Polestar 2 Standard Range vs Nissan Juke

What's the difference?

This latest update for the Polestar 2 is lovely, but driving the original is a reminder of how solid this car has always been if you overlook the inherent impracticalities of being an EV on a combustion-engine platform.

The fact you still get steady flow of over-the-air software updates bringing new features, plus you can now upgrade to the new Qualcomm processor chip, saving some coin and getting a second-hand model that’s a couple of years old isn’t a bad option at all.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

The Juke is a fun little car. It looks cool, it packs most of the important features and safety equipment, but while it can be fun to drive, it’s also a little clunky around town.

It’s so frustrating, because there is a great car in there somewhere, and it would take only small tweaks and enhancements to bring it out.

I’ve always been a fan of the Polestar 2’s exterior design and unlike many new cars it has aged like fine wine over the years. You need to remember the Polestar 2 dates back to 2016 when it was first revealed as a Volvo concept.

It still has clean lines, iconic lightning signatures, plus a tough stance that evokes just a touch of muscle car.

While it has taken me a while to come around to the new blanked-out grille insert, it suits the character of this car given it’s an EV. It also aligns with the wider Polestar design language.

For 2026 there haven’t been any major changes to the exterior. There’s a new sandy-like ‘Dune’ exterior paint colour replacing the silver ‘Jupiter’, plus a new 20-inch forged alloy wheel design for the Long range Dual motor Performance.

Inside, the Polestar 2 looks fundamentally the same as it did when it first launched, in the best and worst ways.

I appreciate how traditional car-like the layouts of the steering wheel, digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system are. Sure it doesn’t scream ultra high-tech anymore like some of its rivals, but there’s still an understated premium feel to it.

The same can be said for the rest of the Polestar 2’s interior. Everything feels purposeful in a minimalist way which helps make for a clean design.

Speaking of purposefulness, the optional Bowers and Wilkins sound system features a prominent tweeter on top of the dashboard. It looks stunning and is functional, helping to create an incredibly punchy and full sound stage in the cabin.

One of the few finishes I dislike in the interior is the glossy piano black on the steering wheel buttons. You interact with these frequently and it doesn’t take long for fingerprints to present themselves.

There’s now a new synthetic leather upholstery finish for those who opt for the $4700 Plus package. It’s quilted which helps emulate a premium puffer jacket-like look.

Although it’s expensive, the $4400 ‘Bridge of Weir’ Nappa leather upholstery is beautiful and required if you want ventilated front seats. You can only get black and white finishes, which is fine, but bringing back a tan or caramel option would be delicious.

Urban style is clearly what the Juke is about. It’s always been about this, but the original incarnation, while unusual, was a bit bulbous and awkward. The current version is a razor-sharp re-interpretation of the original.

Ugly duckling no more, the Juke blends the elements of Nissan’s current design language with its own unique take, in a clever way.

The roofline and bulbous face of the original car, complete with its ‘eye’ headlights are all maintained, but this time they look more contemporary with a splash of chrome and gunmetal plastic in the face, offset by gloss blacks running down the doorline.

The new light fittings look great and the curviness is also gently off-set with some sharp angles. The massive 19-inch wheels finished in a two-tone gloss black and aluminium brush keep this car looking like a concept come to life. Just don’t crash them into the curb. It would be very easy to.

The cool elements continue inside, with rotary air vents, a blend of textures, including a gloss grey for the vent claddings, with white stitching for the wheel, seat, and into the door cards, too.

There are touches of chrome about the place, and an ambient red LED light surrounding the shifter, which sits on its own little pedestal thing.

It’s quirky and punches above its weight when it comes to soft trims in the doors. Like most higher-grade Nissans the seats are pretty comfy, too, clad in a hard-wearing synthetic leather material.

But it won’t be for everyone, and it’s not without its downsides. The abundance of grey plastic down the centre console is a bit cheap, and the tech offering doesn’t match the youthful style.

The centre screen is adequate, but compared to many rivals it’s a bit small and dull, and the Juke is still missing a digital overhaul for its instrument cluster.

The black headlining, usually reserved for sportier cars, makes the cabin feel smaller than it is.

This has always been the downfall of Polestar 2 and it remains true.

While it’s pretty and has a cockpit-like design, the cabin can feel compromised in terms of space and storage. This is primarily due to the centre console which angles upwards sharply, aggressively segmenting the driver and front passenger space.

The only storage spots on the centre console include a shallow shelf under the centre console, a wireless phone charger and another uncovered storage nook under the touchscreen.

It doesn’t help that the cupholder situation doesn’t allow for a proper centre armrest. You either have no cupholders and an armrest, one cupholder and your arm barely reaches the armrest, or two cupholders and the centre armrest flops into the backseat space. It’s not ideal.

