Toyota GR Corolla vs Citroen C4

What's the difference?

The GR Corolla had a lot to live up to before, given the likes of the GR Yaris and GR86 fit their briefs so well.

Now, with a little more daily useability and a little more performance, the GR Corolla is even better at both sides of its Jekyl and Hyde personality.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

It’s weird, wonderful and fun, in more ways that one. I think every segment could use an oddball alternative like the C4. Citroen has successfully transformed it from a hatch to a small SUV with a difference. It’s not going to be for everyone – few Citroens are – but those who are willing to take a chance will be rewarded with a surprisingly competitive little package that stands apart from the crowd.

The Corolla already looks more sporting than most hatchbacks even before the GR treatment, but a few tweaks up front, some wider wheel arches and a third exhaust exit at the back have this thing looking almost ready for a rallycross.

The only downside to that is the changes are relatively minor from some angles. If you weren’t aware of the GR version, you'd need to see the GR Corolla from the front or spot that exhaust to know something was up.

The update has, however, ushered in a change at the front bumper, where the air intakes have been adjusted for improved airflow “to the radiator, intercooler, brake ducts, sub radiator and automatic transmission fluid cooler”

In part, this was necessary to help cool the new automatic gearbox, though it does generally help with overall cooling.

While the GR Corolla looks the part, there’s more function to it. The air that passes in through the side intakes at the front is vented to a duct in the wheel arch that also cools the brakes.

It’s the same as the GR Yaris sibling in terms of the philosophy behind aerodynamics and cooling in many ways, though much of the Yaris is bespoke, where on the Corolla, parts have been attached to the standard body.

Like the outside, the inside of the GR Corolla is mostly the same bones as its non-hot-hatch relatives, but the aforementioned sports seats, leather trim and aluminium pedals are all fairly strong hints this isn’t quite ‘hire car spec’.

It’s really hard to stand out in Australia’s busy marketplace, especially in this small SUV space, where there doesn’t really seem to be as much of a design rulebook as there is in other segments.

Rooflines are wildly different, as are beltines and light profiles. While some may decry the fall of the hatchback to these more high-riding options, at least some of them are bringing fresh design ideas to the car world.

Our C4 is a great example. An SUV perhaps in profile only, it sports a slinky descending roofline, tall, contoured bonnet, a frowny-face LED profile, and characterful plastic claddings, which are a continuation of Citroen’s ‘Airbump’ elements, which gave cars like the previous-generation C4 Cactus such a unique look.

The rear is this car’s most confronting angle, with a post-modern approach to the light profile, and in reference to C4s past, a spoiler integrated into the rear tailgate.

It looks cool, contemporary, and I think is successful in its aim to blend the sporty elements from the hatch world with the sought-after high-riding elements of an SUV.

It certainly caught a few eyeballs in my time with it, and if nothing else, a bit of attention is something the Citroen brand desperately needs.

In the past you could rely on this brand to give you a funky interior, but one that sadly also came with its fair share of sub-par plastics and strange ergonomic. So I’m pleased to report that the new C4 dips into the better looking and feeling Stellantis parts catalogue for a still interesting yet more coherent experience this time around.

The modern look and feel of this car continues with interesting seat designs, a high-riding dash with a higher degree of digitization than before, and improved ergonomic features (even over some notable Peugeots). We’ll talk more about those in the practicality section, but the C4 feels as weird and different from behind the wheel as you’d hope , with an odd dash profile, a fun and minimalist steering yoke, and attention-to-detail elements, like a detail strip that runs through the door trims and across the seats.

These elements are welcome and help separate this Citroen from its Peugeot siblings. It will need this going forward, as it also now shares much of its switchgear and screens with its sister brand.

This is largely a good thing, with the 10-inch screen looking and feeling good and slotting into this car’s design nicely.

As far as hatchbacks to build a daily-useable hot hatch upon go, the Corolla is a relatively solid starting point in terms of ergonomics.

Physical buttons and controls for things like climate are within reach for most functions of the car, though the multimedia touchscreen itself isn’t the most up-to-date.

The seats are comfortable but hold you firmly in place, and the steering wheel, pedals, and shifter are all in the correct positions for engaging driving - particularly important in the manual version.

The storage space is where the GR Corolla disappoints a little. There’s door card space for a water bottle, cupholders, the wireless device charger, but not really anywhere for larger items.

Behind the front row, adults will find themselves a little cramped in terms of kneeroom, while dark interior materials make the second row feel poorly lit.

