Nissan Navara vs Ford Ranger

What's the difference?

While it won’t appeal on the value front as much as its Mitsubishi Triton engineering twin, the Navara’s tweaks from Premcar make it a more comfortable and livable thing. 

The extra cost is worth it for how much better it is on the road, plus you get more features, regardless.

Whether the changes to the Navara are sexy enough to get people in the dealership door is another question, but anyone who takes this over a Triton won’t be disappointed.

If it's for work, the SL or ST will do. If it's doubling as a family car, the Pro-4X is worth the outlay.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The Super Duty is the most formidable workhorse in the Ranger fleet. It projects a feeling of immense strength each time you drive it, reflecting payload and tow ratings well beyond traditional limits for vehicles of this size combined with formidable all-terrain capabilities. For tradies wanting the ultimate Ranger workhorse, the Super Duty is clearly in a class of its own - a class which it created.

Nissan has done well to inject its own design flavour into the ute, because even though there’s inevitable similarity in the silhouette, it doesn’t just look like a Triton.

Impressive given a lot of the car is the same, and Nissan couldn’t change any of the hard points the Triton comes with. In fact, the Navara’s dimensions are largely the same as the Triton, coming in at 5320mm long, 1930mm wide and 1815mm tall.

The biggest Nissan-specific design element is a nod to the Navara’s heritage, the three little vent lines above the grille hark back to the original D21 generation ute which had these holes in the bonnet.

It’s subjective to some extent, but I reckon the Navara has the Triton beat on the design front.

Depending on the variant, you get some other indicators that this is no Triton, including a sports bar on the rear of the cabin with ‘Navara’ cut into it, or Pro-4X decals if that’s the variant you go for.

Given the lifestyle and off-road focus of the Pro-4X, it also has a bit more trim inside and out to feel more rugged and premium.

The Navara’s new interior is a big step up over the previous generation, even if it is genuinely all-Triton in there. The biggest change is the Nissan badge on the steering wheel.

It’s a ute, so there’s still a lot of plastic, cheap materials and even the nicer looking surfaces are in a few spots made of gloss black plastic (sometimes called piano black) which gets smudged easily and after a short while.

The Super Duty, originally based on Ford’s F-series full-size US pickup range, has been a mainstay on farms, building sites and in remote terrain since its inception as a standalone model in 1998, but this is the first time the nameplate has been applied to the Aussie designed and developed Ranger.

Ford claims the Ranger Super Duty resulted from extensive consultation with workers in industries that depend on their trucks in the harshest remote environments, from forestry crews and emergency service workers to land managers and fleet teams.

The challenge was to create a medium-sized truck with higher payload/tow ratings and greater all-terrain capability, as the only vehicles strong enough to carry their gear were too big and unwieldy to access critical locations.

In response, the Ranger Super Duty features a unique reinforced version of the Ranger’s chassis frame, incorporating readily accessible mounting points for a variety of aftermarket accessories and specialised equipment.

There’s also a new heavy-duty rear axle assembly with the largest and strongest differential ever fitted to a production Ranger for enhanced load-carrying capacity, paired with a unique uprated version of the US Bronco Raptor’s front diff.

The two-speed transfer case also has larger and stronger components than the regular Ranger and its low-speed gearset has been upgraded to match the F-series Super Duty.

Other chassis enhancements include uprated eight-stud wheel hubs with stronger bolts, improved cooling system to manage engine temps under heavy loads and during sustained off-road driving, a sealed engine snorkel and high-mounted breathers for the drivetrain/fuel system to enable its 850mm wading depth (50mm deeper than standard Ranger) and more. There was also a brutal and prolonged durability testing program to validate its Super Duty status.

Off-road credentials include steep 36.3 degrees approach, 26.9 degrees ramp breakover and 29.3 degrees departure angles, 299mm ground clearance and an expansive 13.6-metre turning circle which is the largest of all Ranger variants including the wide-tyred Raptor.

It’s a bit of a shame the Navara doesn’t benefit from the changes Nissan has been making to its interior design and layout recently, because it leaves older Nissans in the dust, in terms of design and ergonomics.

But, the Mitsubishi Triton’s interior isn’t a bad one for the Navara to have inherited, because it just works. It’s uncomplicated and sensible, if a little boring.

