Browse over 9,000 car reviews
What's the difference?
Don’t let people talk you into buying a tiny car just because you live in the city. That’s what I’ve learnt from being a car reviewer and living about eight kilometres from the CBD.
Yes, car spaces are small, or almost non existent, but the people that live there are as full-sized as people elsewhere and they often carry around just as much gear. What you need is a big, little car and the Renault Kadjar is that – a small SUV which is actually bigger than most.
The Kadjar is also French, and that’s appealing to us city folk because even though there are millions of us living in one square metre we like to think of ourselves as different, as individuals, cosmopolitan, metropolitan.
So the Kadjar looks perfect then, right?
Well, it’s good yes… in some ways, but after reading this you might prefer its Japanese cousin, the Nissan Qashqai. Let me explain...
Everybody loves an underdog story and Nissan’s one is a beauty.
For decades, the model we knew as the Pulsar struggled to crack the European small car market against the likes of the Ford Focus and the company was in serious strife. Worthy but derivative, it struggled to stand out.
So, for its 2007 replacement, some bright sparks convinced Nissan to reimagine the hatch by butching it up, raising the ride height and changing the name to something exotically daft. And, voila, the original Qashqai was born.
Initially sold in Australia as the Dualis, it quickly became a global smash hit, finally catapulting the brand from follower to leader, creating the small SUV segment as we know it today.
If you love your Hyundai Kona, Mazda CX-30, Toyota C-HR or VW T-Roc you have Nissan’s ingenuity to thank.
Now it’s at it again with the Qashqai e-Power – an EV-first hybrid using a petrol engine to only charge its battery so an electric motor can drive the front wheels. More than a Prius, less than a Tesla, then.
The next big thing or a dead end? Let’s find out.
The Renault Kadjar Intens ticks a lot of the urban boxes. It’s small, which is good for navigating narrow city streets and parking in tight spaces, but it’s also spacious and practical. The Kadjar is fuel efficient for a four-cylinder petrol engine and it has that sophisticated French styling.
The Intens is expensive, though, and unless you absolutely have to have leather seats, a glass roof, and the Bose stereo I’d go for the mid-range Zen grade and save yourself $5K but still have all the same safety tech. That said the Intens has auto parking as standard which is a nice convenience for the city.
Safety could be better. The AEB system doesn’t have pedestrian and cyclist detection, rear cross traffic alert, or reverse emergency braking.
Finally, the dual-clutch automatic and 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engine while a fuel efficient combination, isn’t all that easy to live with and can make driving a less-than-smooth experience. The Nissan Qashqai’s combination of CVT auto and four-cylinder naturally aspirated engine is better suited to the urban jungle - something to think about there.
Now the scores, the Kadjar Intens gets the same mark for daily driving and its urban talents – it could be smoother to drive, but there’s still lots to like.
So, should you give up on the Qashqai e-Power, or surrender to its many and varied charms? Well, when the Japanese brand really tries, as it clearly has here, Nissan can be as imaginative and as innovative as any carmaker on the planet.
And given the latest Qashqai out of Europe is so advanced and unique within its SUV category, this deserves to be on everybody’s shortlist. With e-Power under that pretty bonnet, this Ti is a leader, not a follower. This underdog could win best-in-show!
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.
People talk about French design being good. Well if you want to see just how good take a look at the Nissan Qashqai, because the Kadjar is fundamentally the same SUV with Renault’s design spin applied.
Yep, as I mentioned about 15 seconds ago, Renault and Nissan are part of an alliance that allows them to share the same cars, but each brand has room to ‘make it their own’ with styling that delivers a very different look, inside and out.
Now, the Qashqai is not an ugly car, but I think the Kadjar is more stylish and premium looking in the same way the larger Renault Koleos SUV is gorgeous compared to the relatively straight-laced Nissan X-Trail it’s based on.
There’s no doubt the Kadjar is a Renault thanks to the giant diamond logo on the plunging grille. I like the way the front bumper rises up into the bonnet like it’s all one piece, but I’m not completely sold on the rear of the car which looks a bit like its shirt is tucked into the back of its pants, which makes no sense unless you look at the images.
