Ford Falcon 2002 Problems

Are you having problems with your 2002 Ford Falcon? Let our team of motoring experts keep you up to date with all of the latest 2002 Ford Falcon issues & faults. We have gathered all of the most frequently asked questions and problems relating to the 2002 Ford Falcon in one spot to help you decide if it's a smart buy.

Globe shelf life
Answered by Graham Smith · 15 Nov 2002

The reasons why a lamp may not be working can be varied. The most common cause is the use of poor replacement globes. Like all components, globes have a set life span and will need to be replaced. When one globe does go, replace both because they will have the same life span and the other one will probably fail soon after the first. Also use quality globes, which are normally available from an auto-electrician and will last longer. Heat can be a problem affecting globe life. Globes heat up quite quickly when in use, and can fail if there's not enough air flow around them to dissipate the heat. It's a particular problem with high-mount stop lights which are often contained within small, tightly sealed housings with little cooling air flow. Added to which it is not uncommon for owners to fit incorrect globes, usually globes of too high a wattage, and these can overheat more easily in the stop-light environment, sometimes to the point of melting the socket. Water is another cause if there's a poor seal around the lamp.

Another clunker
Answered by CarsGuide team · 16 Jun 2005

MY understanding is that the problem is caused by a design fault in the diff itself, so it would not show up when the mechanic checks the codes. Though the problem may be reduced if the auto changes are softened, that doesn't really address the problem. But I am told Ford is at a loss as to how to fix it and the solution has to come from the supplier of the diffs.

Falcon's big brake
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 09 Sep 2004

THE BA's brakes were significantly upgraded form the AUIII. The pads are larger, the disc rotors are larger -- 11 mm at the front and 16 mm at the rear -- and the calipers are 40 per cent stiffer, so many factors are affecting what you feel. That should result, as Ford claims, in better braking performance, increased pad life, reduced fade and more solid pedal feel.

Au falcon or explorer?
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 20 Feb 2004

The AU copped plenty of flak for the way it looked, but it wasn't a bad car. There is no reason to believe it is any better or worse than any other recent Falcon. The mechanical package is the same, so I wouldn't dismiss it on that basis. Looks are a different thing, and the value of AU series cars is way, way down on other similar cars. That's an advantage if you're buying, but a disadvantage if you're selling. It's hard to give you any advice about the Explorer without knowing what you intend to do with it. If you want a heavy-duty four-wheel-drive for some serious off-roading, then I would look to the big Japanese models, but if you want it for around-town use, I would go for one of the compact wagons on offer.

Falcon fan
Answered by Graham Smith · 26 May 2005

I DON'T believe we ever said the AU I is a bad car. What it does have is poor resale value, which makes it a poor buy, and we have said that. We have also criticised its styling, but that's a matter of opinion. You're entitled to yours.

Gas-burn territory
Answered by CarsGuide team · 16 Jun 2005

FORD'S response was that they investigated a dedicated gas version of Territory. However, it would have required a unique calibration for the AWD versions. Market research at the time told them there wasn't enough customer interest to justify the additional program complexity, especially as the dedicated gas customer base is relatively small. The current price of petrol hasn't changed that situation.

Keep on complaining
Answered by Carsguide.com.au · 09 Jun 2005

GOOD advice, Tony. I hope Michael can get the same solution. We've heard from many owners of XR6 and XR8 Falcons with the same concern. I'm told it is a problem with the rear axle and there is no fix except maybe to alter the software to soften shifts. I am told Ford was changing rear axles if you complained, but has stopped doing that because it only deferred the problem.