Gripes aside, there are still positives to the Polestar 2’s front row. The seats are comfortable on longer drives and allow for a large degree of electric adjustment.

Ahead of the driver the steering wheel thankfully has physical buttons, allowing for easy use on the move. I also love how satisfying the indicator stalk thwack is. It’s the little things that count.

The digital instrument cluster has a minimalist look and can be customised with a few layouts. I particularly like the Google Maps layout which shows your navigation when using the in-built app.

Moving across, the Google Built-in software for the multimedia system is still up there as one of the most usable out there currently. It’s easy to navigate, plus if you get lost there’s a convenient home button at the bottom of the screen.

Both screens are now driven by a more powerful Qualcomm processor chip which allows for better responsiveness, smoother performance and higher download speeds for in-car apps.

Although we didn’t get a huge opportunity to stress test this new chip, it’s definitely an improvement on the old one. You can technically upgrade your old Polestar 2’s chip through a Polestar service centre, though it conveniently doesn’t list how much this costs.

While physical switchgear is limited, there’s still enough to get by. Over the years I’ve grown accustomed to using the touchscreen to change the climate control, though some physical dials and buttons would be nice.

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are available in wired form only, which is surprising as wireless smartphone mirroring is now commonplace. It does mean however that your phone will charge up reliably.

Moving to the second row, it’s arguably where the Polestar 2 is at its worst. At a leggy 182cm I do fit behind my driving position but headroom is tight.

It doesn’t help that there’s a huge transmission tunnel which technically isn’t needed given this car is fully electric. That’s a downside of using a combustion-engine platform.

Second-row amenities include air vents, two USB-C ports, as well as a fold-down armrest with cupholders. Heated outboard seats are optional.

At the back the button to pop the boot is down where the number plate is. It’s not overtly obvious unless you know where to look.

As standard the tailgate is manually operated and you need to get the $4700 Plus pack in order to get it electrically operated. It also gets a hands-free function which is handy if you’ve got your hands full with bags.

Boot space is 407L with the rear seats upright, expanding to 1097L with them folded. This includes a 43L underfloor section which is large enough for some cables. The boot size is fairly standard for a vehicle of this size and type.

There’s also a 41L front boot which can be used for further cable storage or other various storage needs.

The Juke is a small SUV in the true sense of the word, sitting below the Qashqai which is more like a mid-sizer these days in terms of dimensions.

However, it’s quite cleverly packaged on the inside and is more useful than it first appears.

The front seats, for example, offer heaps of headroom and a surprising amount of width, and while the seats are manual, they’re pretty adjustable. I was able to find a great seating position.

There are big pockets in the doors with an integrated bottle holder suitable for even the largest bottles, although the centre console area is a bit less versatile, choosing its funky design over additional storage.

It features two good bottle holders, but a tiny armrest box and a shallow tray with one 12V socket and a USB-A outlet, as well as an auxiliary audio input under the climate controls.

On the topic of climate controls, I love the fact the Juke maintains a dedicated ventilation panel complete with buttons and dials for all the core functions. No touchscreen nonsense here.

The media screen, as mentioned, is a tad small, and falls victim to glare easily.

The stock Nissan software is a massive upgrade on the brand’s previous-generation products, but while it’s functional it’s far from the prettiest or the fastest on the market.

The back seat offers more space than you might assume, but it’s not as well thought-out as the front of the cabin. At 182cm tall I fit behind my own driving position with just enough space for my knees and just enough headroom.

There are decent bottle holders in the doors, and a further two small ones in the drop-down armrest. The backs of the front seats are clad in that synthetic leather material, which is nice, and have soft pockets, too.

The back of the front centre console offers just a single USB-A outlet and a small cubby. There are no adjustable air vents for rear passengers. It also feels a little claustrophobic back there thanks to the black trim on everything and smaller windows.

Boot capacity for the Juke is impressive for an SUV in this class, with 422 litres on offer, which is close to the volume we’d expect from something a size-bracket up, and 1305L with the second row folded down. There is a space-saver spare under the boot floor.

The Juke range kicks off from just $28,390 which gets you into a base ST and reaches to $36,890 for the top-spec Ti.

We’re driving the $34,440 (before on-road costs) ST-L which is the upper mid-grade car.

It scores concept-style 19-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch digital screen between the analog dials, a surround camera system, single-zone climate, keyless entry and push-start ignition, and LED headlights. 

The quite attractive ‘Magnetic Blue’ paint our car wears is a $700 option. For an additional $1133 you can also step up to the ST-L+ grade which adds alternate two-tone seat trim, chrome and black highlights and a 10-speaker Bose audio system.

