Nissan Z vs Kia Tasman

What's the difference?

The Nismo turns up the wick just enough to justify its $20K premium over the brilliant regular Z.

Visual changes inside and out are one thing, but with tangible boosts in performance, handling and braking – with no detriment to ride quality or comfort – as a result of properly engineered upgrades, the RZ34 version deserves its place in Nissan’s sports car hall of fame.

Note, though, that good as it is, the Nismo is also a potent reminder of how solid a foundation the standard Z also is… especially in manual gearbox guise.

The new Kia Tasman X-Line might not win everyone over with its styling, but as the saying goes, it’s what’s on the inside that counts. And in this case, Kia has delivered a ute that stacks up impressively where it matters most with its passenger comfort, towing ability, and on-road manners.

It also offers relative good value for the segment and plenty of thoughtful features for families and weekend DIYers. I’ve grown to like it and judging by my son’s enthusiasm, Kia has at least one very young brand ambassador already sold.

Reinterpreting a classic via retro styling isn’t always successful – hello, 2001 Ford Thunderbird ­– but what Nissan has achieved with the RZ34, given it’s a pastiche of several Z greatest hits from the ‘70s, ‘80s, ‘90s and today, is truly masterful design.

Take the cab-backward silhouette, long nose and short wheelbase; it somehow manages to deftly capture the spirit of previous Z generations, without looking like a bad caricature.

Points especially go to the stunning nose and tail treatments that evoke both the ‘70s 240/260/280 as well as the sadly long-forgotten Mid-4 II concept car of 1987.

Slightly longer than the regular model, the Nismo’s nose is meant to evoke the early ‘70s Japan domestic market Fairlady ZG, with the G denoting “Grand Nose”. Fun fact: Fairlady first appeared on the 1960 Datsun roadster as deference to the Broadway musical (and later Audrey Hepburn film, presumably) ‘My Fair Lady’.

Anyway, besides scraping speed humps and driveways, the Nismo’s elongated front bumper promotes improved engine cooling and better aero flow, as do the side sills, larger wraparound three-piece spoiler and redesigned rear bumper/diffuser. The wider-yet-lighter back wheels are 10mm wider. And a glossy red stripe runs along the underside like Anna Nicole Smith’s lipstick.

Does it all look better than the simpler, purer regular Z? No. But they perform better. And isn’t that the point of a Nismo?

If there’s one thing the Kia Tasman won’t do, it’s blend in. This ute has probably attracted more comments from my friends and family than any other car I’ve tested (and not all of them have been glowing).

With its distinctive, almost swollen curbside stance, the Tasman is a polarising sight. That said, it looks far better in person than in photos, and if you’re unsure, it’s worth giving it a proper once-over before making up your mind.

Kia has leaned hard into the bruiser aesthetic, with chunky 18-inch machined alloy wheels, large body panels, thick plastic wheel-arch mouldings, a bold grille, and a bonnet that seems to stretch on forever.

The details add to the effect, with LED projection headlights, vertical LED daytime running lights, and a handy little storage pocket above the rear wheel arch - which my son immediately claimed as a treasure box, though it’s really meant for practical items like work gloves.

At the rear, corner steps make climbing into the tray easier, but curiously, despite its 224mm ground clearance, Kia hasn’t added side steps for easier cabin access.

Step inside, and any doubts about the exterior styling may quickly fade. The Tasman’s cabin is impressive, with a spacious, premium feel that punches above expectations for a first-time ute.

There’s synthetic leather upholstery and trims, plenty of soft-touch materials in all the right places and a neat honeycomb detail framing the air vents.

The centrepiece is a sleek panoramic display set-up that combines dual 12.3-inch screens with a dedicated 5.0-inch climate control panel, giving the dash a thoroughly modern and upmarket look.

So, just as the exterior is an anthology of past Z car stylings, the same also applies inside.

A mishmash of new and old as well, they also marry together harmoniously – after you’ve bent and contorted yourself inside nice and snug, on the racy yet not-too-unforgiving set of Recaro bucket seats.