Used Ford Falcon review:
By Graham Smith · 28 Jan 2006
That same car retailed at almost $40,000 when it was new.Now, my dealer mate added his profit to the price before he retailed it out of his yard at $20,500, but even then it was still just a tick over half the original sticker price.The BA Futura used here is just an example of the bargains out there in near-new cars, particularly the Falcons, Commodores, Magnas and Camrys.The BA Falcon was a make-or-break car for Ford. After the disastrous AU the BA had plenty of ground to make up if the company was going to be viable going into the future.Thankfully for all of us it turned out to be a pretty decent car, far and away better than its disappointing predecessor.Ford pumped lots of new features into the BA, far more than it really would have, had it been a normal upgrade.The 4.0-litre six-cylinder engine was given a major overhaul with double overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder with infinitely variable valve timing. In base form the Barra engine put out 182kW at 5000 revs and 380Nm at 3250 revs, more than sufficient to give the BA plenty of zip. There was the choice of a five-speed manual or four-speed auto, the latter having sports shift.The suspension was also revamped, particularly the rear suspension.The overhaul continued inside as well with an all-new layout focused around a central control console. Standard features in the base XT included airconditioning, CD sound, power driver's seat, power front windows, trip computer, cloth trim, dual front airbags, anti-skid brakes, 60/40 split-fold rear seat.In addition to that, the Futura had cruise control, power rear windows, 16-inch (40.64cm) alloy wheels, rear centre armrest, cup holders, grab handles and courtesy lamps.Make the next step up to the Fairmont and you also drove away with dual-zone airconditioning, velour trim, six-stack CD, woodgrain dash, leather-trimmed steering wheel, side airbags, and traction control.The last step, sporty XRs aside, was to the Fairmont Ghia which had the added features of a six-way driver's seat with memory for settings, adjustable pedals, 17-inch (43.1cm) alloys and fog lamps.With just 30,000km or so under its wheels there should be little that's gone wrong with the Falcon. To date there is none of the head gasket, radiator, power steering problems that were a regular occurrence on the AU. And rental car agencies say they're having a better run out of the BA Falcon than they are with the equivalent Commodore or Magna. In reliability terms they are rating it as high as the Camry.Mechanics working on roadside assistance are reporting an annoying BA problem.It seems they simply stop and can't be started again without being towed to a Ford dealer where the electronics can be checked.With decent handling from independent suspension front and rear and anti-skid brakes the Falcon delivers quite good primary safety.On the secondary level it has dual front airbags, and on the Fairmont, side airbags.There are lots of compelling reasons for buying used large cars, but saving money is the best one. At auction, BA Falcon XTs are being knocked down for as little as $14,500 on average. At retail prices, the same car will sell for $3000 more. The Futura sedan retails for about $18,500 and the equivalent wagons will cost about $18,500 and $19,500.
Read the article
Used Ford Falcon review: 2002-2004
By Graham Smith · 11 Dec 2004
The importance of the BA Falcon can't be overstated.  Had it failed to excite the car-buying public it could well have been the model that spelt the end for Ford as a force in this country. Thankfully the BA has been a success. It has rebuilt the image of the Falcon in the minds of car buyers after it had been badly wounded by the disastrous AU.Model watchThe most damning criticism of the AU was aimed at its styling with its downtrodden curves that gave us a sad and sullen look. Fixing that meant major surgery to body panels, which was no cheap exercise.By the time the BA's stylists had finished there was little of the AU left. The doors were about the only panels recognisable from the old model, even the roof line had been modified. The downcast visage was gone, replaced by bright uplifting looks that gave off a positive vibe instead of the depression felt when sighting an AU.There was also an upgraded six-cylinder engine, a new independent rear suspension, sports shift mode for the auto trans, and some cute new features like the control command centre inside and adjustable foot pedals.The base engine was the familiar Ford 4.0-litre inline six, but it was heavily revamped. It now boasted double overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder, and variable cam timing, which delivered good performance right through the rev range, with good torque at low revs and a powerful punch at high revs. At its peak the so-called Barra 182 engine produced 182kW at 5000 revs and 380Nm at 3250 revs, with good torque over a wide speed range.Underneath a new Control Blade IRS replaced the old double wishbone system, delivering the handling benefits of an independent system with improved ride comfort and isolation from road noise.  Brakes were improved discs all round with ABS standard, steering was power assisted.Inside, the awkward old dash was replaced with a much more modern design with a hooded instrument cluster and a centre dash console containing the supplementary controls for air-con and sound. Standard features included airconditioning, CD sound, power front windows, power mirrors, power drivers seat and trip computer.In the shopFew problems reported to date. The six-cylinder engine is the most powerful in its class and appears to be largely trouble-free although the extra power seems to have come at the cost of fuel consumption.Make the usual checks for crash repairs, like poor panel fit, variable gaps between adjoining panels, and colour variation.  Check also for a service record.Crunch timeThe BA was too new to feature in the recent used car safety survey, but it's fair to say that it's as least as good as the AU which fared well. Body structure is improved, and with dual front airbags, provides crash protection.Owner's viewsHamilton Saunders has done just 32,000km in his BA, which he says is a good car, comfortable, reliable and excellent for towing, but is heavier on fuel than the previous model. Problems he's encountered are a noise from the steering box, an occasional sulphur-like smell in very hot weather, neither of which the dealer has been able to fix, and the discs have required machining at every service.Ray Tonisson has completed just over 13,000km in his BA and says, apart from being thirsty, it's the best Ford he has owned. It has power and drives very well especially with the Sports suspension. Ford has lifted its bang for the buck on the XT with a good package of standard features.BA FORD FALCON XT 2002-2004* Happier, more sporty styling than the AU* Sports shift auto transmission for a fun driving experience* Class-leading power* Excessive fuel consumptionRating15/20 Much improved model you won't be afraid to admit owning
Read the article
Disclaimer: You acknowledge and agree that all answers are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as bespoke advice. Carsguide is not liable for the accuracy of any information provided in the answers.
Have a new question for the CarsGuide team?
More than 9,000 questions asked and answered.
Complete guide to Ford Falcon 2002
Complete guide to Ford Falcon 2002 CarsGuide Logo
Reviews, price, specs and more