What's the difference?
When the GLB arrived in Australia in 2020 it did so to much fanfare as the little premium SUV which could do it all.
It had seven-seats, ideal dimensions slotting underneath the mid-size GLC, the option of all-wheel drive, and even a go-fast AMG version to boot.
Now, the clever little luxury SUV can add another headline feature - it’s gone fully electric.
The EQB, like the EQA before it, follows the formula of its donor car to a T, being familiar for an existing Mercedes buyer whilst also making the jump to a fully electric drivetrain.
For now it comes in two variants, a two-wheel drive with seven seats, and a five-seat all-wheel drive which leans more on the performance aspect of its electric drivetrain. Is the trade-off worth it?
The answer is: It depends. Read on to find out why.
Iconic/gangster G-Class Geländewagen aside, is there a cooler-looking Mercedes-Benz SUV than the GLB and so – by association – its electrically-powered EQB twin?
And while we're asking questions, does the electric connection make the EV version even more so?
Let’s take a deeper dive into the new EQB – a striking SUV that Mercedes reckons will be its bestselling EV for the foreseeable future. Because there's much more to this Benz than meets the eye.
I really liked the combustion version of this car, the GLB, for its funky style and flexibility and I was pleased to find how easily Mercedes has made the conversion to a fully-electric layout for the EQB.
Despite a tall price, the EQB 350 is a compelling option for those seeking something a bit more luxurious than the Tesla Model Y, something a bit larger than the Volvo XC40 Recharge, and something a bit smaller than the Audi e-tron or the EQC.
The main trade-off for this 350 variant is the loss of the seven-seat layout in favour of more performance. Instead it offers a huge boot, has a sufficient range for city-based buyers, and offers surprising levels of fun, too.
Just make sure you’ve considered its rivals which may potentially offer more range or features for the same money.
The EQB is a likeable yet complicated machine.
On one hand, the high pricing is a real hurdle, even in the base 250, while the 350 4Matic costing the wrong side of $110K driveaway can’t even be had with seven seats. What is the point of it?
On the other, though, the EQB is roomier than its appearance suggests, way lovelier inside than anticipated, and – especially after allowed to really be driven hard and fast – a whole lot more Mercedes-Benz in the way the 350 4Matic moves, steers, grips, rides and stops.
As a result, we’d skip the capable but bland 250 and try to haggle hard on the price of the altogether too-expensive yet compelling 350 4Matic instead. It’s the EQB to be in.
The EQB has a very predictable design in that it doesn't stray from the combustion car’s formula. At all.
The only evidence from the outside this is the electric version is the blanked out grille, and closer observers might notice the rear light bar which cuts across the boot lid is different from the split tail-light design which appears on the combustion car.
Still, to my eyes, the GLB is a cool design with its upright boxy look bucking the curvaceous trend of most EVs, and, indeed, the rest of the Mercedes line-up.
Its rebellious streak makes it one of the most appealing SUVs in Mercedes’ current range, and it comes with a bit of toughness which is missing from the EQA.
If nothing else, it’s a completely different look from Tesla’s amorphous Model Y, and this may be enough to appeal to some.
Inside is identical to other Mercedes models which sit on the MFA2 small car platform, immediately setting itself apart with the big high-resolution screens, glitzy ambient lighting, as well as an abundance of chrome and gloss black.
It’s designed to impress from the first time you hop in, and there’s no doubt it does, but it may be a bit over-the-top for some, particularly fans of the more conservative Mercedes designs of eras past.
The chrome in particular becomes a bit of a problem, as it has an annoying habit of catching the reflection of the sun and sending it directly into the driver’s eyes.
It all feels as plush as a circa-$100,000 luxury car should though, with the ‘Artico’ seat trim being one of the better synthetic options on the market, and soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin selling the Mercedes promise.
The GLB toughness is even reflected in the chiselled out finishes in the door, dash, and centre console, helping to set it apart from the tamer EQA.
The software is also fast, high resolution, and well presented, which bodes well given the amount of screen real-estate, and the amount of customization is impressive, too.
Again, there are many who will prefer its look and feel to the Apple-store chic of the Tesla Model Y, or the pared back Scandinavian approach of the XC40 Recharge, but also those who won’t. Like many new Mercedes products, it continues to polarise buyers.
The EQB does not employ a dedicated EV architecture – sometimes referred to as a ‘skateboard’ platform – like the Tesla Model Y, or for that matter the brilliant Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6 and Genesis GV60 at around the Benz’s price points.
