Mahindra Scorpio-N vs Mercedes-Benz X220

What's the difference?

It may seem like I've been harsh on this Mahindra but I reckon the Scorpio Z8L+ is a positive product for the company.

It’s nice enough to drive on-road – reasonably refined and comfortable – and it’s also a capable 4WD, with some trade-offs.

But this seven-seat wagon remains a good value-for-money prospect with the addition of more driver-assist tech onboard boosting its safety and adding to its overall appeal.

The X-Class Pure 4x2 is good, but that's its major problem, because three-pointed stars and their high price tags bring with them a justified expectation of being not just good - but great. If a second-generation X-Class needs to borrow some components again, we hope they're from the legendary G-Wagen next time. In fact,a platform share between X-Class and G-Wagen (like Ranger/Everest or Colorado/Trailblazer etc) would have much greater appeal.

Nothing has changed on the Scorpio’s exterior. It still reminds me of the early-generation Hyundai Terracan – long bonnet, generic cabin (i.e. inoffensive, soft lines, nothing to set it apart from most other mid-sized SUVs) and, though its off-road angles check out (more about those later) it looks quite low to the ground.

So it’s all standard for a 4WD wagon.

The Scorpio also has 18-inch alloy wheels, side steps, roof rails and a sunroof.

Potential main rival GWM Tank 300 holds sway in the looks department.

Benz has re-engineered the Navara's steel ladder-frame chassis for greater rigidity and topped it with a restyled body that's 85mm longer and 126mm wider with a new M-B interior. There are also new front suspension components and a new coil-spring multi-link live rear axle assembly with disc brakes, which result in track width increases of 82mm front and 75mm rear (compared to RX Navara 4x2).

These engineering changes, combined with revised springs, shocks, anti-sway bars and steering, result in sure-footed handling with sharp steering response, excellent ride quality and a feeling of solidity that are all X-Class strengths. However, they have also resulted in a hefty 236kg weight gain.

The X-Class Pure 4x2 rides on a 3150mm wheelbase with a 5340mm overall length, 1916mm width and 1839mm height. In comparison to Ford's Ranger, which is considered the 'bigfoot' of Aussie dual cabs, the X-Class is 70mm shorter in wheelbase and 22mm shorter overall, but 56mm wider, 24mm taller and lineball on turning circle at 12.8 metres. So, like the Ranger it's quite a large and imposing vehicle.

Critical rough road credentials include 222mm of ground clearance with 30 degree approach and 25 degree departure angles. Its wading depth of 600mm is better than Amarok (500mm) but considerably less than Ranger (800mm).

It's nice to see sizeable grab handles on the window pillars for front and rear passengers and the driving position is pretty good. However, the Pure's front seats lack sufficient lumbar support and the base cushion (at least the driver's) needs some rake adjustment, as it can feel like you're sliding off the front at times.

For such a sizable vehicle we're surprised by how cramped the rear seating is for taller adults in terms of length and height, with knees touching the front seat backrests and, thanks to the higher 'grandstand' style rear seating, heads touching the roof lining. The rearward location of the B pillar also makes for quite tight entry and exit for those long of limb and large of shoe.

Nothing much has changed inside the Scorpio, either, except for the addition of an electronic park brake.

The cabin has a neat layout with a 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system that is easy to operate but it needs to be bigger.

The synthetic leather trim looks and feels only adequately premium and if you more closely scrutinise the Scorpio’s interior it lacks the build quality, storage spaces and USB charge points of rival wagons.

Driver and front passenger get adequate room, while the second row is actually satisfactorily spacious without being capacious; behind my driving position I had more than enough leg, head and shoulder room – but, take note, I'm the size of a garden gnome. The third row is the stuff of nightmares – only joking, but it should quite rightly be limited to use by small children or your mate the jockey.

There’s one cupholder (between the driver and front passenger), door pockets are narrow and there are few other storage spaces. In this respect, the Scorpio cabin lacks general functionality.

