Alfa Romeo Tonale vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

What's the difference?

If you’re an ‘Alfa Romeo person’, or even just an ‘Italian car person’, you’ve got this on your short list and there’s little I can say that will change your mind. 

And you wouldn’t be making a bad decision if you did pick up a Tonale.

But if $80,000 sounds like a lot for a small SUV and you still want something that looks stylish and feels special, the mild-hybrid Tonale Veloce should do, if the likes of the X1, Q3, or XC40 don’t scratch that left-of-centre itch.

And a fun small SUV? A Mini Countryman JCW, Audi SQ2 or VW T-Roc R are all different sizes, but all more powerful than the Alfa and all fall below the $70,000 mark.

But, if you’re keen on that plug-in hybrid drivetrain and have a day-to-day lifestyle that’ll allow you to make the most of its electric range (and most major city-dwelling Australians do to some extent), then the outlay might just be worth it to be able to check out the Tonale in your garage or driveway every day.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug-in Hybrid EV is an interesting inclusion for the brand, especially as it is typically considered a ‘value player’ in the market.

But with negligible real-world fuel consumption benefits if you drive beyond the limited EV range and a high price premium over the non-PHEV models, it’s important you see if the sums add up for your particular needs.

Primarily going to use the car for running around town? Cool. Think the 50-ish-kay EV range will work for you and make you happy? Amazing. Sold on the look of the car? Hat tipped.

But let me say this - if you are considering the Eclipse Cross PHEV, there are some alternatives you should also have on your list, including the MG HS PHEV, the Hyundai Ioniq PHEV, Kia Niro PHEV, and - the one I’d buy - a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. For me, plug-in hybrid tech is a bit of a halfway house, in most instances offering too high a price premium for the range you’re getting to drive electric. Heck, a Kona Electric isn’t much more than the top-spec Exceed PHEV, and I’d have that if I wanted a real day-to-day EV experience.

If Alfa any traditionalists are hesitant to embrace the Tonale’s hybrid drivetrain, surely the Tonale’s styling has the opposite effect.

Small SUVs can fall victim to trying to look too much like a hatchback, or being plastered with lots of little trim details to break up large areas. The Tonale, on the other hand, looks like an SUV regardless of size, and its styling elements are decidedly restrained.

Most notably, at the front, Alfa Romeo has employed the ‘scudetto’ shield-shaped grille and horizontal lower grilles to form the ‘trefoil’, a face as familiar as BMW’s kidney grille or the Porsche 911’s round headlights.

The aforementioned ‘3+3’ headlights are sleek, and somewhat mirrored by similarly styled tail-lights that flank a light bar across the middle of the boot. Badging is minimal, the ‘Tonale’ on the rear in a cursive ‘Alfa’ typeface and the small ‘Veloce’ lettering found only on the front three-quarter panels.

The 20-inch wheels are so Alfa Romeo in their ‘teledial’ circular design, though all three wheel options for the Tonale fit into this theme. In a car park or on the driveway, they’re certainly eye-catching to those not expecting them - a friend said upon sight of this test car, "Look at the wheels. They’re silly! I love them!".

Inside, the cabin space isn’t too ‘busy’ with visual elements, though some of those that are there - the row of buttons for climate control or the multimedia screen, for example - are possibly a little too simple. The buttons could be from any old car, and the screen looks like a ‘tacked on’ rectangle.

Just about everything else looks suitably restrained but relatively elegant for a small SUV, though, with elements like the steering wheel remaining rather simple and (in modern terms) timeless. The paddles behind it are a bit of visual theatre, too.

Like the exterior, the interior adopts some circular cues like the air vents, door speakers, DNA drive mode dial, and even the cowl over the driver display. 

The second row is a little more spartan, with little in the way of visual ‘wow’ and a disappointingly basic vent (albeit adjustable in two different directions) and USB ports mounted in hard grey plastic.

For the most part, the interior looks quality, and with relatively minimal hard or scratchy plastic, feels it too.