The Z’s signature sloping roof and rising window line; a trio of dials that have been a hallmark of the series since the 240Z, a thin three-spoke steering wheel; a physical hand brake and a pair of old-school seat base angle adjuster knobs just like in sports cars from 20 years ago betray the Nissan’s ageing DNA.

But they set the mood, like hearing a favourite old track, though one remixed by a contemporary DJ to a modern beat.

Which means that you’ll be able to view whichever artist you like through the 8.0-inch touchscreen, either via Bluetooth audio streaming, Spotify or some such app.

Easy to decipher and simple to navigate (though no imbedded GPS is fitted), the Z’s dashboard also offers the essential surround-view parking camera (given how limited vision is as you’re sat so low with not much glass to peer out through), amongst a host of vehicle functions. You’re also privy to extremely useful blind-spot alert thoughtfully placed inside the car by the mirror mounts, four cupholders if you count the door-sited ones and surprisingly generous storage. Practicality, thy name is Fairlady.

For lightness and sensible packaging, we understand why Nissan’s sports coupe is strictly a two-seater proposition – and certainly a roomy enough one for the lucky pair at that.

However, it’s a shame Nissan doesn’t offer a 2+2-seater option in the form of a pair of occasional jump seats behind, as per the old Datsun days, as there seems to be just enough space for smaller folk – though as a pair of shelves, that area did prove very useful during our week with the Nismo.

Issues? Along with a sheer lack of grace entering and exiting the Z, poor overall vision and 350Z-era switchgear that are now old enough to drive themselves, finding the right driving position eluded this particular 178cm tester. The seats do a great job keeping you firmly fixed in place, and of course the wheel tilts and telescopes, but those pair of knobs were forever being twirled and fiddled with.

Oh, and simultaneously unlocking and opening the doors was also confounding, due to exterior door handles and pressure sensor not designed for Homo Sapien hands.

Further back, and as in the two previous generations Zeds, a brace bisects the luggage area. Rated at 241 litres VDA, it is wide and flat but a wee bit shallow. At least it adds another level of practicality and is big enough for those weekends away.

There’s no cover (though seeing what’s inside isn’t easy) and no spare wheel of any size is fitted.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the Nismo…

The Kia Tasman impresses when it comes to passenger space. This is a genuine five-seater for adults, which is remarkable for a ute that hasn’t gone full-American-behemoth like a Ram or Chevrolet.

At 168cm (5' 6") the only small challenge for me is the lack of side steps because with its 224mm ground clearance and higher seating, climbing in and out can be a bit of a workout, especially on a slope.

Surprisingly, my eight-year-old had little trouble getting in, though he’s not always graceful on the exit. Expect to lend a hand with younger kids.

Seat comfort is excellent across both rows. Long seat bases provide proper under-thigh support and padding is generous. Both front seats are heated across three levels, though it’s a bit disappointing that only the driver’s seat is electric at this grade.

The rear bench is wide enough to comfortably fit three adults, and the flat floor ensures legroom is consistent for everyone. ISOFIX child-seat mounts and top-tether anchor points are present on the outboard seats, though there’s none in the middle, which might disappoint larger families.

Storage options are abundant, making the cabin easy to keep tidy. Up front, there are dual glove boxes - one large enough for more than just the manual and another more well-suited to a phone and wallet.

The middle console is shallow but long and features a 12-volt socket and a lid that flips over to create a picnic tray. There are a couple of generously-sized cupholders and drink bottle holders in each row, perfect if you have one of those emotional support water bottles!

The centre console also houses most of the charging options, including two USB-C ports and two wireless charging pads. There are another two USB-C ports unusually placed on the dash.

The rear offers zipped soft map pockets, device holders on the backs of the front seats, and more in the fold-down armrest.

The rear bench slides forward in a 60/40 split, and the seat bases lift to reveal 31L of storage, when accommodating the jack. Rear passengers also enjoy directional air vents, two USB-C ports and a 240-volt domestic outlet.

Technology in the cabin is mostly intuitive. The touchscreen is responsive, wireless Apple CarPlay is easy to connect, and the built-in sat nav comes with 10 years of map updates.

