Polestar 2 Long Range vs Alfa Romeo 4C

What's the difference?

This latest update for the Polestar 2 is lovely, but driving the original is a reminder of how solid this car has always been if you overlook the inherent impracticalities of being an EV on a combustion-engine platform.

The fact you still get steady flow of over-the-air software updates bringing new features, plus you can now upgrade to the new Qualcomm processor chip, saving some coin and getting a second-hand model that’s a couple of years old isn’t a bad option at all.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

People might wonder if there’s a reason to buy an Alfa Romeo 4C. It has some great dollar-for-dollar competitors - the Alpine A110 does most of the things the Alfa does, but in a more polished way. And then there’s the Porsche 718 Cayman, which is a considerably more, well, considered option.

But there is no doubt the 4C stands alone, a sort-of cut-price alternative to a Maserati or Ferrari, and nearly as rare to spot on the road as those cars, too. And just like the rollercoaster at Luna Park, it’s the sort of car that’ll leave you wanting another go.

I’ve always been a fan of the Polestar 2’s exterior design and unlike many new cars it has aged like fine wine over the years. You need to remember the Polestar 2 dates back to 2016 when it was first revealed as a Volvo concept.

It still has clean lines, iconic lightning signatures, plus a tough stance that evokes just a touch of muscle car.

While it has taken me a while to come around to the new blanked-out grille insert, it suits the character of this car given it’s an EV. It also aligns with the wider Polestar design language.

For 2026 there haven’t been any major changes to the exterior. There’s a new sandy-like ‘Dune’ exterior paint colour replacing the silver ‘Jupiter’, plus a new 20-inch forged alloy wheel design for the Long range Dual motor Performance.

Inside, the Polestar 2 looks fundamentally the same as it did when it first launched, in the best and worst ways.

I appreciate how traditional car-like the layouts of the steering wheel, digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system are. Sure it doesn’t scream ultra high-tech anymore like some of its rivals, but there’s still an understated premium feel to it.

The same can be said for the rest of the Polestar 2’s interior. Everything feels purposeful in a minimalist way which helps make for a clean design.

Speaking of purposefulness, the optional Bowers and Wilkins sound system features a prominent tweeter on top of the dashboard. It looks stunning and is functional, helping to create an incredibly punchy and full sound stage in the cabin.

One of the few finishes I dislike in the interior is the glossy piano black on the steering wheel buttons. You interact with these frequently and it doesn’t take long for fingerprints to present themselves.

There’s now a new synthetic leather upholstery finish for those who opt for the $4700 Plus package. It’s quilted which helps emulate a premium puffer jacket-like look.

Although it’s expensive, the $4400 ‘Bridge of Weir’ Nappa leather upholstery is beautiful and required if you want ventilated front seats. You can only get black and white finishes, which is fine, but bringing back a tan or caramel option would be delicious.

Slap a Ferrari badge on it, and people would think it was the real deal - a pint-sized performance hustler, with all the right angles to get plenty of glances.

In fact, I had dozens of punters nod, wave, mount ‘nice car mate’ and even a few rubber-neck moments - you know, when you drive past and someone on the footpath can’t help but forget they’re walking, and they stare so hard they might well collide with the upcoming lamp-post. 

It really is a head-turner. So why does it only get an 8/10? Well, there are some elements of the design that make it less user-friendly than some of its rivals.

For instance, the step-in to the cabin is enormous, because the carbon-fibre tub sills are huge. And the cabin itself is pretty tight, especially for taller people. An Alpine A110 or Porsche Boxster are much more amenable for day-to-day driving… but hey, the 4C is markedly better than, say, a Lotus Elise for ingress and egress.

Also, as smart as it still looks, there are elements of Alfa Romeo design that have moved on since the 4C launched back in 2015. The headlights are the bit that I dislike most - I had a real thing for the spider-eyes lights of the launch edition model.

But even if it isn’t unmistakably Alfa Romeo, it’s unmistakably a 4C. 

