Ford Ranger vs Nissan 370Z

What's the difference?

The Super Duty is the most formidable workhorse in the Ranger fleet. It projects a feeling of immense strength each time you drive it, reflecting payload and tow ratings well beyond traditional limits for vehicles of this size combined with formidable all-terrain capabilities. For tradies wanting the ultimate Ranger workhorse, the Super Duty is clearly in a class of its own - a class which it created.

It's hard not to be ageist when it comes to the current Nissan Zed, because 15 years in market (nine if we're generous) is a lengthy stretch in anyone's book. But somehow the 370Z is more than the sum of its parts. It has fantastic front-engine/rear-drive balance, an increasingly rare atmo engine, and a beautiful manual 'box. The value equation is decent, and it's nicely put together. Just don't expect to be dazzled with the latest safety, driver-assist and multimedia technology.

The Super Duty, originally based on Ford’s F-series full-size US pickup range, has been a mainstay on farms, building sites and in remote terrain since its inception as a standalone model in 1998, but this is the first time the nameplate has been applied to the Aussie designed and developed Ranger.

Ford claims the Ranger Super Duty resulted from extensive consultation with workers in industries that depend on their trucks in the harshest remote environments, from forestry crews and emergency service workers to land managers and fleet teams.

The challenge was to create a medium-sized truck with higher payload/tow ratings and greater all-terrain capability, as the only vehicles strong enough to carry their gear were too big and unwieldy to access critical locations.

In response, the Ranger Super Duty features a unique reinforced version of the Ranger’s chassis frame, incorporating readily accessible mounting points for a variety of aftermarket accessories and specialised equipment.

There’s also a new heavy-duty rear axle assembly with the largest and strongest differential ever fitted to a production Ranger for enhanced load-carrying capacity, paired with a unique uprated version of the US Bronco Raptor’s front diff.

The two-speed transfer case also has larger and stronger components than the regular Ranger and its low-speed gearset has been upgraded to match the F-series Super Duty.

Other chassis enhancements include uprated eight-stud wheel hubs with stronger bolts, improved cooling system to manage engine temps under heavy loads and during sustained off-road driving, a sealed engine snorkel and high-mounted breathers for the drivetrain/fuel system to enable its 850mm wading depth (50mm deeper than standard Ranger) and more. There was also a brutal and prolonged durability testing program to validate its Super Duty status.

Off-road credentials include steep 36.3 degrees approach, 26.9 degrees ramp breakover and 29.3 degrees departure angles, 299mm ground clearance and an expansive 13.6-metre turning circle which is the largest of all Ranger variants including the wide-tyred Raptor.

If you want to go all the way back, the 370Z clearly takes its design direction from Datsun's star of the '70s, the original 240Z.

Inspired by Ferrari, and (along with the Toyota 2000GT) a sports-car breakthrough for the Japanese industry, the first Zed's front-engine, long-nose proportions have remained largely intact in successive iterations over the decades.

With a broad, flat nose, distinctively jagged headlights, and steeply raked rear profile, there's no mistaking the 370's signature stance, with pumped-up guards sitting over fat, 19-inch alloy rims.

Sharp-eyed car-spotters will notice the update's new design RAYS forged wheels, smoked front and rear lights, and a similar smoked finish on the exterior door handles.

A new colour, 'Cherry Red' also replaces 'Bordeaux Black' in an eight-shade colour palette. Our test example was finished in 'Gun Metallic'.

Inside, echoes of Zeds past abound, with a trio of hooded gauges (clock, voltmeter, oil temp) sitting in the centre of the dash top, and the tachometer in the middle of a cowled, three-instrument main cluster shaded by an exaggerated tube.

And aside from consciously retro design touches, some elements have been present inside the car for so long they're just... ancient.

For example, old-school orange graphics for the odometer, gear position and trip computer are dated, and the small (7.0-inch touchscreen) multimedia display has the feel of an early noughties edition of Tekken 6.

Forget a digital speedo or head-up display. A CD slot still sits proudly in the centre stack, and matt silver highlights scattered around the cabin are as on-trend as double denim.

And the steering wheel (joined with the instrument binnacle) adjusts for height, but annoyingly, not reach.

That said, friends and family who rode in the car during the week I had the keys all commented on the swoopy exterior and cozy cockpit feel of the interior. So, what do I know?

Proof of the increased solidity of the Ranger Super Duty single cab-chassis is its hefty 2518kg kerb weight, which in bare cab-chassis form (without tray) is 625kg more than a standard 2.0L Ranger XL single cab-chassis 4x4 equivalent.

