Mercedes-Benz Eqb250 vs GWM UTE

What's the difference?

The EQB is a likeable yet complicated machine.

On one hand, the high pricing is a real hurdle, even in the base 250, while the 350 4Matic costing the wrong side of $110K driveaway can’t even be had with seven seats. What is the point of it? 

On the other, though, the EQB is roomier than its appearance suggests, way lovelier inside than anticipated, and – especially after allowed to really be driven hard and fast – a whole lot more Mercedes-Benz in the way the 350 4Matic moves, steers, grips, rides and stops.

As a result, we’d skip the capable but bland 250 and try to haggle hard on the price of the altogether too-expensive yet compelling 350 4Matic instead. It’s the EQB to be in.

In a very competitive ute market, the GWM Cannon XSR represents plenty of bang for your buck, but it’s just not as refined as you’d hope. 

It should be better at this price-point, especially when it’ll be unfavourably cross-shopped with lower-spec variants in the Ford Ranger, Isuzu D-Max and Toyota HiLux line-ups.

It’s a nice enough vehicle on-road, and the XSR is an effective 4WD on the dirt without ever being truly exceptional – but that’s fine for those who want to save big bucks and still drive away in a well-equipped twin-locked off-road vehicle.

The EQB does not employ a dedicated EV architecture – sometimes referred to as a ‘skateboard’ platform – like the Tesla Model Y, or for that matter the brilliant Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6 and Genesis GV60 at around the Benz’s price points.

By this, we mean that it was originally designed as an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. In this case, what lies beneath is the MFA2 platform, first seen in the redesigned A-Class hatch back in 2018, and applied to all transverse-engined Mercedes models since.

The upshot here is that there are some compromises as a result compared to the aforementioned EV-only alternatives, namely concerning packaging as well as weight distribution in some cases.   

Like we said earlier, the EQB’s design is eye-catching and quite handsome. It is clear that the success of the GLB that spawned it is partly attributed to the chunky, almost function-over-form tall-boy utilitarian styling. That ‘W’ shaped window-line kink is an interesting visual feature too.

The changes from GLB to EQB do give the EV definite points of difference, from the front-end’s black flat panel and fibre optic light that connects the (blue-highlight) headlights, to the curved strip LED tail-lights and bumper-sited numberplate mount.

We reckon the 20-inch AMG turbine wheels really do enhance the EQB aesthetically as well, but of course they’re an option on the 250. Though probably not in Gold Rose.

The XSR is 5439mm long (with a 3230mm wheelbase), 1958mm wide, and 1918mm high. It has a listed kerb weight of 1965kg.

It looks like the mongrel child of a HiLux, Ranger and D-Max – in a good way.

The wider-than-standard wheel track, as well as the snorkel, sports bar, substantial bash plates, tyres and even red brake calipers add to this ute’s presence.

As with the popular GLB that spawned it, there’s more to the EQB than meets the eye.

Photos mask the German electric vehicle’s considerable length and height as well as the substantial space offered inside, giving the Mercedes a handy advantage compared to premium alternatives like the Volvo XC40 Recharge, the Genesis GV60 and BMW’s recently announced (and quite handsome in the flesh) iX1 due early next year.

In fact, the EQB’s lengthy 2829mm wheelbase accommodates the batteries as well as impressive cabin packaging flexibility. Its 4684mm body is actually 26mm longer and 37mm higher than the larger, current-shape (X253) GLC, though width is identical to the EQA, making this a long, tall but quite narrow SUV proportionally speaking.

That expansive feeling is boosted by deep side windows offering reassuring all-round vision, boosted by an excellent driving position. All launch vehicles had the AMG sports seats (optional on the EQB 250, so we can’t speak for the base model), but as tested, they provided hours and hours of comfort and support. Loads of adjustability also help.

The EQB’s dash design is attractive and contemporary, though it can also seem daunting at first, requiring time to learn and understand where all the switchgear and controls are. The ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice command mostly works well, too, and can provide additional tuition. The multimedia screen can be swiped like a tablet/iPad, or controlled via a fiddly touchpad on one of the steering wheel spokes.