You’re going to be able to tell the PHEV model from its more conventional counterparts by those oversized ‘Plug-in Hybrid EV’ badges on the front doors, and if you want to tell those behind you what you’re driving, there’s also a ‘PHEV’ badge there, too. Wait, wasn’t the plan to do away with the term ‘PHEV’, Mitsubishi? 

But aside from that, the outside features just the different 18-inch alloy wheels (which are the same on all PHEV models, no matter the cost - I think that’s a bit lame, because if I’m spending $7500 on the Exceed I’d like a different wheel design!). Oh, and the Aspire and Exceed get that different lower front splitter, too.

Plus the PHEV has two fuel filler doors - one on each side of the car over the rear wheels. The driver’s side one is the EV charging ports (x2 - detailed below), and the passenger’s side one is for the petrol. Note: while the EV port is push-openable, the petrol cap still requires you to lift a lever in the driver’s footwell. 

It may be categorised a small SUV but at 4545mm long, riding on a 2670mm wheelbase, 1805mm wide and 1685mm tall, it’s big for its boots. The popular Mazda CX-5 is only 5mm longer, and it plays in the midsize SUV segment!

Inside there are some design differences, with a specific gear joystick-style selector, and a different instrument panel.

It is impressive how the brand has managed to shoehorn a petrol engine, two electric motors, a battery pack and more into the car, but there are some practicality implications. Read about them in the next section.

Inside, the Tonale feels relatively spacious for a small SUV, with possibly more places to put things than you might expect from a traditionally enthusiast-focused brand. 

In both front and rear seats, no part of the body or console impedes on passenger space - though the door armrests feel like they're a little far to comfortably rest an elbow on - and nothing gets in the way when reaching controls or the centre console.

Ergonomically, everything falls well to hand and no far reaches are really required, though the cupholders in the centre are a little narrow for some relatively normal-sized cups or bottles, and have rubber grips inside that require a little extra pull to retrieve items from.

Other options for bottles include the door pockets, or for a small bottle even the centre console bin is quite deep (albeit narrow).

Smartphones, even fairly tall ones, will rest securely in the angled - a nice touch - wireless charging bay, though while having the phone in a position it won’t slide out from is a plus, angling a phone screen to be visible to the driver might be too tempting for some. It is, mercifully, a little obscured by the gear shifter.

On controls, the steering-wheel design hasn’t changed for more than half a decade which, honestly, is so, so fine. Really, Alfa’s steering wheel has few buttons including the engine start, a relatively timeless (read: simple) visual style, and a thin rim with moulded thumb rests that encourage 9-and-3 hand positions.

The buttons on the wheel are easy, clear, and feel nice, and controlling the driver display is relatively easy as there aren’t really sub-menus to get lost in.

The main multimedia screen is also relatively well laid out, marking a nice step up from previous Uconnect systems (Jeep and Fiat owners will also know), though the connectivity with wireless phone mirroring, Android Auto in my case, was a little laggy and dropped out occasionally, seemingly in the same spot on the same Melbourne CBD street during my commute each morning.

The downsides are relatively few on the practicality front, but there is another: the boot space in the hybrid suffers due to the battery space needed, so 500 litres for the non-plug-in Tonale variants is down to 385 litres for the PHEV.

That’s still less than an electric Volvo XC40 Recharge (claimed to be 418L), though fortunately it grows to a spacious 1430 with the seats folded down, and is accessible via an automatic electrically opening boot door.

Another important point, while we’re in the boot, is the lack of spare tyre. Instead, a repair kit is provided - something those who enjoy a road trip might lament.

Up front, the cabin is a pretty smart place, with nice enough materials and finishes, and a few good storage options. There’s a cubby in front of the shifter, but oddly enough it doesn’t have a wireless charger (there are 2x USB 2.0 ports above) and isn’t quite big enough for a smartphone (even the smaller ones don’t fit there all that easily), and there are cup holders between the seats, a decent covered centre console bin, and door pockets large enough for bottles.

