Mercedes-Benz C350 E vs Ford Maverick

What's the difference?

Plug-in hybrids will probably not appeal to all buyers, but in the premium space they make sense.

Smooth electric driving paired with the potential for weekend trips outside the 100km-or-so range make the C350e a decent thing, let alone its price parity with the C300.

It still doesn’t top the charts for value or practicality, but even aside from the PHEV tech, the C350e remains a fun-to-drive sedan that holds its own in the executive space.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

Potential is the key word when it comes to the Maverick. It has loads of potential to be a sales hit in Australia, provided Ford can get it in at the right price and specification level. In many ways, for all the success the Ranger has had for the company, the Maverick is the closest thing Ford has built to the Falcon Ute since its demise.

There’s obviously no guarantees in the automotive business, but if Ford could add the Maverick as a would-be Escape replacement it clearly has the potential (there’s that word again) to do a much better job for a brand known for its adventurous models. Whereas the Escape struggled to attract attention in a crowded SUV market alongside the likes of the Mazda CX-5, Toyota RAV4 and others, that wouldn’t be the case for the Maverick.

It’s been a hit for the Blue Oval in the US, with more than 22,000 examples sold in the first three months of 2023 and the company hiring more workers to try and keep up with demand. Which will only delay any plans to bring it to Australia, as the US market clearly has priority.

Which is a shame, because it would appeal to the large number of Australians who live in urban centres but have an active lifestyle. Especially the hybrid model, which would be ideal for weekday use while allowing owners to chuck their mountain bike or surfboard in the tray and head for adventure on the weekends.

Maybe that’s an idealistic view, but the Maverick left a strong impression and would fit so neatly into Ford Australia’s line-up it would be a waste if it never made its way Down Under.

The C350e doesn’t depart massively from the familiar visual formula that is the current ‘206’ generation C-Class and that’s no bad thing.

Call it conservative if you like, but having seen what’s possible when Mercedes takes risks (hello EQ models), the traditional Mercedes design language is put into healthy perspective. 

Handsome proportions and lines without any fuss - there are no unnecessary creases or panels or materials.

The plug-in C350e comes, as mentioned, with the AMG Line pack, adding 18-inch five-spoke AMG wheels, an AMG front apron, grille insert, and of course EQ Hybrid badging.

The pack also includes AMG Line styling inside, where you’d have to be a Mercedes regular to spot the specifics. The AMG-style steering wheel and seats are the biggest giveaways.

The design of the Maverick is one of its standout features, because it looks like a proper Ford truck, with elements in common with the Ranger and the F-150.

That’s despite the fact that underneath it actually has more in common with an SUV, sharing Ford’s ‘C2’ platform with the Escape and Bronco Sport.

It has the same ‘C-clamp’ lights that are a signature of the F-150 and have since found their way onto the Ranger.

It also has the same boxy design as its bigger siblings with a very upright front end and cut-off tail, giving it the ‘tough truck’ look popular amongst modern ute/pickup buyers in Australia and the US.

Other noticeable design elements include the Ranger-style grille treatment, slightly flared wheel arches and the ‘Maverick’ name stamped into the tailgate.

The Maverick is also available with exposed tow hooks as optional extras on the standard XLT, but they are included on the Tremor package, and add to the ‘rugged’ look of the Maverick.

Inside the Maverick looks less and feels like a pick-up and more like an SUV, with elements like the steering wheel and media system seemingly coming straight from the Escape.

But there are a number of small details in the interior design that impress, like the unique door designs and the texture finishes to some of the inlays on the dashboard and door pocket.

The space inside the C-Class remains straight-forward as ever. The layout and features don’t stray from convention, meaning there’s a sizable central screen, digital driver display, central cupholders, and places to put things like a phone, with wireless charging included.

The electrically adjustable seat and steering column make getting into a comfortable position easy, and the memory settings keep it that way.

While physical buttons are scarce, the key controls are easy to access via the central multimedia touchscreen and there’s a lack of complicated sub-menus. It's a refreshingly straightforward system compared to some from rivals, especially that of former category benchmark BMW.

There are fewer than a dozen main tile buttons on the menu, and they’re clear and easy to work out. The main screen also defaults to the navigation, and the climate controls are always visible on the touchscreen.

The central storage area is laid out so a phone sitting in the charging pad is slightly hidden, meaning it’s not a distraction, plus the cover means the cupholders and storage can be hidden away. Tidy!

The AMG-style steering wheel’s haptic controls can be used as regular buttons, but more than once on the test drive I nudged the volume and turned my music back on, just a minor annoyance.