While this ST-L grade gets the lion’s share of Juke equipment without the price-hike to the Ti (and is therefore the pick of the range) there are some notable items missing at this price.

For example, there’s no wireless phone charging, no head-up display, no fully digital instrument cluster, and no electrical adjustment for the seats. The 8.0-inch multimedia screen is starting to look a bit dated, too.

Still, it looks trendy and those massive wheels are well above the standard for a car at this size or price. So, if you’re going for style over equipment there is a choice to be made here.

Nissan also hasn’t cheaped out on safety equipment, with most active stuff coming standard, even on the base ST. More on this later.

Pricing is about line-ball with its most direct competitors. It’s a tad cheaper than some like the outgoing similarly-styled Toyota C-HR (Koba 2WD - $35,695), or slightly more expensive than others like the current equivalent Ford Puma (ST-Line - $33,190) or Mazda CX-3 (Touring SP - $34,300) although it is also ever so slightly larger than those last two by width, height, and wheelbase.

No changes have been made to the Polestar 2’s electric motor set-up for 2026.

Both the single-motor versions have been rear-wheel drive now for a few years and produce either 200kW or 220kW, depending on the battery pack.

The Long range Dual motor adds a front-mounted electric motor bringing total system outputs to 310kW and 740Nm. It’s capable of doing the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.5 seconds.

The $8980 Performance pack (available only on the Long range Dual motor) bumps the total system power output to 350kW. It also reduces the 0-100km/h sprint to 4.2 seconds.

In the Juke’s messy engine bay lies a 1.0-litre, three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine which sends 84kW/180Nm to the front wheels.

Nissan has its own 'HR10DET' engine code for this unit but it’s actually a Renault 'H5Dt' engine as evidenced by Renault logos all over the place.

Power is communicated by a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic which has been a source of strife for this car since it arrived. This very European engine and transmission combination is one which the Juke shares with its Renault Captur cousin.

I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but I would prefer a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which Nissan uses elsewhere in its range. It would solve maybe the main issue with this car, which we’ll explore up next in the driving section of this review

Although we didn’t get to drive it at this media launch, the entry-level Polestar 2 Standard range Single motor has arguably received the biggest refresh of the line-up with this MY26 update.

It now has a slightly larger 70kWh lithium-ion battery pack sourced from CATL, replacing the LG Chem-sourced 69kWh lithium-ion battery. As a result there’s 554km of WLTP-claimed range with up to 554km (up from 546km).

Long range versions still have a CATL-sourced 82kWh lithium-ion battery with between 568km and 659km of WLTP-claimed range, depending on the variant. This is good but Tesla has moved the game forward with its Model 3 Long Range RWD which offers up to 750km of range.

We didn’t get a chance to fully test out energy consumption during this media event, but Polestar claims between 14.8kWh/100km and 17.2kWh/100km, depending on the variant. This is much better than when the Polestar 2 first launched.

While the maximum AC charging rate remains at 11kW across the line-up, the Standard range versions can now DC fast-charge at rates up to 180kW (up from 135kW). This means a 10 to 80 per cent charge can now take as little as 26 minutes.

Maximum DC fast-charging for Long range versions is still up to 205kW, allowing a 10 to 80 per cent charge in 28 minutes. Lots of newer rivals offer faster charging now.

One of the reasons this car comes equipped with a dual-clutch automatic is to chase fuel efficiency as well as emissions output. On paper DCT autos don’t suffer the inherent losses of a traditional torque converter transmission.

The official combined cycle fuel consumption figure is 5.8L/100km. My week of driving, weighted slightly more towards freeway conditions, produced a marginally higher average of 6.8L/100km. It’s not the claim, but it’s pretty good.

This little engine requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel, and the Juke has a 46-litre fuel tank, suggesting a driving range of 793km using the official fuel consumption number.

While outright practicality isn’t the Polestar 2’s strong suit, once you get on the road this melts away almost instantly.

This EV is and has always been a driver’s car that’s engaging and rewarding to steer. It’s a shame that many people’s first experience with it was likely in the second row as a rideshare with a driver that has a bad case of taxi foot.

Surprisingly, during the media launch drive program we had the opportunity to sample the original MY22 Long range Single motor and compare it back-to-back to the MY26 models. It’s rare this kind of thing happen.

This is notable because single-motor versions made the switch from front- to rear-wheel drive back in 2024.

While the MY22 example feels like a bulldog yet still capable of carving up corners, it holds up well if you ignore the odd cabin rattle and creak. You can also feel a marked difference with how the rear guides the latest MY26 Long range Single motor instead of the front when pushed.

