Mercedes-Benz Eqc400 vs RAM 2500

What's the difference?

When I was telling my colleagues about the Mercedes-Benz EQC my summary was, basically, it’s the best electric luxury car I’ve driven. 

It’s plusher than a Jaguar i-Pace, more polished than a Tesla Model X - indeed, it feels like a different kind of electric car to both of those models. It’s an impressive foray into the segment, and we can’t wait for the chance to put it against some like-minded electric European luxury SUVs at some point in the future.

If you're a grey nomad with a massive caravan searching for something to do the big lap in, or a big boater seeking an effortless weekend getaway machine, then this sort of ute makes sense. The HD series shows just how much more muscle is available, for those who genuinely need it.

But if towing or hauling to the max isn’t your priority, then the far-more dynamic – and class-leading – Ram 1500 series does everything else with much-greater aplomb.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Mercedes-Benz EQC is entirely different to what we expect from the brand, but it’s really what we expected all along when it came to an electric SUV from the Daimler stable.

It is sleek, streamlined and smooth, with panels that almost look like they’re formed from liquid. And it has the eco-edgy graphics you’d expect, with a specific grille treatment (yes, a real grille), headlights that are unlike any other Benz (they even have an LED that runs the width of the grille), and a rear-end style that looks almost like it was penned with another Stuttgart-based brand in mind… Porsche. I’m talking about Porsche.

But one thing that I really love about the EQC is its moustache. It's more prominent when the car is finished in white paint, but there’s a moustache that former Daimler chief Dieter Zetsche himself could be envious of. And he had one helluva soup strainer.

It is clearly made to be slippery, despite essentially sharing its underpinnings with the more conventionally angular - yet still rounded-edged - GLC SUV.

While it is a nicely styled gizmo, I found there are some things that could be annoying.

For instance, I was trying to plug in at night in a dark area, and while there is a small light above the charge port, other EVs have a light that actually illuminates the area where you’re plugging in. 

And also, the plug port is on the driver’s side. If, like me, you had to charge up with the car on the street, it just adds a little bit more anxiety to the whole situation. I shudder to think what could happen if the charger was hit by a passing car - folding the mirrors in is one thing, but you can’t fold the power cable! The lead for the charger is long, thankfully. 

I know, most people (maybe even all people!) who buy and EQC are going to have undercover parking in a garage or carport, but it’s still worth remembering that the filler isn’t on the kerb side like a number of other EVs. 

It has almost identical dimensions to that car: 4774mm long on a 2873mm wheelbase, with a width of 1884mm and a height of 1622mm. For context, GLC is 4669mm long, same wheelbase, a bit wider (1890mm) and just a little more height (1639mm).

What about interior design? Well it’s also familiarly different, with a number of changes to the materials used but still the same tech and comfort you’d expect. Check out the interior images in the section below.

You can spot the HD facelift by the bi-LED headlights and bulgier bonnet, while chrome’s been replaced by black trim inside and out, including in the restyled grille, alloy wheels and side steps, for a more-modern appearance.

Both models are identical bar the badging. However, while they share a tri-link solid front axle system, the 2500 HD features coil-spring rear suspension, while the super heavy-duty 3500 HD relies on leaf springs. That’s for it to achieve maximum pulling and hauling capability.

Inside, the already-contemporary dashboard, with its 12-inch Tesla-esque portrait touchscreen, remains much the same as before, except for a few detail updates to accommodate the big new centre console, twin wireless charger housings, extra USB ports and restyled electronic instrument cluster.

Otherwise, it’s as vast as ever.

If you’re thinking the EQC looks like a seven-seat SUV, you’re wrong. It’s a five-seater, with a decent sized boot, too.

The luggage capacity is 500 litres, which is decent for a car of this size, but bear in mind there is no spare wheel under the boot floor. 

Rear seat space is reasonably spacious for someone my size (182cm) sitting behind their own driving position, with decent knee and toe space. Headroom is not terrific, though, and anyone taller will need to watch their head as they get in and out of the car as the top sill eats into space quite a bit. 