The PHEV models get a different instrument cluster dial for EV driving readout info, but all have the old-school 4.2-inch TFT colour display that lacks the size and usability of some rivals with larger info screens - the MG HS PHEV, for instance, has a 12.3-inch digital display, which shows you a lot more info than this tiny little screen does. Heck, there’s not even a digital speedometer in there - and you only get one if you buy the Exceed model, which has a head-up display (HUD).

That’s part of the problem with the way this car’s interface operates. If you want the most detailed information you need to use the touchscreen media system, but that negates the usability of the media functions. On multiple occasions I found myself switching between Apple CarPlay phone calls and searching for that particular driving info screen I found most useful (there are about 15 screens to choose from, and plenty of them are hard to decipher).

It’s a huge disappointment for a customer who might want to see all that detailed information but also listen to a podcast, answer a call, follow their phone’s mapping or just have anything other than the hybrid info come up on the infotainment screen. The screen itself - an 8.0-inch unit, with sat nav integrated into the top spec only - is fine, but small compared to today’s rivals.

In the back seat, there’s a compromise for cabin space. The leg room is good, but the seat has been bumped up to accommodate some of the electrical hardware and the petrol tank, meaning someone my size (182cm/6’0”) will find they’ve got enough room for their legs but not their head, and those even larger will really need to take care getting in and out. While pre-facelift examples of this car had a clever sliding second row seat, that’s gone. It was never a feature in any PHEV version, and undoubtedly the layout of the battery pack has something to do with that. 

The double pane sunroof no doubt eats into the space in the rear to a degree as well, and in the Exceed it likely feels a bit more cramped because of the black headliner. 

While three adults could potentially fit across the back row for very short trips, there are dual ISOFIX and three top-tether points for child seats. The Exceed is the one you want if you’re aiming to treat your rear-seat passengers right: it has heated rear outboard seats, rear directional air vents and two USB ports for charging - the ES and Aspire miss out on all that stuff.  

Boot space is 359L (VDA) for PHEV models, which is a step down from the 405 litres (VDA) for the non-hybrid models. There is extra hardware under the floor, and you don’t get a spare wheel in the PHEV models either - instead there’s a tyre repair kit. For context, we only just managed to fit all three CarsGuide hard suitcases (124L, 95L and 36L) in the boot of the PHEV version, while it was far less of an issue in the non-PHEV.

Oddly, no model comes with a power tailgate. 

The 2022 Eclipse Cross PHEV line-up is expensive compared to the petrol-turbo models.

The ES AWD has a list price (all prices MSRP, before on-road costs) of $46,490, while the mid-spec Aspire costs $49,990 and the top-end Exceed lists at $53,990. 

I know they’re not like-for-like in every instance - the ES and Aspire petrol-turbo models are 2WD, not AWD, for example, and there are some specification differences, too - but the price jump from each respective non-PHEV version is $15,500 (ES), $14,250 (Aspire) and $12,500 (Exceed).

Yikes.

You’d really, really have to want the EV driving experience to justify that additional expenditure, right?

Here’s a rundown of the specifications across the three PHEV grades.

Standard for the $46,490 ES grade are 18-inch alloy wheels, LED daytime running lights, halogen headlights, keyless entry and push-button start, cloth interior trim, manual front seat adjustment, an 8.0-inch touchscreen media system with Apple CarPlay and Android auto, a reversing camera, a four speaker stereo, digital radio and a rear cargo blind.

Step up to the $49,990 Aspire and you score LED headlights and fog lights, a lower body kit, heated front seats, faux-leather and microsuede trim, auto wipers, adaptive cruise control, an eight-speaker stereo, surround view camera, front and rear parking sensors, and an array of safety equipment that we’ll cover off in the safety section.

Choosing the range-topping $53,990 Exceed model nets you leather seat trim, a heated steering wheel, a head-up display - making it the only grade with a digital speedo! - as well as sat nav, a dual pane sunroof, and a black headliner in the cabin.