My only minor gripe is the climate control panel, as the steering wheel occasionally blocks it and the toggle symbols can be tricky to read.

Outside, the tray offers solid practicality with a soft-drop tailgate, full-size spare wheel, LED tray lights, and a payload capacity of 1027kg.

Tray dimensions are 1512mm H x 1572mm W x 540mm D, giving 1173L of storage, plus an extra 240-volt domestic outlet for DIY or worksite convenience.

The Kia Tasman is available in five grades, with only the entry-level S offering the choice of two- or four-wheel drive. The model tested here is the X-Line, which sits second from the top of the range.

At $67,990, before on-road costs, it manages to be the most affordable option when lined up against similarly positioned rivals. For context, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak starts at $69,640, the Isuzu D-Max X-Terrain at $70,500, and the Toyota HiLux Rogue at $71,530.

While the entire line-up shares the same engine, the X-Line steps things up with a range of premium features. These include synthetic leather upholstery, heated front seats, an electric driver’s seat, dual wireless phone chargers (instead of one), LED projection headlights, rear collision warning, a blind-spot view monitor, side parking sensors and a 360-degree camera system - though the latter really should be standard on a ute this size.

On the practical front, the X-Line also scores a remote-release tailgate, a storage box above the rear wheel arch, remote parking assist (via the key fob) plus sliding rear seats with under-seat storage.

Beyond these extras and some design tweaks, equipment is broadly shared with lower grades, which is where the price conversation gets interesting.

The X-Line commands a more than $18,000 premium over the S 4x4, and while that spend brings extra safety and convenience, it won’t completely soften the sting for every buyer.

Standard kit across the range remains strong, with wired and wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, dual 12.3-inch displays plus a 5.0-inch climate control screen, satellite navigation (with 10 years' of updates), OTA software updates, digital radio, a full-size spare, tray lighting, a soft-opening tailgate, six USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket and two 240-volt domestic-style outlets.

All up, compared to its direct rivals, the X-Line represents good value for what you get. Against its siblings, the leap isn’t quite as clear-cut but that’s nitpicking in what is otherwise a very competitive package.

Nissan sure knows how to make a great six-cylinder engine.

The Nismo’s internal combustion engine in question is the VR30DDTT – a twin-turbo V6 making four per cent more power and around 10 per cent more torque compared to the one found in the regular Z.

Power jumps 11kW and torque a handier 45Nm to 309kW @ 6400rpm and 520Nm between 2000rpm and 5200rpm respectively, providing extra punch as well as a slightly superior power-to-weight ratio of around 184kW per tonne.

That’s up 2kW/tonne, despite the Nismo gaining around 50 kilos, to 1680kg.

This has been possible thanks to extra turbo boost, revised ignition timing, improved cooling systems and updated engine management software.

Driving the rear wheels is a Mercedes-Benz based nine-speed torque-converter auto. Upgraded and retuned for track use, it includes a Sport+ mode providing speedier shift responses. Aided by the new launch control function, we managed a tidy 4.5 seconds from standstill to 100km/h.

Sadly, though, there’s no manual option as per the regular Z.

What else is unique here? Underneath, the platform might date all the way back to the 350Z of 2003, but Nismo has really worked some of its magic.

Along with the retuned dampers, everything else has been stiffened up – including the anti-roll bars, springs, bushes and even the steering rack mounts – to help deliver more controlled and linear steering. There’s extra underfloor bracing at the front, centre and rear of the car, thicker brake rotors and model-specific Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT600 tyres that are wider at the back, on gloss-black RAYS alloys.

Continuing to use a double-wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up, the Z’s front/rear weight distribution is 56/44 front/rear.

Now, the Nismo was our favourite version of the previous 370Z by some margin. How does it all square up in RZ34 guise?

All Kia Tasman variants are powered by the same 2.2-litre, four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, producing 154kW of power and 440Nm of torque.

That places it close to its Isuzu D-Max counterpart in terms of output, though Ford and Toyota rivals still offer slightly higher torque which is something to consider if you’re planning to tow larger toys or heavy trailers.