Any middle-seat passengers might find the room a little less likeable, as the transmission tunnel intrudes quite a bit. Those with big feet might find shoehorning themselves in and out a bit of a challenge as the sills are quite large, and our car even had optional ($1200) “aluminium-look running boards with rubber studs” - side steps, essentially. They get in the way, too.

But if you’re just sitting two abreast in the back the seat comfort is really good, the trim quality is excellent, and there is a flip down armrest with the storage bin and pop out cupholders. There are rear air vents (no climate control adjustment in the back, though, and no USB charging either), and there are two map pockets, plus bottle holders in the doors. Up front you will find a mix of familiar elements if you’ve sat in any recent Benz model, but a few unique finishes and trim elements that might be new to you.

There’s a beautiful horizontal fin theme that runs around the cabin, as well as the now-traditionally audacious looking Burmester sound system speaker covers. They don’t quite gel with the aesthetic, to my eye. 

The dash-top material - “fine surface texture”, as Benz calls it - is unlike anything else we’ve seen from the brand, it’s kind of like a soft silky slippery fabric trim. While there are lovely copper trim elements that just add something visually entertaining and appealing to the space.

There is a large covered centre console bin with 2x USB-C charge points and there is an additional USB-C upfront next to the wireless phone charger. The Mercedes touchpad system that aligns with the MBUX media screen is reasonably easy to get used to, but being a Benz there are plenty of options for usability - the centre screen is a touch-capacitive unit, or you can use the steering wheel-mounted controller on the left side of the wheel to control the middle screen. The right thumb controller manages the driver info screen.

It was mostly very easily managed, although the menus did get stuck at times for me - mainly in the section around the energy consumption. Plus I tried the whole “Hey, Mercedes” command thing, and it failed on numerous occasions. 

As with all Walkinshaw Automotive Group utes (that includes the Silverado), the Ram HD’s fit and finish seem exemplary, with an insider suggesting the quality may exceed the North American factory original.

This is no small feat. Ateco Automotive, the instigator and original importer of over 35,000 (and counting) remanufactured left-hand to right-hand-drive DS, DT and DJ full-sized utes in Australia since the first 2500 HD rolled off the Melbourne production line in 2015, says “between 400 and 500” unique engineering pieces are necessary.

Compared to the pre-facelift versions, the DJ Series II sees a switching out of the old front bench seat, which meant the earlier versions were six seaters, to shapelier individual items. Apparently, comfort and convenience are what buyers prefer, since a large centre console with armrest is now included. It’s certainly seems plush and luxurious inside.

Along with greater storage, the Ram’s electronic instrumentation is new and the multimedia system has been updated, with extra USB ports as well as twin phone chargers.

The driving position might be compromised for some by a lack of reach adjustability for the steering column (unlike in the DT 1500), and the foot-operated park brake seems like an anachronistic nowadays, but otherwise everything is easy to reach and operate – despite being scattered all about – after you’ve learned what all the buttons and switches do.

Meanwhile, the now-fixed seats can accommodate a trio of burly occupants no problems due to the sheer width of the cabin.

Included are air vents, extra USB ports, a sliding back window and storage underneath the seat cushions and within a special floor compartment.

Owners can also create a raised floor section, by tilting both cushions up and folding down two corresponding bases for a flat and even load area, with additional hidden storage within the now-covered footwells.

Overall, the Ram’s cabin balances convenience and utility quite well.

Further back, the tub length is 1938mm, width is 1687mm and 1295mm between the wheel arches and height is 511mm. This compares to the Silverado 2500’s superior corresponding figures of 2089mm/1814mm/1317mm/533mm, respectively.

A swing-away step is provided to help tub access, as well as a spray-in bedliner, strut-assisted tailgate-close and 12-pin towbar fitted as standard.

Maximum towing capacities vary from 3.5 tonnes to an unmatched eight tonnes with the correct accessories. The 2500’s payload is 785kg while the 3500 more than doubles that. And standard exhaust brakes help with braking on long descents when fully laden.

Which brings us to the heart of the matter. Muscle.

