Kia Sportage vs Mazda CX-3

What's the difference?

The Sportage still feels like a super solid offering in its segment, plus the addition of more hybrid options is only going to help.

It does feel a little under-specced in the lower grades, though, considering the everything-and-the-kitchen-sink approach taken by its Chinese rivals.

I feel like I should almost whisper this bit, given it's a dirty word at the moment, but that diesel engine, it's a real peach, and if I wasn't afraid of being run out of Sydney's inner west with pitchforks, that's probably the one I'd be choosing.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

All new Sportage models feature a redesigned front and rear end, but they actually have a slightly different look. There's one look for the cheaper models and then one for the top-spec cars, the SX+ and GT-Line.

The changes aren't overwhelming, though. There are fog lights in the more expensive models, but also just more use of black edging, as opposed to the silver edging that frames the bottom of the grille and rear end in the cheaper cars.

Either way, I still really like the way the Sportage has come together. The front end looks bold and powerful, mostly because of the vertically stacked headlights and and the DRLs that really frame the front end, but they've also done a good job of making a fairly big and spacious SUV feel small and not too imposing.

Now, inside the top-spec cars it’s very modern Kia, with a big twin-screen setup, and the dual-function bar beneath them that handles things like climate control, but also mapping and media and those kinds of functions. The cheaper models also get the same look, but swap the second 12.3-inch screen for a smaller driver display.

It means you don't have to dig through the screen for everything, which is always a nice touch. And I also like some of the materials used in the GT-Line, too, like the synthetic wood grain that’s actually nice to touch.

But there are a couple of key downsides. Not quite so much in the top-spec cars, but in the cheaper versions. I hate those constant reminders that you didn't spring for a more expensive model, and there are plenty of those in the lower-spec cars.

In the more expensive models, there are buttons alongside the gearshift, but in the cheaper cars, those buttons are still there, just blacked out and inactive. And even the cutout for the head-up display still exists in the cheaper cars, but of course, there's no head-up display.

All of that combined with some hard and scratchy plastics front and back makes you really want to dig deep for a more expensive Sportage.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

The Sportage measures 4685mm long, 1865mm wide and between 1665mm and 1680mm tall, depending on the trim.

Slip into the backseat of the Sportage and you’ll find legroom is ample, at least for my 175cm frame, and headroom is ok, without being great - though our test car had the sunroof fitted which could be eating into the space.

Elsewhere in the back though, even the top spec GT-Line just doesn't feel that plush. And by that, I mean some of the materials are a bit hard and scratchy, you don’t get your own temperature controls for the air vents, and it generally just lacks a premium air.

Now, to the all-important point in this segment, and that is boot space. The official VDA numbers are 543-1829 litres for the petrol and diesel cars, and 586-1872L for the hybrid, but the real-world reality is a boot that is deep and wide and really has enough space to carry plenty of groceries.

But there is an important caveat. Under the flat floor there is a temporary spare wheel in the hybrids, where in some of the ICE cars, you get a full-size spare wheel.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

Upon updating the Mazda CX-3, the Evolve variant is now a $32,100 ask before on-road costs, which is $900 more than before. It’s a little step up from the $30,370 entry price of the Pure, but falls well short of the top-spec Akari’s $38,890 sticker price.

The CX-3 range now comes with updated autonomous emergency braking and adaptive cruise control, with the Evolve specifically scoring new fog lights and keyless entry.

The Evolve also comes with black machined 18-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim and front parking sensors.

This is all on top of the CX-3’s standard kit which includes a leather-wrapped gear shift knob, handbrake handle and steering wheel, keyless start, an 8.0-inch multimedia display, wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto plus LED headlights, daytime running lights and tail-lights.

For its segment, the CX-3 isn’t cheap. The Evolve grade is more expensive than pretty much the entire line-ups of rivals like the Kia Stonic or Hyundai Venue, and its price somewhat lines up with the newer, hybrid-powered Toyota Yaris Cross.

But there’s more to the CX-3 than just a list of features.

The big news about this mid-life update for the Sportage is the expansion of Kia’s hybrid powertrain, which is now available with AWD, and the inclusion of an eight-speed automatic for the 1.6-litre turbo-petrol variants.

Elsewhere, the 2.0-litre petrol option produces 115kW and 192Nm, pairs with a six-speed automatic, and drives the front wheels. The other pure petrol option is a 1.6-litre turbocharged petrol unit that produces 132kW and 265Nm, paired with an eight-speed auto and powering all four wheels.

