Toyota HiAce vs Ford Ranger

What's the difference?

When you consider its competitive pricing (particularly for fleets), resolute resale value, robust construction, rock-solid reliability, excellent load-hauling ability, five-star safety and all-round practicality, it’s not hard to understand why the HiAce is such a popular workhorse. It’s not perfect, like any van, but when performing its intended role it’s very good.

The Ford Ranger is a strong starting point for a plug-in hybrid upgrade. And there are valid pros accompanying the addition of a high-voltage battery. But those benefits aren’t primarily seen on the road.

In fact, given its higher price, the Ranger PHEV loses out when compared to its BYD and GWM rivals, which offer more features and a far higher EV range at lower prices.

The Ranger doesn’t compromise its ‘ute-ness’ as its rivals do in different ways. But its target audience is likely relatively small. One that's willing to fork out for a capable, comfortable ute that can power a campsite or run tools on the job.

If you want an EV that just looks like a ute, this isn’t it. But if you're after a dual cab that can do proper ute things, with a bonus when it comes to efficiency and convenience, you’ll need deep pockets.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

Toyota’s unwavering adherence to rear-wheel drive ensures the HiAce has an inherent traction advantage over its predominantly front-wheel-drive rivals, particularly when hauling heavy payloads on low-grip surfaces.

Rear-wheel drive also ensures the front wheels can be turned sharply enough for its 3210mm wheelbase to deliver an impressively tight 11.0-metre turning circle. And its 1990mm height also allows access to underground loading docks and multi-storey car parks.

The chassis design is simple and robust with MacPherson strut front suspension, a leaf-spring live rear axle, variable-ratio rack and pinion steering and (on automatic variants) four-wheel disc brakes.

There’s no mesh-type cargo barrier or solid bulkhead between the cargo bay and cabin (but both are also available as genuine accessories) and the black door-handles and unpainted black plastic front and rear bumpers are designed to best withstand the wear and tear often evident in these areas on hard-working vans.

The two-tone dash layout is neat and functional, with clear analogue instrumentation and dash controls (mostly physical dials and buttons) that are easy to reach and operate. And it sticks with a good old lever-type manual handbrake instead of an electric one. All are chosen for their rugged simplicity.

The only useful item missing is a fold-down inboard armrest for the driver’s seat, offered by numerous rivals to reduce neck and shoulder strain during long days behind the wheel.

The Ford Ranger is still one of the best-looking utes available, with a strong brand identity and a lack of design features that lean into trends - perhaps aside from the ‘C-shaped’ DRL signature.

There are only a few hints that any given Ranger you might be looking at is a plug-in hybrid, with the vehicle’s panels and general design features looking primarily the same.

The most obvious change is fender badging that outs the Ranger as a ‘PHEV’, though its lettering isn’t too ‘shouty’.

But to those more familiar with the Ranger, or anyone able to have a proper look around a PHEV, there are a couple of other giveaways.

For example, the Ranger plug-in has a new set of wheel designs that range from the 17-inch alloys on the XLT to the Stormtrak-specific 18s featuring 'Chill Grey' inserts as trim accents.

The Stormtrak can also be had in Chill Grey, the colour being exclusive to that variant along with the aforementioned unique trim design.

There are also plug outlets in the ute’s tub for access to the Ranger’s battery power. Harder to spot if you’re looking at one of the higher-spec variants that feature a roller cover.

Inside, it’s a similar story with the PHEV’s interior being standard Ranger fare aside from the button that controls its EV modes.

Our barn-door-equipped test vehicle has a hefty 2245kg kerb weight and 3300kg GVM, which results in a genuine one-tonne-plus payload rating of 1055kg. Up to 120kg of that weight can be carried on Toyota’s triple roof-rack set.

It’s also rated to tow up to 1500kg of braked trailer, which is less than some rivals but in reality should adequately cover most towing requirements of van operators.

And with its 4800kg GCM rating (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time), that means it can carry its maximum payload while towing its maximum trailer weight. So, that’s a combined total of more than 2.5 tonnes of cargo-carrying ability, which would comfortably meet or exceed most job requirements.

