Chery Omoda5 vs Kia Stonic

What's the difference?

The GT AWD successfully adds a performance spark to the city-sized Chery Omoda 5 SUV formula. It’s sprightly and stacks up well in terms of value and practicality. It’s also space-efficient, safety’s great and the ownership package is hard to beat.

That said, despite the shift to a multi-link rear suspension, ride comfort and the steering could be better. But overall, no rotten tomatoes here. This is a worthy contender that shows how far and how quickly Chery has progressed.

All in all, the Stonic is a satisfactory daily driver, it’s just nowhere near ideal as a modern urban conveyance.

Sure, it’s reasonably priced in an increasingly expensive market, but it is very sluggish off the mark which is a solid negative against its overall rating. It also feels cheap inside and lacks contemporary driver-assist tech, such as adaptive cruise control.

The Omoda 5 GT is a re-tuned version of the standard car, mechanically and visually.

We’ll cover the oily bits shortly, but from a design point-of-view, it retains the sweeping, diamond pattern grille and overall mix of intersecting surfaces and angular details from the entry models.

On three of eight available colours the GT shares red accents on the gloss black 18-inch alloys, exterior mirrors, lower part of the doors and underneath the roof spoiler also available on the Omoda 5 EX, but it somehow seems more appropriate here.

A car’s appearance is always a subjective call but I think the Omoda 5 looks contemporary in a sharply defined, Lexus kind of way, especially at the rear. The red highlights aren’t my cup of tea, but you might love them. 

The interior tone is set by the dual 10.25-inch LCD screens installed together across a sleek flat panel, one is touch-sensitive for multimedia and other functions and the second for instrumentation and drive information. 

Worth noting the GT’s centre console finish is gloss black rather than the standard car’s matt metallic-style treatment.

It all flows together nicely, the materials used look and feel good while the dash and front console layout looks sleek and works well from an ergonomic point-of view… with the exception of USB ports located low down on the passenger side of the console. Handy for the front passenger but likely a hangover from left-hand-drive production that’s uneconomic to change.

I spend the lion’s share of my time in large and upper large 4WDs, so spending quality time in something like this little hot hatchbac… er, small SUV, is a revelation and a lot of zippy fun. Like driving a go-kart without the fumes and the prangs.

The 2025 Kia Stonic Sport is 4140mm long (with a 2580mm wheelbase), 1760mm wide and 1520mm high. It has a listed kerb weight of 1227kg.

This is a slick-looking hatchbac… er, light SUV, and it looks suitably sporty. 

Though ground clearance is unlisted, it stands well clear of the road surface, giving this hatchbac… er, compact SUV, more presence than it otherwise might have.

At a fraction under 4.4m long, just over 1.8m wide and close to 1.6m tall, with a roughly 2.6m wheelbase the Omoda 5 GT fits within the typical small SUV footprint.

At 183cm I’ve got more than enough breathing room in the front, the away slope of the twin screen array helping to open up the space.

For storage, there’s lots, including a decent-size, cooled lidded box between the seats, which doubles as a centre armrest, two cupholders, a generous glove box, a large area underneath the centre console and big bins in the doors with enough room for large bottles.

And in the back, sitting behind the driver’s seat, set to my position, I’ve got adequate foot room, plenty of legroom and heaps of headroom as well as adjustable ventilation. Big tick.

Storage options include map pockets, decent door bins and two cupholders in the fold-down centre armrest.

Power and connectivity runs to a 50-watt wireless charging pad as well as two USB-A sockets (one in the interior mirror housing ready for a dash cam) a USB-C and 12-volt socket in the front, a USB-A in the rear and another 12V in the boot.

Speaking of which, with all seats up the Omoda 5 GT offers 300 litres of storage space, which is relatively modest, but you have more than 1000 litres with the 60/40 split rear seat folded.

The upside is a full-size alloy spare sits under the floor (the 2WD has marginally more boot space but cops a space-saver) and the tailgate is power-operated. But those keen on towing are out of luck as the Omoda 5 isn’t rated.

The Stonic Sport’s interior is a practical space but it feels a bit dated and underdone in a car market increasingly packed with well-equipped, cheaper and more contemporary SUVs.

The most obvious factors working against the Sport are its the 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia (too small), the absence of wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and wireless phone charging and multiple hard plastic surfaces.

Sure, the touchscreen is easy enough to operate, but it sometimes takes a few finger stabs to hit the sweet spot you’re after, and thankfully there are dials and buttons off-screen as alternatives for air con controls, etc.