This isn’t apparent in calmer, everyday driving situations. If you’re not a car person you likely wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

The rear-mounted electric motor produces an adequate amount of oomph, allowing you to get up to speed with ease. Like all EVs you get snappy acceleration from a standstill, which is thrilling.

This is dialled up to 11 in the Long range Dual motor Performance. Although the Model 3 Performance is technically faster, it still feels like this Polestar 2 is quick enough.

In the fully loaded all-wheel drive trim you’re able to carve corners enthusiastically. It’s incredibly confidence-inspiring to chuck into corners as there’s grip for days and a bucketload of power to back it up.

Although the regenerative braking system is pretty powerful already, the Performance pack adds chunky Brembo physical brakes for added peace of mind. Perhaps Tesla could take note of this?

The aforementioned Performance pack also adds manually adjustable Öhlins dampers with a ‘Polestar Engineered’ performance chassis. It’s an incredible package with a dialled-in feel, though if you want to adjust the dampers you need to jack up the car.

If you’re not keen on outright performance, the regular Polestar 2’s suspension set-up still holds its own but has an added level of all-around comfort. It’s an improvement from the original which was a little too firm.

Across the line-up the steering is direct and makes this car feel nimble regardless of where or how you’re driving. You’re able to select from different steering feels which increase or decrease the resistance.

Given EVs have no engine noise, they can sometimes have more noticeable road and wind noise out on the open road. Thankfully the Polestar 2’s cabin is quiet enough, that is unless you’re driving on coarse-chip roads.

The Juke can be fun to drive, and I wanted to like it more, but the transmission its peppy little engine is paired with is frustrating.

Outputs of 84kW/180Nm doesn’t sound like a lot, but power isn’t the problem. The little engine has a fun turbo-surge which pairs with the Juke's light frame to make for a car which is quite athletic when you push it.

The issue is a mountain of turbo-lag conspires with the clunky dual-clutch automatic to make it far too sluggish off the line.

There’s a full second (or two, at times) to wait for any power to arrive, which simply isn’t good enough at T-junctions and roundabouts, the kind of situations a little urban SUV like this will constantly be encountering.

Nissan says the transmission software was even updated after the Juke’s launch, but it’s still not where it should be.

It has good traits, too. When you’re out on the open road, it has quick, snappy and well-defined shifts, and the engine is much better when it’s being properly pushed, too.

It has a gruff, entertaining tone, and the Juke’s light frame, firm ride, and comparatively heavy steering make it a joy to throw into some corners.

The long wheelbase for such a small SUV, paired with a decent set of tyres, also keeps it confident when its predecessor was a little clumsy.

Again, though, the reasonably hard ride, not helped by the very large wheels, isn't its best trait in an urban environment. The Juke is by no means uncomfortable, it just seems like the priorities for this little SUV aren’t in the right place.

I’ve said this before but there’s a great car in here somewhere. The Juke is fun to drive in the right environment, it’s just this environment is not where most prospective buyers will primarily be looking to use it.

What could fix this issue? A different transmission perhaps. Better yet, an e-Power hybrid powertrain.

The Juke's standard active safety features include freeway-speed auto emergency braking, lane departure warning with lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control and traffic sign recognition.

Last time I reviewed this car I complained about the way it vibrates the steering wheel when the lane keep function decides you’re going out of your lane. But having since experienced so many more invasive lane keep systems, this one seems comparatively low-key.

Elsewhere, the Juke gets the standard array of six airbags (dual front, side, and curtain) and wears a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2019 standards.

The Polestar 2 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered by an eight-year, 160,000km warranty.

While this battery warranty length is standard, a five-year warranty is getting a little short now in the grand scheme of things as many brands are moving to seven-year warranties.

Owners also get five years' of roadside assistance which can be accessed by pressing the ‘Connect’ button on the overhead console. It’s available 24/7 and includes car recovery and alternative transport, if required.

Logbook servicing is required every 24 months or 30,000km, which is standard for EVs. At the time of writing Polestar Australia was finalising service pricing for the MY26 2 and we'll update this review as soon as we receive the details.

There are a total of 23 Polestar service centres around Australia, a number of them shared with Volvo.

Nissan offers the Juke with a five-year, unlimited km warranty, with five-years of roadside assist included.

It requires servicing every 12 months or 20,000km and the cost is subject to a capped price servicing program for the first six years.

This averages $651.33 annually, which is not cheap for a small SUV in this class.

However, there is also the option of a pre-paid five-year service plan which brings the annual cost over five years down to a more reasonable $429.60.

But, notably, it does not include the pricy $1521 sixth-year interval. It’s worth asking yourself how long you’ll own the car for before splurging on it.