Mazda CX-90 vs Subaru BRZ

What's the difference?

There are many reasons I quite like this CX-90. It sells the plush luxury promise when it comes to its interior and design, it feels big and purposeful, and has a refreshingly minimalist approach to its cabin tech. As a seven-seat SUV it’s particularly impressive, with plenty of amenity and a third row that can genuinely fit an adult in comfort.

However, there are areas where it could use more polish, from the drivetrain to the ride, and it ultimately strikes an odd point for price and ownership which feels lost between the premium segment and the mainstream rivals.

If you’re a long-term Mazda owner, I still think you’ll love it, and this Touring grade is definitely the best value in the range. It offers the lion’s share of equipment at a price more comparable to Mazda’s traditional mainstream rivals.

The Subaru BRZ is a classic modern-day sports car that is a driver’s car through and through. This top-spec tS tester with the litany of accessories is a great example of what’s possible straight from the dealer, but it’s definitely not the best bang for your buck.

Thankfully you still get virtually every benefit the BRZ offers in the entry-level model. You’ll save thousands of dollars which you can use to pay for fuel on a road trip or modify your car exactly how you’d like.

The CX-90 is an impressive car to behold. Moving things onwards and upwards from its CX-9 predecessor, the CX-90 is bigger and even more refined in a lot of ways.

Mazda’s signature design language has evolved into something a bit beefier, trading out the delicate sharp angles and chromes of its front-wheel-drive predecessors for something a bit more upright, with a wide stance and tough proportions.

The long bonnet and expansive body panels stress the long-engined, fluid nature of this car’s design language. It certainly gives it a more premium vibe than the boxy American-influenced style of the Hyundai Palisade, and leans more European than the science-fiction styling of something like the Kia Sorento.

If anything, there’s some clear BMW influence in the shape of the tail and light fittings. Light lashings of chrome keep it in-line with Mazda’s previous design language, and on this base model at least, plastic claddings over the arches toughen it up a bit.

Inside is plush. In fact, it’s treading on Lexus territory when it comes to the design and feel of the seats, dash, doors and there are even padded leather touches down the sides of the centre console for your knees to rest against. Even the standard leather seats are nice (with softer Nappa leather available on higher grades), and I actually find the somewhat monochrome interior treatment on our test car to be the most modest option. It’s off-set by silver trims and a touch of chrome in the steering wheel and doors.

The dash is in a more traditional style (again, it feels influenced by BMW here) with a padded insert across the front, inset vents and a climate control panel leading down to a nice wide console with tasteful patterned trims, and an electronic shifter. The screen in this base car is of modest dimensions compared to most cars today, but those who aren’t sold on giant touchscreens will love it.

Even the digital dash elements are tastefully executed, although they’re not particularly customisable, which is a shame. 

The Subaru BRZ has a timeless exterior design that screams dynamic sports car from every angle.

Even though the second-generation BRZ is around halfway through its lifecycle now, the design is aging like fine wine. It’s also a lovely evolution of the original which dates back to 2011.

The BRZ is low slung, has an aggressive front fascia plus the rear has prominent exhaust pipes. All of this stacks up to make a tough-looking car.

Thankfully this test example is also finished in 'WR Blue' exterior paint, which in my books is still the best colour for a Subaru performance car.

Adding all the genuine accessory goodies onto this car not only amplifies its street appeal, but also harnesses its racing intent. The carbon rear wing in particular has a swan neck design much like the Porsche 911 GT3. Many interested car-spotters craned their necks to get a good look.

Despite this, all the accessories are too flashy for my taste, especially for a car likely to be driven daily. I’d go for the stock look to retain resale, or something subtle like a small rear lip spoiler.

Inside the BRZ has all of the hallmarks of a sports car, as well. These include a steering wheel with minimal buttons, a prominent rev counter and contoured seats.

The manual gear shifter in this car is prominent and nice to hold. It’s great to still see manual options as they’re slowly but surely falling out of favour with buyers.

The manual handbrake is also a nice touch from a design perspective, but it limits overall interior practicality. More on that in a bit.

You can tell the interior is getting a little dated due to the older central multimedia system. But at the end of the day sports cars are more about the driving experience than the flashy tech.

The CX-90 is enormous, but despite its long bonnet, it feels on the inside like it makes good use of its dimensions.

Up front, it’s easy to find a seating position thanks to an array of adjustability, from the seats to the telescopic adjust for the wheel, and the cabin is wide and tall enough to accommodate pretty much anyone with ease.