The generously-sized cargo bay, which offers an impressive 6.2 cubic metres of load volume, is accessed from either side through sliding doors with large 1010mm openings, or from the rear through the optional barn doors which can be opened to 180 degrees (with special lower hinges to hold them there) allowing easy access for forklifts.

The cargo bay is 2530mm long, 1760mm wide and 1340mm high and with 1268mm between the rear wheel housings it can swallow up to two standard Aussie pallets or up to three Euro pallets, held in place by a choice of six load-anchorage points.

There’s plenty of internal lighting, the walls and doors are lined to mid-height and the roof features a full-length internal lining, which is unusual for vans and we suspect contributes to suppression of tyre noise emanating from the rear wheel housings.

Cabin storage includes a large bottle holder and bin in the base of each front door, small-bottle/cupholders on either side of the dash and in the centre, plus a single glove box. The well-designed centre console offers another two bottle holders plus large internal storage, which is capped by a hinged lid that multi-tasks as a shallow storage tray and handy work desk.

The Ford Ranger’s interior is impressive for a dual-cab ute when it comes to layout and functionality.

A large 12-inch touchscreen dominates the central space on the dash, but there are still physical controls for the climate settings and the screen has shortcuts to main functions thanks to Ford’s 'Sync' software.

A big 12.4-inch driver display is similarly handy, being clear in its layout and able to be customised to the extent you’d expect from a modern bit of kit.

As mentioned, in the XLT you miss out on a few goodies, but the phone charger found in other variants is placed out of the way, under the screen and behind the gear shift.

Cupholders are similarly out of the way of any buttons or controls, and the gear-shifter itself is mercifully a traditional one rather than a dial or buttons.

With everything in an ergonomically sensible place, it’s similarly comforting that the seats and the steering wheel can be adjusted to find a suitable position.

It’s still a dual-cab ute, so don’t anticipate ‘melt-into-the-seat’ levels of comfort, but the space on offer in the front and rear seats is enough for an adult to feel at ease on even a long trip.

Behind the cabin, there’s space for two euro pallets according to Ford, with a payload as high as 973kg for the XLT. The Stormtrak’s 808kg payload is the lowest of the bunch, with Sport (934kg) and Wildtrak (885kg) slotting in between.

There’s a spare tyre underneath the tub and the ability to tow a 3500kg braked trailer - all combining to make it the most functional workhorse on offer in the plug-in hybrid ute segment. The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV can tow 3.5-tonne and the BYD Shark 6’s payload is okay, but neither can do it all.

That said, the Ranger falls short in the plug-in game, which we’ll get to shortly.

The Ford Ranger PHEV is not cheap. While rivals kick off in the $50,000-bracket, the entry-level Ranger PHEV XLT starts from $71,990, before on-road costs.

The range tops out at $86,990 for the PHEV Stormtrak, which is approaching Raptor territory.

For reference, the BYD Shark starts at $57,990, while the GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV kicks off from $59,990.

The standard features list for the Ranger PHEV is pretty slim when it comes to interior mod-cons. The base model even makes do with halogen headlights as opposed to more commonly standard LEDs.

With cloth seats, no phone charger pad, manual adjust seats and even a more rudimental cruise control system than the rest of the range, more than $70,000 is a big ask.

The Ranger Sport adds some quite useful features and is only $4000 more, at $75,990.

LED headlights and DRLs, a sports bar and 18-inch alloys to replace the XLT’s 17s are visual clues, while inside there’s leather-accented seats, heated for the front row and the driver’s is electrically adjustable. Plus a wireless phone charger ups the tech on offer.

The $79,990 PHEV Wildtrak adds matrix LED headlights with auto-levelling and auto high beam, some unique trim including a different grille and a sail plane, as well as a roller shutter over the ute’s tub.

For more comfy vibes inside there’s ambient lighting, Wildtrak-specific leather seats with electric adjustment for the driver and front passenger and a premium 10-speaker sound system.

It also adds surround view parking cameras and Ford’s trailer assist system.

Finally, the top-of-the-range Stormtrak slots in at a relatively steep $86,990.

It gains a unique grille design, and other exclusive styling cues including specific wheels. But it’s the rack and cargo systems and auxiliary switches that owners will likely find handy.