This has always been the downfall of Polestar 2 and it remains true.

While it’s pretty and has a cockpit-like design, the cabin can feel compromised in terms of space and storage. This is primarily due to the centre console which angles upwards sharply, aggressively segmenting the driver and front passenger space.

The only storage spots on the centre console include a shallow shelf under the centre console, a wireless phone charger and another uncovered storage nook under the touchscreen.

It doesn’t help that the cupholder situation doesn’t allow for a proper centre armrest. You either have no cupholders and an armrest, one cupholder and your arm barely reaches the armrest, or two cupholders and the centre armrest flops into the backseat space. It’s not ideal.

Gripes aside, there are still positives to the Polestar 2’s front row. The seats are comfortable on longer drives and allow for a large degree of electric adjustment.

Ahead of the driver the steering wheel thankfully has physical buttons, allowing for easy use on the move. I also love how satisfying the indicator stalk thwack is. It’s the little things that count.

The digital instrument cluster has a minimalist look and can be customised with a few layouts. I particularly like the Google Maps layout which shows your navigation when using the in-built app.

Moving across, the Google Built-in software for the multimedia system is still up there as one of the most usable out there currently. It’s easy to navigate, plus if you get lost there’s a convenient home button at the bottom of the screen.

Both screens are now driven by a more powerful Qualcomm processor chip which allows for better responsiveness, smoother performance and higher download speeds for in-car apps.

Although we didn’t get a huge opportunity to stress test this new chip, it’s definitely an improvement on the old one. You can technically upgrade your old Polestar 2’s chip through a Polestar service centre, though it conveniently doesn’t list how much this costs.

While physical switchgear is limited, there’s still enough to get by. Over the years I’ve grown accustomed to using the touchscreen to change the climate control, though some physical dials and buttons would be nice.

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are available in wired form only, which is surprising as wireless smartphone mirroring is now commonplace. It does mean however that your phone will charge up reliably.

Moving to the second row, it’s arguably where the Polestar 2 is at its worst. At a leggy 182cm I do fit behind my driving position but headroom is tight.

It doesn’t help that there’s a huge transmission tunnel which technically isn’t needed given this car is fully electric. That’s a downside of using a combustion-engine platform.

Second-row amenities include air vents, two USB-C ports, as well as a fold-down armrest with cupholders. Heated outboard seats are optional.

At the back the button to pop the boot is down where the number plate is. It’s not overtly obvious unless you know where to look.

As standard the tailgate is manually operated and you need to get the $4700 Plus pack in order to get it electrically operated. It also gets a hands-free function which is handy if you’ve got your hands full with bags.

Boot space is 407L with the rear seats upright, expanding to 1097L with them folded. This includes a 43L underfloor section which is large enough for some cables. The boot size is fairly standard for a vehicle of this size and type.

There’s also a 41L front boot which can be used for further cable storage or other various storage needs.

You can’t get into a car this small and expect a lot of space.

The dimensions of the 4C are tiny - it’s just 3989mm long, 1868mm wide and only 1185mm tall, and as you can see from the pictures, it’s a squat little thing. The Spider’s removable roof could be great for you if you’re tall.

I’m six-feet tall (182cm) and I found it to be cocoon-like in the cabin. You feel almost as though you’re tying yourself to the tub of the car when you get into the driver’s seat. And getting in and out? Just make sure you do some stretches beforehand. It’s not as bad as a Lotus for ingress and egress, but it’s still hard to look good clambering in and out of. 

The cabin is a cramped space. There’s limited head room and leg room, and while there is reach and rake adjustment for the steering wheel, the seat only has manual slide and backrest movement - no lumbar adjust, no height adjust… almost like a racing bucket. They’re hard like a race seat, too. 

The ergonomics aren’t terrific - the controls for the air-con are hard to see at a glance, the buttons for the gear select take some learning, and the two centrally-mounted cup holders (one for your double-shot mocha latte, the other for a hazelnut piccolo) are inconveniently positioned exactly where you might want to put your elbow. 