Still, the tail-lights have a prestige feel and the Kadjar model name spelled out across the tailgate is a confident statement, also adopted recently by other brands such as Volkswagen (T-Cross) and Ford (Puma).
Telling the Intens apart from the other two grades is fairly easy, it has 19-inch wheels (the others have 17-inch rims), there’s the enormous glass roof, and it also has a chrome effect on the front and rear bumpers, side skirts, and around the fog lights. It’s a more premium look.
That higher-end feel goes into the cabin as well with the Intens’ black leather upholstery and colourful ambient lighting. The touchscreen is tiny, though, and there isn’t a great deal inside that you don’t get in the entry-grade Kadjar’s cabin, which is also almost as stylish.
The Kadjar is classified as a small SUV, which means nothing really when it comes to wondering if it’s going to fit in your garage or in the tiny parking spaces we’re faced with in the city.
So, I’ve mapped it out for you. The Kadjar’s dimensions are, 4449mm long, 2058 mm across (including the wing mirrors), and 1612mm tall.
Another interesting thing – each B-pillar is adorned with a little French flag. I’m not sure if they're a sign of Gallic national pride or to remind everybody that meets the Kadjar that Renaults are French.
Either way, you don’t see this type of thing on other cars and for many buyers the appeal of a Renault is having a car that’s not like everybody else’s.
There’s nothing radical or ground-breaking about the third-gen version’s styling, other than it’s pretty and unmistakably a Qashqai. Even from tens of metres away. That’s a hallmark of good design.
But, like an Oscar’s worthy red-carpet outfit, the familiar lines remain classy on this third imagining, with a particularly strong front-end LED lighting graphics presence against a modern grille treatment, pleasing classical proportions and an elegantly executed posterior.
Unless you’re a train spotter-type or work for Nissan PR, it’s easy to miss the very minor details setting this particular Ti apart. Nissan dubs the extra glossy black lipstick up front as its ‘premium grille’ appearance. There’s a smattering of e-Power badges. And ground clearance drops 5.0mm, to 175mm. That’s it.
As with all current Qashqais, the e-Power offers larger packaging compared to before, as a result of adopting a fresh “global Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance platform”. The upshot is a longer, wider and taller small SUV, to the tune of 31, 30 and 29mm, respectively.
And, for the benefit of rear seat occupants, the wheelbase has also been stretched by 19mm.
It’s worth noting that, despite Nissan’s best efforts to keep the kilos down by deploying aluminium for the doors, bonnet and front guards (resulting in a commendable 60kg saving while body stiffness rises by 41 per cent), the e-Power attracts a hefty 200kg penalty over the ICE Ti.
Does this adversely affect efficiency? Please keep reading to find out.
The Kadjar is a big-small SUV, in that it’s longer than many in the same segment at 4.4m with a wheelbase of more than 2.6m, which means more space inside for people and their stuff.
That said, don’t expect limousine legroom, but at 191cm (6'3") tall, I can sit behind my driving position with my knees only just touching the front seat back, which is pretty darn good for a small SUV.
Making life a bit more comfortable back there, too, are directional air vents, two USB charging ports and a 12V power outlet. There are another two USB ports and a 12V up front, too.
Cabin storage is okay. The door pockets in the back are big enough for a 500ml bottle, while there are larger ones in the front, along with two cupholders and another circular hole, which looks like it’s for coins, if anybody still uses those?
The centre console bin is pretty decent in size and so too is the boot which has a cargo capacity of 408 litres with all seats up and 1478 litres with the second row folded flat.
Being bigger than before brings benefits.
The Qashqai’s doors open super-wide. Great for entry/egress, winning over SUV sceptics and inflicting damage on adjacent vehicles.
Once sat inside, the people-pleasing presentation continues in this sumptuously-presented Ti grade, with eyes immediately drinking in the pleated leather-faced seat patterns, subtle colour-coded trim, attractive dashboard architecture and the surprising depth of quality in the materials deployed.
As we discovered to our delight, all are further flattered when drenched in the dappled rays of an early autumnal afternoon sun, courtesy of that panoramic hole in the roof.