Toyota’s well-proven 1GD-FTV 2.8 litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel, which also powers Toyota’s HiLux, Fortuna and Prado model lines, produces 130kW at 3400rpm and (in auto models like ours) 450Nm of torque between 1600-2400rpm. Its Euro 5 emissions compliance doesn’t require AdBlue, which minimises maintenance and running costs.

The refined and smooth-shifting six-speed torque converter automatic offers the choice of sequential manual shifting if required. Fuel efficiency is also optimised with full torque converter lock-up on fourth, fifth and sixth gears, along with overdrive on fifth and sixth being ideal for highway driving. The inherent traction advantage of rear-wheel drive is enhanced by an electronically controlled automatic limited-slip diff.

The Ranger PHEV remains an off-road-capable 4x4 ute, with all four wheels receiving power. But the drivetrain is not your standard Ranger gear.

Ford’s 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder 'EcoBoost' engine does the heavy lifting, aided by an electric motor mounted between it and the transmission.

The engine isn’t unproven in the ute game. In fact, it’s found in some variants of the current-gen Ranger’s cousin, the Volkswagen Amarok.

In the Ranger PHEV, it makes 138kW and 411Nm which, paired with the 75kW electric motor, contributes to a total 207kW and 697Nm output, transferred to all four wheels via Ford’s 10-speed automatic transmission.

Of course, the ute’s 4WD system is able to be set to '2H', '4A', '4H' or '4L' and has a rear diff-lock to assist in traversing tricky terrain.

Toyota claims combined average consumption of 7.9L/100km for our test vehicle, but the dash readout was showing 11.0L/100km when we stopped to refuel after 270km of testing.

This was conducted with the engine’s auto start/stop function switched off and comprised a mix of city, suburban and highway driving, of which about one third was hauling a near-maximum payload.

Our own figure, calculated from actual fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was higher again at 11.8, which still isn’t bad for a vehicle with a kerb weight exceeding 2.2 tonnes driven mostly in busy urban traffic and hauling almost one tonne during our test. So, based on our ‘real-world’ consumption figures, you could expect a driving range of around 600km from its 70-litre tank.

Ford claims the Ranger PHEV sips 2.9L/100km according to NEDC testing, but like many plug-in hybrids that would be difficult to achieve without constantly stopping to charge.

It’s also only able to charge the 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery at a 3.5kW rate under AC power and it takes around four hours to do so. There’s no DC fast charging.

It’s got a 70-litre fuel tank, and requires minimum 91 RON petrol.

During the launch drive, the highest figure reasonable driving produced in terms of a fuel consumption on the trip computer was 9.6L/100km during battery charging.

So, while theoretical range is around 2400km, that closer to real-world number reduces the distance between fills to a still useful 730km.

Ford didn’t offer an expected general consumption figure for ‘low-power’ driving - i.e. while the battery isn’t being actively charged but also isn’t carrying enough juice to fully propel the ute.

It’s easy for drivers of most shapes and sizes to find a comfortable driving position in the spacious cabin, given its height/reach adjustable steering wheel, large left footrest and supportive seating with power-adjustable lumbar support.

Although there’s a huge blind spot over the driver’s left shoulder created by the solid walls of the cargo bay, active driver aids including blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and rear-view camera minimise the potential hazards of changing lanes and reversing out of driveways into busy traffic.

Braking is reassuringly strong and the steering is responsive, with easy manoeuvrability thanks to the conspicuously tight turning circle and lightness of the variable-ratio steering at parking speeds.

The ride quality is reasonably supple when unladen or lightly loaded and, for a van without a bulkhead between the cabin and cargo bay, has comparatively low internal noise levels at speeds up to 80km/h.

The 2.8-litre turbo-diesel, with its sizeable 450Nm of torque, has strong low-rpm response and displays good flexibility in city and suburban driving.

Its performance is optimised by the smooth-shifting six-speed auto, which also delivers fuel-efficient highway travel that requires less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h. The sequential manual-shifting function can be handy in certain situations, like carrying/towing heavy loads in hilly terrain.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 890kg into the cargo bay, which combined with the driver equalled a total payload of 990kg that was only 65kg shy of its 1055kg limit.