There are physical buttons for shortcuts, and the tech is relatively straightforward, even if it does also carry the downside of Android Auto being wired-only. It adds to the somewhat dated feeling the Navara’s interior carries, but the physical space itself is rather sensible.

The Navara’s seats are comfortable, and as the driver it’s easy to find your own preferred position, with the electric adjustment in higher variants being an extra help there.

The driving ergonomics and visibility are also good, which lines up well with the Navara’s driving dynamics and makes it feel less like you’re pedalling a big dual-cab around.

Behind the driver, there’s not heaps in the way of amenity, but the addition of USB ports once you’re past the base SL is welcome for second-row passengers, and the space isn’t cramped by any means.

The Navara has a tub capable of easily fitting a Euro pallet, according to Nissan’s specs, but with its distance of 1135mm between wheel arches, it won’t fit an Aussie pallet. The tub is almost square, at 1555mm long and 1545mm wide, and 525mm tall. 

Plus there’s the 3500kg towing capacity and its payload ranging between 964kg for the Pro-4X or up to 1064kg in the base SL.

Proof of the increased solidity of the Ranger Super Duty single cab-chassis is its hefty 2518kg kerb weight, which in bare cab-chassis form (without tray) is 625kg more than a standard 2.0L Ranger XL single cab-chassis 4x4 equivalent.

The Super Duty’s 4500kg GVM results in a huge 1982kg payload limit. It’s also rated to tow up to 4500kg of braked trailer and with its towering 8000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum 4.5 tonne trailer weight while hauling almost one tonne of payload.

These are big numbers when compared to our standard XL Ranger example, given that the Super Duty has a 645kg higher payload rating, 1000kg higher tow rating and 1650kg higher GCM rating.

The galvanised full steel tray is equipped with six internal load anchorages, each rated up to 1800kg, which lie flush with the checker-plate floor when not in use.

There’s also external rope rails beneath the tray along each side and a sturdy front bulkhead with wire-mesh rear window protection.

As previously highlighted, this tray ensemble includes a driver-side lockable toolbox and passenger-side water tank (complete with handwash pump bottle) mounted behind their respective rear wheels.

Its work-focused interior is a comfortably familiar place for Ranger single cab-chassis workhorse owners, with fabric bucket seats, wipe-clean vinyl floor and large ‘Super Duty’ lettering embossed in the passenger side dash.

Cabin storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, pop-out cupholders on each side of the dash, an overhead glasses holder, upper/lower glove boxes plus a well-equipped centre console with wireless phone charging, USB ports, two cupholders, 400W (230V) inverter and a storage box with internal 12V socket and padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

The Ranger Super Duty is currently available in a trio of cab-chassis configurations comprising single cab, extended cab and dual cab body styles, with a dual cab ute variant and higher-grade XLT trim option due in mid-2026.

Our test vehicle is the single cab-chassis, which like all Super Duty variants comes standard with a 3.0-litre V6 turbo-diesel, 10-speed automatic and full-time 4WD, for a list price of $82,990 plus on-road costs.

Its standard equipment list includes rugged 18-inch steel wheels with 33-inch tall General Grabber 275/70 R18 all-terrain tyres and a full-size spare.

There’s also LED headlights/front fog lights/daytime running lights, zone lighting (360-degree lighting around the vehicle), a sealed engine snorkel, 4500kg tow-bar with integrated trailer brake controller and towing assistance features, onboard scales to help calculate payloads, composite side steps, heated door mirrors with puddle lamps, a frame-mounted steel bumper, twin recovery points front and rear, high-strength steel underbody armour, a big 130-litre fuel tank and more.

The work-focused interior features smart key entry and push-button start, an electric parking brake, 400W (230V) inverter, 12V socket, three USB ports, wireless phone charging, overhead auxiliary switch bank, dual-zone climate and more.

The driver is treated to a configurable 8.0-inch colour digital instrument cluster plus a big 12-inch central touchscreen for a multimedia system that includes 'SYNC' voice activation, wireless 'FordPass'/Apple/Android connectivity and digital radio.

Factory options and accessories can be ordered individually but Ford also offers three optional equipment packs tailored for different vehicle applications comprising the 'Work Pack', 'Farm Pack' and 'Adventure Pack', with pricing dependent on cab type and tray finish.