If you’re expecting the common-sense dullness of some less-ambitious Nissans, a significant mindset reset is required, highlighting the European aspirations of this cosy yet comfy British-built SUV.
In our comparatively brief time in the Qashqai, we also noted the excellent driving position, enveloping support of the fine front seats, user-friendliness of the digital displays (including the head-up dials), clear instrumentation that still manages to convey as much, or as little, data as you need without bamboozling you with info-overload, generous storage and an effective climate-control system.
Plus, that vast sunroof includes a full-sunblock screen – a feature sorely missing in many European and Chinese branded alternatives. Others, take heed.
Our main objection is obstructed over-the-shoulder and rear vision, that’s very obvious when parking in tight spots. Those cameras are essential.
Moving out the back, it’s fairly spacious for most people though knee room remains tight for longer-legged passengers. Most expected amenities are present, such as face-level air vents, USB-A and -C outlets, a centre armrest with cupholders and overhead lighting. And the upmarket ambience carries through, too.
But don’t go expecting any sliding or reclining back-seat versatility, as you might find in some rival SUVs.
Now, here’s an interesting fact. Nissan says there’s no drop in cargo capacity between the e-Power and the regular ICE-powered version of the Qashqai. Indeed, the figure increases, from 418 litres to 452L and, if you lower the back seat, from 1513 to 1518L.
So, how does this magic work? The location of the battery underneath the front seats (rather than under the rear bench) helps, as well as the elimination of the ICE Ti’s 19-inch alloy spare wheel for that infernal tyre-repair kit.
Win some, lose some!
The Intens is the highest grade of Kadjar you can buy and has a list price of $37,990. As a point of reference, the entry-grade Kadjar with an automatic transmission is $29,990. So, what are you getting for an extra $8K?
Well, the entry-level Kadjar comes with a 7.0-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, cloth seats, dual-zone climate control, privacy glass and 17-inch alloy wheels. The Intens gets 19-inch alloys, leather seats (heated up front), a seven-speaker Bose sound system, leather steering wheel, panoramic sunroof, as well as LED headlights and fog lights.
The Intens also comes standard with auto parking, and even the most determined DIY parkers will appreciate that in the city.
The Intens also has more advanced safety equipment than the entry-grade, although the same tech also comes on the mid-spec Zen for $32,990.
You may already know this, but the Kadjar and the Nissan Qashqai are essentially the same car. Renault and Nissan have an alliance which lets them share technology and as well as entire models.
So, you might want to compare the Kadjar Intens to a Qashqai Ti which lists for $38,790. Other models to check are the Mitsubishi ASX and Toyota C-HR.
Right now, there’s only the single, Qashqai Ti e-Power grade for Australia.
Starting from $51,590, before on-road costs, it adds $4200 to the price of the regular 1.3-litre turbo-petrol Ti, and is gunning straight for more conventional hybrids like the Hyundai Kona N-Line HEV, Honda’s superb ZR-V e:HEV and the new, second-gen Toyota C-HR Koba.
Now, they’re all conventional hybrids with their internal combustion engine (ICE) doing the driving, so the Nissan has a point of difference – and possibly an advantage – over those.
Note, though, that both the C-HR and Kona hybrids also come in grades costing under $45,000 – something the Qashqai e-Power won’t match until the lower-spec versions arrive in Australia sometime later on.
At least Nissan sees fit to stuff the Ti with luxuries like adaptive LED headlights, a head-up display, panoramic sunroof, hands-free powered tailgate, a 10-speaker Bose audio system, heated front seats with massaging function, pleated leather trim, front and rear USB A/C outlets and 19-inch alloys.
These come on top of expected goodies like dual-zone climate control, a 12.3-inch central touchscreen, satellite navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay, wired Android Auto, digital radio, a wireless phone charger, a surround-view camera, auto on/off headlights and wipers, auto-folding exterior mirrors and ambient lighting.
There’s also a host of welcome driver-assist tech. More on those in the Safety section below.
However, the e-Power loses the essential temporary spare wheel for the fiddly and often-useless tyre repair kit. Not good enough, Nissan.