The Super Duty’s 4500kg GVM results in a huge 1982kg payload limit. It’s also rated to tow up to 4500kg of braked trailer and with its towering 8000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum 4.5 tonne trailer weight while hauling almost one tonne of payload.

These are big numbers when compared to our standard XL Ranger example, given that the Super Duty has a 645kg higher payload rating, 1000kg higher tow rating and 1650kg higher GCM rating.

The galvanised full steel tray is equipped with six internal load anchorages, each rated up to 1800kg, which lie flush with the checker-plate floor when not in use.

There’s also external rope rails beneath the tray along each side and a sturdy front bulkhead with wire-mesh rear window protection.

As previously highlighted, this tray ensemble includes a driver-side lockable toolbox and passenger-side water tank (complete with handwash pump bottle) mounted behind their respective rear wheels.

Its work-focused interior is a comfortably familiar place for Ranger single cab-chassis workhorse owners, with fabric bucket seats, wipe-clean vinyl floor and large ‘Super Duty’ lettering embossed in the passenger side dash.

Cabin storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, pop-out cupholders on each side of the dash, an overhead glasses holder, upper/lower glove boxes plus a well-equipped centre console with wireless phone charging, USB ports, two cupholders, 400W (230V) inverter and a storage box with internal 12V socket and padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

Two seats means practicality is a relative term when applied to the 370Z. For example, getting in and out is an athletic exercise requiring gymnastic levels of flexibility and poise. As with most low-lying coupes, I found the outer hand on the A-pillar technique helps with swinging down into the car, or lurching up out of it.

Once ensconced behind the wheel, you're confronted with a relatively modest amount of storage space, running to a medium-size glove box, a lidded bin at the rear of the dividing console, a single cupholder, and door pockets incorporating recesses for small bottles only.

There are two lined recesses for soft bags or coats behind each seat, including a fold-out map pocket, but they're not exactly convenient for retrieving things when you're on the move. What's missing is a tray where you can easily stow things likes keys, coins or a phone.

There are also two 12-volt power outlets, a USB port and an aux-in audio connection.

Rear load space is limited to 195 litres, mainly due to the boot's shallow floor (an alloy space-saver spare sits underneath). It does incorporate a cargo blind and four tie-down hooks, but we only managed to squeeze in the largest (105-litre) suitcase from our three-piece hard set, or a combination of the two smaller ones (35 and 68 litres).

We also had a crack at stuffing in the CarsGuide pram (there is a top-tether hook provided for child seat fitment) and managed it with only a couple of beads of perspiration expended.

Forget the nappy-bag paraphernalia, though. The soft bags with all the baby stuff would have to go in the storage bays in the cabin behind the seats.

The arrival of the tricked-up 370Z NISMO in August last year, offered Nissan Australia an opportunity to reposition the regular model, dropping the MSRP for the manual version from $56,930 to $49,990.

Aside from adjusting the car's value-for-money proposition (and pissing off those who'd bought one in July), that close to seven grand haircut delivered more pricing headroom up to the Roadster (starting at $60,990), and NISMO (from $61,490) versions.

For that money the standard equipment list includes, keyless entry and start, cruise control, climate control air, go-fast alloy finish pedals, 'HDD' (Hard Disc Drive) sat nav with 3D mapping, a 7.0-inch colour multimedia touchscreen, and Bose eight-speaker audio with 9.3GB 'Music Box' hard drive.

You'll also pick up sports seats with lots of features. First, they're 'leather accented', which is code for genuine hide in all the places you regularly contact, and a faux equivalent everywhere else. Not uncommon, and not necessarily unpleasant. Then they're heated and four-way power-adjustable, (with manual lumbar and height adjustment for the driver).

The steering wheel and gear knob also cop the 'leather accented' treatment, plus you can expect LED DRLs and tail-lights as well as auto headlights. It's worth noting that the headlights are garden-variety xenons, and things you might expect in a $50k coupe, like, rain-sensing wipers, dual zone climate, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity or tyre-pressure monitoring are 100 per cent absent.

Lining up direct competitors for the 370Z isn't easy, because there aren't any. But the closest is arguably a 2.3-litre EcoBoost version of Ford's Mustang at $45,990 for the manual. A further stretch of the imagination could haul in the Mazda MX-5 RF ($43,890) or the 86 GTS+ ($39,440) and Subaru BRZ tS ($39,894).

All Ranger Super Duty models are powered by the same 3.0-litre V6 turbo-diesel, which meets tough Euro 6.2 emission standards using AdBlue. It produces 154kW of power at 3250rpm and a towering 600Nm of torque at 1750rpm.

This is paired with a 10-speed torque converter automatic with the choice of sequential manual-shifting using a toggle switch on the shift knob. It also offers seven drive modes to optimise performance in different terrain applications.