Our example showcases the heavy-duty galvanised steel tray, water tank with handwash bottle, lockable toolbox and all-weather floor mats shared by all three packs, plus the Work Pack’s 'Integrated Device Mounting System' (IDMS) and wheel nut (tension) indicators, the Farm Pack/Adventure Pack’s ARB Summit bull bar and the Adventure Pack’s rock sliders and high capacity Warn winch.

It’s also fitted with a rear ladder rack from Ford’s genuine accessories range, so depending on what combination of options and/or accessories are ordered (combined with on-road costs) you could pay more than $100K, drive-away.

A 150kW/470Nm four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine lies under the bonnet, which falls a little short of some rivals, but isn’t glaringly weak.

Its power lines up with, for example, the Toyota HiLux, but torque falls short of its rival’s 500Nm. It’s the same story for the Ranger, though that ute slips a nose ahead with 4.0kW more than HiLux and Navara in its four-cylinder guise.

The Navara’s six-speed automatic transmission also sends that power and torque to all four wheels, though how exactly it gets there depends on the spec and whether you have a centre differential or not.

All Ranger Super Duty models are powered by the same 3.0-litre V6 turbo-diesel, which meets tough Euro 6.2 emission standards using AdBlue. It produces 154kW of power at 3250rpm and a towering 600Nm of torque at 1750rpm.

This is paired with a 10-speed torque converter automatic with the choice of sequential manual-shifting using a toggle switch on the shift knob. It also offers seven drive modes to optimise performance in different terrain applications.

The full-time 4WD transfer case allows drivers to switch between high and low ranges and access other technologies when tackling difficult terrain including 'Trail Control' (low-speed off-road cruise control), 'Trail Turn Assist' (applies braking to the inside rear wheel to tighten turning radius), front and rear diff locks and more.

From the Navara’s 75L tank, a claimed 7.7L/100km is used on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, though on the launch drive we saw the trip computer hovering around 9.0L/100km.

With a few hundred kilos in the tray, that jumped up to the low 11s.

Hypothetically, if you manage to get close to Nissan’s claimed consumption, you should be able to get more than 900km out of a single tank of diesel. Nissan’s claim isn’t too outrageous, either, considering the type of driving a car launch generally consists of isn’t normally conducive to favourable fuel consumption figures.

Vehicles in this GVM class do not come with official fuel consumption figures. Even so, we clocked up 385km during our tradie-focused test which included our usual mix of suburban, city, highway and unsealed road driving, of which about one quarter was hauling its near maximum payload.

When we stopped to refuel at the end of our test, the dash display was showing average combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) consumption of 13.4L/100km which was lower than our own figure of 15.5 calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings.

That’s still decent economy for a heavy-duty off-roader driven in the daily grind of metro traffic, during which it hauled more than one tonne of payload for a day.

Therefore, based on our own test figures, you could expect a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its big 130-litre diesel tank.

Now we get to the biggest reason you’d consider a Navara over the Triton it’s based on.

While the Navara benefits from having a relatively new platform underneath it - thanks Mitsubishi - it’s still a ladder-frame dual-cab ute so expectations weren’t exactly on the floor, but they also weren’t sky-high.

And sure, a lot of the details about the new Navara aren’t groundbreaking, nor is much of the way it drives - but the changes Premcar has made to the suspension in this ute are well worth the extra outlay.

What Premcar has done with the Navara, on what we would guess is a relatively constrained budget, is find the most cost-effective way to make the ute better to drive.

They went with upgraded dampers which have been tuned to balance control and comfort with the ute’s off-road ability.

The result? A very controlled front-end, more communicative steering and confidence on the road to drive over even rough surfaces without fear of being flung off the road. Ladder-frame utes don't normally feel so controlled over rough surfaces at high speeds.

It’s worth noting that while the SL and ST still benefit from the suspension upgrades, the ST-X and Pro-4X in particular are much better to drive than you’d expect from a dual-cab ute.

Some of the roads around Canberra are particularly rough, even close to town where the speeds are lower, but the Navara handled myriad surfaces and conditions on- and off-road, in the soaking wet and when it was bone-dry.

Aside from one particular section of the launch that may have just been a little unkind to the ‘stiffer’ sidewalls on the ST-X compared to the Pro-4X, the Navara’s behaviour was not only confidence-building, but allowed for a degree of fun not normally present in the class.