By this, we mean that it was originally designed as an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. In this case, what lies beneath is the MFA2 platform, first seen in the redesigned A-Class hatch back in 2018, and applied to all transverse-engined Mercedes models since.
The upshot here is that there are some compromises as a result compared to the aforementioned EV-only alternatives, namely concerning packaging as well as weight distribution in some cases.
Like we said earlier, the EQB’s design is eye-catching and quite handsome. It is clear that the success of the GLB that spawned it is partly attributed to the chunky, almost function-over-form tall-boy utilitarian styling. That ‘W’ shaped window-line kink is an interesting visual feature too.
The changes from GLB to EQB do give the EV definite points of difference, from the front-end’s black flat panel and fibre optic light that connects the (blue-highlight) headlights, to the curved strip LED tail-lights and bumper-sited numberplate mount.
We reckon the 20-inch AMG turbine wheels really do enhance the EQB aesthetically as well, but of course they’re an option on the 250. Though probably not in Gold Rose.
This should be the GLB’s calling card. It’s a car with an ideal footprint, not as wide or as long as most mid-size SUVs, whilst also offering a larger cabin and boot.
The big drawback for this variant in particular is the lack of a seven-seat option, as the all-wheel drive requires the under-floor space which is required to give rear occupants legroom.
It’s a shame, too, because I found the two rear seats in this car’s GLB combustion equivalent to be surprisingly accommodating for even adults.
As a result of these missing seats, though, the full volume can be exploited in the boot, which comes in at a whopping 495 litres.
It’s rivalled by the Model Y, which also has a cavernous boot, although it has a much larger storage area than the Volvo XC40.
As an added bonus, there is a decent under-floor storage area which has enough space for all your charging cables, although there is no so-called ‘frunk’ with what is normally the engine bay taken up by cooling and auxiliary hardware.
At first glance there’s so much going on under there, you’d be forgiven for thinking the EQB has an actual engine!
The cabin is also enormous as well as configurable. The EQB has massive rear doors (as it’s designed to be a seven-seater) to make it easy to get in and out of, and once you’re settled in, the amount of space for me (at 182cm) behind my own driving position is very impressive, with ample leg, arm, and headroom.
Rear passengers score the same nice synthetic leather seat and door trim as the front passengers, a bottle holder in each door, as well as two in a flip-out caddy on the drop-down armrest, two nets on the backs of the front seats, dual adjustable air vents, and power outlets on the back of the console. There is also a separate section of the split sunroof to benefit those in the back seat.
Up front the cabin is equally flexible, although it immediately seems odd that the front seats are manually adjustable. Almost unforgivable in a $100,000 car.
At least the trim is comfortable, and again, the space is configurable for people of all shapes and sizes.
Storage options include large bins in each door, a split-opening armrest console with USB-C outlets inside, a slide-open area underneath the climate unit, which houses a wireless phone charger and additional power outlets, as well as the usual glove box arrangement.
Soft trims continue into the doors, although one small annoyance is the excess of chrome trim which has the unfortunate habit of reflecting harsh Australian sun into your eyes if it hits at the wrong angle.
The software is nice and quick, but can be cumbersome and over-complicated to operate at times, particularly when using the centre touchpad, or adjusting the dash with the small touch elements on the wheel.
It is also notable the Apple CarPlay as-tested only took up a centre portion of the screen, and is not set-up for widescreen mode to take full advantage of the hardware.
Minor complaints aside, though, the EQB follows its combustion GLB twin in having by far one of the most flexible and configurable cabins in its class.
As with the popular GLB that spawned it, there’s more to the EQB than meets the eye.
Photos mask the German electric vehicle’s considerable length and height as well as the substantial space offered inside, giving the Mercedes a handy advantage compared to premium alternatives like the Volvo XC40 Recharge, the Genesis GV60 and BMW’s recently announced (and quite handsome in the flesh) iX1 due early next year.
In fact, the EQB’s lengthy 2829mm wheelbase accommodates the batteries as well as impressive cabin packaging flexibility. Its 4684mm body is actually 26mm longer and 37mm higher than the larger, current-shape (X253) GLC, though width is identical to the EQA, making this a long, tall but quite narrow SUV proportionally speaking.
That expansive feeling is boosted by deep side windows offering reassuring all-round vision, boosted by an excellent driving position. All launch vehicles had the AMG sports seats (optional on the EQB 250, so we can’t speak for the base model), but as tested, they provided hours and hours of comfort and support. Loads of adjustability also help.