Engaging driving is key to an Alfa Romeo justifying being somewhat on the pricier end of the cost spectrum, so numbers like ‘208kW’ for a total system output in a small SUV are welcome to see on paper.

The Tonale’s 1.3-litre turbocharged petrol four-cylinder engine alone makes 132kW and 270Nm, aided by an electric system outputting 90kW and 250Nm. The 208kW is its total useable peak, with Alfa not stating a peak torque figure, but a 0-100km/h claim comes in at a fairly impressive 6.2 seconds.

That’s helped by the Tonale’s all-wheel-drive nature, the front wheels driven by the engine via a six-speed torque converter automatic, and electricity powering the rears.

The plug-in hybrid version runs a non-turbocharged 2.4-litre Atkinson cycle petrol engine producing just 94kW and 199Nm.

Meagre outputs, but the petrol unit is backed by two electric motors - the front motor has outputs of 60kW/137Nm, while the rear motor produces 70kW/195Nm. It’s all controlled by a single-speed transmission.

There is no ‘combined power output’ figure, but there is a 13.8kWh lithium-ion battery pack as part of the equation as well.

The engine can power the battery pack in series hybrid driving mode, so if you want to top up the batteries before you get to a city, you can. And there is regenerative braking, of course. More on recharging in the next section.

A 42.5-litre petrol tank and a 15.5kWh lithium-ion battery combine to provide an electric driving range of 60.5km that’s backed up by the ability to charge or save power for when it’s needed by letting the internal-combustion engine (ICE) kick in.

And while this has the potential to mean essentially no fuel is used in short-run, day-to-day driving, anything resembling a longer trip means you’re unlikely to reach the kind of efficiency figures Alfa Romeo claims.

The official combined fuel consumption figure for the Tonale PHEV is 1.5L/100km, though achieving this would require stopping and recharging the battery every 100km of driving, and the driving would need to be in perfect conditions for battery range - i.e. relatively low speeds.

The Tonale PHEV is efficient, yes, but it’s not ‘1.5L/100km efficient’ in the real world if you need to take a drive longer than a standard work day with maybe an errand or two.

After 23 kilometres of real-world driving, the indicated battery range dropped from 65km (odd given Alfa’s spec sheet provided claims a 60.5km range) to 30km, an indicated drop of 35km.

A 12 km discrepancy between over just 23km of standard driving isn’t ideal, though the trip included some highway driving - not an electric drivetrain’s best stage.

Alfa Romeo says a household-style 3.0kW charger should fill the battery from empty in 5.5 hours, while a ‘fast’ charger at 7.4kW should take 2.5 hours via the Type 2 charging port.

The Eclipse Cross PHEV has an official combined cycle fuel consumption figure of 1.9L/100km. That’s astounding, really, but you need to realise that the test calculation is only for the first 100 kays - there’s a really good chance your real-world consumption will be a lot higher, as you can only deplete the battery charge once before calling on the engine (and your petrol tank) to juice it back up.

Electric driving range is stated at 55km based on NEDC cycle testing, while the WLTP rating is a more realistic 45km. In our testing we fell between the two during our “fully charged” 100km run, in which the electric charge initially ran for 50km. But, over the 100km run, the dashboard info screen said the car used “82 per cent” electric driving, while somehow also showing 3.9L/100km for petrol consumption.

I did the numbers at the fuel filler, and the actual return was 4.5L/100km. That’s okay, but not nearly as spectacular as you might hope, and I’ve seen very close in a RAV4 hybrid - which in most instances is cheaper than the Eclipse Cross despite being bigger and, frankly, a lot better.

I also ran the car for a further 100 kays without plugging in, just to see what the ‘worst case scenario’ might be - and it wasn’t too bad, with the fuel consumption jumping to a real-world return of 5.5L/100km. But again, that’s worse than you’ll likely get with a RAV4…

When it comes to charging/recharging, there is available AC charging using a Type 2 plug that can fully recharge the battery in as little as 3.5 hours, according to the brand. DC fast charging with a CHAdeMO plug should fill from zero to 80 per cent in 25 minutes. Maximum charge input is 3.6kW.

