What's the difference?
Ah, Mitsubishi. When my Dad was buying the three diamonds, it was all Astron engines, high-roofed Sigma wagons and then Magnas and stuff.
The company knew how to make passengers cars, made them here and if you were a bearded Akubra hat type, you bought a Pajero. And if you were a weirdo you bought the wacky little Pajero io, because why wouldn't you?
Times have changed and Mitsubishi has changed with them. Now it's almost all SUVs, the tiddly Mirage everyone seems (thankfully) to have forgotten about and even the Methuselah-like Lancer is no more. I thought that car would never die (yes, it will live on in our hearts, etc.).
The Eclipse Cross came not a moment too soon for Mitsubishi. While the ASX is unaccountably still a strong seller for the brand as is the rather better Outlander, there's a gap there in which Mazda, Hyundai and Toyota (among others) make quite a bit of hay.
Mitsubishi needed to be in that market and to do so, resurrected the name of a late '90s sports coupe (yes, really) and slapped it on a startling-looking SUV. If you're gonna plug a gap, go large, right?
Long before it was cool to take the name of a sports car that was never officially released here and slap it on the rump of a compact SUV (Ford Puma, if you're wondering), Mitsubishi had already been there and done that with a car of its own, the Eclipse Cross.
One imagines it was so named because Eclipse owners would be terribly cross about what the bods in marketing had done, but it's rather more likely that Cross is short for crossover. At least, that's what they tell me.
The Eclipse Cross has been around for a couple of years. Originally intended as a replacement for the ageing ASX, people just kept buying the ASX at quite a clip.
Even in fire and plague-riddled 2020, Mitsubishi shifted more than 14,000 ASXs while the Eclipse Cross managed just under a third of that number. Nothing to be sneezed at, I hasten to add, because when you combine the two, that means nearly one in five small SUVs bought last year were Mitsubishis.
When you stand back and look at the Eclipse Cross, it's a curious thing. Barely bigger than a Nissan Qashqai - heck, it's not much bigger than the ASX - and priced at the top end of compact SUVs and the middle of mid-sizers.
It's got an impressive safety package but drives like a car much older than it looks. It pairs a brand new engine with a deeply ordinary transmission. For every bit of contemporary bling, Mitsubishi saddles it with some old school cruft.
Despite all that, I almost liked it - roomy, great safety gear, interesting to look at and almost well-priced. Perhaps the LS is a better buy - a fair bit less money, not much less bling.
Apart from the slightly improved styling, the most striking thing about the Eclipse Cross is that 10-year warranty (terms and conditions applying, naturally). It is better than it was when first launched but I can't help wondering if Mitsubishi is being a little too ambitious for this car. It was supposed to replace the old ASX but that didn't work, so pushing it upmarket to compete with more accomplished cars from a huge range of other makers seems even more perplexing.
On the face of it, it is good value, but can't hope to compete with the CX-30 let alone HR-V or C-HR and RAV4. There is a plug-in hybrid coming, which may make a compelling case, as it does for its other under-the-metal sibling, the Outlander. You're also a bit cornered, here, because the Exceed gets all the safety gear that other models don't have. Many of its competitors have the same package up and down the range with a couple of exceptions.
I can't really say why you would choose this car over the plethora of other options except you might see it and fall in love with it. And on that score, I won't try to dissuade you because it's good enough.