Chery C5 vs Mercedes-Benz Eqa350

What's the difference?

Can a new name, fresh face and suspension update save Chery’s sleek SUV coupe from the ignominy of being one of the least pleasant options in its ultra-competitive class?

Sadly, not enough has been done for us to recommend the new C5.

As an affordable, stylish, roomy and zoomy SUV, the Chery definitely provides showroom appeal, especially given the decent warranty.

But, with lots of little niggles still present to distract and frustrate, the C5 is far from A1. Plus, with prices now creeping up, it doesn’t even have the cheap pricing of the old Omoda 5 to get it over the line.

Heading into 2026, Chery still needs to do better than this.

On one hand, the EQA 350 4Matic has the styling, interior presentation, forceful performance and handling prowess to make you forgive its very expensive price tag, especially when so many rival EVs are also so talented.

But there’s too much that’s ordinary about this Mercedes to justify its huge ask, including a lack of that final polish in the way it drives and rides.

Despite being a recent release, the EQA is already feeling beyond its age. For the money, the 350 4Matic feels out of its depth.

The new and narrower nose treatment is better, banishing the Omoda 5’s insectoid face straight into the bin. As an example of coupe-SUV design, the unaltered silhouette remains contemporary and is a defining signature for the series.

But, as before, the C5’s styling is hobbled by its narrow-gutted track width and highish (at 184mm) ground clearance, that give it a muffin-top and tippy-toed appearance respectively from most angles. Flashbacks to a Holden VN Commodore. Stance be damned.

Let’s look at the newcomer’s dimensions, compared to the Tiggo 4 for perspective: length is 4351mm (plus 44mm), width is 1831mm (+6mm), height is 1662mm (+2mm) and wheelbase is identical at 2610mm.

Still, there’s a positively Pollyanna-esque perspective to be gained here as well, since the C5’s extra size translates to a biggish small SUV inside a cabin that seems stylishly minimalistic. Or fairly basic. It all depends on your point of view.

Let’s take a closer look.

A high-riding hatchback (its handy 209mm ground clearance is only 4.0mm shy of the GLA equivalent), the smooth and handsome EQA is like an EQC that’s been left in a tumble dryer for too long, shrinking into its smaller proportions.

Along with the EQA's obvious electric powertrain inclusion, differences compared to the GLA include a blanked-out grille, a redesigned bumper, fresh wheel styles and a full-width LED tail-light treatment. 

All add some character to the rather amorphous donor car.

Three things struck me the moment I stepped inside the C5.

Firstly, though the silhouette suggests a low-slung car, the tall stance means getting in and out isn’t a drama at all, with the seats being up high enough for this to deserve its SUV/crossover status.

Secondly, the Chery emits a somewhat repellent plastic off-gas odour, a bit like a cheap toy. The smell never goes away. Perhaps it was just our test car? Unlikely though, as it reminds me of pre-2000s Kias and Hyundais.

And in stark contrast, thirdly, there’s an arresting elegance to the dashboard’s minimalist layout and presentation. Nothing’s changed visually and nothing needed to.

Let’s concentrate on the many positive points first.

There’s plenty of space around you for a comparatively small and narrow SUV, including ample legroom and head room for your 178cm tester front and back. It doesn't feel cramped at all.

Finding the ideal driving position is easy, with most of the (available) switches and controls where you’d need them to be without having to stretch to reach. Helping things out here is an adjustable steering wheel for rake as well as reach. Unlike in an MG ZS.

The dash layout looks great, given that this car is of a 2022 vintage, with the large, twin 10.25-inch integrated displays for both the electronic instrumentation and the multimedia system seamlessly presented. Both are fairly clear and easy to work out and operate. And, despite being an older-generation vehicle (it’s now well into year four of production), the instruments still look fresh.

And though the C5 runs a software-based operating system for vehicle functions, climate, audio, multimedia and other settings, the few buttons provided are well integrated and mostly work logically.

Below the touchscreen is a row of haptic switches for the main heating and cooling elements, meaning just one touch is necessary and with no complicated and time-consuming sub-menus to navigate. That's good.

You do need to dive into sub-menus for some drive settings and modes, though, and that's disappointing, but at least the C5’s is not as complicated as some others we’ve experienced of late.

Other plus points include excellent ventilation and loads of storage, including a big old glovebox, a cavernous centre console bin, a vast lower area to hide things on, deep cupholders and a ‘wall’ to lean two phones or a tablet while still being visible for the driver to glance at, with one side providing wireless charging on the Ultimate grade.

Along with pleasant cloth seats that are surprisingly comfortable, all show a reassuring degree of thoughtfulness.