The full-time 4WD transfer case allows drivers to switch between high and low ranges and access other technologies when tackling difficult terrain including 'Trail Control' (low-speed off-road cruise control), 'Trail Turn Assist' (applies braking to the inside rear wheel to tighten turning radius), front and rear diff locks and more.

The 370Z is powered by an all-alloy, 3.7-litre (VQ37VHR), naturally aspirated, quad-cam V6, producing 245kW at 7000rpm and 363Nm at 5200rpm.

Serving in a vast array of Nissan, Infiniti, Renault and Mitsubishi models, the VQ V6 engine series has been around in various displacements for over 20 years.

It features the 'Continuously Variable Valve Timing Control System' (CVTCS) with 'Variable Valve Event and Lift' (VVEL) on the intake side. And while all that may sound new and ultra-high tech, it was actually introduced in 2007.

Transmission choice is between a seven-speed auto (with manual mode and paddles) or six-speed manual gearbox, as tested here. And this 2018 upgrade brings a high-performance clutch from Japanese specialist Exedy.

Drive goes to the rear wheels via a carbon-fibre composite drive shaft, connecting with a viscous limited slip differential (LSD).

Additional features that won't necessarily be music to purists' ears include 'Active Noise Cancellation', and 'Active Sound Enhancement'.

The former monitors and measures engine sounds, using the audio speakers to produce "acoustically opposing signals to cancel undesirable sounds". So, okay, maybe filtering out the messy noise is a good thing.

But at the same time Active Sound Enhancement employs "digital signal processing to enhance the engine note, using the vehicle's sound system to augment or modify the spectrum of select powertrain sounds in the cabin". Yuck.

I can cop a tube that channels a bit of genuine engine noise into the interior, but in this context, the phrase 'digital signal processing' is a turn-off.

Vehicles in this GVM class do not come with official fuel consumption figures. Even so, we clocked up 385km during our tradie-focused test which included our usual mix of suburban, city, highway and unsealed road driving, of which about one quarter was hauling its near maximum payload.

When we stopped to refuel at the end of our test, the dash display was showing average combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) consumption of 13.4L/100km which was lower than our own figure of 15.5 calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings.

That’s still decent economy for a heavy-duty off-roader driven in the daily grind of metro traffic, during which it hauled more than one tonne of payload for a day.

Therefore, based on our own test figures, you could expect a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its big 130-litre diesel tank.

Claimed fuel economy for the combined (ADR 81/02 - urban, extra-urban) cycle is 10.6L/100km, the 370Z emitting 249g/km of CO2 in the process.

Over roughly 250km of city, suburban and freeway running, we averaged 15.6L/100km, at the bowser. Far from miserly.

Minimum fuel requirement is 95 RON premium unleaded, although Nissan says "for optimum performance" you should stump up for 98 RON. And just to rub it in, you'll need 72 litres of it to fill the tank.

It has a comfortable driving position with huge door mirrors providing commanding views. There’s also plenty of headroom for blokes my size (186cm) plus manual adjustment of the steering wheel and seat (including lumbar support) and a big left footrest for additional support.

The steering feels great like all Rangers, backed by sure-footed handling and strong braking response. The unladen ride quality is surprisingly supple for such a heavy lifter, given the combined effect of its baggy tyre sidewalls and the vehicle's substantial sprung weight helping to iron out the bumps.

Given its hefty kerb mass, acceleration feels slightly subdued compared to a standard V6 Ranger, as you’d expect. However, it still provides a satisfying surge of response in urban use thanks to 600Nm of torque and gearing that keeps the engine operating at or near its peak torque output at around 1800rpm.

It’s a relaxed highway cruiser with low engine and tyre noise. The most noticeable ingress at these speeds is mild wind buffeting around bulky fixtures like the engine snorkel, door mirrors and tray bulkhead, but it’s not overly intrusive with conversation not requiring raised voices.

To test its payload rating we firstly put our test vehicle on a public weighbridge. Unladen and with a full tank of fuel, it tipped the scales at 3130kg which after deducting the 2518kg base kerb weight revealed a sizeable combined accessory weight of 612kg.

So, given accessories are included in kerb weight, the Super Duty’s 'naked' 1982kg payload rating drops by the same amount to 1370kg, which is still a mighty capacity for a vehicle of this size.

We strapped 975kg on the tray, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 1150kg (still more than 200kg under its limit) which the onboard scales vaguely confirmed. The robust rear leaf springs compressed a mere 30mm in response, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming out on our test route.

