BYD Shark 6 vs Mitsubishi Triton

What's the difference?

BYD’s Shark 6 continues to break new ground with its work-focused Dynamic PHEV cab-chassis, which impresses with its quiet operation, spirited acceleration, excellent handling, single-digit fuel economy and generous standard equipment at a competitive price. However, its tow rating is one tonne less than PHEV ute rivals which could be a deal breaker for some.

Apart from its distracting driver attention monitor, we can't see any major flaws that would detract from this vehicle’s comfort, practicality and performance when serving as either a utilitarian 4x4 workhorse or back-to-basics 4x4 dual cab for adventures off the beaten track.

The Shark 6 projects a bold grille and headlight treatment that appears to draw inspiration from full-size US pick-ups, but with an LED-enhanced ‘technical’ look consistent with its hybrid drivetrain.

Like its stablemates, the cab-chassis version rides on a 3260mm wheelbase with generous length/width/height dimensions similar to a Ford Ranger.

The interior with its synthetic leather seating has a high-quality look and feel, with brightly contrasting red air-vent/cupholder surrounds and exposed red stitching along numerous seams throughout the cabin adding to its visual appeal.

Our test vehicle rides on a compact 3130mm wheelbase and is 1865mm wide and 1795mm tall, which combined with a 12.4-metre turning circle makes it agile and easy to manoeuvre both on and off-road.

Speaking of which, its all-terrain credentials include 228mm of ground clearance, a useful 30.4 degrees approach angle (without bull-bar) and 23.4 degrees ramp breakover angle, with the departure angle dependent on the type of tray fitted. These numbers would be more than adequate for accessing rugged worksites.

Its front suspension is double-wishbone with coil-springs, paired with a robust leaf-spring live rear axle. Brakes are front discs and rear drums and it has electric power-assistance for the rack and pinion steering.

Looks are subjective of course but we reckon it has a robust and purposeful appearance in cab-chassis form, particularly with the accessories fitted to our example.

Chrome is all but extinct in its predominantly grey interior. However, hard surfaces on the centre console and door-pulls have a synthetic carbon-fibre finish, which adds a touch of style to a low-maintenance cabin that won’t get trashed by spilled coffee or muddy boots.

You also won’t find fancy features like digital instruments (it has analogue speedo/tacho) or an electronic handbrake (this one’s the good old manual lever). Plus there’s physical dials for audio volume/tuning and ‘piano key’ buttons for the cabin’s climate control, which ensures no distracting touchscreen prompts when driving.

With its hefty 2600kg kerb weight (without tray) and 3500kg GVM, the Shark 6 Dynamic has a 900kg payload rating which, after deducting the weight of the aluminium tray (150kg) and towbar assembly (50kg) as fitted to our test vehicle, lowers the remaining payload to 700kg.

It’s also rated to tow up to 2500kg of braked trailer which is 1000kg or one tonne less than the category benchmark and all PHEV ute rivals. And with its 5750kg GCM rating (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing its maximum trailer weight would leave 650kg of vehicle payload capacity which drops to 450kg after deducting the combined weight of the tray/towbar.

And that 450kg of payload could easily be used up by the weight of four large tradies before you could think about loading their gear, so it’s important to be aware of these weight ratings if you’re planning to tow heavy trailers.

The optional aluminium tray is designed in partnership and manufactured by Aussie aftermarket off-road equipment specialist, Ironman. According to our tape measure, its internal dimensions are 1680mm length and 1810mm width with 260mm-deep drop-sides.

It has a sturdy tubular aluminium front bulkhead topped by vertical load retainers on each side plus external rope rails and eight internal load anchorage points.

The driver's side lockable storage box tucked up behind the rear wheel is integral with the cab-chassis structure and therefore separate from the tray, which allows any tray or service body to be mounted above it without compromising the propulsion battery's charge port and trio of V2L three-pin sockets mounted inside. The matching passenger-side storage box differs only in being part of the tray structure and therefore removable.

Seating is spacious and comfortable for the driver and front passenger while the rear bench seat is equally accommodating, given I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat set in my position I still have ample knee and headroom.