Unlike some Mazdas which have a strange zoom-factor on their rear vision mirrors, the CX-90 doesn't have this problem, and visibility generally out the windows is impressive. I can see the long, tall bonnet and cosy dash design creating visibility issues for shorter drivers, however.

Padded materials are everywhere they should be (and more), and when it comes to storage there’s a large bottle holder in each front door, two more cupholders in the centre console (with a flip-out cover), a split-opening centre console box (which hides USB-C connections, great for cable management) and a wireless charging bay up front below the climate unit.

It’s rare these days to see a full array of physical buttons and toggles for a dual-zone climate set-up, but the Mazda has the whole lot. It’s a breeze to adjust on the fly and integrates into the design in a subtle way.

It’s also worth calling out the multimedia screen isn’t a touch unit. Instead, you need to control it through a handful of buttons and a rotary dial on the centre console. It’s nice to have a physicality to it, and it works well for the relatively simple base operating system, but it’s a clumsy way to interact with phone mirroring.

In my experience Apple CarPlay has simply too many icons and menu features to work around with a dial-operated system, to the point where it’s distracting to use on-the-go (thus, defeating the purpose of having physical controls).

The second row is a real highlight. Set to its default position, I have leagues of legroom behind my own driving position (at 182cm tall). Again, heaps of width and headroom here, and even the huge rear doors open nice and wide, which should make loading luggage and fitting child seats easy.

The seat trim is just as good as it is in the front, with decent side bolstering, and top-notch amenities, with shades built into the windows, decent-sized bottle holders in each door, a further two in the drop-down armrest, soft pockets on the backs of each front seat, and a separate climate zone with independent temperature and fan speed controls.

There are two adjustable air vents with a lock-off, as well as two USB-C ports for power. Top marks.

The third row is usually where things get tricky for SUVs like this, but the CX-90 isn’t out of tricks yet.

Access isn’t the easiest. The second row can fold forward, but the left over aperture for clambering in, even though the doors are quite large, isn’t great, which will make it a no-go for anyone with mobility issues.

However, once you’re back there, I was surprised to find a full-sized adult like me can fit in relative comfort. With the second row set as far back as it can go, my knees are hard up against the back, but when rolled forward for more third-row space, there's still plenty of room in the middle. I was left with ample room for my knees and feet in the back seats. The seat trim also offers decent padding and comfortable trims, which is rare for most three-row SUVs, and while you wouldn’t want to be too much taller than me, the roof was just tall enough to have a little airspace above.

The armrests are hard plastic, unfortunately, but offer two large bottle holders on each side, as well as a USB-C port, and vents with decent air flow, which is again, quite rare for a three-row SUV.

I’d go so far as to say this is one of the best SUV third rows I’ve been in when it comes to space, comfort and amenity.

Now for the luggage space. I was pleased to find, even with the third row up, I could fit the largest (124 litre) CarsGuide luggage case with room to spare on either side. Officially, space here is 257L, but it’s rare to fit a case this size in a three-row SUV.

With the third row folded down, space comes in at 608 litres, which is on-par for this segment, and with the second and third row down, it tops out at 2025L.

With such space on offer it’s probably worth keeping in mind the payload, which is 580kg, and for those who want to add a trailer to the mix, the maximum towing capacity is 2500kg braked or 750kg unbraked for the 50e petrol straight-six versions like the one we’re testing here.

Hopping into the BRZ you’re immediately aware you’re getting into a sports car. It’s low-slung and the driving position feels like you’re almost sitting on the road. Perfect for this kind of machine.

The front seats are beautifully contoured and lock you in for when you’re driving through the twisties. Thankfully, the bolstering isn’t too aggressive and it’s still comfortable for everyday driving.

Ahead of the driver, the leather-wrapped steering wheel has a thin rim and is lovely to hold and turn. There aren’t many buttons but the few that remain are purposeful and have a lovely tactile click.

Behind this there is a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster that permanently displays the rev counter in the middle. It’s a cool set-up that almost has a retro look to it, plus you’re able to configure the content that is displayed on the left-hand side.

Moving across, the central touchscreen multimedia system is classic Subaru. Nothing revolutionary, but I appreciate the physical shortcut buttons and dials on both sides of the screen.

It’s very easy to navigate around the screen, though as the photos show it is prone to glare, especially in bright scenarios.

Disappointingly there is only wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, with no wireless versions offered. You need to plug your phone in with a USB-A cable in a slot under the split-fold centre armrest.

While this means your phone will reliably charge, rather than having your phone overheat on a wireless charger, there’s no nice spot to put your phone given the physical handbrake takes up so much valuable centre armrest space.

You can put your phone in one of the cupholder spots, but when you do you don’t get a centre armrest. It’s too compromised for my liking.