Like me, you’ll want to do the maths to see what is going to be the most economical way to run your car - aside from just plugging it in at the office and hoping nobody notices.

A standard 10-amp household plug - which should take about seven hours to replenish the batteries - could cost as little as $1.88 to get back your circa-50km EV range - that’s based on overnight charging, off-peak, on an average 13.6c/kWh electricity price. Of course, if you’re considering a PHEV, you might have a solar array and the electricity could well be free. Good for you.

But remember, there’s more to it than just the electricity costs - you need to also consider the additional purchase budget required just to get into the PHEV model over a regular Eclipse Cross. 

This might be the make-or-break topic for a select few Alfa Romeo customers - is the Tonale fun to drive?

Yes, thankfully.

Where the mild-hybrid was sometimes criticised for being slightly underwhelming for a car wearing the snake-adorned badge from Milan, the extra power, all-wheel-drive grip and electric torque delivery make the Tonale feel spirited enough for a sporty-leaning small SUV.

The DNA dial really does come into play plenty, too. 

D, for dynamic, is pretty much reserved for when you’re actually ‘driving’ the Tonale - its stiffened suspension and relatively greedy power draw isn’t for low-speed commuting or daily efficiency.

N, or natural, is best for most long-ish commuting or trip situations, particularly highway driving where relying fully on the battery range isn’t ideal, as mentioned.

A, for advanced efficiency, is the ‘EV mode’ and best suits anyone whose daily commute takes them between urban or suburban areas which can be done under EV driving, though it can be used up to 206km/h.

If you don’t mind the petrol engine kicking in on occasion, leaving ‘natural’ to its own devices will result in some relatively frugal driving - a week of testing, commuting, filming and enjoying the Tonale used less than a tank of fuel, including one round trip of more than 140km.

Commuting in the Tonale proved comfortable enough - the steering is light and the dual-stage valve suspension in its softer mode combined with the electric drivetrain resulted in a calm and controlled feeling.

Its suspension soaks up bumps well, though a consistently uneven road surface can feel a little jittery (though not harsh or crashy) after a while.

Getting more dynamic (yes, the D on the dial), however, brought out some interesting characteristics of the Tonale. That light steering is paired with a quick rack (a 14.8:1 ratio, or two-and-a-half turns lock to lock), meaning the Tonale is easy to turn in hard, and a 53F/47R weight distribution provides enough balance (paired with a low centre of gravity thanks to the battery) to keep on top of the small SUVs movements.

All four wheels being driven under its ‘dynamic’ hybrid mode means grip and acceleration in cornering is plenty useful, though braking coming into the corners via the Tonale’s ‘brake by wire’ system could be a little more feelsome.

The gearbox is very eager under acceleration, too much so for commuting, but if it doesn’t suit your needs even for spirited driving then the manual mode is there.

It’s worth noting that those huge brushed alloy shift paddles come into play here, though being attached to the column steering rather than the wheel presents a key ‘pro’ and ‘con’ each: the paddles are always in the same place, just not always in relation to your hands.

If you’re after that electric car thrill of near-silent, almost mind-blowing acceleration, the Eclipse Cross mightn’t be the right car for you

But if swift progress and the buzz you get from taking off from the traffic lights without any hesitation at all is more your thing, it could be great for you. And if you’re not quite ready to go “full EV”, then it’s probably something you’re considering.

The EV driving mode is the best driving mode in this car. You can run it just on the petrol engine to ensure you save your battery range, and you might choose to do that when you’re driving on the freeway and know you’re approaching an urban area where the EV goodness will be better used. Or you could have it so it's using battery and petrol power, and that’s where you’ll get maximum combined performance.

But running the car in the default, EV-prioritised mode means you will make the best of this powertrain's strengths, because - for the fifty odd kays you’ll get out of the battery - it’s pretty good.