That aside, they make for a finely-crafted and properly fully-equipped small hybrid SUV out of Europe, that, when considered in that light, offers strong value-for-money against technically less-intriguing alternatives.
Advantage, Qashqai.
While the Renault Kadjar and Nissan Qashqai are essentially the same car, they don’t share the same powertrain. The Kadjar has a smaller but more powerful engine – a 1.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder making 117kW/260Nm.
Shifting gears is a seven-speed dual-clutch auto. There’s no manual available, and all Kadjars are front-wheel drive.
Frankly, the Qashqai four cylinder with less grunt and CVT are a smoother combination. The dual-clutch auto and turbo lag means power delivery and acceleration are delayed, while low-speed gear shifts can be jerky.
Under the e-Power’s bonnet is a 1.5-litre three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine featuring a unique and intriguing, efficiency-enhancing yet performance-boosting, variable compression ratio.
It produces 116kW of power and 250Nm of torque on its own, and is mated to a small-ish 2.1kWh lithium-ion battery and inverter, powering an electric motor that sends drive, via a single-speed reduction-gear transmission, to the front wheels. A set-up Nissan calls 'e-CVT'.
Combined power and torque maximums are 140kW and a considerable 330Nm, respectively. Tipping the scales at 1728kg, the Ti e-Power’s power-to-weight ratio is a healthy 81kW/tonne.
Along with 'Sport' and 'Eco' modes, there’s also a one-pedal driving option that provides electricity-saving regenerative braking that washes off a good deal of speed to substantially slow you down. It's a stepping stone between a hybrid and full EV and you never need to plug it in anywhere.
Nissan made myriad changes to the MacPherson-style strut front and multi-link rear suspension design to accommodate all the additional electrification tech.
Remember towing capacity is half that of the regular Qashqai’s 1500kg (braked trailer), dropping to the latter’s 750kg unbraked figure.
Renault says after a combination of open and urban roads the Kadjar will have used 6.3L/100km. In my own testing I measured 6.5L/100km at the fuel pump. That’s outstanding.
Nissan reckons the Ti e-Power should average around 5.2L/100km on a combined urban, extra-urban cycle, which equates to a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 117 grams/km.
We managed a still-commendable 5.8L as indicated by the trip computer, but we did not have a chance to test it at the pump.
Note, as with all Qashqais, the e-Power needs more-expensive 95 RON premium unleaded petrol. Brimming the 55L fuel tank, expect a range of up to around 1050km between refills. That's 150km up on the regular 1.3L turbo versions.
Renault’s Kadjar may be a better-looking version of Nissan’s Qashqai, but it doesn’t drive as well. This comes down to the engine and transmission Renault has gone with.
There’s turbo lag with that small four-cylinder and this delay is made more pronounced by a dual-clutch transmission that causes the vehicle to lurch during shifts.
This type of shemozzle is not uncommon, the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke behave in the same way with their similar powertrains.
There’s nothing wrong with them, it’s just that for a car that’s probably going to spend its life mainly in the city, the Kadjar won’t provide the smoothest driving experience.
The Qashqai has a CVT automatic and while these transmission aren’t as sporty feeling as a dual-clutch, they’re smooth and good for easy city driving.
The Kadjar does have a comfortable ride and good handling, so if you’re able to get used to the antics of the engine and transmission there’s more to like than not about the way this Renault drives.
Two things are obvious soon after the driver presses the starter and silently whooshes away in a Qashqai Ti e-Power.
Firstly, there’s a real weight to it, highlighting this as a solid (as well as heavy) vehicle of substance. And, secondly, once over this initial impression, everything then seems completely normal and intuitive. There’s nothing alien going on here.
Despite the mass, acceleration is brisk, with throttle response becoming even livelier once on the move, since you can feel all that instant torque on tap, even with a light flex of your right foot.
Pushing down harder, it should soon become clear this is a fast machine, so keep an eye on that digital speedo display. It caught us out a couple of times during our test drive through central Victoria.
Using the driving modes reveals varying behaviour according to the settings. In Eco mode the e-Power has a smooth and relaxed gait; performance is Normal seems more spirited while in Sport responses are appropriately stronger and more urgent.