Once mastered, the layout is logical and operation clear… with the exception of the drive selector on the right-hand side, which can be confused for an indicator and so knocked out of ‘gear’ and into Neutral on a regular basis. This has been a two-decade-long criticism of Mercedes models.

As with most MFA2 vehicles, the interior design and quality are a big step forward compared to earlier efforts. Multi-configurable digital instrumentation (including an elegant uncluttered mode), gorgeous turbine-look vents, a row of classy toggle switches for the main buttons and a great steering wheel are highlights to behold. Storage seems endless, reinforcing the practical nature of this cabin.

Speaking of which, stepping into the rear (second row) seats further underlines the EQB’s spaciousness. Entry/egress is easy due to wide-opening doors, taller folk should find ample room for knees, legs and (especially) heads, and the (slightly reclinable) backrest does its job. Comfy if firm cushions also slide forward (by up to 140mm) when required.

That’s to aid third-row access (where applicable). To that end, the second-row seats also tilt to allow people to squeeze past. Note, though that this is really a kids-only area, rated for occupants no taller than 1.65 metres. Surprisingly cosy, both chairs are OK for short trips, but longer ones would be a stretch too far except for the smallest passengers. 

Keep in mind that all outboard middle and rear seats where fitted have ISOFIX latches for child seats.

Luggage space is another EQB bonus, offering 130 litres with all seven seats up, or 495L with the third-row folded. Drop the middle row and there’s 1710L (or 1620L in seven-seater versions). These figures are between 20L to 60L down compared to the GLB.

Note, too, there is no spare wheel fitted. Just a tyre-repair kit.

The XSR’s five-seat interior is a neat and roomy space but, in line with most utes at this price-point, if you scrutinise it in a critical way you soon discover that some parts feel a bit cheap and flimsy, such as some buttons, dials and switches.

Up front there are two USB ports, a wireless charging pad, a 12V plug and a capacious centre console.

A pair of cupholders can be concealed under a sliding cover and the storage bin is on the right side of big.

The driver gets a six-way power-adjustable seat; the front-seat passenger gets four-way power adjustment. Both seats are comfortable without being too plush.

Second-row passengers get a firm but comfortable seat and amenities include a USB port, a 220V plug, and a fold-down centre armrest.

The second-row seat base can be folded up and out of the way to make room for more gear if only two people are travelling.

Build quality is generally okay, part from the aforementioned flimsy-feeling buttons.

The XSR’s business end, the tub, has a durable-looking tub liner, tie-down points and a handy pop-out step hidden in the top of the tailgate.

But it's worth noting this ute’s tailgate can’t be locked.

The XSR has a manufacturer suggested retail price of $52,990 drive-away.

Standard features include a 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreen system (with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), a 7.0-inch digital driver info display, quilted leather seat trim, quilted leather door trim, 18-inch black alloy wheels, a sports bar, an assisted tailgate (with a pop-out step) and roof rails. 

It also has LED headlights with LED DRLs, side steps, powered mirrors, keyless entry, push-button start, power-adjustable and heated front seats, a leather steering wheel, single-zone climate control air conditioning, an auto-dimming rear view mirror, tinted rear glass, and a six-speaker audio system.

As well, the XSR gets a part-time 4WD system (with 2WD high-range, 4WD high-range and 4WD low-range), rather than full-time 4WD, which is on lower-spec GWM utes; a front differential lock (in addition to the existing rear diff lock) and Cooper Discoverer AT3 all-terrain tyres.

It also gets red brake calipers, an underbody bash plate, wheel arch flares, and a sunroof.

Elsewhere, it gets steel front and rear bumpers and a new black grille.

As with the related EQA, the EQB uses an asynchronous motor and a single-speed reduction gear transmission under the bonnet to drive the front axle. In the 250, it makes 140kW of power and 385Nm of torque.

Moving on to the 350 4Matic, it delivers 215kW and 520Nm, since a second permanently excited synchronous motor is fitted on the rear axle. This slashes the 0-100km/h acceleration time from 8.9 seconds to 6.2s, though both offer a 160km/h top speed.