Head clearance is also sufficient when seated in the central position, which is enhanced with a flat floor to avoid having to straddle a transmission tunnel. However, shoulder room for a trio of adults is tight, so travelling with three in the rear seat is best limited to short drives.

Cabin storage for front seat occupants includes a bottle holder and bin in each front door, an overhead glasses holder plus a glove box and dash storage shelf on the passenger side. The centre console has wireless phone charging and two USB ports up front, a pair of cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back containing a 12V accessory socket.

Rear passengers also get a bottle holder and bin in each door, plus pockets on the rear of both front seat backrests and a fold-down centre armrest with two cupholders. The rear of the centre console offers adjustable air-vents, two more USB ports and another 230V V2L three-pin plug socket to power numerous domestic appliances inside the cabin.

The bench seat’s base cushion can be raised and stored vertically if more internal luggage space is required but there’s no under-floor storage.

With a kerb weight of only 1993kg (without tray) and 3200kg GVM, our test vehicle has a 1207kg payload rating. However, after you add the combined weight of its steel tray and other accessories (417kg), the payload rating is reduced by the same amount to 790kg. Even so, that still leaves a sizeable weight capacity for up to five tradies and their tools.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6250kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) the payload would have to be reduced by 450kg (from 790kg to 340kg) to avoid exceeding the GCM.

In real-world use it’s unlikely that many (if any) Triton owners would need to tow 3500kg but it’s important to be across these numbers to avoid overloading, which is dangerous and illegal.

The genuine accessory galvanised steel tray is internally 1650mm long and 1780mm wide. It has a robust checker-plate floor and a tube-frame front bulkhead with sturdy wire-mesh rear window protection.

There’s also swing-up load retainers on top of the tube-frame on each side, which when paired with the matching rear tube-rack accessory provides secure carrying space for extension ladders or long lengths of timber and PVC pipe/conduit.

There’s also external rope/strap rails along each side but like all steel trays we’ve come across there’s no internal load-anchorage points.

The driver and front passenger have access to a bottle holder and storage bin in each front door plus an overhead glasses holder and a large open compartment above the glovebox. The centre console offers more open storage plus two bottle/cupholders in the centre and a usefully-sized box at the back with a lid that doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

The rear bench seat is comfortable and surprisingly spacious for tall people, given I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat when set in my position, I have about 40mm of kneeroom and 60mm of headroom.

There’s also adequate head clearance for those seated in the slightly higher centre position, but the floor’s prominent transmission tunnel requires one boot either side and knees together between the front seat backrests.

And like all dual-cab utes short of a full-size US pick-up, rear shoulder room is squeezy for three adults, which is tolerable for short trips but a maximum of two adults would be ideal for longer drives.

Rear seat storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. The centre seat’s backrest also folds forward to serve as an armrest with dual bottle/cup-holders.

The bench seat’s base cushion is fixed, so unlike numerous rivals it can’t swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required.

The Triton’s cab-chassis list pricing (without tray) starts at $34,490 for the GLX single-cab 4x2 manual and finishes at $61,540 for the premium GSR dual-cab 4x4 auto.

Our GLX test vehicle comes standard with a 2.4-litre twin-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine (shared by all Tritons) and optional six-speed automatic for $49,490. This pricing is competitive with base-model 4x4 dual-cab-chassis equivalents like the Toyota HiLux Workmate ($48,735), Ford Ranger XL ($49,230) and Isuzu D-Max SX ($51,200).

However, our example is loaded with numerous items from Mitsubishi’s genuine accessories range including a steel tray ($5775), rear ladder rack ($951.42), steel bull-bar ($4755), driving lights ($1295), side-steps ($1750) and 3500kg towing kit/electronic brake controller ($2370).

This desirable ensemble adds almost $17,000 to the price, which with on-road costs would be nudging $70K to drive away. So, buyers must keep their budgets in mind, as it’s easy to get carried away in genuine accessory lolly shops.

Our test vehicle comes standard with 17-inch steel wheels and 265/65R17 all-terrain tyres plus a full-size spare. It also has heavy-duty rear suspension and underbody armour, front/rear parking sensors, reversing camera, tyre-pressure monitoring and more.