The media system is rubbish. It’d be the first thing to go, if I bought one of these, and in its place would be an aftermarket touchscreen which would: a) actually let you pair to Bluetooth; b) look like it was from sometime after 2004; and c) be more fitting for a car of this price tag. I’d upgrade the speakers, too, because they’re poor. But I can totally understand if those things don’t matter, because it’s the engine you want to hear.

The materials - aside from the red leather seats - aren’t great. The plastics used are similar in look and feel to what you find in second-hand Fiats, but the sheer volume of exposed carbon-fibre does help you forget those details. And the leather pull straps to close the doors are nice, too. 

The visibility from the driver’s seat is decent - for this type of car. It’s low, and the rear window is small, so you can’t expect to see everything around you at all times, but the mirrors are good and the forward vision is excellent.

Look, no-one considering an Italian sports car is likely to be wearing their common sense hat, but even so, the Alfa Romeo 4C Spider is an indulgent purchase.

With a list price of $99,000 plus on-road costs, it isn’t affordable. Not considering what you get for your money.

Standard inclusions consist of air conditioning, remote central locking, heated electric door mirrors, leather sports seats with manual adjustment, a leather-lined steering wheel, and a four-speaker stereo system with USB connectivity and Bluetooth phone and audio streaming. It’s not a touchscreen, so there’s no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, and there’s no sat nav… but the thing about this car is going the fun way home, so forget maps and GPS. And there’s a digital instrument cluster with a digital speedometer - believe me, you’ll need it.

The standard wheels are a staggered set - 17-inch at the front and 18-inch at the rear. All 4C models have bi-xenon headlights, LED daytime running lights, LED tail-lights and dual exhaust tips. 

Of course, being the Spider model, you also get a removable soft top and you know what’s neat? You get a car cover included as standard, but you’d want to put it in the shed, as it takes up a bit of boot room!

Our car was even further up the pay scale, with an as-tested price of $118,000 before on-roads - it had a few option boxes ticked. 

First there’s that beautiful Basalt Grey metallic paint ($2000), and those contrasting red brake calipers ($1000).

Plus there’s the Carbon & Leather package - with carbon-fibre mirror caps, interior bezels, and a stitched leather instrument cover panel. It’s a $4000 option.

And finally, the Racing Package ($12,000), which includes a staggered set of 18-inch and 19-inch wheels with a dark paint finish, and those wheels are fitted with model specific Pirelli P Zero tyres (205/40/18 up front, 235/35/19 at the rear). Plus theres the sports racing exhaust system, which is awesome, and a racing suspension setup. 

No changes have been made to the Polestar 2’s electric motor set-up for 2026.

Both the single-motor versions have been rear-wheel drive now for a few years and produce either 200kW or 220kW, depending on the battery pack.

The Long range Dual motor adds a front-mounted electric motor bringing total system outputs to 310kW and 740Nm. It’s capable of doing the 0-100km/h sprint in 4.5 seconds.

The $8980 Performance pack (available only on the Long range Dual motor) bumps the total system power output to 350kW. It also reduces the 0-100km/h sprint to 4.2 seconds.

The Alfa Romeo 4C is powered by a 1.7-litre turbocharged petrol four-cylinder engine, which produces 177kW of power at 6000rpm and 350Nm of torque from 2200-4250rpm. 

The motor is mounted amidships, and it is rear-wheel drive. It uses a six-speed dual-clutch (TCT) automatic with launch control. 

Alfa Romeo claims a 0-100km/h time of 4.5 seconds, which makes it one of the quickest cars at this price point. 

Although we didn’t get to drive it at this media launch, the entry-level Polestar 2 Standard range Single motor has arguably received the biggest refresh of the line-up with this MY26 update.

It now has a slightly larger 70kWh lithium-ion battery pack sourced from CATL, replacing the LG Chem-sourced 69kWh lithium-ion battery. As a result there’s 554km of WLTP-claimed range with up to 554km (up from 546km).