Coded as the DJ, the 2500 and even heavier-duty 3500 differ significantly compared to the DT-series 1500, and use many of the body, chassis and mechanical components from the previous-gen DS-series 2500/3500 HD. Hence the unique model code.

Only launched in North America earlier this year, the DJ Series II kicks off from $172,950 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the 2500 HD. That’s the same old retail figure as before, despite the newcomer ushering in a minor facelift, major muscle boost and more kit, although the Silverado 2500 HD is still cheaper, at about $5K less, while the old runout versions now start from under $170K driveaway.

It’s also worth keeping in mind that the Ram 3500 HD has no direct rival in Australia.

As you’d expect, many luxury features are standard, such as heated and vented front seats with driver’s side memory, leather upholstery, retractable exterior mirrors, a surround-view monitor and adaptive cruise control. Upgraded driver-assist safety systems have also been added. More on those later on.

The newly-added items include a sunroof, centre console bisecting the front seats, a 12.3-inch instrument display, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, dual smartphone chargers, eight USB ports and traffic sign recognition.

So, no more three-person front bench. And it seems the reclining rear seat has been binned for a fixed-position item.

The EQC has a power output of 300kW and it has 760Nm of torque, which is enough to see its claimed 0-100km/h acceleration pegged at just 5.1 seconds.

The EQC’s top speed is 180km/h (limited for the sake of the batteries), and it has an 80kWh lithium-ion battery pack.

It uses a pair of asynchronous motors - one front, one rear - and they can alternate to do what’s best in the situation - be it working in 2WD (RWD or FWD), or in AWD. 

If you’re thinking about an EQC as a towing option, the towing capacity is 750kg for an un-braked trailer and 1800kg for a braked trailer.

Under the now-bulgier bonnet may be the torquiest engine money can buy, at least in something that does not require a special driving license. Or pilot's licence.

Completely overhauled with a redesigned engine head, larger intake and exhaust valves, a new turbo, heavier-duty pistons, a higher-pressure fuel system and upgraded intake manifold amongst other changes, the Cummins-sourced 6.7-litre in-line six-cylinder turbo-diesel unit now delivers 313kW of power at 2800rpm and 1458Nm at 1800rpm.

Formerly making 276kW and 1152Nm, the new figures are 13 per cent and 26 per cent better than before (respectively), reducing the power gap with the Silverado’s 350kW/1322Nm 6.6L V8 turbo-diesel, while easily leap-frogging it for torque.

At 3710kg (kerb), the HD’s power-to-weight ratio improves significantly despite putting on about 100kg, from 76.5 kW/tonne to 84.4kW/tonne.

Meanwhile, a ZF-supplied eight-speed auto replaces the old six-speed unit. It’s now a second faster to 100 at under 7.3 seconds and the spread of extra gears should improve highway fuel consumption, albeit slightly.

Drive is sent to the rear wheels in two-wheel drive (2WD) mode in most cases. However, 4WD High (4H) is also available via a part-time dual-range transfer case and is selectable on-the-fly, though it is not recommended for operation above 80km/h, while 4WD Low (4L) is for rougher terrain at very low speeds.

With an 80kWh battery pack and a Type 2 CCS plug (up to AC 7.4kW / DC 110kW) the charge times vary pretty greatly depending on what output you’re powering up from.

Mercedes-Benz says a DC fast charging station should be able to replenish the battery bank in 1 hour 22 minutes (at a maximum of 110kW, though some Chargefox stations offer charge rates up to 350kW) while an AC charging station (like you’d find in car parks) or Mercedes-Benz’s own Wallbox system should take about 12 hours 13 minutes.

Charging from a regular household powerpoint is a last resort option. It is claimed to take 46 hours 40 minutes from empty to full (230-volt outlet, 10-amp/2.3kW). I plugged in to a powerpoint in my house and the car’s info display was stating it would take 9.5 hours to achieve the remaining 16 per cent of charge. It didn’t get to 100 per cent before I had to unplug, however.

My not-so-urban test drive loop commenced with 97 per cent of battery charge and an indicated range of 363km available. The idea was to get a feel for the “range vs reality” of the situation, so I did it in Comfort drive mode with the climate control active and no intent to either thrash the vehicle or baby it to save battery.