Additionally, the poor side and rear vision is at least aided by large side mirrors and a crisp reverse-camera views.

However, there are some serious downsides too, starting with the C5’s aforementioned phone/tablet wall. The rubber backing in our test car was misshapen and dog-eared, undermining the otherwise exemplary build quality.

Until you learn its weird ways, the gear shifter can be unfathomable. It looks like it would operate as per a regular T-bar, but pressing the side button to engage Drive or Reverse instead locks them out, meaning the uninitiated will inevitably find themselves panicking manoeuvring in traffic with impatient drivers wondering why a Chery is blocking the road during a cheeky three-point turn. Embarrassing and, yes, super frustrating.

In the Ultra at least, the lofty front passenger seat has no height adjustment. The digital radio did not work for the entire week we had the C5. Maybe it was just our car, but even in inner Melbourne, reception proved elusive.

And the touchscreen-based secondary climate settings that aren’t supported by physical buttons are a stretch away, including temperature adjustment, meaning these and other items are arranged for left-hand-drive access.

This means it is fiddly to operate, as concentration is not on the road ahead, resulting in the driver monitor sounding off, leading to more frustration. An unvirtuous circle of distraction ensues, highlighting the folly of software-based vehicle systems that have not been tailored to Australian road conditions. Fail.

But nothing is as aggravating as the Chery’s voice control system. Like we said earlier, when turned on, it mishears or misunderstands words to almost a comical degree… if it wasn’t so constantly intrusive. As with paranoid and/or trigger-happy ADAS warnings, you end up switching off such irritating tech. Which beggars the question: what is their point?

Moving to the back seat, things look up again, with sufficient space for most smaller families to settle into.

The bench is fine, offering adequate comfort for shorter journeys. Legroom is generous, helped out by room for boots to tuck underneath the front cushion. And most amenities are present for a base model car, including a folding armrest with two cupholders (again, unlike in an MG ZS), as well as one-touch electric windows, overhead grab handles, coat hooks, decent size door bins, a USB port and face level ventilation.

All those go towards making the C5 well-packaged, small family transport.

Further back, Chery has managed to liberate an extra 10 litres of cargo capacity compared to the old Omoda 5, so 360 litres is available – which is not bad for a small SUV. That rises to 1075L in two-seater mode.

It’s also a practical and easy boot to use, with a space saver spare wheel.

Like the second-gen (H247) GLA, the EQA sits up high, offering lofty seating. That’s core to this range’s appeal, making getting in and out a less acrobatic feat compared to smaller and lower EVs.

The cabin is very similar to many of the second-generation MFA2 transverse-engine/front-drive-based Benzes like the current A-Class. That means solid looking and feeling doors and dash, upping the sense of quality. Very on-brand stuff.

This is a very modern and inviting interior, with those aforementioned screens set within a large rectangular binnacle. To the centre there are the trio of turbine-style air vents that still bring a spark of joy to the cabin (as well as seriously effective ventilation), along with the row of metallic toggle switches; both provide pleasing, high-quality sensory experiences.

It can lean towards overkill with a trashy night-club ambience if restraint is not exercised with the (configurable) coloured light show dotting the EQA's cabin. 

Not to everybody’s liking, but thankfully you can turn that stuff off, so no complaining necessary here.

You wouldn’t call the EQA particularly spacious with its curvy roof, snug sports seating, high waistline, narrow glass areas and thick pillars, but even 200cm-tall people should find enough legroom up front. There’s a sense of cosiness rather than crampedness.

The 350 4Matic’s sports seats do a great job holding and caressing you in, providing excellent bracing through tight corners. Three’s ample (powered) adjustment, including for lumbar and lower-back areas, as well as enough support for thighs. The cushions themselves are typically firm yet comfy. And the seats look great. 

The driving position is superb, ahead of a set of vibrant digital instrumentation choices that run the gamut of tastes, with the 'Classic' dial-like look and minimalist settings (reminiscent of Saab in its essentials-only display) included, so as to not scare away traditionalists. There is also a 'Progressive' screen that’s colourful and techy, though the info presented is a lot to take in.

What may not please conservative Benz buyers are the cheap-looking plastics dotted throughout the interior, along with the rattles that are regular companions, especially over less-than-smooth roads. 

This has been a bugbear of all MFA-platform vehicles for more than a decade now, and while better than in some previous models, the EQA at $100K should possess vault-like build quality, not squeaky trim.

And when will that small and flimsy gear selector stalk be binned?

Our test car’s ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice control system was erratic at best, barely providing any assistance and regularly annoying/entertaining with misunderstood responses and laughably limited functionality. Was our example glitchy? Perhaps.