There’s a satisfactory number of storage spaces in the front including two cupholders between the seats, a few little receptacles for your everyday carry gear, and bottle holders in each of the front doors.

The back seat is short on cupholders – there are none – but there are bottle holders in the doors, and the passengers back there get a USB-A port, a map pocket (in the back of the front passenger’s seat) and flip-down grab handles. There are no directional air vents.

Back-seat room is satisfactory for an adult without being spacious, but fine for kids. What do you expect in a small SUV?

In terms of packability, the cargo area (with the rear seat up and in use) yields a listed 352 litres of space. The rear seats are in a 60/40 split fold configuration and with them folded down there is a listed 1155 litres of useable room.

The rear cargo area has bag hooks, a storage space in the left-hand inner wall, and tie-down points at each corner of the floor.

A steel space-saver spare wheel is under the cargo area floor.

The Kia Stonic is available in three grades – the S ($25,460), our test vehicle, the mid-spec Sport ($28,590) and the GT-Line ($31,780), all prices excluding on-road costs. All have five seats.

Standard features include an 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system (with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), satellite navigation, digital radio, two USB charging ports, single-zone climate control, six-way manual driver’s seat adjustment, a premium shift knob, premium steering wheel, and Tricot cloth trim seats.

It also has 17-inch alloy wheels, push-button start and rear privacy glass.

Standard paint is 'Clear White', but premium options including 'Sparkling Silver', 'Astro Grey', 'Aurora Black Pearl', 'Signal Red', 'Sporty Blue', 'Honeybee' and 'Snow White Pearl' cost $520.

The GT swaps out the Omoda 5 BX and EX’s 1.5-litre turbo-petrol four sending drive to the front wheels through a CVT auto for a more powerful 1.6-litre turbo-petrol four pushing 137kW (at 5500rpm) and 275Nm (from 2000-4000rpm) to the front, or as here, all four wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch auto.

That means power is up 27 per cent on the standard car and torque is boosted by no less than 31 per cent.

The all-alloy engine is an in-house design produced by Chery’s Acteco powertrain subsidiary and features direct-injection and dual variable valve timing, while the dual-clutch auto comes from a collaboration with German transmission specialist Getrag.

The 2025 Kia Sonic Sport has a 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol engine – producing 74kW at 4500-6000rpm and 172Nm at 1500-4000rpm – and that’s paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. 

This pairing is a mostly punchy one, although definite lagginess is evident from a standing start often enough that it’s a disconcerting characteristic rather than a mildly annoying one.

This turbocharged engine used to only be offered in the top-spec GT-Line, so it’s a welcome addition to the other grades.

Chery’s official combined cycle fuel-economy figure for the Omoda 5 GT AWD is 7.4L/100km, the 1.6-litre turbo four emitting 176g/km of CO2 in the process.

Idling stop-start is standard and over a week covering mainly urban and suburban driving, with a hint of freeway running thrown in, we recorded an average of 10.2L/100km which is on the thirstier side of the spectrum.

Worth noting the minimum fuel requirement is the pricier 95 RON premium unleaded and you’ll need 51 litres of it to fill the tank which translates to a theoretical range of around 690km (roughly 500km using our real-world number).

Kia's official fuel consumption figure for the Stonic Sport is 5.4L/100km, on a combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle. And on this test I recorded 8.2L/100km.

The Stonic Sport has an 45-litre fuel tank so, going by my on-test fuel figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 548km from a full tank. 

Fuel requirement is 91 RON 'standard' unleaded.

Chery doesn’t quote a 0-100km/h figure for this car but expect a time in the mid-seven-second range, and it feels quick. Particularly urgent in the mid-range.

That’s because maximum torque is delivered across a broad plateau from 2000-4000rpm, right where you want easy pulling power for safe lane changes and drama-free overtaking.

This car tips the scales at around 1.5 tonnes (100kg more than 2WD), which is par for the small SUV course and it feels nimble in traffic and on the open road. 

As is often the case with relatively small capacity turbo-petrol engines, you need to ease into the throttle gently for smooth take-offs. And once underway there are multiple modes available, the default ‘Eco’ setting, then ‘Sport’, ‘Snow’, ‘Mud’ and ‘Off-road’.

While we didn’t explore the loose surface modes, in Sport the seven-speed dual-clutch auto holds onto gears that little bit longer and changes down more readily. In fact, the transmission’s first few ratios feel quite low, so even in Eco the Omoda 5 GT has an eager, sporty personality.

Although the central shifter easily transitions to sequential ‘manual’ mode a pair of wheel-mounted paddles, sadly missing, would be even better for direct gear control.