Long range versions still have a CATL-sourced 82kWh lithium-ion battery with between 568km and 659km of WLTP-claimed range, depending on the variant. This is good but Tesla has moved the game forward with its Model 3 Long Range RWD which offers up to 750km of range.

We didn’t get a chance to fully test out energy consumption during this media event, but Polestar claims between 14.8kWh/100km and 17.2kWh/100km, depending on the variant. This is much better than when the Polestar 2 first launched.

While the maximum AC charging rate remains at 11kW across the line-up, the Standard range versions can now DC fast-charge at rates up to 180kW (up from 135kW). This means a 10 to 80 per cent charge can now take as little as 26 minutes.

Maximum DC fast-charging for Long range versions is still up to 205kW, allowing a 10 to 80 per cent charge in 28 minutes. Lots of newer rivals offer faster charging now.

Claimed fuel consumption for the Alfa Romeo 4C Spider is rated at 6.9 litres per 100 kilometres, so it’s no miser.

But, impressively, I saw real-world fuel economy of 8.1L/100km, over a loop that included urban, highway and ‘spirited’ driving on twisty roads.

While outright practicality isn’t the Polestar 2’s strong suit, once you get on the road this melts away almost instantly.

This EV is and has always been a driver’s car that’s engaging and rewarding to steer. It’s a shame that many people’s first experience with it was likely in the second row as a rideshare with a driver that has a bad case of taxi foot.

Surprisingly, during the media launch drive program we had the opportunity to sample the original MY22 Long range Single motor and compare it back-to-back to the MY26 models. It’s rare this kind of thing happen.

This is notable because single-motor versions made the switch from front- to rear-wheel drive back in 2024.

While the MY22 example feels like a bulldog yet still capable of carving up corners, it holds up well if you ignore the odd cabin rattle and creak. You can also feel a marked difference with how the rear guides the latest MY26 Long range Single motor instead of the front when pushed.

This isn’t apparent in calmer, everyday driving situations. If you’re not a car person you likely wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

The rear-mounted electric motor produces an adequate amount of oomph, allowing you to get up to speed with ease. Like all EVs you get snappy acceleration from a standstill, which is thrilling.

This is dialled up to 11 in the Long range Dual motor Performance. Although the Model 3 Performance is technically faster, it still feels like this Polestar 2 is quick enough.

In the fully loaded all-wheel drive trim you’re able to carve corners enthusiastically. It’s incredibly confidence-inspiring to chuck into corners as there’s grip for days and a bucketload of power to back it up.

Although the regenerative braking system is pretty powerful already, the Performance pack adds chunky Brembo physical brakes for added peace of mind. Perhaps Tesla could take note of this?

The aforementioned Performance pack also adds manually adjustable Öhlins dampers with a ‘Polestar Engineered’ performance chassis. It’s an incredible package with a dialled-in feel, though if you want to adjust the dampers you need to jack up the car.

If you’re not keen on outright performance, the regular Polestar 2’s suspension set-up still holds its own but has an added level of all-around comfort. It’s an improvement from the original which was a little too firm.

Across the line-up the steering is direct and makes this car feel nimble regardless of where or how you’re driving. You’re able to select from different steering feels which increase or decrease the resistance.

Given EVs have no engine noise, they can sometimes have more noticeable road and wind noise out on the open road. Thankfully the Polestar 2’s cabin is quiet enough, that is unless you’re driving on coarse-chip roads.

I said that it’s like a rollercoaster, and it really, truly is. The air doesn’t quite rush through your hair as much, sure - but with the roof off, the windows down and the speedometer constantly edging towards licence suspension, it’s a real hoot of an experience.

It just feels so tight - the carbon-fibre monocoque chassis is rigid and super stiff. You hit a cats-eye and its all so sensitive, you could mistake it for having hit an actual cat. 