In the second row, there’s generous space for a mid-size sedan, and the seats are comfortable for an adult to ride along for a lengthy trip.

There’s a centre armrest, hidden cupholders, and a generally light and open feeling thanks to the panoramic sunroof.

The battery for the hybrid system sits under the second row seats, which means there’s no uneven flooring in the 315L boot.

Again, in terms of size and use you’ll feel more like you’re in an SUV than a ute when you jump inside a Maverick. It definitely feels more like an Escape than a Ranger, even down to the basic layout of all the controls, air conditioning vents and storage spots.

But there are some unique elements, like the previously mentioned interior door trims, and there are some handy storage spots in the centre console along with a pair of cupholders.

There’s respectable space in the back for what is ultimately a small vehicle, but it could do with some extra amenities for the rear seat passengers. There’s a power outlet and some under seat storage space but no rear air con vents or cupholders. 

As for luggage space, this is where the Maverick diverges from the SUV script by adding its ute-style tray.

It’s a good sized bed, as the Americans call it, measuring 1381mm long and 1353mm wide, but with the tailgate able to be set a floor height it can accommodate eight-feet by four-feet wooden sheets (2400mm x 1200mm). Our test car came with the optional spray-in liner.

The tray features what Ford calls its ‘Flexbed’, which describes a variety of in-built functionality including pre-stamped slots in the side of the tray so you can insert timber as dividers, depending on what you want to use it for. There’s also a 12-volt outlet and 10 tie-down points to lean into its practical nature. 

It may be small in stature compared to the Ranger and F-150 but the Maverick isn’t a show pony. In the years since it arrived we’ve seen multiple examples of the Maverick being used as a working truck in the US, with plumbers and builders who don’t need a bigger model opting for the practical small ute and it’s easy to see it filling a similar role here.

The Maverick is clearly the entry-level model in Ford’s US ‘pick-up’ line-up, positioned beneath the bigger Ranger and biggest F-150.

There’s a three model line-up in the US - XL, XLT and Lariat (following the same naming protocols as its bigger siblings).

The XL is the workhorse of the range, riding on steel wheels, and begins the range at US$23,400 (approx. $36,500), while XLT starts at US$26,315 (approx. $41,100) and the more generously equipped Lariat is priced from US$34,855 (approx. $54,450).

For context, in the US, the Escape range begins at US$28,000 (approx. $43,740) and the Bronco Sport from US$31,230 (approx. $48,780), so the Maverick is one of the more affordable members of the Ford family, which is no doubt a big part of its appeal.

In terms of standard equipment on the XLT we drove, it included 17-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, keyless entry (but not ignition), cruise control, single-zone air conditioning, a 4.2-inch instrument display and a six-speaker sound system with Bluetooth connectivity and an 8.0-inch touchscreen running Ford’s 'Sync 4' multimedia set-up.

The Tremor is a new addition to the line-up, adding some genuine off-road credentials to the XLT or Lariat in the form of a one-inch suspension lift, Ford’s 'Trail Control' drive mode system, unique off-road biased suspension and all-wheel drive with four-wheel drive lock and the 2.0-litre EcoBoost as standard.

Cosmetic upgrades include a new grille and front fender vent, blacked-out Ford logos and lights plus orange tow hooks.

The C350e’s plug-in hybrid drivetrain consists of a 2.0-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder engine and an electric motor that drives the rear wheels via a nine-speed automatic transmission.

The combustion engine’s peak outputs are 150kW and 320Nm, while the 95kW/440Nm electric motor works with it to land on a total system output of 230kW and 550Nm.

While it’s not lightning quick, the C350e has a decent claimed 0-100km/h sprint of 6.1 seconds, and from the driver’s seat it certainly feels brisk enough to get out of its own way.

Ford offers two engine choices in the USA - a standard 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol-electric hybrid and a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol ‘EcoBoost’ option.

The hybrid powertrain makes a modest 120kW/210Nm and is only available in front-wheel drive, in an obvious nod to this ute’s shared DNA with an urban SUV. 

The EcoBoost fitted to our test car packs more punch, with 186kW/375Nm on tap and it’s paired to an all-wheel drive system via an eight-speed automatic transmission. 

Mercedes officially claims the C350e has a driving range of 104km under NEDC testing, with a 25.4kWh battery supplying the juice.

Official fuel use is just 1.5L/100km, but Mercedes says that becomes 7.6L without any battery charge to help it out.

Under standard 11kW AC charging, it’s about two hours from flat to full, but with the optional 55kW DC fast-charging, it takes about 20 minutes from flat to 80 per cent.

