Peugeot 3008 vs Nissan Juke

What's the difference?

The new Peugeot 3008 GT Premium Hybrid might not be the most spacious SUV for passengers, but it makes up for it with ample boot space and a standout design. It’s fresh-faced, interesting and packed with comfort features that elevate the everyday driving experience.

Is it expensive? Absolutely. But it also delivers a genuinely premium cabin that many rivals can’t match, along with refined on-road manners and efficiency that make it a pleasure to drive.

It doesn’t hit every note perfectly but there’s definitely a melody here worth listening to.

The Juke is a fun little car. It looks cool, it packs most of the important features and safety equipment, but while it can be fun to drive, it’s also a little clunky around town.

It’s so frustrating, because there is a great car in there somewhere, and it would take only small tweaks and enhancements to bring it out.

The third-generation Peugeot 3008 boasts a striking silhouette, with coupe-like lines at the rear and well-proportioned overall dimensions that give it a confident, refined stance.

Signature Peugeot elements like the claw-inspired LED headlights and tail-lights lend it a distinctive, modern edge, which elevates its presence in a crowded SUV segment.

That said, the extensive use of black plastic cladding around the lower body detracts from the otherwise premium exterior and feels out of place.

Step inside and the cabin is easily one of the most captivating interiors I've been in recently. There's real design flair here: a multi-level centre console, sculpted ambient lighting panels that highlight the angular dashboard, and a rich, eclectic mix of materials. From quilted Nappa leather seats to textured grey knit fabric and brushed aluminium accents, it’s a refreshingly bold and beautifully executed space.

Add the panoramic sunroof and long equipment list, it's a cabin that you'll like to spend a lot of time in.

Urban style is clearly what the Juke is about. It’s always been about this, but the original incarnation, while unusual, was a bit bulbous and awkward. The current version is a razor-sharp re-interpretation of the original.

Ugly duckling no more, the Juke blends the elements of Nissan’s current design language with its own unique take, in a clever way.

The roofline and bulbous face of the original car, complete with its ‘eye’ headlights are all maintained, but this time they look more contemporary with a splash of chrome and gunmetal plastic in the face, offset by gloss blacks running down the doorline.

The new light fittings look great and the curviness is also gently off-set with some sharp angles. The massive 19-inch wheels finished in a two-tone gloss black and aluminium brush keep this car looking like a concept come to life. Just don’t crash them into the curb. It would be very easy to.

The cool elements continue inside, with rotary air vents, a blend of textures, including a gloss grey for the vent claddings, with white stitching for the wheel, seat, and into the door cards, too.

There are touches of chrome about the place, and an ambient red LED light surrounding the shifter, which sits on its own little pedestal thing.

It’s quirky and punches above its weight when it comes to soft trims in the doors. Like most higher-grade Nissans the seats are pretty comfy, too, clad in a hard-wearing synthetic leather material.

But it won’t be for everyone, and it’s not without its downsides. The abundance of grey plastic down the centre console is a bit cheap, and the tech offering doesn’t match the youthful style.

The centre screen is adequate, but compared to many rivals it’s a bit small and dull, and the Juke is still missing a digital overhaul for its instrument cluster.

The black headlining, usually reserved for sportier cars, makes the cabin feel smaller than it is.

The best part of the cabin is easily up front. There's generous space, and the seats are comfortable, even before you engage any of their functions. Longer trips have been a dream. I particularly enjoyed the massage settings, though the session durations felt a bit inconsistent.

Storage in the front is cleverly designed, with plenty of options: a sunglasses holder, a large glovebox, a phone shelf, a deep centre console and ample drink holders. It’s easy to keep the space tidy and organised.

Charging options are solid, with two USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket and a wireless charging pad.

The updated multimedia system has a screen that is wider than it's tall, making the icons small and easy to miss while on the go. I did tap the wrong one a few times!

That said, I appreciated the customisable quick-access and instrument panels, and connecting to the wireless Apple CarPlay was seamless. The touchscreen can be a little laggy, but overall the system is functional and intuitive once you're used to it.

Owing to its relatively short 4542mm length, rear legroom is tight, and the bench isn’t wide enough to comfortably seat three adults over long distances. This just makes it feel cramped for a mid-size SUV and it's something my eight-year old noticed straight away.

The seats are well-padded, though, and rear amenities are strong with directional air vents, heated outboard seats, two USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket and the usual cupholders and map pockets.

Boot space is generous at 520L with a flat load floor. The 48-volt battery means there's no spare tyre, but the powered tailgate with kick-function was a lifesaver during errand runs this week. For more flexibility, the rear row folds in a 40/20/40 split.

The Juke is a small SUV in the true sense of the word, sitting below the Qashqai which is more like a mid-sizer these days in terms of dimensions.

