all that torque was delivered without struggle or strain, and almost immediately the 3500 was sitting steadily at 110km/h. The planted chassis and various electronics seamlessly kept everything in line.

But the track surface was too calm to assess the ride comfort from the leaf-sprung suspension, and we weren’t allowed to venture on to public roads.

Returning back to base, we even forgot all about the caravan quietly shadowing our every move out back, which is a sign of the 3500’s towering towing confidence.

Which is exactly what it says on the tin.

Neither ANCAP nor Euro NCAP have tested any full-sized American utes at this stage.

However, the 2500 HD is alone in its class in having a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rating for 2025, scoring four out of five stars.

For the Series II upgrade, the autonomous emergency braking system now includes cyclist and pedestrian detection and braking, the traffic-sign recognition tech is new, whilst rear-cross-traffic alert, blind-spot monitoring, a 360-degree view camera and tyre-pressure monitors continue. No operation parameter data for the AEB is provided.

Plus, dual front, front side and curtain airbags are fitted, along with three child-seat restraining top-tether points and a pair of ISOFIX latches in the rear outboard seats.

The Kadjar is covered by Renault’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 30,000km and capped at $399 for the first three services, followed by $789 for the fourth then back to $399.

There’s also up to five years roadside assistance, if you service your Kadjar with Renault.

So, here's where the news may not be so good for potential HD buyers, because the Ram’s warranty is well below its main competitor.

Now it is the sole US full-sized ute with a three-year, 100,000km warranty, instead of the five-year/unlimited-kilometre coverage offered by the others.

And don’t forget, this is the era where (albeit smaller) utes from Kia have seven years while Mitsubishi, Nissan and MG are up to 10 years (conditionally).

Service intervals are at just six months or 12,000km and there are no capped-price servicing options either.

As a result of trailing the competition so badly in these key areas, the Ram HD’s overall rating has been dragged down significantly.

Along with the 75 Ram dealers throughout every state and territory in Australia, there are an additional three garages that will service the vehicles.