The Super Duty carried this payload with arrogant ease, maintaining its surefooted handling and scoffing at our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb. It also displayed strong engine braking on the way down, in a convincing demonstration of its heavy load hauling ability.

The Nissan 370Z is actually the car many want the Toyobaru 86/BRZ to be. I can sense some of you spluttering out a sweary response to that notion. But hear me out.

If you, like many others, think the 86/BRZ would be perfect with an extra 50kW/80Nm, just bolt on a turbo or supercharger, and voila. You'll get that extra grunt, but remember, the 86/BRZ was conceived to be light, tactile, and, not least of all, affordable.

Up the outputs and you light the wick on an engineering arms race that should also lead to bigger brakes, an engine with more exotic pistons and a tougher bottom end, a stronger gearbox and clutch, a beefier diff, sturdier chassis, fatter rims and rubber... the list goes on, and on. Until you end up with something very much like the spec, weight, and price of the 370Z.

That's not to say this car isn't a fun drive. It is. Just don't expect the quick reflexes of an MX-5 or 86/BRZ.

Despite light-weighting tricks like an aluminium bonnet and all-alloy suspension, the 370Z weighs in at a not inconsiderable 1467kg. And although its 3.7-litre V6 develops a solid 245kW/363Nm, first impressions are dominated by its hollow mid-range.

Much as I love the free-revving nature of a naturally aspirated engine, there's no denying a modern turbo typically delivers lots of torque low down, with peak power also available within a useful rev range.

All the action here is at the top end, with maximum torque arriving way up at 5200rpm, and peak power taking over at a nose-bleed 7000rpm (the rev ceiling is 7500rpm). Not exactly an easily accessible sweet spot.

The gearbox is a sweet reminder of what a pleasure it is swap ratios in a top-notch close-ratio manual.

But there's still so much to like about this evergreen Zed. Its classic front engine/rear-drive layout results in a 53/47 front to rear weight distribution and the car feels balanced and beautifully predictable.

Suspension is double wishbone front, multi-link rear, and ride comfort, even over choppy bitumen surfaces is surprisingly good. On the flip-side, rumble coming up from the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A rubber (245/40 f / 275/35 r) is always noticeable, and often intrusive.

The steering is supported by old-school hydraulic power assist and while connection with the front wheels is impressive, overall feel is light. Hello 'Merica.

The gearbox is a sweet reminder of what a pleasure it is swap ratios in a top-notch close-ratio manual, and hats off to Exedy for producing a wonderfully progressive clutch. Personal preference was to turn off the standard 'SynchroRev Match' function, because I like having a go at the ol' heel 'n' toe tap dance myself.

Brakes are ventilated front and rear with almost equal size rotors (355mm f / 350mm r) clamped by four-piston calipers up front and two piston units at the rear. They are reassuringly powerful and consistent.

Age has not wearied the 370Z's ergonomics. Although the lack of a digital speedo and no reach adjustment for the steering column is annoying, the sports seats are snug and comfortable, the moderately chunky wheel feels great, and all the major controls are simple to use. Who needs slick screens and 'piano black' finishes?

The 370Z must feel like a wall flower at the crash-test disco because it currently isn't rated for safety performance by ANCAP, its Euro NCAP affiliate, JNCAP in Japan, or the USA's NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) or IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety).

That said, in terms of active safety features you'll find ABS, BA, EBD, traction control, 'Vehicle Dynamic Control' (stability control), and a rear-view camera with 'Predictive Path' guidance lines.

But if you're looking for more current active tech, look elsewhere, because things like AEB, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, active cruise, lane-keep assist, auto high beam or any kind of pedestrian detection are missing-in-action. They're not even available on the options list.

If all else fails and a crash is unavoidable, primary passive safety runs to active head restraints and eight airbags (driver and passenger front and side airbags, plus roof- and door-mounted curtain airbags).

The Ranger Super Duty comes with the same five years/unlimited km warranty shared by all Ranger models, with up to seven years of conditional roadside assist available if serviced at Ford dealerships.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Ford offers a pre-paid service plan that provides capped price servicing for the first five scheduled services up to five years/75,000km, which totals $2100 or a reasonable average of $420 per service.

Ford has a long-established network of around 180 dealers spanning all states and territories including key rural and regional areas.

Nissan offers a three year/100,000km warranty, which isn't exactly ground-breaking in the age of Kia's seven year/unlimited km commitment.

But it does include 24-hour roadside assistance for three years, and Nissan's 'myNissan Service Certainty' capped-price servicing program applies for up to six years/120,000km.

The scheduled maintenance interval is six months/10,000km, with charges ranging from a low of $283, to a high of $831 (100,000km), averaging out to roughly $428 per service.