Further back in the Corolla is the 213-litre boot, which is pretty small even for a hatchback, although Toyota lists a maximum 503 litres with the seats folded down.

Under the boot floor is a tyre repair kit, rather than a spare tyre. Keep that in mind if undertaking a road trip.

The C4 brings some interesting practicality elements. There are a few areas where it’s even better than the improved layouts of recent Peugeot models.

The cabin feels spacious, with the C4’s relatively long wheelbase providing ample room in both rows. Adjustability is good for the driver, although it is worth noting that the seats have an odd blend of manual adjust for sliding fore and aft, contrasted with electrical adjust for seat height and tilt.

Comfort is superb from the memory-foam stuffed and thick synthetic-leather-clad seats. I don’t know why more cars don’t adopt this approach to seat design. You sink into these seats and are left feeling like you’re floating above the ground rather than sitting on something. The feeling here is unmatched in the small SUV space.

The massage function is a wholly unnecessary addition, and with the thick seat cladding, it didn’t really add much to the experience.

The seat bases aren’t too high either, unlike some cars in the SUV class, but the dash design itself is very tall, so people shorter than my 182cm height might find extra adjustment is required to see over the bonnet.

There are large bottle holders in each door with a very small bin; dual cupholders in the centre console, and a small armrest console box.

There’s also an odd little two-tiered shelf under the climate unit, with a removable base for extra storage underneath. It seems to me that the top shelf is a missed opportunity to place a wireless charger, although connectivity is handy with the choice of USB-C or USB 2.0 to connect to the wired phone mirroring.

A big win is the presence of a full dial set for not just volume but the climate unit too. This is something the Citroen scores over some of the new Peugeots, which have moved the climate functions to the screen.

Somewhat less wonderful are the digital dash cluster and holographic head-up display. These seem to be a bit redundant in the information they display to the driver, and the digital dash has no customisation, leaving me wondering what the point of it is.

The C4 also has some interesting innovations on the front passenger side. It has an unusually large glovebox and a neat little sliding tray, which looks like something from a Bond car.

It also has a slide-out tablet holder. This odd little thing lets you securely mount a tablet to the dash to provide a multimedia solution for the front passenger, which may be good for entertaining larger kids on longer journeys. Or adults who don't want to talk to the driver. It’s a neat inclusion, but I’m not sure how many people will use it in the real world.

The back seat offers a remarkable amount of room. I’m 182cm tall and had heaps of knee room behind my own driving position. The nice seat trims continue, as does the patternwork and detailing, which is the kind of attention to detail you don’t always get from rivals.

Headroom is a little limited, but you also score dual adjustable air vents and a single USB port.

The boot comes in at a hatch-sized 380-litres (VDA). It’s a neat, square shape with no little cutaways at the sides and is just big enough to fit our full CarsGuide demo luggage set, but leaves no room to spare. The C4 features a space-saver spare wheel under the floor.

In recent memory, Citroen’s offerings (the smaller C3 hatch in particular) have decidedly missed the mark on value. It’s not enough to be a niche player in Australia anymore – we have too many brands for that - so Citroen has had to have a re-think of its pricing strategy.

The resulting C4 that launches in Australia comes in a single, highly specified trim level, at a price that is remarkably competitive for its segment.

Wearing an MSRP of $37,990, the C4 Shine is positioned to compete with rivals like the Subaru XV (2.0i-S $37,290), Toyota C-HR (Koba hybrid - $37,665), and equally funky Mazda MX-30 (G20e Touring - $36,490).

For the asking price you also get the full list of available equipment, including 18-inch alloys, full LED exterior lighting, a 10-inch multimedia touchscreen with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, built-in navigation, a 5.5-inch digital dash cluster, a head-up display, dual-zone climate, full synthetic leather interior trim, and a top-down parking camera. This leaves only a sunroof ($1490) and metallic paint options (everything but white - $690) as available extras.

The Citroen also packs some unusual items that represent surprising value – the front seats have a massage function and are stuffed with a very nice memory foam material, while the suspension system packs a set of hydraulic dampers to iron out the ride.

While the C4 faces tough competition in the small SUV segment, I think it represents pretty solid value at the price, so long as you’re chasing a virtue like comfort over hybridisation. More on that later.

The GR Corolla’s 1.6-litre three-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine is now a little torquier than before, with outputs now 221kW (at 6500rpm) and 400Nm (between 3250 and 4600rpm) thanks to an extra 30Nm.

The G16E-GTS engine can now drive the Corolla’s four wheels through a choice of gearboxes, either the existing six-speed manual or an eight-speed torque converter automatic.