The X-Line holds its own with a 3.5-tonne braked towing capacity, a rear differential lock, and three terrain modes ('Snow', 'Mud' and 'Sand') for added confidence off the beaten track.

Kia has also included a clever ‘Tow Mode’, accessible via its own menu under Trailer on the media display. This feature allows you to select the weight range of whatever you’re towing, which fine-tunes the driving experience, especially how the eight-speed automatic shifts under load.

Not surprisingly, the Z Nismo needs to drink from the 98 RON premium unleaded petrol fountain.

Nissan reckons owners should expect to average 10.4L/100km (for 242 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions) on the combined cycle (and 15.0 and 7.7 L/100km for the urban and extra-urban ratings respectively.

This figure is almost half a litre worse than the non-Nismo Z’s 9.8L/100km result, but still substantially better than the six-speed manual base grade’s 10.8L, despite the latter being some 33kg lighter.

With a sizeable 62L tank, you might be able to average just under 600km between refills.

For the record, we achieved 11.9 litres per 100km in a mix of urban, freeway and performance driving which is not too bad at all given how often we fanged this thing.

The X-Line claims an official combined fuel consumption of 7.8L/100km and comes with a generous 80L fuel tank, giving it a theoretical driving range of around 1000km.

In real-world use, a mix of school runs, grocery trips, and a few longer drives, I recorded 8.8L/100km, which is a strong result for a ute of this size and capability.

Of course, this figure doesn’t account for towing a trailer or fully loading the tray, but for everyday family life, the Tasman strikes a good balance between power and efficiency. It’s the kind of ute you can happily drive all week without constantly hunting for a fuel station.

Nissan does plenty of things really well, and the Nismo is no exception.

Firing up the VR30DDTT 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 is also a reminder of how brilliant the brand’s six-cylinder engines are. They tingle all the right sensory areas, starting with the baritone rumble at idle.

What a portent of what’s to come!

Nismo’s massaging of the engine, combined with upgraded clutch packs and a retune of the nine-speed auto’s software, results in stronger, hungrier and angrier acceleration, no matter which of the three driving modes you’ve selected. Even in Normal, the Nissan leaps off the line. In Sport, its appetite for speed is palpable. In Sport+, this thing is eating up the tarmac. Somehow, in an EV era where 4.5s to 100 is ho-hum, the (electronically enhanced but who cares) guttural exhaust bellow seems to amplify the action and thrills.

And spills. For five of our seven days together, the heavens poured. Now, in Normal mode, the Nismo was as benign and controlled as you’d hope in wet conditions, the driver-assist tech metering out just enough torque and braking to seamlessly keep the car humming along. Ever-present but always nuanced, they’ll help make your commute a safer and more relaxing one.

Selecting Sport loosened things up markedly, with the driver needing to be ready to counteract with steering, seating and throttle, though still with a safety net to keep the car from going totally out of whack; Sport+, meanwhile, is not for amateurs or the distracted. This is serious, tail-wagging waywardness that should only be fully explored with experience and care.

Later in the week, Launch Mode in Sport+ on cold but dry bitumen also requires super concentration, as we discovered attempting to extract the fastest acceleration time. Sideways in a straight line at 100km/h-plus is not for the faint hearted.

Beyond all-out performance and drama, the Nismo soars with weighty yet linear and precise steering, resulting in satisfying, hunkered-down handling that is the hallmark of a great sports car. Really tight turns can be taken at impressive speeds, but there’s about 1.7 tonne of muscle to manipulate, so the real fun can be found blasting along a snaking set of more open corners, where the Z’s inherent thrust, poise and grip come into play, all to the symphony of that bi-turbo V6.

That the suspension can feel both firm and supple at the same time is another arrow in the Nismo’s bow.

Nissan isn’t pretending this is anything but a rousing and rapid grand tourer with track aspirations, so the fact there’s also comfort and sophistication to be enjoyed just shows the sheer bandwidth of this particular Z.