It’s also impressive the way this powertrain dips between petrol engine, battery pack or both at higher speeds. When the battery range had depleted on my test drive, the engine kicked in almost imperceptibly, working to power the car and also generate more electricity for the battery pack. It then dipped out of petrol, back to battery, and so on and so forth, multiple times during my drive. 

The best thing about the way it did so was that it was smooth. There is barely any vibration from the petrol engine, the transmission doesn’t have any gears to fumble with, and overall the refinement is really good.

There are drive modes - Eco, Normal, Snow, Gravel and Tarmac - and in my test I kept to Normal. I did fiddle with the regenerative braking reactiveness, though, using the paddleshifters to dial up or down the aggressiveness of the energy recoup system. It doesn’t feel as aggressive as some pure electric cars, but thankfully it has a decent pedal feel and progression when you apply the brakes yourself. 

The steering is light and lacks feel, and doesn’t offer that much engagement or involvement. That might matter to you if you’re like me. I wish it was more fun. But at least it’s easy to park.

While the suspension is fine and comfortable on the highway, it can feel wooden and the ride is quite lumpy at low speeds. It never really feels all that well resolved for urban driving, which is a bit of a downer considering that’s likely where a car like this will spend most of its time

The tune of the suspension - being a bit firm at lower pace - surprisingly doesn’t have any payoff when it comes to cornering, as it lacks a bit of body control, shifting its weight side to side. 

All in all it is a decent plug-in hybrid offering – and will be perfectly suitable to someone who wants some EV driving as a part of their lifestyle. It’s just a matter of doing the maths as to whether it will work for you.

All Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross models have been awarded a five-star ANCAP crash test safety rating based on 2017 testing for the pre-facelift model. 

The range has increasing levels of safety technology the more you spend, but all variants have forward autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with forward collision warning (operates between 5km/h and 80km/h) and the AEB includes pedestrian detection (between 15km/h and 140km/h). 

Standard on all grades is a reversing camera, rear parking sensors, seven airbags (dual front, driver’s knee, front side, side curtain for both rows), active Yaw control, stability control, and anti-lock brakes (ABS) with brake force distribution. Lane departure warning is standard too.

Spend up on the Aspire for adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and front parking sensors. From Aspire up to Exceed, there’s the addition of the brand’s Ultrasonic Misacceleration Mitigation System, which can dull throttle response to prevent potential low speed collisions.

No speed sign recognition is available, and therefore no smart cruise control either. Plus there is no lane centring system fitted either, and nor is there a driver attention monitoring system, so it’s falling behind on the tech front.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is built in Japan.

Alfa Romeo has a relatively industry standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty for its models, and the Tonale falls under this, with five years of free roadside assistance thrown in, too.

Being a plug-in hybrid, the battery does have its own specific warranty, that being eight years or 160,000km, whichever comes first.

The first five services are priced at a maximum on Alfa Romeo’s website, listed at a top of $500 for the first (15,000km/12 months), $600 for the second (30,000km or 24 months, as the intervals go), while the third is $500, the fourth a whopping $1000 max, and the final capped price back to $500.

There’s a huge 10 year/200,000 kilometre warranty on offer - but it’s valid if you maintain your car with Mitsubishi’s dedicated dealer service network over the 10 years/200,000km timeline, or else you get a five-year/100,000km plan.

But while the rest of the car will be covered by that decade-long warranty if you service it with Mitsubishi, the battery is only covered for eight years/160,000km, no matter where you have the car serviced.

Maintenance is due every 12 months/15,000km. But just a note - the more complex powertrain means higher service costs than the regular turbo-petrol versions. The annual fees are: $299, $399, $299, $399, $299, $799, $299, $799, $399, $799; so an average cost of $339 for the first five years, or $558.90 per visit over 10 years/150,000kn. 

Included for customers who service their car with the brand is four years of roadside assist.

Do you have questions over reliability, issues, concerns, recalls, automatic transmission problems, or anything else of that ilk? Check out our Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross problems page.