As well as the usual drive modes, Eco, Normal and Sport, the Corolla’s GR-Four all-wheel-drive system can split the torque to the front or rear wheels via its limited-slip diffs.

Normal, Track and Gravel modes can distribute drive either 60:40 front/rear in Normal, 53:47 in Gravel, or variably depending on conditions and need for acceleration in Track.

Toyota hasn't provided a 0-100km/h time for the 2025 GR Corolla in either variant, but the auto should knock it over in under five seconds, with the manual taking a little longer.

The C4’s single trim level has a single engine, and it’s a good one; a peppy 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo.

It appears elsewhere in the Stellantis catalogue and has been refreshed for the 2022 model year with a new turbo and other small refinements. In the C4 it produces 114kW/240Nm and drives the front wheels via an Aisin-sourced eight-speed torque converter automatic transmission.

No dual-clutches or CVTs to be found here. This sounds good to me, but is it good to drive? You’ll have to read on to find out.

Toyota’s claimed fuel consumption for the GR Corolla with a manual gearbox hasn't changed from the previous 8.4L/100km, which isn’t bad for a sports car.

With the auto, Toyota says it burns through the fuel faster at a rate of 9.5L/100km.

In either case, the Corolla’s 50-litre fuel tank needs to be filled with premium 98 RON petrol, and theoretically could provide more than 500km of driving if conditions and your driving style are both perfect for efficiency.

Chances are, however, you’ll feel the need to put your right foot down a little harder than they did during WLTP testing, if for no other reason than to hear the turbo flutter when you lift off.

Despite the little turbocharged engine and the abundance of ratios in that transmission, the Citroen C4 disappointed me a little bit when it came to real-world consumption.

The official/combined consumption sounds reasonable at just 6.1L/100km, but after a week of driving in what I would consider realistic combined conditions my car returned 8.4L/100km.

While it’s not terrible in the wider context of small SUVs (a segment that is still packed with naturally aspirated 2.0-litre engines), it could be better.

The C4 also needs at least mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel and has a 50-litre fuel tank.

The GR Corolla isn’t as engaging to drive as the GR Yaris, it’s not as honed as one particular rival, the Honda Civic Type R, and it’s not as ‘nice’ as the Golf R.

But the GR Corolla is still an excellent car to drive, and it’s better for its update. In fact, the two major gripes I had with the pre-facelift car have been addressed.

I was in a unique position to be able to compare the old and new versions of the GR Corolla as I drove a MY 2024 version a week prior to the media launch for the 2025 model.

The first and probably biggest issue I had was that the Corolla’s suspension seemed like it must have been rather stiff and the body bracing quite rigid for a car riding on 19-inch wheels to let that much road noise and that many harsh bumps into the cabin.

Though it wasn’t mentioned before the on-road drive loop, the car felt more compliant without sacrificing ability and seemed much more suited to daily duties.

Toyota’s product team confirmed there had been tweaks made to the rear suspension geometry and that I wasn’t just imagining it.

The second issue is more for the sake of passengers who may be less agreeable to the three-pot thrum resonating along the exhaust underfloor.

Toyota has solved this by putting a slight mute on the pipes in the Eco drive mode, so the car is now just ‘a bit’ lairy rather than full boy racer.

Generally, it’s hard not to compare the GR Corolla to the smaller (but original) GR hatch, the Yaris. Especially having driven them back-to-back at the media launch.

Without leaning too much on that, I will say that while the Yaris feels like a rally car that's been modified to be road-legal, the Corolla feels more like a road car that was tweaked for rallying.

The Corolla stops just short of being too ‘raw’ for everyday use in most aspects, but it’s still very capable when it comes to driving fast. 

Like its suspension, the steering feel is dialled in for feedback without being too rough, and allows you to corner accurately without feeling like you need to second-guess or adjust inputs.

When it comes to handling, it doesn’t feel like the Corolla is entirely leaning on the Yokohama Advan tyres for grip, as it feels tied-down and doesn’t pitch and roll through corners.

The duality of the GR Corolla is helped by its drive mode and differential settings and even on track can help you lean into your own driving style.

While the rear-biased 30:70 setting previously made for a slightly tail-happy hot hatch, the new variable Track setting does a fabulous job of keeping the drive where it needs to be, though it turns out it’s also rather handy for sliding the Corolla around a wet skid pan.