Storage is good. And, ergonomically, everything’s within reach of the driver, but there’s a lot to take in, with scattered switchgear.

It’s also worth noting that, if you’re new to the MBUX multimedia system, taking the time to learn its many functions and capabilities is advisable, as it’s more logical and simpler than the intimidating first impression suggests. 

A deft thumb is required for the steering-wheel spoke-actuated tabs for instrument data, but even technophobes ought to master it all eventually. 

The central part of the screen can be swiped to access the vast array of features, including the excellent audio system and detailed vehicle control settings.

Further back, passengers sit up high, giving a wide view of what’s happening up front, while the backrest is angled at just the right position. 

There’s not much fun to be had sitting on the raised middle bit, and shoulder space is seriously limited with three abreast, but otherwise, even adults should find sufficient legroom and headroom – even with the panoramic sunroof fitted.

Deep door pockets, face-level air outlets, reading lights and a folding armrest are to be found back there, though the latter includes a flimsy slide-out cupholder set that’s not worthy of the brand. 

Because there’s a battery pack in the rear half of the EQA, cargo capacity shrinks from the donor GLA's 435 litres to just 340L, while dropping the 40/20/40 backrests extends that into the cabin for a 1320L load space. Note there’s no spare wheel, just a tyre inflation kit.

People don’t buy these small crossover Mercedes models for space or practicality – that’s why the GLB/EQB exist – but the EQA isn’t too bad for the urban demographic which wants/needs a compact, high-riding EV with impressive ground clearance.

Does it represent good value for the price? We’re not so sure.

Starting from $96,900, before on-road costs, the EQA 350 4Matic all-wheel drive (AWD) costs over $15,000 more the established EQA 250 front-drive version.

That’s a lot of dosh, even in the world of expensive EVs, given that’s nearly in Tesla Model 3/Y Performance, new flagship Kia EV6 GT and range-topping Hyundai Ioniq 5 Epiq (with change) territory.

These are bespoke electric vehicles in that they’re designed from the ground up to be electrified, not internal combustion engine (ICE) models modified to take electric motors and batteries, as the EQA is. It doesn’t take much imagination to see the popular GLA small-car/crossover behind the badge.

The same applies to the GLB-based EQB, which at least offers a seven-seat version in the base 250, giving it a unique selling proposition. The 350 4Matic benefits from no such advantage against its fierce volley of foes.

Additionally, the Mercedes must battle some pretty impressive yet cheaper ICE-based EV AWD rivals, including the Volvo XC40/C40 Recharge Twin fraternal twins, Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor and coming BMW iX1 xDrive30.

As the Stuttgart EV isn’t measurably ahead and is sometimes even behind these in performance, efficiency, range and charging capacity, its pricing seems needlessly steep.

Unfortunately, the 350 4Matic isn’t brimming with extra standard features to compensate, either.

Along with that second motor and AWD, your $15,200 premium over the 250 scores an AMG makeover inside and out, with an AMG Line Sports exterior treatment, 20-inch AMG alloys, AMG interior trim with synthetic leather and suede seat material, a leather AMG steering wheel, aluminium pedal covers and a top-stitched dash.

The 250’s optional 'Vision Package' is also thrown in, bringing a panoramic sunroof and surround-view camera.

You’ll also find dual keyless entry/go, electric and heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice control, a wireless smartphone charger, two 10.25-inch screens (for instrumentation and multimedia touchscreen), Bluetooth connectivity, wired Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, digital radio, satellite navigation, 10-speaker audio, ambient lighting, a powered tailgate and adaptive dampers.

On the safety front there are LED headlights with high-beam assist, autonomous emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, evasive steering assist and parking sensors all-round.

However, items that can dial up the glamour for potential buyers in EQA adverts, also cost thousands of dollars extra, such as a head-up display, hand gesture activation for several vehicle functions and the 'MBUX' augmented reality for navigation.

There’s a Wallbox from $1710 (before fitment) for personal parking-space charging, bringing a Type 2 AC Charger, 22kW single-phase and three-phase charging. 

A free Chargefox subscription is also part of the deal. But are all these enough?

The C5 is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine, delivering 108kW of power at 5500rpm and 210Nm of torque from 1750-4000rpm.

As part of the MY25 facelift, the Chery swaps out the old Omoda 5’s CVT for a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, complete with a handy manual mode. It drives the front wheels only.

Tipping the scales at 1462kg (kerb), the C5 Ultra offers a power-to-weight ratio of 73.9kW/tonne – which is slightly less than, say, a Haval Jolion, but quite a bit behind a Mazda CX-3.