While I’m on the topic of storage, there isn’t a great deal of it. There’s a small glove box and if you want, you can technically use the backseat area as they’re way too compromised for adults to fit into.

The rear seats are so small I didn’t even bother trying to fit as in my default driving position there is zero legroom. Even kids would struggle.

In terms of boot space, there is 201L available with the rear seats upright. It’s a fine space, though it’s impeded by the full-size spare wheel poking above the load floor. As a result you need to pack around the wheel.

Folding the rear seats makes the boot space more usable, though the envelope to slot things into the boot is narrow.

While the full-size spare wheel impedes the boot area, I’m glad it’s there because it’s much more usable than a dinky space-saver spare wheel or nothing at all. It gives you peace of mind in the event you have a puncture in the middle of nowhere.

The 2026 Subaru BRZ line-up starts at $47,890, before on-road costs, for the entry-level model regardless of whether you opt for the manual or automatic.

On test here, however, is the flagship tS trim which starts from $52,790, before on-roads. That's $4100 more expensive than it was when it first launched in 2024.

It’s worth noting this is overlooking the limited-edition tS Kiiro ($53,590, before on-roads) with its bright yellow paint.

As a base, the BRZ comes with a solid amount of kit. This includes 18-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, power-folding side mirrors, an 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto plus dual-zone climate control.

One of the few things missing is wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. This is becoming commonplace in many cars and while it can be a hassle to plug into a USB port, it also means your phone will reliably charge.

You need to step up to the S trim if you want features like leather-accented upholstery and heated front seats. The top-spec tS in particular gains STI-tuned suspension, Brembo front and rear brakes, black door mirror covers and tS badging.

Adding to this, our particular tester comes equipped with a wealth of optional accessories. These include an STI body kit, STI alloy wheels and an STI carbon boot spoiler, totalling just over $14,500 fitted… Goodness me. For reference, the carbon rear wing is almost half of that.

Altogether, this kitted-up BRZ tS tester costs around $67,300, before on-road costs. While this is much more than the top-spec Toyota GR86 and Mazda MX-5, it’s still less than an entry-level Ford Mustang Ecoboost or BMW 2 Series.

The CX-90 gets a bit exciting under the bonnet with its big 3.3-litre in-line six-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine. It produces a whopping 254kW/500Nm, well above par compared to its mainstream rivals.

This engine is mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. This is no run-of-the-mill transmission though. Instead of the usual smooth hydraulic coupling this style of transmission is known for, the Mazda uses a hybridised single clutch set-up instead.

This is in the name of efficiency. A single-clutch plate has less loss, and is therefore more fuel efficient, with a small electric motor helping to push things along as part of the mix.

The catch is, like the sometimes-derided dual-clutch automatics, it’s not as smooth to operate. More on this in the driving section.

Efficiency – What is its fuel consumption? What is its driving range? 8/10

As a result of this unusual transmission set-up, fuel efficiency isn’t bad for such a big and powerful engine, and for such a large vehicle.

The official combined fuel consumption for the CX-90 G50e is 8.2L/100km, which is already impressive, and in my week with the car over a few hundred (mostly urban) kilometres it landed close, at just 8.9L/100km.

It’s seriously impressive and runs rings around the six-cylinder Hyundai Palisade (10.7L/100km combined) while producing significantly more power than the more efficient Toyota Kluger Hybrid (5.6L/100km). On the flipside, you’ll need to fill its massive 75L fuel tank with mid-shelf 95RON fuel.

Power continues to come from a 2.4-litre naturally aspirated flat-four petrol engine producing 174kW and 250Nm.

This is mated to either a six-speed manual gearbox or a six-speed automatic transmission. Our tester is equipped with the former. Both feature a limited-slip rear differential.

For all its clever, efficient drivetrain, the CX-90 has a bit of a mixed drive experience. Initially, it comes off as impressive. It’s plush and quiet from behind the wheel, and the primarily rear-drive nature of its drivetrain gives it the big premium steering response missing from its mostly front-drive rivals.

The flaws with its tricky transmission quickly become evident, though. The clutch constantly needing to engage in stop-start scenarios makes for a slightly jerky and uneven experience, similar to the feel of a dual-clutch auto, particularly in traffic, while the at-speed gear shifts, which in a dual-clutch tend to be much smoother are telegraphed more physically by this Mazda system.

As evidenced by the actual fuel consumption, it’s clear this system does what it sets out to, and it even feels like it could be significantly better, but Mazda will need to invest some time in calibration. For what it’s worth, it feels better than its original implementation I drove at the launch of the CX-60, which was the first car to get this system.