However, it’s quite cleverly packaged on the inside and is more useful than it first appears.

The front seats, for example, offer heaps of headroom and a surprising amount of width, and while the seats are manual, they’re pretty adjustable. I was able to find a great seating position.

There are big pockets in the doors with an integrated bottle holder suitable for even the largest bottles, although the centre console area is a bit less versatile, choosing its funky design over additional storage.

It features two good bottle holders, but a tiny armrest box and a shallow tray with one 12V socket and a USB-A outlet, as well as an auxiliary audio input under the climate controls.

On the topic of climate controls, I love the fact the Juke maintains a dedicated ventilation panel complete with buttons and dials for all the core functions. No touchscreen nonsense here.

The media screen, as mentioned, is a tad small, and falls victim to glare easily.

The stock Nissan software is a massive upgrade on the brand’s previous-generation products, but while it’s functional it’s far from the prettiest or the fastest on the market.

The back seat offers more space than you might assume, but it’s not as well thought-out as the front of the cabin. At 182cm tall I fit behind my own driving position with just enough space for my knees and just enough headroom.

There are decent bottle holders in the doors, and a further two small ones in the drop-down armrest. The backs of the front seats are clad in that synthetic leather material, which is nice, and have soft pockets, too.

The back of the front centre console offers just a single USB-A outlet and a small cubby. There are no adjustable air vents for rear passengers. It also feels a little claustrophobic back there thanks to the black trim on everything and smaller windows.

Boot capacity for the Juke is impressive for an SUV in this class, with 422 litres on offer, which is close to the volume we’d expect from something a size-bracket up, and 1305L with the second row folded down. There is a space-saver spare under the boot floor.

The Juke range kicks off from just $28,390 which gets you into a base ST and reaches to $36,890 for the top-spec Ti.

We’re driving the $34,440 (before on-road costs) ST-L which is the upper mid-grade car.

It scores concept-style 19-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch digital screen between the analog dials, a surround camera system, single-zone climate, keyless entry and push-start ignition, and LED headlights. 

The quite attractive ‘Magnetic Blue’ paint our car wears is a $700 option. For an additional $1133 you can also step up to the ST-L+ grade which adds alternate two-tone seat trim, chrome and black highlights and a 10-speaker Bose audio system.

While this ST-L grade gets the lion’s share of Juke equipment without the price-hike to the Ti (and is therefore the pick of the range) there are some notable items missing at this price.

For example, there’s no wireless phone charging, no head-up display, no fully digital instrument cluster, and no electrical adjustment for the seats. The 8.0-inch multimedia screen is starting to look a bit dated, too.

Still, it looks trendy and those massive wheels are well above the standard for a car at this size or price. So, if you’re going for style over equipment there is a choice to be made here.

Nissan also hasn’t cheaped out on safety equipment, with most active stuff coming standard, even on the base ST. More on this later.

Pricing is about line-ball with its most direct competitors. It’s a tad cheaper than some like the outgoing similarly-styled Toyota C-HR (Koba 2WD - $35,695), or slightly more expensive than others like the current equivalent Ford Puma (ST-Line - $33,190) or Mazda CX-3 (Touring SP - $34,300) although it is also ever so slightly larger than those last two by width, height, and wheelbase.

All grades of the 3008 are powered by the same mild-hybrid setup, featuring a 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol engine that's paired with a small electric motor and a 48-volt battery. Power is sent through a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, with the system delivering combined outputs of 100kW of power and 230Nm of torque.

Performance is modest, with a 0-100km/h sprint time taking 10.2 seconds. It’s perfectly adequate for everyday driving around town and in traffic, but the lack of urgency becomes more noticeable when overtaking at highway speeds. Still, the hybrid system offers smoother low-speed acceleration and improved efficiency over the outgoing petrol-only model.

In the Juke’s messy engine bay lies a 1.0-litre, three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine which sends 84kW/180Nm to the front wheels.

Nissan has its own 'HR10DET' engine code for this unit but it’s actually a Renault 'H5Dt' engine as evidenced by Renault logos all over the place.

Power is communicated by a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic which has been a source of strife for this car since it arrived. This very European engine and transmission combination is one which the Juke shares with its Renault Captur cousin.

I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but I would prefer a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which Nissan uses elsewhere in its range. It would solve maybe the main issue with this car, which we’ll explore up next in the driving section of this review

The new mild-hybrid powertrain brings a solid improvement to efficiency, with an official combined fuel consumption of 4.9L/100km. Paired with a 55-litre fuel tank, that delivers a theoretical driving range of up to 1122km, which is an impressive figure for a mid-size SUV.

Over the past week, I’ve done a mix of longer highway drives, urban errands and the usual big grocery hauls. My real-world average came in at 6.1L/100km, which is still a strong result for this segment.