Ford claims the Maverick Hybrid is capable of hitting a fuel economy figure of 6.3L/100km, which is a lot more efficient than its bigger ute siblings can manage and on par with consumption the Escape Hybrid manages in the US market.

The more powerful EcoBoost is obviously not quite as efficient, using 9.4L/100km on the combined urban/highway cycle. Although this turned out to be pessimistic, as we saw returns of around 9.0L/100km in our LA test drive.

The C350e has a few drive modes that are mostly self-explanatory, those being Battery Hold, Electric, Hybrid, Sport and Individual.

You’ll likely find yourself using Electric and Hybrid most of the time, so we’ll focus on those. Sport is fine but somewhat defeats the purpose of the plug-in system for day-to-day driving.

In electric mode, the C350e doesn’t feel like it’s lacking any power without the engine helping it along. Acceleration is smooth, brisk enough, and a 130km/h top speed means you won’t need the engine on your commute.

Realistically, its 104km range is probably somewhere closer to 80km, but covers you for a decent daily distance.

Let the car use the engine to help out via Hybrid mode and, if you’ve got music playing, you might not notice the engine starting and cutting. The system is smooth and it means a much longer life out of the battery before needing to charge. That, and there’s the benefit of more brisk acceleration thanks to the hefty 230kW/550Nm total outputs.

Everything else about the C350e is classic C-Class - the ride is controlled and the suspension does a decent job of soaking up bumps and rough roads, the comfort and self-levelling suspension makes cornering smooth and inspires confidence.

The most noticeable shortcoming for the car is its transmission hesitation if you put your foot down quickly, though the ability to use the paddles to choose your own gears in Sport mode avoids this.

In Electric or Hybrid, the paddles decide how much braking regen to apply, a useful feature that lets you recuperate some power for the battery if your drive includes a lot of downhill slopes or if you’re avoiding relying on the brake pedal.

The C530e’s extra weight doesn’t dull its driving characteristics as you might expect from a car laden with PHEV tech, so it’s a welcome surprise that you could pick up a plush plug-in for the same price as a combustion C300.

As you approach the Maverick your brain tells you it’s a ute, but once you hope inside and start driving that idea quickly vanishes and you realise this is an SUV in disguise.

And that’s not a criticism, because Ford offers the Ranger and F-150 for people who do want a ute/pick-up that looks and drives like a ute/pick-up, so that’s not the role of the Maverick.

This is designed to be an urban-friendly vehicle for those who may want a ute but need something smaller and more efficient.

The EcoBoost performs admirably on the road, with decent low speed response and enough grunt when you stand on the accelerator and rev it hard. The Maverick isn’t a big vehicle, so it doesn’t need a particularly big engine to get the job done. 

The eight-speed auto is well-suited to the EcoBoost, able to get the most out of the engine when needed but also returning that strong fuel figure. 

It’s not meek, though, the Maverick EcoBoost has a standard towing capacity of 900kg but can be upgraded to pull up to 1800kg with the 'Tow Package'.

Unfortunately, the Los Angeles landscape didn’t give us a chance to test the Maverick’s off-road credentials, because it does have good on-paper capabilities.

Particularly the Tremor, which has specific drive modes for 'Normal', 'Sand', 'Mud', 'Slippery' and 'Towing', as well as the ability to switch the traction control off with the press of a button so you can let the wheels slip on loose surfaces.

But around the streets and freeways of LA it did impress with its on-road manners. The steering is nicely weighted and direct, and when paired with the compact dimensions of the Maverick it reacts and drives much more SUV-like which means it feels at home in the city.

In the US the Maverick XLT comes standard with seven airbags, a reversing camera and auto headlights as well as pre-collision assist with autonomous emergency braking.

But features such as blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warning and lane keeping assist are all optional extras.

It’s too early to even speculate, but given safety expectations are higher in Australia Ford would need to include those optional elements as standard to satisfy buyers.

Mercedes has a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty which is decent for a premium brand.

Servicing is pricey, though. 

A three-year pack covering a service every 12 months (or 25,000km, whichever comes first) costs $3355, that being just three services.

Four years costs $4630, or five includes a more expensive service and brings the total to $6890. That’s an average of $1378 per service.

Finding somewhere to spend that money shouldn’t be hard as there are 100 dealers listed in Australia.

It’s also much too early to speculate on ownership and warranty details.

Ford hasn’t made any official commitment to bringing the Maverick to Australia but if it does it would be logical to expect it to mirror what we already expect in terms of warranty and the ownership experience.

That means five-years/unlimited kilometres of coverage and Ford’s capped price servicing plan.