Alfa Romeo’s DNA drive modes - the letters stand for Dynamic, Natural, All Weather - is one of those proper examples of this type of system done well. There’s a marked difference between how these different settings operate, where some other drive modes out there are more sedate in their adjustments. There’s a fourth mode - Alfa Race - which I didn’t dare sample on public roads. Dynamic was enough to test my mettle. 

The steering in Natural mode is lovely - there’s great weighting and feedback, super direct and incredibly in touch with the surface below you, and the engine isn’t quite as zesty, but still offers tremendous response on the move. 

It’ll be a difficult choice between this and Alpine A110 and a Porsche Cayman

The ride is firm but composed and compliant in any of the drive modes, and it doesn’t have adaptive suspension. It is a stiffer suspension setup, and though the damping doesn’t change in Dynamic mode, if the surface is anything but perfect you will tram-track and twitch all over the place, because the steering feels even more dialled in. 

In Dynamic mode the engine offers amazing response when you’re at pace, building speed incredibly and before you know it, you’re in licence loss zone.

The brake pedal requires some firm footwork - just like in a race car - but it pulls up strongly when you need it to. You’ve just gotta get used to the pedal feel. 

The transmission is a good thing at speed in manual mode. It won’t overrule you if you want to find the redline, and it sounds tremendous. The exhaust is exhilarating!

With roof on and windows up there’s very noticeable noise intrusion - lots of tyre roar and engine noise. But remove the roof and drop the windows and you get the full effect of the drive experience - you’ll even get some "sut-tu-tu” wastegate flutter. It doesn’t even matter that much that the stereo system is so rubbish.

At normal speeds in normal driving you do need to be considerate of the powertrain because it is finnicky and slow to react at times. There’s notable lag if you’re gentle on the throttle, both from engine and transmission, and the fact peak torque doesn’t come on song until 2200rpm means there’s lag to contend with. 

It’ll be a difficult choice between this and Alpine A110 and a Porsche Cayman – each of these vehicles has a very different character. But for me, this is the most go-kart like and it is, undeniably incredibly involving to drive.

You’re in the wrong spot if you want the latest in safety technology. Sure, it’s at the cutting edge because it has an ultra strong carbon-fibre design, but there’s not much else happening here.

The 4C has dual front airbags, rear parking sensors and an alarm with tow-away protection, plus - of course - electronic stability control. 

But there are no side airbags or curtain airbags, there’s no reversing camera, there’s no auto emergency braking (AEB) or lane keep assist, no lane departure warning or blind spot detection. Admittedly - there are a few other sports cars in the segment which lack safety smarts, too, but 

The 4C has never been crash tested, so there’s no ANCAP or Euro NCAP safety score available.

The Polestar 2 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered by an eight-year, 160,000km warranty.

While this battery warranty length is standard, a five-year warranty is getting a little short now in the grand scheme of things as many brands are moving to seven-year warranties.

Owners also get five years' of roadside assistance which can be accessed by pressing the ‘Connect’ button on the overhead console. It’s available 24/7 and includes car recovery and alternative transport, if required.

Logbook servicing is required every 24 months or 30,000km, which is standard for EVs. At the time of writing Polestar Australia was finalising service pricing for the MY26 2 and we'll update this review as soon as we receive the details.

There are a total of 23 Polestar service centres around Australia, a number of them shared with Volvo.

If you’re hoping that a ‘simple’ car like the 4C will mean low ownership costs, you might be disappointed in this section.

The Alfa Romeo website service calculator suggests that over 60 months or 75,000km (with service intervals set every 12 months/15,000km), you will have to fork out $6625 total. For a breakdown, the services cost $895, $1445, $895, $2495, $895.

I mean, that’s what you get when you buy an Italian sports car, I suppose. But consider you can get a Jaguar F-Type with five years of free servicing, and the Alfa looks like a rip-off. 

The Alfa does, however, come with a three-year/150,000km warranty plan, which includes the same cover for roadside assist.