The system also features regenerative braking, which while not customisable, is noticeable in everyday driving. It kicks in strongly enough to give the sensation of heavy braking at times, particularly in city traffic and it reminds you that it's working behind the scenes to recover energy.

One of the reasons this car comes equipped with a dual-clutch automatic is to chase fuel efficiency as well as emissions output. On paper DCT autos don’t suffer the inherent losses of a traditional torque converter transmission.

The official combined cycle fuel consumption figure is 5.8L/100km. My week of driving, weighted slightly more towards freeway conditions, produced a marginally higher average of 6.8L/100km. It’s not the claim, but it’s pretty good.

This little engine requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel, and the Juke has a 46-litre fuel tank, suggesting a driving range of 793km using the official fuel consumption number.

The 3008 has been genuinely enjoyable to drive. It’s easy to handle, with responsive steering and a stable, confident feel at higher speeds. The transmission generally keeps the powertrain in the right gear, only occasionally over-revving during open-road driving.

Power delivery is prompt enough for stop-start traffic and quick city lane changes. That said, there's a noticeable dip in performance when overtaking on the highway and it’s a clear reminder that this isn’t a high-output powertrain.

Visibility is generally good, though the narrow rear window can limit your view, especially when passengers or a child seat are in the back. Still, the pillars didn’t obstruct my view from the driver’s seat.

The suspension is on the firmer side, so you will feel the larger bumps, but it strikes a decent balance for everyday driving.

There’s a bit of body roll when cornering, which prevents it from feeling as sporty as its coupe-inspired design might suggest.

Parking is a breeze thanks to the clear 360-degree camera system, ample sensors and a tight 10.64m turning circle. My only gripe is that the rear camera points slightly downward, which can make the view feel narrower than expected.

The Juke can be fun to drive, and I wanted to like it more, but the transmission its peppy little engine is paired with is frustrating.

Outputs of 84kW/180Nm doesn’t sound like a lot, but power isn’t the problem. The little engine has a fun turbo-surge which pairs with the Juke's light frame to make for a car which is quite athletic when you push it.

The issue is a mountain of turbo-lag conspires with the clunky dual-clutch automatic to make it far too sluggish off the line.

There’s a full second (or two, at times) to wait for any power to arrive, which simply isn’t good enough at T-junctions and roundabouts, the kind of situations a little urban SUV like this will constantly be encountering.

Nissan says the transmission software was even updated after the Juke’s launch, but it’s still not where it should be.

It has good traits, too. When you’re out on the open road, it has quick, snappy and well-defined shifts, and the engine is much better when it’s being properly pushed, too.

It has a gruff, entertaining tone, and the Juke’s light frame, firm ride, and comparatively heavy steering make it a joy to throw into some corners.

The long wheelbase for such a small SUV, paired with a decent set of tyres, also keeps it confident when its predecessor was a little clumsy.

Again, though, the reasonably hard ride, not helped by the very large wheels, isn't its best trait in an urban environment. The Juke is by no means uncomfortable, it just seems like the priorities for this little SUV aren’t in the right place.

I’ve said this before but there’s a great car in here somewhere. The Juke is fun to drive in the right environment, it’s just this environment is not where most prospective buyers will primarily be looking to use it.

What could fix this issue? A different transmission perhaps. Better yet, an e-Power hybrid powertrain.

The Juke's standard active safety features include freeway-speed auto emergency braking, lane departure warning with lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control and traffic sign recognition.

Last time I reviewed this car I complained about the way it vibrates the steering wheel when the lane keep function decides you’re going out of your lane. But having since experienced so many more invasive lane keep systems, this one seems comparatively low-key.

Elsewhere, the Juke gets the standard array of six airbags (dual front, side, and curtain) and wears a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2019 standards.

The 3008 comes with a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is okay but now feels a bit basic, especially when rivals like Nissan offer up to 10 years of coverage (under specific servicing conditions).

Peugeot also provides a five-year capped-price servicing plan, or you can opt to pre-purchase servicing for three, four or five years. The five-year pre-paid plan comes in at $1890, which works out to be more affordable than sticking with the capped-price option.

Servicing intervals are every 12 months or 25,000km, whichever comes first. That’s quite generous, particularly if you rack up a lot of kilometres annually.

Nissan offers the Juke with a five-year, unlimited km warranty, with five-years of roadside assist included.

It requires servicing every 12 months or 20,000km and the cost is subject to a capped price servicing program for the first six years.

This averages $651.33 annually, which is not cheap for a small SUV in this class.

However, there is also the option of a pre-paid five-year service plan which brings the annual cost over five years down to a more reasonable $429.60.

But, notably, it does not include the pricy $1521 sixth-year interval. It’s worth asking yourself how long you’ll own the car for before splurging on it.