My drive ended with 36 per cent indicated charge remaining, after I’d covered 231.6km. That means, based on the car’s own algorithm, that it would have covered 315km before the battery was depleted, which is a long way short of the claimed 434km range.

The indicated energy consumption was 20.8kWh/100km, which is ‘thirsty’ for an EV. On our recent electric car comparison test, the most efficient of our EVs - the Hyundai Ioniq Electric - used just 13.0kWh/100km. Yes, I know the EQC is a lot heavier (2425kg kerb weight), but even the Tesla Model 3 was notably more efficient (18.5kWh/100km) than the EQC over very similar terrain and driving.

However, our testing saw us return an even better consumption rate than Mercedes-Benz’s claimed figure, which is 21.4kWh/100km.

Ram says the Australian Government doesn't mandate an official combined fuel consumption figure for full-sized utes like these, so there is no average economy number for us to share.

But the trip meter in two of our test vehicles said it consumed between 15 litres per 100km and 15.6L/100km of diesel fuel, and both had not been towing a trailer or load since being reset.

Despite the new ZF eight-speed auto’s revised final drive ratio (now 3.42:1 instead of 3.73:1) to help improve efficiency, clearly this is no Toyota Prius.

Based on those trip computer numbers, expect the 117-litre fuel tank to provide about 760km between refills. Handily, the 28.4L AdBlue reservoir comes with its own tank display on the dash.

If you have a garage and a Wallbox connector, there’s no reason the Mercedes EQC couldn’t be a terrific option as a commuter, a second car, or even your primary vehicle. 

The thing with all electric cars is that it’s about settling into a rhythm. If you use the car to commute to work, maybe you can charge it there. Or you might have a solar array and charge at home.

No matter the situation, you’ll be getting a rather nice vehicle to live with, based on my week with the EQC.

It’s a plush car, that’s for sure. The silence it offers is truly relaxing, and there’s effortless torque to pull you away from a standstill. The way you can build pace to overtake, the rush of noise-free acceleration, is pretty astounding. Perhaps not as visceral as in a GLC 63 AMG, but it’s still an experience.

The steering is direct and doesn’t require much thought, though it does lack a little bit of feel. But it’s easy to predict and quick to respond, making for pleasant progress around town. It’s easy to park, as well, with a great surround view camera system, as well as front and rear parking sensors. And if you’re not confident, the car has semi-autonomous parking, too.

The brake pedal feel takes some acclimation, because it responds pretty well, but the action is hard to modulate at times. That is partly due to the brake regeneration system, which actively captures energy that would have otherwise been lost during braking. You can adjust the level of aggression of the regen brakes, too, by tapping either the up or down shift paddles. The most aggressive setting will almost pull you up to a halt from urban speed without any brake pressure required.

The suspension of the EQC feels more settled than the last GLC I drove, and that could be in part due to the extra weight and stiffness of the battery cell under the body. The centre of gravity feels low, and it feels stuck down to the road in most situations.

The ride is mostly fine, but with big 20-inch wheels and low profile tyres, it can jar on hard edges. I also noticed that it can feel a bit unsettled at higher speed, as the body moves around - from side to side - more than I would have expected. It deals well with undulation changes and big dips, and if the surface is good, so are the comfort levels in the cabin. 

The Ram HD’s column shifter and foot-operated park brake say it all. This is a big, floaty and, at times, old-fashioned American truck, and that is certainly how it feels from behind the wheel.

2500 HD first.

From the initial burble of the forced-induction in-line six diesel, you can feel the torque simmering restlessly within. Slot the awkward selector into Drive, and – depending on how much heft you’re hauling – the Ram will lurch off the line like a startled bull, and before you know it, you’re bounding along.

If lightly laden, you’ll even momentarily spin the rear wheels in the lower ratios – second (the start-off gear; first’s for lugging only), third and maybe even fourth if the surface is slippery enough, though the traction controls will quell anything more than a bit of a bum wiggle.