The stout rear leaf-springs only compressed about 30mm under this loading, which left more than 60mm of static bump-stop clearance that was more than enough to ensure there was no bottoming-out on our test route.

The turbo-diesel’s ample torque made light work of hauling this payload in city, suburban and highway driving. It was also particularly strong in the hills, where it easily conquered our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb in third gear.

Engine braking on the way down, in a manually selected second gear, wasn’t as strong but far from disgraced given the near one-tonne payload it was trying to restrain. Even so, its four-wheel disc brakes were more than capable of keeping speeds in check.

Our only criticism is the high internal noise levels at highway speeds, when tyre roar through the rear wheel housings can become intolerable over long distances, particularly on coarse bitumen surfaces with an empty cargo bay amplifying the noise.

In our experience, this is a problem shared by all vans at these speeds if they’re not equipped with a sealed cabin bulkhead. So, if your work involves a lot of highway travel, we would recommend fitting one that's available in Toyota’s genuine accessories range. Or buying some earplugs.

During a presentation and Q&A to media before the launch drive program, the Ford Australia team was keen to spruik how handy the PHEV’s battery would be for things like powering worksite equipment or for use during camping trips.

Alternately, focus on how the battery might come into play while on the road was modest. And behind the wheel it became clear why.

On-paper, the 49km electric driving range seems handy, but the NEDC testing which produced that figure is known for being optimistic.

On top of that, the launch program's highway driving wasn’t prime EV territory. In fact, we were encouraged to keep the cars in ‘charge’ mode to leave enough electric power in reserve to experience the Ranger PHEV’s off-road capabilities.

As mentioned, fuel consumption doesn’t exactly skyrocket even while the engine is charging the battery, but to make the most of the Ranger’s EV range you’d want to have a relatively short commute.

In terms of its on-road manners, the Ranger’s status as a benchmark for the category means even with the extra weight of the battery, the PHEV performs well.

Its 75kW EV output means driving under the electric motor’s power alone is reserved for low speed, but it does well to boost the torque provided by the engine. While it’s no sports car, it doesn’t feel sluggish.

The Ranger’s suspension does well to balance relative softness when it comes to bumps and rough surfaces without feeling like it doesn’t have the ute's weight under control.

If you want the best on-road driving experience from a Ranger, a V6-powered variant will provide the balance of comfort and power you seek.

Off-road, the PHEV’s capability is likely more than enough for most weekend warriors.

The electrified ute’s ability to use battery and engine to carefully cover terrain that would likely intimidate any off-road beginner is impressive. But we'll wait until we can get the Ranger PHEV onto home turf for a proper off-highway test before making a definitive judgement.

The Ranger PHEV comes with the same safety kit as its diesel counterpart, depending on variant, aside from the addition of an acoustic alert for pedestrians when in EV mode.

Adaptive cruise, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, pre-collision assist and lane-keeping plus tyre pressure monitoring are all standard. 

There are a couple of features that only come with higher grades. For example, the PHEV XLT is the only variant to miss out on lane-centring (more specific than lane-keeping) and traffic sign recognition.

The Wildtrak and Stormtrak are the only variants to feature a surround-view camera set-up and Ford’s trailer reverse assist.

The Ranger PHEV also has nine airbags as standard, which is plenty for even a passenger vehicle, including front, side, knee and full-length curtain airbags, plus a far-side (front centre) driver airbag.

There are also outboard ISOFIX points in the second row with top tethers for child restraints.

In terms of on-road behaviour, the Ranger’s safety systems work away in the background rather than intervening in everyday driving.

Even during off-roading, the Ranger’s active safety didn’t overstep in providing alerts to the driver about obstacles or, importantly, intervening during moments that required careful, considered input.

It is covered by a five-year/unlimited km warranty. Scheduled servicing is a relatively short six months/10,000km intervals, whichever occurs first. Capped-price of $290 per service covers the first six scheduled services over three years or 60,000km.

Ford’s five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the Ranger PHEV, but like all electrified Fords there’s an eight-year or 160,000km warranty on the high-voltage battery.

Ford also has set pricing for the first five years of servicing at a reasonable $399 per service, with the recommended interval set at 12 months or 15,000km.