Another neat trick is the GR’s handbrake, same as the Yaris, which can disconnect the rear diff when engaged so you don’t need to dip the clutch pedal in the manual version when indulging in handbrake turns.

It will set you back to 2WD mode when the drivetrain overheats, however, or at least when its sensors suspect the drivetrain has overheated - something that only happened after a lot of handbrake turning and spinning wheels as the hatchback slid sideways.

The Corolla’s brakes are ventilated 356mm front and 297mm rear discs, and doesn't lose stopping power even after plenty of tight, twisting road driving where the brakes and the sticky Yokohama Advan tyres copped a workout.

The new auto transmission is also a delight. It's calm during normal driving but snappy with shifts in Sport mode and set to manual gear selection. It won’t really cooperate on a rapid drive of its own accord.

The only criticism of the auto gearbox (aside from being less engaging than the manual, but that’s your own choice) is that the shift paddles behind the wheel feel a little plasticky, but I’m nitpicking at this point.

Driving the C4 is an interesting experience because it approaches the road a little differently from most of its rivals.

It really leans into Citroen’s newfound comfort-focused niche with the seating and suspension. This results in an overall experience that is a bit unique in the market, and quite pleasant, too.

The ride really is quite good. It’s not a fully hydraulic system but has dual-stage dampers that essentially smooth out corrugations and much of the nasty stuff that comes into contact with the tyres.

It’s odd because you can hear the big alloys crashing about on the road, but ultimately you feel little of it in the cabin. What’s more impressive is Citroen has managed to imbue the C4 with this floating-on-the-road feeling, while maintaining enough of a ‘real’ driving position to make it feel like you’re sitting in the car and not on it.

The overall result is impressive. The comfort extends to the seats, as mentioned, which really do still feel floaty and supportive even after hours on the road. It also extends to the steering, which has a very light tune. This is a bit unsettling at first, as it feels like it has a large dead-zone in the centre, but it is also speed dependent, so once you’re cruising it regains a significant amount of feel. You can also manually bring back a bit of firmness by setting this car to its Sport drive mode, which is unusually good.

This means you can have an ease of operation in tight quarters while maintaining enough feel to make it fun to drive when you need to ask more of it. Clever.

Speaking of fun, the revised 1.2-litre three-pot is a hoot. It has a distant but entertaining gruff tone under pressure, and surges forward with just enough urgency to not leave you really wanting for power.

It’s not what I would call quick, but it has a raucous attitude paired with a well-behaved torque converter auto to make it truly entertaining. When you push it, there’s a moment of turbo lag followed by a lump of torque, which the transmission lets you ride out before decisively snapping into the next gear. I like it.

Again, it's not quick, but it punches just enough above its weight to leave you with a smile when you stick your boot in. To have that in a car otherwise so focused on comfort is an unexpected pleasure.

The dash cluster could use some work, as could visibility out of the cabin. The small aperture out the rear and tall dash line could leave some drivers feeling a bit claustrophobic. While the engine is fun to engage with, the turbo lag could potentially be a source for annoyance at times, too.

Brief negatives aside, I think the C4's drive experience really brings something unique, fun, and comfortable to the small SUV space.

There's not such a good story to tell here. While the C4 comes with today’s expected suite of active-safety items, it just fell short of a five-star ANCAP rating, scoring just four stars upon its launch.

Active items on the C4 Shine include auto emergency braking, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control, and driver-attention alert.

Some active items are notably missing, like rear cross traffic alert, rear auto braking, and more cutting-edge items like junction alert for the AEB system.

What cost this car its five-star rating? ANCAP says the lack of a centre airbag contributed, but the C4 also fell short on protection for vulnerable road users in the event of a collision, and its AEB system also had marginal night-time performance.

Toyota offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty plus an extra two-year warranty on the GR Corolla’s engine and driveline.

There’s also a capped price on the first three years of servicing for the GR Corolla at $310 per service.

The downside to the servicing arrangement is that intervals are six months or 10,000km, whichever comes first. That's more regular than a usual schedule and it means potentially pricier servicing for the seventh visit onwards.

Ownership has always been a tough topic for unusual Euros like the C4, and that seems to continue here. While Citroen offers a competitive five-year and unlimited-kilometre warranty for all its new products, it’s the service costs that will hurt the most.

While most Japanese and Korean brands are competing to really keep these numbers down, the C4’s average yearly cost, according to the provided schedule, comes in at an average of $497 for the first five years. That’s nearly double the cost of Toyota’s C-HR!

The C4 Shine will need to see a service centre once a year or every 15,000km, whichever occurs first.