The work-focused cabin has wipe-clean fabric seat trim and vinyl floors, power-adjustable driver’s lumbar support, twin 12-volt accessory sockets and USB ports, 7.0-inch driver’s instrument cluster and a four-speaker audio system controlled by a 9.0-inch multimedia screen with Android Auto, Apple CarPlay and Bluetooth connectivity.

The hybrid drivetrain provides permanent all-wheel drive courtesy of its two electric motors, with the front motor producing up to 170kW/310Nm driving the front wheels and the rear motor providing up to 150kW/340Nm driving the rears.

These motors are teamed with a 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine producing up to 135kW/260Nm, which serves dual roles as a generator to maintain charge in the 29.58kWh ‘Blade’ lithium-ion battery and to assist with driving the front wheels as required. It can also perform both roles simultaneously.

Charging of the propulsion battery is assisted by regenerative braking served in a choice of standard or high strength, along with three energy management settings from pure EV mode to full Hybrid (HEV) mode.

The combined official output is up to 321kW/650Nm. There are also three drive modes comprising Eco/Normal/Sport plus different all-terrain settings to optimise performance in Mud/Sand/Snow/Mountain.

The plug-in propulsion battery can be charged using either the AC Type 2 (7.0kW) port or DC CCS/2 (55kW) port.

Our test vehicle features a traditional body-on-frame chassis design, combined with double-wishbone front and rear suspension which enhances ride and handling. There’s also rack-and-pinion steering and four-wheel disc brakes.

The turning circle is a compact 11 metres, combined with off-road credentials including 230mm of unladen ground clearance with 31 degrees approach/17 degrees ramp-over/19.3 degrees departure angles.

Its standard wading depth is capped at 530mm (compared to the ute's 700mm) to allow for the lower height of the electrical components located in the driver's side storage box.

The Triton’s 2.4-litre four-cylinder diesel engine is equipped with two turbochargers that work in sequence to boost efficiency, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one optimising performance at higher rpm. The result is 150kW of power at 3500rpm and torque peaking at 470Nm between 1500-2750rpm, using AdBlue to minimise emissions.

It’s paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic that offers the choice of sequential manual shifting, which can be preferable when hauling and/or towing heavy loads, particularly in hilly terrain.

The 4x4 system is dual-range, part-time offering 2H (2WD High Range), 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) controlled by a dial on the centre console. However, you need to step up to the GLX+ to get a rear diff-lock.

BYD claims combined average fuel consumption for the petrol engine as low as 2.0L/100km with 25-100 per cent SoC (State of Charge) which spikes to 7.9L/100km when SoC drops below 25 per cent.

It also claims a battery-only driving range of up to 100km and up to 800km when the dual motors and battery are assisting the petrol engine in hybrid mode. However, these figures are based on NEDC certification, which is renowned for its optimism compared to more realistic WLTP ratings.

We covered 352km during our test comprising a mix of city, suburban and regional roads plus some highway driving, of which about one third was hauling a near-maximum payload.

This included an initial 67km in pure EV mode, which depleted the battery’s charge from 92 per cent (when we collected the vehicle) to 34 per cent. It then automatically switched to HEV (hybrid) mode for the remainder of the test during which the engine charged the battery to its 70 per cent limit (for engine charging) set by BYD.

At the completion of testing the onboard computer claimed average petrol consumption of 8.1L/100km and a remaining hybrid range of 282km, suggesting a real-world driving range (including some heavy load hauling) of around 650km from the 60-litre petrol tank.

Mitsubishi claims official combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km but the dash display was showing 9.9 at the completion of our 316km test, which included the usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third of that distance was hauling its maximum payload.

Our own consumption figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, came in higher again at 10.7L/100km which is on the borderline of the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer claims and real-world consumption.

So, based on our own numbers, the test vehicle should have a real-world driving range of around 700km from its 75-litre tank.

Large handles on the A- (and B-) pillars assist climbing aboard, where most drivers will find a comfortable and supportive seating position enhanced by a large left footrest and thick-rimmed leather-wrapped steering wheel.

It’s not only quiet to drive but feels refined and solidly built. It also has excellent ride quality and agile handling thanks to the disciplined tuning of its double-wishbone suspension and nicely weighted steering which belie the fact you’re riding high in a 2.7-tonne all-terrain ute.