This is despite a heavier kerb weight (2153kg, up from 2059kg). Power to weight ratio for the 250 is 68kW per tonne, compared to the 350 4Matic’s 99.9kW/tonne. That second motor sure makes a difference!

Both models use a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack fitted between the axles, with a maximum 11kW AC and 100kW DC charging capability.

As with most electrified MFA2 models, front suspension is via MacPherson-style struts while the rear brings a multi-link arrangement. Steering is by electrically assisted rack-and-pinion.

The XSR has the Cannon’s 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine that produces 120kW at 3600rpm and 400Nm from 1500rpm to 2500rpm. 

It has an eight-speed automatic transmission. 

As mentioned, the XSR has part-time 4WD – with 2WD high-range, 4WD high-range and 4WD low-range – rather than the full-time 4WD set-up that’s in standard Cannons.

Using WLTP figures, the EQB 250 has a combined consumption rating of 20.4kWh per 100km, down from the EQB 350 4Matic’s 21kWh/100km.

Maximum range is rated at 371km and 360km respectively. Note that due to challenging flood-water and torrential rain weather conditions, on-road real-world figures were not available during the launch drive.

The EQB offers varying levels of energy recuperation to help recharge the battery pack. In ‘D Auto’ it figures out the level of resistance automatically, but drivers can also choose to do this manually via ‘D+’ that provides coasting, ‘D’ that brings mild regeneration off-throttle, and ‘D—’ that activates maximising regen for close to single-pedal driving. These are paddle activated.

Cables for home charging with three-prong outlets are included – an eight metre long one plus a five metre public charging cable.

Mercedes says that using a 100kW DC charger will take an EQB from 10-80 per cent charged in 30 minutes, while an 11kW AC public outlet needs 4.1 hours and at home using a regular 3kW 10-amp socket requires at least 25 hours.

The Cannon XSR has a listed fuel consumption of 9.4L/100km on a combined cycle.

Actual fuel consumption on this test, from pump to pump, was 11.2L/100km but, as is the nature of my testing, I did a lot of low-range four-wheel driving.

The Cannon XSR has an 78-litre tank so, going by that fuel figure above, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 696km from a full tank.

Note: Drop 30km to 50km from any vehicle’s total calculated fuel-range figure for a better idea of that vehicle’s safe touring range – so, following that advice, the above driving range figure (696km) would become 666km after a 30km safe-distance buffer has been subtracted.

Also, remember that numerous other factors affect your fuel consumption and so impact your driving range, including how much extra weight you have onboard (passengers, camping gear, etc), whether your vehicle is fitted with any aftermarket equipment (bullbar, spare-wheel carrier, etc), whether you are towing (a camper-trailer, caravan, or boat, etc), your vehicle's tyre pressures, and the conditions.

The most remarkable thing about driving the EQB is how similar the 250 and 350 4Matic seem initially, until when push comes to shove.

Around town, both rise up to meet brand expectations. Easy and smooth off the line, acceleration is sufficiently brisk in the 250 and noticeably stronger driving the 350, as you’d expect in a two-motor EV. Progress is spirited, smooth and refined.

We're also grateful that the engineers seem to have cheekily dialled in connected and agile steering, imbuing the EQB with a likeable athletic attitude that’s just right for weaving in and out of tight traffic spots. Which is quite a feat really, given this car’s substantial size and mass.

Perhaps more surprising is how settled the ride is, no doubt aided by the sheer weight of these two-tonne-plus SUVs, as well as the standard-fitment adaptive dampers. Most bumps are quietly and effectively absorbed.

Out on the open road, the 250 remains sufficiently powerful, offering decent throttle response and quite a relaxed cruising gate. However, if you’re expecting Tesla-matching neck-snapping mid-range thrust, look elsewhere. Same applies to the other model. Though undeniably stronger throughout, not even the twin-motor 350 4Matic can be classed as especially quick.

However, while both EQBs display beautifully balanced steering that go exactly where you need them to be, only the 350 4Matic has the muscle to really explore the lofty dynamic capabilities available at higher speeds.