The Scorpio also cops a mark down because of its third row. With the third-row seats in use, there’s a small rear cargo area, and those seats don’t fold flat so when they’re not in use they occupy a lot of what could be useable storage space.

As a result, the Scorpio is one of the few modern 4WDs I’d consider removing the third row every time long-distance loaded-up travel was on the cards – just so it’s a more practical touring vehicle.

Some features, such as the directional air vents, feel flimsy. Otherwise, the Scorpio’s cabin is adequately practical, rather than overly impressive.

Suffice to say, in terms of practicality, the Scorpio’s rivals have it beaten.

Deducting the 4x2 Pure's 2046kg kerb weight from its 3200kg GVM would normally equal a payload of 1154kg, but the official payload figure is 68kg under that at 1086kg, which is an extra safety margin should the payload (but not the GVM) be exceeded.

The Pure 4x2's braked towing capacity of up to 3200kg is less than the 4x4 models' 3500kg rating. Even so, its generous 6139kg GCM allows for a substantial 884kg payload while towing its heaviest trailer load, which is impressive.

The load tub is 1581mm long, 1560mm wide and 475mm deep, with 1215mm between the wheel arches ensuring it can carry an 1160mm-square standard Aussie pallet. As mentioned earlier, our test vehicle was equipped with the optional $490 rear window guard frame, which should not only be standard but also have tradie-friendly pivoting load retainers or 'book-ends' on each side for carrying long lengths of timber, PVC pipe, etc.

The test vehicle's adjustable load-securing rail system mounted near the top of the tub (as seen on Navara) works well for securing loads of matching height or more, but there also needs to be four tie-down points in each corner at floor level to secure lower loads as well. The absence of load retainers and floor level tie-down points are glaring omissions for such a work-focused vehicle.

With tradies in mind there's also a lack of cabin storage, limited to bottle holders and storage pockets in each front door, an overhead sunglasses holder and small glove box. The multimedia system's sizeable rotary controller and touch-pad occupy a big chunk of potential storage space in the centre console, which only offers a tiny front storage slot, single cup holder and small rear lidded box (and there's no box if you opt for the 1-DIN audio ports as fitted to our test vehicle).

Rear seat passengers get a bottle holder and smaller storage pocket in each door and the bench seat base pivots upwards to a vertical position if you want some extra internal cargo space. But there are no flexible storage pockets on the front seat backrests and no cupholders. This needs a re-think because you quickly run out of places to store things.

Our test vehicle is as basic as an X-Class can get - the X220d Pure 4x2 dual-cab with six-speed manual transmission for $46,400. It's effectively a 'Hi-Rider' in industry speak, even if M-B doesn't use that term.

Given its work-focused specification, with hose-out vinyl floor, 17-inch steel wheels with 255/65 R17 road-biased tyres and matching spare, plus black bumpers, door handles, hub caps, etc, with not a hint of bling anywhere (bar the shiny three-pointed star on the grille), pricing north of $46K (before on-road costs) is Pikes Peak steep compared to the competition.

For example, the Ford Ranger Hi-Rider 4x2 in base-level XL trim with 2.2-litre diesel and six-speed manual is only $36,390 and Toyota's HiLux Workmate 4x2 Hi-Rider with 2.4-litre diesel and six-speed auto is $39,490.

And keep in mind our test vehicle also has the $1300 'Plus Package' ('Parktronic' and adjustable load-securing rail system), optional 1-DIN audio access ports ($150) and rear window guard frame ($490), raising the price to $48,340. That's a lot of money for a new player to be asking at base level, regardless of how much its star may twinkle.

Even so, the X220d's standard equipment list does include useful stuff like front fog lamps, DRL and dusk-sensing head lights, cruise control, tyre pressure monitoring, rear view camera, four 12-volt sockets, load tub light, four-speaker audio system with big 7.0-inch screen, multiple connectivity including Bluetooth and steering wheel controls, plus benchmark safety.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ has a 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, producing 129kW and 400Nm and it’s matched to a six-speed automatic transmission.