It’s worth keeping the latter in mind, because the chassis is set up for a sporty, Euro feel, meaning there’s a tautness to the suspension that's a little at odds with the plushness of the interior. This isn’t a soft, bouncy ride.
Rolling on a 235/50 R19 wheel and tyre package, there’s a pleasing balance of steering feel, handling agility and roadholding grip, resulting in a dynamically athletic and reassuringly controlled vehicle, even at speed through tighter corners. However, as with the e-Power’s acceleration delivery, the keener driver has to first push through a level of inertia to discover this.
One trait worth keeping in mind is that the tail can become loose and even slide out a little before the ESC quickly yet calmly reels it back in, if you attempt to take a bend too fast. Beware, though, that as the roads were hot and dry during our drive, we cannot attest to how this behaviour will manifest in the wet. Should be fun if you’re a keener driver. We weren’t expecting that.
What else? The easy e-Pedal function works well, providing significant braking up to a point, without bringing the vehicle to a full stop. It soon feels second nature.
Plus, unlike most Toyota hybrids, many EVs and even the X-Trail Ti e-Power we tested recently, the smaller-brother Qashqai avoids that oddly wooden brake-pedal feel, though again, a test in inner-urban traffic may reveal something else.
And, finally, over coarse-chip surfaces, there’s a bit too much tyre or road-noise intrusion coming inside, though over the smoother stuff, you’ll also feel blissfully cocooned in the comfort the Ti packaging provides.
Overall, then, the Qashqai e-Power is a swift, agile and entertaining drive, as well as safe and secure, revealing a further depth to Nissan’s engineering talent and capability.
The Kadjar hasn’t been given an ANCAP safety rating, but it did score the maximum five stars when tested by its European equivalent Euro NCAP in 2015.
But beware, the Kadjar isn’t equipped with much in the way of advanced safety equipment. Yes, there is AEB on all grades, while the mid-spec Zen and top-of-the-range Intens come with blind spot monitoring and lane departure warning. But that’s about it. No lane keeping assist, or rear cross traffic alert, or adaptive cruise.
There are front and rear parking sensors, which are almost vital in the city, and a reversing camera.
It’s for this reason the score here is so low – charging $38K and not having anywhere near the level of safety tech on a new car that costs much less is disappointing.
For child seats there are three top tether anchor points across the second row and two ISOFIX points.
Under the boot floor is a space saver spare wheel.
The e-Power is included with the rest of the existing Qashqai range in scoring a five-star ANCAP crash-test result in 2021.
It features seven airbags including front-centre and front-to-rear curtain coverage.
You’ll also find front and rear Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) with pedestrian, cyclist and back-over detection, blind-spot warning, lane-keep assist systems, adaptive cruise control with full stop-go function, a driver fatigue monitor, auto high beams, traffic sign recognition, front and rear parking sensors, ABS with brake assist, Electronic Brake-force Distribution, hill-start assist, stability control, traction control and a surround-view monitor.
There’s also a vehicle approach sound for pedestrians.
Note that Nissan’s AEB kicks in from 5.0-130km/h, pedestrian and cyclist AEB from 10-80km/h, and the lane support systems work between 60-250km/h.
ISOFIX child-seat latches are fitted to outboard rear seat positions, while a trio of top tethers for straps are included across the rear bench.
The Kadjar is covered by Renault’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.
Service intervals are every 12 months or 30,000km and capped at $399 for the first three services, followed by $789 for the fourth then back to $399.
There’s also up to five years roadside assistance, if you service your Kadjar with Renault.
Like all Qashqais, the Ti e-Power offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty that also includes roadside assistance. Nothing unusual there.
Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km. The latter is 5000km sooner than in the ICE equivalent, by the way.
Nissan also offers a choice of servicing options, starting with the Capped Price Servicing that is nearly a thousand dollars cheaper than the regular ICE versions of the Qashqai over the six-year period as published on the company’s website, at around $2850.
Pay in advance and there’s an additional 10 per cent discount. Of course, terms and conditions apply.