Then comes the diesel, which is a 2.0-litre unit making 137kW and 416Nm. It pairs with an eight-speed automatic and powers all four wheels.

Finally, there’s a hybrid option, now with two- or all-wheel drive. It pairs a 1.6-litre turbo-petrol engine and a six-speed automatic with an electric motor and a 1.49kWh lithium-ion battery to produce a total 173kW and 367Nm.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

All pure ICE Sportage grades are fitted with 54-litre fuel tanks, while the hybrids get 52-litre tanks. But the hybrids more than make up for it when it comes to fuel efficiency, with the FWD sipping a claimed 4.9 litres per hundred kilometres on the combined cycle, while the AWD drinks 5.3 litres.

The diesel is the next most-efficient, using a claimed 6.3L/100km combined, while the turbo-petrol needs 7.5 litres, and the 2.0-litre petrol requires 8.1 litres.

Our calculations suggest that, taking the fuel claims at face value, a 2.0-litre petrol Sportage should carry you 666kms on a full tank, while a turbo-petrol will take you 720kms. The diesel should deliver 857kms, while the FWD hybrid (1061kms) and AWD hybrid (981kms) will take you the furthest.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

I want to start this with just a small caveat. It hasn't been the most comprehensive drive of this car so far. And remember, there are a lot of variants.

Petrol, diesel, hybrid, two-wheel drive, all-wheel drive – we haven't driven all of them, and so I feel uncomfortable giving you my rock-solid verdict across the whole range. I can, however, give you my first impressions.

The first of those is that whoever in the vast Hyundai group came up with adding a long-hold function to the stereo mute button deserves a medal. By far the most annoying of the modern safety systems is the overspeed warning, which inevitably reads some signs incorrectly, others not at all, and has no idea when school zones actually start.

Thankfully, Kia, like Hyundai, now has the shortcut to mute it. You just long-hold down mute button and voila, the bing-bongs vanish.

Now elsewhere, as is pretty typical of modern Kias, the ride in this car feels properly well sorted. We've taken it through the city, onto the freeway, along a little twisting road section, and on some typically coarse and broken country B-roads, and the Sportage handled them all really well.

And even when you're getting a little frisky with the driving, there's little in the way of body roll, with the Sportage feeling planted and solid.

I wasn't totally blown away with the refinement in the cabin. On the wrong road surface, you definitely get a bit of road noise in the cabin – mind you, that is pretty hard to avoid on the coarse chip stuff – but you can also hear the engines revving away and working hard when you put your foot down.

That said, the way the gearboxes channel that power is smooth and easy, and when you put your foot down in each of the powertrains we tested, there's certainly enough urge to get you up and moving.

And that is especially true in the diesel, which I do think is a bit of a peach of a powertrain – super torquey and super easy to get the Sportage up and moving. It might find itself on the endangered species list, that engine, so get it while you can.

Now, one small downside. While the ride hasn't changed, at least for any of the ICE-powered cars, the steering has changed for all of them, and at speed, it's really lovely. It's quite direct, confidence-inspiring, and nicely weighted.

But at low speeds it can feel a little bit darty, like it takes a really big bite when you put a little input in, and it takes a little bit of getting used to.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The Mazda CX-3 is technically unrated by ANCAP, though only because its original maximum five-star rating expired after seven years. While this means it easily passes many of ANCAP’s main criteria for safety (and strict Australian Design Rules - ADRs - to be able to be sold here), the CX-3 is missing some recent, more complex safety features.

Not everything is standard across the line-up, either. The Evolve misses out on adaptive headlights, a surround-view parking camera and traffic sign recognition. The base Pure variant also misses out on a front parking sensor.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other key features like seven airbags, dual-front and front-side plus curtain airbags spanning the sides. The CX-3 also has ABS and emergency braking with forward pedestrian detection and rear cross-traffic alert.

There’s lane departure warning, forward obstruction warning, blind-spot monitoring and a driver attention alert for those times you might miss something or - hopefully not often - are distracted.

All these systems are programmed well to minimise interference while driving, making the CX-3 refreshingly trusting of the driver to actually do the job of driving.

All Kia models also get the brand’s seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, seven years of capped-price servicing and, should you service with Kia, eight years of roadside assistance.

Turbo-petrol and hybrid models require servicing every 12 months or 10,000kms, where the rest are 15,000km intervals. The Kia website has the full costings for each powertrain choice, but for reference, seven years of hybrid ownership will cost you a not-insubstantial $4510.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.