Near-instant torque from the dual electric motors also helps to mask its bulk which combined with permanent all-wheel drive allows triple-digit speeds to be reached in less than six seconds.

We did most of our test in the ‘Normal’ (default) drive mode, as it provides a happy medium between the heightened response of ‘Sport’ and the slightly subdued ‘Eco’ modes.

To test its GVM rating, we loaded 650kg into the load tub which with driver and about half a tank of petrol was lineball with its payload limit. The rear suspension compressed almost 60mm with the upper rear suspension arms close to nudging their rubber bump-stops, but there was no hard bottoming-out detected on our test route.

As displayed live on the energy management screen, the petrol engine maintained the minimum battery charge needed to feed the electric motors while also providing drive to the front wheels as required. At times the 1.5-litre engine sounded like it was working very hard doing this, but it did prove effective in performing these dual roles.

The heavily-loaded test vehicle also made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set-climb, which was no surprise given we had up to 650Nm of torque to work with.

However, the hybrid system with its single-speed transmission produces minimal engine-braking (even with the maximum regenerative brake setting) which is an important consideration if you regularly carry and/or tow heavy loads, particularly in hilly terrain.

Large assist-handles on the A (and B) pillars, combined with the accessory side-steps on our example, make it easy to climb aboard and find a comfortable driving position.

The unladen ride is firm, as you’d expect given its 6.0-tonne-plus GCM rating, but it’s still supple enough to soak up the bumps without the harsh kidney-belting ride suffered in some cab-chassis one-tonners we’ve tested.

This is no doubt helped by the accessories fitted, which provide more than 400kg of additional sprung weight to engage the heavy-duty rear springs and improve the ride quality. That’s something to keep in mind if you often drive unladen.

The steering is firmly weighted and the brakes have good response, with the rear drums offering a terrier-like bite when the manual handbrake is applied on steep hills with a heavy load on board.

The four-cylinder 2.4-litre diesel, with its sequential turbocharging and strong outputs, provides energetic all-round performance with efficient gearing that ensures its operating within its peak torque band most of the time.

However, at highway speeds it does tend to hold top gear for too long, when the engine has dropped below 1500rpm and is clearly wanting a downshift.

To test its payload rating, we strapped 650kg on the tray which when combined with accessories and crew was right on the weight limit. The stout rear springs compressed only 25mm under this load, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that assured there was no bottoming-out on our test route.

The Triton handled this task with competence, maintaining good performance and chassis stability. It easily hauled this load up our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb at 60km/h, with the six-speed auto self-shifting down to third gear and 2500rpm which was comfortably within its peak torque band. Engine braking on the way down was also commendable.

Our only gripe is the driver distraction monitoring system which is still too reactive in certain situations, like scratching an itch below my eye even though I was looking straight ahead while doing it. Even though Mitsubishi has tried to improve this system, it needs more refinement, as it detracts from an otherwise positive driving experience.

The Triton comes with a five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2024) and a suite of passive and active features highlighted by eight airbags (including side-curtains), auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian/cyclist detection and junction assist, rear AEB when reversing, front/rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping, front/rear parking sensors, reversing camera, trailer stability assist and lots more. Rear seat has ISOFIX child-seat anchorages on the two outer rear seating positions and three top-tethers.

Comes standard with a six-year/150,000km vehicle warranty (Ford has recently topped this with seven years/unlimited km if Ford dealer serviced) and separate eight-year/160,000km propulsion battery warranty. There’s also 12 months of complimentary roadside assistance from the date of purchase.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/20,000km, whichever occurs first. Capped pricing for the first six scheduled services totals $2945 or an average of $491.00 annually. BYD has an evolving national network of around 120-150 dealerships spanning all states and territories, including many regional areas.

It comes with a five-year/100,000km standard warranty, or 10 years/200,000km if serviced at Mitsubishi dealers.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Pricing is capped at $6860 for 10 scheduled services up to 10 years/150,000km, or an average of $686 per service.

Mitsubishi currently has more than 200 dealers across its national network that spans metro, rural and regional areas. Mitsubishi dealerships are also service centres.