Downsides? There’s always a wall of sound, be it mechanical or noise intrusion from the rubber and/or bitumen. The Nismo is rarely quiet. The extended front spoiler seems to summon up speed humps and bumps you never knew existed. The adaptive cruise control’s inability to resume in heavy stop/start traffic betrays this car’s 350Z-era tech. And the lack of a manual transmission, we reckon, is a missed opportunity for an even greater degree of interactive sports car driving.

Still, the Nismo delivers exactly what the brand promises, and continues to improve a firm favourite for speed and drama.

But the gap between Nismo and regular model is smaller than the one that existed in the preceding 370Z, which means that – if $100K driveaway is too steep – you’re already driving something elevated in the standard Z. Particularly if you yearn for a manual.

It’s all good.

The X-Line has enough power to feel confident on the open road, though I’d have liked a touch more grunt for overtaking or quick acceleration.

The eight-speed automatic shifts smoothly most of the time, but occasionally drops out of lower gears a bit too quickly, giving a slightly luggy feel when you need an extra burst of speed.

The higher ride height has its pros and cons. Visibility is excellent and you can see the road ahead clearly but it can act a bit like a windsail on the highway, pushing the ute around in strong crosswinds. There’s some roll through corners, though less than I expected.

A practical consideration for families is that from the driver’s seat, it’s often tricky to see small children or pets near the car, so vigilance is key when they’re outside the vehicle!

Ride comfort is decent for a ute. The Tasman absorbs most bumps with ease, though it’s not always perfectly poised on rougher surfaces. Overall, it’s a comfortable open-roader and the cabin remains relatively quiet despite the rumbling turbo-diesel engine.

At over 5.4m in length with a 12.3m turning circle, manoeuvring takes a bit of planning. Thankfully, the 360-degree camera system, along with front, side, and rear parking sensors helps a lot, though I feel more comfortable backing in than reversing out of tight spaces.

While the X-Line and flagship X-Pro grades don’t yet carry over the five-star ANCAP safety rating achieved by their siblings in 2025, they do share the same impressive suite of safety equipment.

Standard highlights include blind-spot monitoring, driver attention warning, forward collision warning, seven airbags, rear cross-traffic alert, safe exit warning, lane keep assist and lane departure warning, plus SOS emergency call functionality, seatbelt reminders for all seating positions and daytime running lights.

Towing-focused safety is also well covered, with a trailer brake controller and trailer stability assist. Families benefit from two ISOFIX mounts and top-tether anchor points on the outboard rear seats, along with a rear occupant alert and child locks for the windows and doors.

Stepping up to the X-Line grade adds more premium touches, including a blind spot view monitor, parking collision assist, side parking sensors and a crisp 360-degree camera system that makes manoeuvring the 5.4m ute far less intimidating.

Like many recent Kia models, some of the driver assistance tech can be intrusive. The driver attention warning and traffic sign recognition alerts quickly become tiresome, while the lane keep assist feels jerky at times.

Thankfully, the last two can now be toggled off easily from the steering wheel. The adaptive cruise control also isn’t as finely calibrated as rivals as it tends to brake too hard and takes its time returning to speed.

Your wallet’s pretty secure as well.

Like all Zs, the Nismo is subject to a warranty period of five years with unlimited kilometres, while service intervals are fixed at every 12 months or 10,000km – whichever occurs first. There is also five years of roadside assistance.

Nissan also provides pre-paid maintenance plans that can save up to $245 over three years, as well as capped-price servicing. At the time of publishing, the capped-price service appointments cost between $347 and $950 depending on the year of ownership.

The Kia Tasman comes with a seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is a solid term for the class.

Complementing that is a seven-year capped-price servicing plan, with services averaging $610 per visit. That’s a little higher than some rivals.

For context, the Ford Ranger averages $399, the Toyota HiLux $580, and the Isuzu D-Max $449 per service but it does include roadside assistance if you service through a Kia dealership.

Services are spaced every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. With around 162 Kia service centres across Australia, city and regional owners are reasonably well covered.

Overall, the Tasman offers relatively straightforward ownership, even if servicing isn’t the cheapest in the segment.