From there on in, on a straight piece of highway anyway, the 3.7-tonne ute just strides along effortlessly, picking up the pace with ridiculous ease as required. You’re soon aware that the cruise control is vital if you’re going to keep your licence.

If you’re wondering how different the HD feels compared to the related regular Ram 1500, the first corner will serve up some answers soon enough.

The steering is light and reassuringly measured in response, but also numb and less precise than expected, if not quite vague, meaning you need to feed in inputs carefully. Especially at speed. Rushing it in, or blundering through a tighter turn carelessly, will have the laws of physics reminding you of this truck’s length and girth, and not to mention maybe the long arm of the law on your tail as well before long. Anyway, other road users will soon let you know as well. Take it easy.

Over the varied and at-times tight rural roads of Victoria’s Gippsland region, the endless pitter-patter of the unladen suspension, combined with the constant pitching from the body and trigger-happy brakes, resulted in motion queasiness, if not sickness. We’ve been assured that with a load as intended, everything including our internal sense of balance should settle down. Which makes sense. A boat or caravan out back should provide the anchoring effect required.

Back on straighter and smoother ground, where the 2500 smothers and smooshes most things before it, you’ll be glad for the commanding vision aided by the massive mirrors and surround-view cameras, helping to boost driver confidence, particularly when weaving through traffic or in parking scenarios.

But the compromises demanded for the ability to haul up to eight tonnes means this is a very niche proposition.

Which is why Ram insisted on us testing the sole 3500 HD with a 3.5-tonne caravan hitched out back, on the ex-Holden speed loop at Lang Lang.

This was a test of acceleration and control, and – again – we managed to spin the rear wheels in the lower gears.

Likewise, all that torque was delivered without struggle or strain, and almost immediately the 3500 was sitting steadily at 110km/h. The planted chassis and various electronics seamlessly kept everything in line.

But the track surface was too calm to assess the ride comfort from the leaf-sprung suspension, and we weren’t allowed to venture on to public roads.

Returning back to base, we even forgot all about the caravan quietly shadowing our every move out back, which is a sign of the 3500’s towering towing confidence.

Which is exactly what it says on the tin.

Neither ANCAP nor Euro NCAP have tested any full-sized American utes at this stage.

However, the 2500 HD is alone in its class in having a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rating for 2025, scoring four out of five stars.

For the Series II upgrade, the autonomous emergency braking system now includes cyclist and pedestrian detection and braking, the traffic-sign recognition tech is new, whilst rear-cross-traffic alert, blind-spot monitoring, a 360-degree view camera and tyre-pressure monitors continue. No operation parameter data for the AEB is provided.

Plus, dual front, front side and curtain airbags are fitted, along with three child-seat restraining top-tether points and a pair of ISOFIX latches in the rear outboard seats.

It mightn’t have the same method of propulsion as a petrol or diesel Merc, but it has similar service requirements. You still need to take it to the workshop for maintenance every 12 months - or every 25,000km! - whichever comes first.

Owners can either pay as they go for servicing, or pay up front and bundle it into their finance. The upfront rate is $1350 for three years/75,000km. Pay as you go will peg you along at $450 (year one), $750 (year two), $450 (year three). 

When the EQC launched it came with a three-year/unlimited kilometre warranty plan, but that was recently updated to a five-year/unlimited km plan, bringing Benz inline with the likes of Korean luxury maker Genesis, not to mention the majority of mainstream car brands.

So, here's where the news may not be so good for potential HD buyers, because the Ram’s warranty is well below its main competitor.

Now it is the sole US full-sized ute with a three-year, 100,000km warranty, instead of the five-year/unlimited-kilometre coverage offered by the others.

And don’t forget, this is the era where (albeit smaller) utes from Kia have seven years while Mitsubishi, Nissan and MG are up to 10 years (conditionally).

Service intervals are at just six months or 12,000km and there are no capped-price servicing options either.

As a result of trailing the competition so badly in these key areas, the Ram HD’s overall rating has been dragged down significantly.

Along with the 75 Ram dealers throughout every state and territory in Australia, there are an additional three garages that will service the vehicles.