With a slight helping hand from a strong northerly wind, we managed to record a 0-100km/h sprint time of 9.9 seconds. This figure suggests the Chery feels faster than it is.

The EQA 350 4Matic features an asynchronous motor and a single-speed reduction gear transmission under the bonnet, delivering 140kW of power and 385Nm of torque to the front wheels, and supported by a second, permanently excited synchronous motor located on the back axle.

'Dual E-motor' total outputs are 215kW between 7130-9506rpm up front and 5746-7661rpm for the rear motor, for a 520Nm torque total, from zero rpm. 

Drive is infinitely variable on both axles, for AWD capability. Tipping the scales at 2091kg (kerb), the 350 4Matic’s power-to-weight ratio is an impressive 103kW per tonne.

Result? Some six seconds is required to race from 0-100km/h, on the way to a 160km/h top speed.

The EQA employs a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack fitted between the axles, with a maximum 11kW AC and 100kW DC charging capability.

Suspension is via MacPherson-style struts up front while a multi-link arrangement is out back. Steering is by electrically assisted rack-and-pinion.

The C5’s combined average fuel consumption figure is 6.9L/100km, for a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 160 grams/km. And that’s on regular 91 RON standard unleaded. Topping the 51-litre petrol tank should result in nearly 740km of range between refills.

During our week with the Chery, we managed 9.0L/100km, which is very disappointing, though that did include highway and performance driving.

Using WLTP figures, the EQA 350 4Matic’s official consumption figure is 17.9kWh/100km. Maximum range is rated at 400km.

At pick-up, our EQA was displaying a 395km maximum range availability. After 273km of a mix of city, urban and freeway driving, our car showed 47km of range left, which means we could expect up to 320km in real-world driving scenarios. 

That did include some performance testing, which tends to suck out the kilowatts, by the way.

Our trip computer showed the vehicle had consumed 20.8kWh/100km on average.

Like the EQB, the EQA offers varying levels of energy recuperation to help recharge the battery pack. In ‘D Auto’ it figures out the level of resistance automatically, but drivers can also choose to do this manually via ‘D+’ that provides coasting, ‘D’ that brings mild regeneration off-throttle, and ‘D—’ that activates maximising regen for close to single-pedal driving. These are paddle activated.

Cables for home charging with three-prong outlets are included – an eight-metre long one plus a five-metre public charging cable.

Mercedes says a 100kW DC charger will take an EQA from 10-80 per cent charged in 30 minutes, while an 11kW AC public outlet needs seven hours, and at home using a regular 3.0kW 10-amp socket requires at least 34 hours.

Mercedes also offers a Wallbox with up to 22kW charging capability for your home or office from $1710, not including installation. That drops the charging time to under eight hours, which is ideal for overnight-home or all-day work charging scenarios.

Chery has made some pretty fundamental changes underneath, so we had higher hopes of the C5 compared to the preceding Omoda 5. However, expectations ought to be tempered here.

Let’s begin with the Chinese SUV’s performance.

After a moment’s hesitation, the C5 feels punchy from the get-go, with a decent amount of muscle as the revs rise. Throttle response is brisk, even at higher speeds. And the brakes do a great job. This is quite the rapid little runabout.

Some of that initial lag is down to the dual-clutch transmission, since it needs time for the turbo to spool up. Once sorted, it shifts swiftly and smoothly, and without delay. Only the aforementioned gear selector complication will catch out new drivers, as the operation is needlessly complicated.

But the engine is never really quiet, and can even feel coarse when extended under hard acceleration, betraying this Chery’s station as a cheap SUV. And the stop/start tech is especially jerky.

The steering, meanwhile, is a mix of disgruntle and delight.

When driving on the motorway, it can feel lumpy, with the driver-assist system tugging away endlessly at the wheel. The sudden jolts make it feel like a pinball as the vehicle feels like it is ricocheting off the white lines. Such constant correction is both tiring and irritating, leading to fatigue and, if your fuse is really short, aggravation.

For steering smoothness or linearity, you need to dive into a sub menu and opt out of several ADAS modes. Or otherwise pull over and wonder why Chinese car companies especially seem to have such disdain for Australian drivers. If this sounds like a nightmare, the C5 is not for you.

Furthermore, there’s no point choosing a steering setting. Comfort is light enough for easy driving and weighty enough for the driver to feel in control, but feedback and feel are absent. And selecting Sport just adds needless heft and makes it all feel way too heavy.

Now, that said, the C5 offers some dynamic compensation, and likely courtesy of its multi-link suspension upgrade.