The steering feel left no guesswork necessary, and there’s not a huge on-centre dead-spot as is often the case in a dual-cab. Nice and direct without being too heavy.

The Navara’s weak point, which still gets a pass mark, is probably that its drivetrain now feels older than the ute in which it lives. The outputs are passable, and the transmission finds the correct place well enough, but in a world of 10-speed autos in Rangers or petrol plug-in hybrids, a bog-standard turbo-diesel with six gears has to be bang-on perfect to keep up. 

The Navara’s is adequate, but once you’re used to it, the drive experience is a step above most in the ute segment in terms of control, something that’s hard to come by in this segment.

It translates well to off-roading, where the ute’s front-end settles very quickly over ridges and undulating surfaces without the harshness of a too-stiff set of dampers.

Unsealed roads feel easily dispatched even at relatively high speeds, and with the right tyres (a la Pro-4X) the Navara is a seriously capable thing.

If you find yourself the owner of a D27 Navara and never leave the bitumen, you’re missing out.

It has a comfortable driving position with huge door mirrors providing commanding views. There’s also plenty of headroom for blokes my size (186cm) plus manual adjustment of the steering wheel and seat (including lumbar support) and a big left footrest for additional support.

The steering feels great like all Rangers, backed by sure-footed handling and strong braking response. The unladen ride quality is surprisingly supple for such a heavy lifter, given the combined effect of its baggy tyre sidewalls and the vehicle's substantial sprung weight helping to iron out the bumps.

Given its hefty kerb mass, acceleration feels slightly subdued compared to a standard V6 Ranger, as you’d expect. However, it still provides a satisfying surge of response in urban use thanks to 600Nm of torque and gearing that keeps the engine operating at or near its peak torque output at around 1800rpm.

It’s a relaxed highway cruiser with low engine and tyre noise. The most noticeable ingress at these speeds is mild wind buffeting around bulky fixtures like the engine snorkel, door mirrors and tray bulkhead, but it’s not overly intrusive with conversation not requiring raised voices.

To test its payload rating we firstly put our test vehicle on a public weighbridge. Unladen and with a full tank of fuel, it tipped the scales at 3130kg which after deducting the 2518kg base kerb weight revealed a sizeable combined accessory weight of 612kg.

So, given accessories are included in kerb weight, the Super Duty’s 'naked' 1982kg payload rating drops by the same amount to 1370kg, which is still a mighty capacity for a vehicle of this size.

We strapped 975kg on the tray, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 1150kg (still more than 200kg under its limit) which the onboard scales vaguely confirmed. The robust rear leaf springs compressed a mere 30mm in response, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming out on our test route.

The Super Duty carried this payload with arrogant ease, maintaining its surefooted handling and scoffing at our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb. It also displayed strong engine braking on the way down, in a convincing demonstration of its heavy load hauling ability.

ANCAP safety ratings do not apply to vehicles in this GVM class but it has a suite of passive and active features including nine airbags, AEB with pedestrian detection, traffic sign recognition, tyre pressure monitoring, lane keeping and adaptive cruise control.

A new feature under the rear of the tray not previously available on Ranger cab-chassis variants is what Ford calls the ‘rear driver assistance technology bar’ which delivers numerous safety functions including front/rear parking aids, 360-degree camera, blind-spot monitoring with trailer coverage and reverse brake assist with cross-traffic alert.

Nissan’s 10-year/300,000km warranty is fantastic but applies only if you service with Nissan. It’s five years with no kilometre limit otherwise. 

There’s five years' of flat-price servicing at $499 per visit, every 12-months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Roadside assist is also free for a decade if you service with Nissan, or a year otherwise.

Given there are around 180 Nissan dealers nationwide, finding one shouldn’t be a challenge.

The Ranger Super Duty comes with the same five years/unlimited km warranty shared by all Ranger models, with up to seven years of conditional roadside assist available if serviced at Ford dealerships.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Ford offers a pre-paid service plan that provides capped price servicing for the first five scheduled services up to five years/75,000km, which totals $2100 or a reasonable average of $420 per service.

Ford has a long-established network of around 180 dealers spanning all states and territories including key rural and regional areas.