Across water-logged and desolate rural Victoria, the EQB behaved with exceptional athleticism given its role in life, providing outstanding steering precision, matched by brilliantly reassuring control. We’re talking planted confidence, as the 350 4Matic has the ability to really come together and move with the ebb and flow of a fast country road with outstanding aplomb. Despite teeming rain at times, the Mercedes behaved like you’d hope a swift, safe and sound grand tourer would. Who'd have figured?

Back on the highway, there was plenty of road noise intrusion coming up through the tyres, but otherwise, it seems obvious to us that though you pay more, you do get more with the twin-motor AWD version.

If you’re not expecting a dynamic, sporty driving experience from the Cannon XSR, then you won’t be disappointed.

I’m enjoying the fact that off-road vehicles from China and India are improving all the time but there are significant trade-offs when opting for a much cheaper version of the ute you actually want.

The XSR is not an insubstantial ute, but that doesn’t excuse its less-than-ideal steering (which feels too loose) or its stiff ride on upgraded suspension which, even though it increases wheel travel (for 4WDing – more about that later), seemingly hasn’t been tuned to suit the XSR’s bigger tyres, wider wheel track and greater bulk than its lower-spec stablemates.

Also, this ute has an unwieldy turning circle of 13.7m, which makes it an interesting vehicle to manoeuvre along busy urban streets or through a bustling car park.

This is a well priced ute if compared to similarly equipped, much more expensive utes, but that doesn’t excuse its touchy throttle and thrashy transmission.

However, its engine, which can feel underdone when challenged, has a relaxed feel about it when open-road cruising and if you aren’t putting too much pressure on it you likely won’t think it’s much of a let-down.

Overall, the XSR does okay on sealed surfaces, without ever getting anywhere near great – it’s simply not as refined or compliant as it could – or should – be.

On the dirt track leading to our 4WD test track, the XSR was very skippy over corrugations and tended to thump through potholes.

This ute does go well off-road though when it comes time for low-range 4WDing but, equipped with front and rear diff locks, that’s to be expected.

Off-road traction control and other systems including hill descent control, are adequate without being as seamlessly smooth as the equivalent systems in more expensive vehicles.

It also has 'Crawl Mode' (allows for no-pedal, low-speed driving) and 'Turn Assist' (which brakes the XSR’s inside rear wheel to reduce the ute’s turning circle on traction-compromised surfaces).

The over-sensitive throttle is far from ideal during low-speed low-range 4WDing when you need absolute control for safe driving, but I did become used to it – or at least I put up with it.

As mentioned earlier, the upgraded suspension has boosted wheel travel, which means you’re more than likely able in the XSR to stretch a tyre to the dirt for better traction and controlled forward progress.

The XSR’s Cooper Discoverer AT3 all-terrain tyres help, especially when the dirt becomes sticky mud that would gum up a lesser tyre, and we had no strife getting up and over one of our more severe set-piece hill climbs on that rubber.

All in all, the XSR is a capable twin-locked 4WD without ever being exceptional – and that’s fine.

The Cannon XSR has towing capacities of 750kg (unbraked) and 3000kg (braked).

The Cannon range has the maximum five-star ANCAP rating from testing in 2021, however the Cannon XSR is not covered by this rating. 

Standard safety gear on the XSR includes seven airbags, AEB (sans pedestrian detection) forward collision warning, lane-departure warning, lane-keep assistance, adaptive cruise control, traffic sign recognition, rear parking sensors, a 360-degree camera and tyre-pressure monitoring.

It does not get front parking sensors, lane-change assist or a door-open warning.

Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. The battery pack warranty is also industry-standard, valid for the usual eight years/160,000km.

Service intervals are every year or 25,000km. The EQB Service Plan starts at $1625 for the first three years, $2225 for four years and $2650 for five years.

The XSR is covered by a seven year/unlimited km warranty.

The first service is scheduled at the six-month/5000km mark (and costs $260), then every 12 months or 10,000km, with each service costing $360 a pop.