A subsequent software update has solved some issues, but it still can’t compare to a regular auto when it comes to smoothness.

However, the engine is immensely satisfying. The big six has a low roar when pushed, and motivates the big CX-90 with ease when you step on it. It pairs nicely with the weighty steering to make for a car which feels purposeful and satisfying to steer when it gets going.

In this sense it nails the brief of elevating Mazda out of the regular crop of front-drive seven-seat SUVs, giving it a distinct and more premium edge.

As also noted with the CX-60 though, the CX-90 has the same issue with its ride quality. It’s a little too hard to give it the kind of refined response to road imperfections we’ve come to expect from brands like Lexus and BMW. The firm response to the road helps this big heavy SUV feel controlled in the corners, but it doesn’t deal with suburban bumps how it should.

Larger hits in particular are often communicated to the cabin. The CX-90 is better than its smaller CX-60 sibling, which went so far as to have its rear dampers recalled, but the brand is even considering similar updates to this large SUV, so keep an eye out.

While this version of the CX-90, the base Touring with its smaller alloys and larger tyres, is more comfortable than any other Mazda on this new platform I’ve driven, it still leaves room for improvement.

It’s a shame, because otherwise the CX-90 is a lovely and luxurious SUV to drive, with a quiet, plush interior and a satisfying engine. It’s so close to greatness that it’s frustrating.

This is where the BRZ has always excelled and this kitted-out tS manual is no exception.

Firing up with a cold engine, you’re immediately aware this is powered by a horizontally-opposed 'boxer' engine. It has that classic high idle that eventually simmers down once the engine has warmed up a bit.

Setting off you need to acquaint yourself with how this manual gearbox works. Every manual is a little different, however this BRZ is easy to pick up and understand quickly.

I particularly like the notchy and direct gear throw. It makes changing gears easy, fun and engaging.

If I am to be critical, the clutch bite point is a little high and there is a touch too much rev hang when changing gears, especially in the ‘Sport’ drive mode, but you get used to it eventually.

In everyday driving scenarios there is enough power available. Some more wouldn’t go astray due to the lack of a turbocharger, but this constraint makes the car more fun to drive as you have to work harder with the gears.

Speaking of, the gearing is short, which means you will be shifting gears quickly. At 60km/h, for example, the car can be driven around in sixth gear, which is clearly focused on maximising efficiency.

Once you’ve reached your set speed there’s enough torque to maintain it without having to dive back through the gears. This is nice because you don’t have to shuffle through the gears to keep up with traffic.

Out on the open road is where the BRZ comes into its own. The steering in particular highlights how balanced and poised the car feels. It’s so fun to chuck around on twisty bends and feel the weight transfer.

The STI-tuned suspension in this particular trim also highlights how sporty and dialled-in this car is. It can feel a little rough and taut on pimpled urban roads, though you need to remind yourself this is a sports car, not a comfort-oriented SUV.

In a similar vein, at higher speeds there is a lot of road and tyre noise that transfers into the cabin. This is made worse when the rear seats are folded. While more sound insulation would likely fix this, I like it being left out in the name of lighter weight (kerb weight is only 1.3 tonnes).

The current-generation Subaru BRZ hasn’t been crash-tested by ANCAP and is therefore unrated.

In 2025, the manual BRZ joined the auto version when it gained Subaru’s 'EyeSight' camera system, which brings autonomous emergency braking (AEB), lane departure warning and even adaptive cruise control. It’s rare for manual-equipped vehicles to feature the latter.

This is above and beyond the seven airbags, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane change assist, reverse camera and tyre pressure monitoring.

It’s worth noting manual versions of the BRZ do not have any parking sensors, front or rear, as standard. Automatic versions gain rear parking sensors and a rear AEB system.

There are two ISOFIX anchors and two top-tether points for child seats in the second row, though space is rather limited.

The usual five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the CX-90 range, with a matching five years of roadside assistance.

Servicing is required once every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, and a schedule of costs on Mazda’s website extends to seven years. Over the first five years, prices fluctuate between $469 and $1304 annually, with an average yearly cost of $693.30. The price puts this big-engined Mazda up the premium end of mainstream automakers when it comes to service costs.

Subaru BRZ owners are covered by a five-year, 100,000km warranty which is now commonplace in the mainstream segment. Many carmakers are now extending their coverage out to seven years and beyond.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. The first five services cost a total of $2595.51, which averages out to around $519 per service. For the performance car space this isn’t cheap but not as exorbitant as more premium offerings.

Subaru has a total of 128 dealers around Australia, with a spread across metro, rural and regional areas.