Suspension is by struts at the front and multi-links at the rear, the latter a change from the ‘standard’ car’s torsion beam set-up.

The 18-inch alloy rims are shod with 215/55 rubber and that 55 aspect ratio makes for a relatively comfy tyre sidewall. But beware the ride is firmer than the standard car with high-frequency bumps making their presence felt, although it’s far from extreme.

In fact, the car is refined in terms of engine or any other noise with standard acoustic front side glass playing its part.

No surprise the steering is electrically assisted and it can be swapped through ‘Sport’ and ‘Comfort’ modes. The latter is relatively light and road-feel is okay.

Switch to Sport and the weight increases noticeably but road feel remains the same. Not the best in the business but not the worst, either.

Given this GT’s get up and go and sporty pretensions you’re likely to enjoy a drive on your favourite twisty backroad and this AWD version grips securely through the bends.

On the highway, with the active cruise engaged, it’s worth noting steering wheel inputs from the lane-departure function are constant and relatively abrupt even in sweeping, well-marked bends.

Braking is by discs all around, ventilated at the front with the GT featuring bigger rotors front and rear (308mm vs 283mm fr - 313mm vs 263mm rr). Aside from the fact it’s unusual to have a larger disc at the rear they’re pretty smooth but you need to be firm with the pedal to wash off speed effectively.

Under the heading of miscellaneous observations, in 3D mode the ‘AVM’ panoramic view system plays with your mind. It’s literally an out of body experience thanks to four external cameras providing an exterior view of the car on the road on the central media screen.

At just over 10 metres the turning circle is agreeably tight while vision for parking, supported by the reversing camera and panoramic view, is clear.

The driver’s door armrest is kinda firm and the media system, complete with ‘Hello Chery’ voice recognition, is quick to respond and easy to navigate. 

The Stonic Sport is a handy urban conveyance, but it is far from perfect.

It’s a small, light vehicle so it’s nimble for navigating through car-packed streets and convenient for tricky parking manoeuvres.

Steering is well weighted and precise.

And the turbocharged petrol engine is a welcome addition to the Stonic package, introducing a handy amount of power and torque which is sensibly harnessed and delivered – most of the time anyway – via the mostly clever transmission.

However, in stop-start, inner-city traffic or even a busy suburban area, the Stonic Sport struggles to get off the mark from a standstill, so much so that this one characteristic threatens to spoil the rest of the driving experience. 

Once the Sport is out on the open road, it’s a pleasant cruiser as this compact SUV simply rolls along.

Ride is firm – 17-inch wheels and low-profile tyres are the culprits here – and handling is impressive.

In terms of refinement the Stonic is mostly, um, fine but there is some tyre noise, especially over rougher roads out of the city, but it’s not terrible.

Every Stonic has three drive modes – 'Normal', 'Sport' and 'Eco' – each of which tweaks throttle response, engine output and transmission settings to best suit the driver and conditions. 

The Stonic is generally a reasonable daily driver, but the absence of adaptive cruise control is a let-down when it comes to highway running.

Not that you’ll be buying a Stonic with the aim of skull-dragging a 3500kg caravan along the highway, but it’s handy to know this Kia SUV’s towing capacities are 450kg (unbraked trailer) and 900kg (braked).

The Kia Stonic has the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating as a result of testing in 2017, but that rating is set to expire in 2025.

Standard safety features include six airbags (dual front, front side and full-length curtain), as well as a suite of driver-assist tech, including AEB (with forward collision warning, car, pedestrian and cyclist detection), lane-keep assist, front and rear parking sensors and blind-spot collision avoidance. But it doesn’t have adaptive cruise control which is disappointing in this day and age.

Chery covers the Omoda 5 with a seven-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is two years up on the majority of the mainstream market.

Roadside Assist is complimentary for the first year, renewed annually for up to seven years if you have your Omoda 5 serviced at an authorised Chery dealer. 

The main service interval is 12 months/10,000km, which is a bit short on kays relative to most of the competition at 15,000, however, Chery offers capped-price servicing for up to 10 years/150,000km, the average cost for service over the seven-year warranty period being just over $350, which is in the ballpark for the category.

Kia’s seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the Stonic and you have access to roadside assistance for up to eight years as long as you always get it serviced at an authorised Kia garage.

Servicing intervals are set at every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever comes soonest.

Service costs start at $290 (12 months/10,000km), peak at $727 (48 months/40,000km) and finish at $578 (84 months/70,000km) and the total over seven years is $3367; an average of $481 per workshop visit (correct at time of writing). That’s rather pricey for something in the small SUV market.