This engine-and-auto combination is sluggish at times but it’s generally okay.

The Scorpio has a part-time 4WD system (with high- and low-range) and an automatic rear diff lock.

Worth noting the Scorpio must be in neutral and stationary for the driver to shift into '4WD low-range', but the driver is able to shift between '2WD' and '4WD High' on the move, up to 80km/h.

This 4WD wagon’s '4Explor' system’s drive modes include 'Normal' (2WD for sealed surfaces), 'Grass/Snow' (4WD), 'Mud & Ruts' (4WD) and 'Sand' (4WD).

The Scorpio lags behind its rivals here.

The X-Class shares the Navara's engines and transmissions, but Nissan's superb YS23DDTT 2.3 diesel with sequential twin turbocharging and 140kW/450Nm is reserved only for the X250d variants.

The entry-level X220d Pure 4x2 and 4x4 models (like the entry-level Navara RX) make do with the less powerful but still excellent single turbo version with variable vane technology, producing 120kW at 3750rpm and 403Nm of torque between 1500-2500rpm.

The RWD Pure's six-speed manual gearbox (backed by hill start assist) has a pretty low (4.685:1) first gear which is handy for getting big loads underway from standing starts, while the over-driven top gear allows economic engine rpm at highway speeds. There's no rear diff lock like the Ranger Hi-Rider.

Official fuel consumption is 7.2L/100km on a combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle on regular unleaded fuel.

Actual fuel consumption on this test was 9.0L/100km, which is better than the 9.6L/100km I recorded on my last Scorpio review a couple of years ago.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ has a 57-litre fuel tank so, going by those fuel figures, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 633km from a full tank. It also has a 16-litre Adblue tank, so keep that mind.

Remember, that 633km is a best-case scenario figure and has not had a 30-50km safe-distance buffer subtracted from it. And it doesn't take into account the fact that, when being used for touring, the Scorpio may be loaded with people, pets, camping gear and more.

Rivals such as the GWM Tank 300 easily outclass the Scorpio when it comes to off-roading and all-round touring suitability.

Mercedes Benz's official combined figure is 7.6L/100km and the instrument display was showing that figure at the end of our test, which covered more than 660km on different roads (sealed and unsealed) and with a variety of loads, including our usual GVM run.

By comparison, our figures calculated from trip meter and fuel bowser readings came in at 9.0L/100km. Any dual-cab ute, particularly one this size, which can deliver genuine single-digit fuel economy in 'real world' driving gets a big tick from us. Based on our figures, you could expect a realistic driving range of 850km-plus from its 80-litre tank, which is fuel efficiency with a capital E.

On road the Scorpio is reasonable. It’s comfortable and refined but can be a bit firm on the suspension it has – double wishbone and coil springs at the front, live axle with multi links, Watts link and coil springs at the rear. But for a four-wheel drive wagon it's quite nice on sealed surfaces.

The powertrain is generally a reasonable set-up, although there is lag between foot-down and acceleration and it holds onto gears for too long before upshifting.

There have been no mechanical changes to this Scorpio over the previous generation and that's fine because this Mahindra’s tractable engine offers reasonable power and torque across enough of a rev range to make it an effective 4WD.

The Scorpio feels comfortable and reasonable off road. And when it’s time to tackle ‘4WD-only’ territory, it is generally capable. High- and low-range gearing is decent, and as mentioned earlier, its off-road drive modes adjust traction control, among other aspects, to best suit the terrain you’re tackling.

Its no rock-crawling beast but as a result of these mechanical and technical elements this 4WD wagon is able to drive the kind of terrain you’d reasonably expect to be able to cover in a standard off-roader that's been engineered for 4WDing across light to moderately difficult terrain.

The Scorpio’s off-road angles and ground clearance are on par with mid-size SUV rivals. Ground clearance is a listed 227mm. It feels quite low, but if you drive it with care and consideration, you should be fine.