At higher speeds, the steering, for instance, is pleasingly direct and precise, meaning it turns exactly where you choose it to. The handling feels controlled and the tyres grip well, for some unintentional scrappy fun through really tight corners, to a certain extent anyway. It’s a side to the Chery the Omoda 5 never seemed capable of delivering.

But, inevitably, this comes at a price, and that is a busy and at times agitated ride, with the suspension failing to soak up bumps and irregularities on anything other than smooth roads, despite its new-found independence, adding to further fatigue. For the record, our test car rode on 215/60R17 Giti tyres.

Would higher-quality rubber help fix this? If you’re buying a sub-$30K Chery SUV, would you even care? Basically, unless you enjoy the occasional hoon, the C5 lacks dynamic sophistication as well as sufficient Australian road tuning. Much like its predecessor. Such a letdown.

Probably the most impressive thing about the EQA 350 4Matic is how effortless, easy, and fun it is to drive, whether around town or out on the open road.

Slot the flimsy drive selector to D and this wastes no time moving off the line, streaking past 100km/h even more swiftly than the 6.0s official time suggests. 

The Mercedes powers along with strong acceleration available at all times. With such instant torque on tap, this is a treat weaving through traffic, zipping into rapidly closing gaps like a little go-cart.

At slower speeds, even in slippery conditions, the 350 4Matic feels glued to the road, possessing tons of grip wearing Pirelli P Zero 235/45R20 rubber, to help it carve through without breaking a sweat, pulled along by endless torrents of torque. Just a slight flex of your right foot has this car bounding ahead in no time.

Armed with nicely weighted and responsive steering and a planted yet agile chassis, all the makings are present for a premium electric hot hatch experience. 

However, there’s just a bit too much weight, which seems to manifest itself in somewhat top-heavy handling at higher speeds or through fairly tight corners. 

In such conditions, the Benz feels a bit nervous and a tad skittish, and not quite as composed as we’d hoped.

Disappointingly, while there’s regenerative braking using the steering paddles, it doesn’t quite bring the car to a full stop, but instead slows it down with enough force to wipe off most but not all of the speed. You can’t rely on full stop/go single-pedal braking, then.

Finally, there’s the suspension’s ability to cope with our patchy road surfaces. Over big bumps, ride comfort is fine, but smaller-frequency ones are all-too-often felt. 

There’s an underlying firmness to the chassis tune that’s in keeping with the EQA’s German heritage, but we expected more suppleness and isolation in a high-riding SUV equipped with adaptive dampers.

Plus, there’s more tyre/road noise than we’d like.

So, as a sprightly urban runabout, the EQA is ideal, with forceful acceleration and a slick powertrain. Backed up by the security of AWD, the 350 4Matic is great in inclement weather, too, with exceptional roadholding dynamics. But it isn’t quite as agile nor sophisticated and refined as we’d like a $100K Mercedes EV to be.

On the ANCAP website, a EuroNCAP-tested EQA scored a five-star crash-test safety result. This was conducted in 2019.

Included is Mercedes’ 'Driver Assistance Package' that features, among other safety items, autonomous emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring with an exit warning that alerts the driver to approaching cyclists or vehicles if the door begins to open into their path, lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control, as well as evasive steering and a ‘Parking Package’ featuring front and rear parking sensors and a surround-view camera.

There are also nine airbags, made up of front, pelvis side and window bags for driver and front passenger, and side and curtain airbags for rear occupants. There’s also a knee airbag for the driver.

The AEB with forward collision warning works between 7.0km/h and 200km/h, and offers pedestrian and cyclist protection day or night. The 'Active Lane Assist' tech operates between 60km/h and 200km/h.

The EQA makes a sound for pedestrians and other warns other road users that’s audible at speeds below 20km/h, plus a reversing tone.

Along with a trio of child-seat tether anchorages, the EQA’s rear seat base is fitted with two ISOFIX attachments.

Very competitive if not quite as class leading as the conditional Nissan, Mitsubishi and MG 10-year warranty, the C5 comes with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Chery also offers seven years/105,000km of capped-price servicing and a year’s free roadside assistance, though up to seven years is available should owners choose to have their vehicle maintained at an authorised dealer during that period.

Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km, and cost $280 per visit for the first five, extending to nearly $370 and $290 for the final two.

Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

The battery pack warranty is also industry-standard, valid for the usual eight years/160,000km. Service intervals are every year or 25,000km.

There is no capped-price servicing, however buyers can purchase up-front when new to save money. 

The EQA 'Service Plan' starts at $1600 for the first three years/75,000km (whichever occurs first), $2200 for four years and $2650 for five years.