The rear diff lock doesn't feel as clunky in its application as it has in the past. Maybe I'm more forgiving in my old age because, as I mentioned earlier, there haven't been any upgrades mechanically or in terms of off-road-specific driver-assist tech or in diff lock operation.

Hill descent control works reasonably well, although it's not the greatest, allowing for some free-wheeling before it bites.

The Scorpio’s road-oriented Bridgestone Ecopia (255/60 R18) tyres are fine on formed dirt tracks but are found wanting on anything rougher than that.

In terms of towing capacity, the Scorpio is able to tow 750kg unbraked and 2500kg braked. So if you're looking to haul anything larger than a small box trailer, camper trailer or tinny, you'll have to look elsewhere.

GVM and GCM are 2610kg and 5155kg, respectively.

Main potential rival GWM Tank 300 has it over the Scorpio in terms of off-roading prowess and, even though it’s not a towing beast, the GWM wagon is better suited to life as a touring platform than the Mahindra.

It might be based on a Nissan Navara, but it doesn't drive like one. Even at 4x2 entry level, the X Class's excellent un-laden ride quality, sure-footed 'wide track' handling and steering feel/response are benchmark for the class, which is the minimum you'd expect from this brand.  Cabin noise is also low.

The single-turbo Nissan engine is a strong point. Despite the X-Class having a higher kerb weight, the Navara engine does not feel sluggish, with ample low and mid-range punch making it a spirited enough performer under light loads with more than enough torque for heavy load-hauling. The six-speed manual gearbox shifts sweetly and its ratios are well matched, keeping the engine in its maximum torque band on the highway with 2000rpm at 100km/h and 2300rpm at 110km/h.

To test the 3200kg GVM rating we forklifted 920kg into the load tub, which with a 100kg driver was  only about 60kg under its 1086kg payload ceiling. The rear coil springs compressed a full 80mm and the nose rose 21mm, resulting in the rather ungainly tail-down-nose-up 'praying mantis' stance similar to the coil-sprung Navara from which it is derived.

A look under the tail revealed the top of the rubber bump-stop cones just kissing the underside of the chassis rails. Once underway, though, there was none of the Navara's riding-on-rubber feeling, as the Merc's thicker rising-rate rear coils maintained a modicum of springing. However, the sloping tail felt less stable, with some noticeable suspension squirm in a straight line and wagging through some corners, particularly on unsealed roads.

Even so, its Nissan engine made light work of our 2.0km 13 per cent gradient set climb, proving its excellent load-lugging ability by climbing it so easily in third gear that we made a second successful ascent in fourth. Engine braking in second gear on the way down, though, could not restrain such a big payload on its own, requiring regular prods of the brake pedal to maintain the 60km/h limit.

Maximum five-star ANCAP rating and first dual-cab ute to bring AEB to this segment gets a rare perfect score from us. Passive safety includes driver and front passenger front, thorax, side curtain and driver's knee airbags, child restraint top tethers plus iSize and ISOFIX anchorages on outer rear seat positions.

Active safety also includes lane-keeping assist and vital ute features like brake-force distribution, trailer stability assist, hill start assist and tyre pressure monitoring.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ has a seven-year/150,000km warranty and comes with seven years' of roadside assistance if your Scorpio is serviced by Mahindra.

The first service is scheduled at the 1500km mark, then every 12 months or 10,000km. Pricing details were not available at the time of writing.

Five years of capped price servicing is available at an average cost per visit of $471.

For reference, the GWM Tank 300 offers a seven year/unlimited km warranty, five years' of roadside assistance, and five years of capped price servicing (starting at $360 for the first service and topping out at $1035 for the sixth). Service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km.

At time of writing there were reportedly about 80 Mahindra dealerships spread across Australia. According to the company, "the dealer network spans all states and territories, including locations in major cities like Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth". Your Scorpio can be serviced at any authorised Mahindra dealership.

Warranty cover is three years/unlimited km with 24/7 roadside assist.

Service intervals are 12 months/20,000km, whichever occurs first. Under M-B's 'Service Care Promise' the first three scheduled services will cost between $585 and $930.