The EQB’s dash design is attractive and contemporary, though it can also seem daunting at first, requiring time to learn and understand where all the switchgear and controls are. The ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice command mostly works well, too, and can provide additional tuition. The multimedia screen can be swiped like a tablet/iPad, or controlled via a fiddly touchpad on one of the steering wheel spokes.
Once mastered, the layout is logical and operation clear… with the exception of the drive selector on the right-hand side, which can be confused for an indicator and so knocked out of ‘gear’ and into Neutral on a regular basis. This has been a two-decade-long criticism of Mercedes models.
As with most MFA2 vehicles, the interior design and quality are a big step forward compared to earlier efforts. Multi-configurable digital instrumentation (including an elegant uncluttered mode), gorgeous turbine-look vents, a row of classy toggle switches for the main buttons and a great steering wheel are highlights to behold. Storage seems endless, reinforcing the practical nature of this cabin.
Speaking of which, stepping into the rear (second row) seats further underlines the EQB’s spaciousness. Entry/egress is easy due to wide-opening doors, taller folk should find ample room for knees, legs and (especially) heads, and the (slightly reclinable) backrest does its job. Comfy if firm cushions also slide forward (by up to 140mm) when required.
That’s to aid third-row access (where applicable). To that end, the second-row seats also tilt to allow people to squeeze past. Note, though that this is really a kids-only area, rated for occupants no taller than 1.65 metres. Surprisingly cosy, both chairs are OK for short trips, but longer ones would be a stretch too far except for the smallest passengers.
Keep in mind that all outboard middle and rear seats where fitted have ISOFIX latches for child seats.
Luggage space is another EQB bonus, offering 130 litres with all seven seats up, or 495L with the third-row folded. Drop the middle row and there’s 1710L (or 1620L in seven-seater versions). These figures are between 20L to 60L down compared to the GLB.
Note, too, there is no spare wheel fitted. Just a tyre-repair kit.
The EQB range kicks off from $87,800, before on-road costs, for the base 250, but the car we’re looking at for this review is the top-spec 350 4Matic, which wears a price-tag of $106,700.
There’s no doubt it’s a hefty price, even for an EV, and especially for a sort-of ‘small’ SUV. There’s more to consider, too. As I mentioned in the intro, the all-wheel drive system precludes the seven-seat layout in this top-spec car, and it has less range than the front-wheel drive model, too, dropping from 371km to 360km.
On the upswing, the dual-motor powertrain is far preferable to the so-so front-wheel drive option, and the 350 also gains an AMG-spiced bodykit and flat-bottomed steering wheel, as well as a panoramic sunroof.
Outside of the extra flair, the EQB 350 is almost as well equipped as you could hope, with the flashy dual-10.25-inch 'MBUX' screen set-up, Nappa leather steering wheel and interior appointments with Mercedes’ signature 'Artico' synthetic seat trim, LED headlights, ambient interior lighting with fully customisable RGB controls, dual-zone climate, a wireless phone charger, 20-inch alloy wheels, as well as keyless entry and push-start ignition.
Given the EQB’s dimensions it would seem its most direct rival is the Tesla Model Y, although it may not be a favourable comparison.
At over $100,000 the EQB 350 is still more expensive than the top-spec Model Y Performance, which is even more powerful than our Merc here.
Other more indirect rivals include the Volvo XC40 Recharge (from $74,490 in twin-motor form), or less performance-oriented Lexus UX300e ($80,691 for the top-spec Sports Luxury), although neither are as large as the EQB, and the Lexus has about half the performance.
Tricky one, this.
Kicking off from $87,800 (all prices are before on-road costs), the EQB 250 front-wheel drive is nearly $24,000 more expensive than the 1.3-litre turbo petrol-powered GLB 200 FWD equivalent.
From a numerical power-output point of view, however, the GLB 250 4Matic (which adds a 2.0-litre turbo petrol engine and all-wheel drive) only costs $10,265 less, which evens things out a bit more.
But wait. To match the GLB 250 4Matic spec, you’ll need to tick the $2900 third-row seats option box in the EQB 250, while AWD is unavailable, even as an option.
An electrified future comes neither cheap nor without compromise, no matter how much you frame it.
At least that $87,800 (which sits neatly between the EQA and EQC EV SUVs) does bring some interesting technology, starting with a 140kW electric motor mounted up front, as well as a sizeable 66.5kWh battery with a rated range of up to 371km (WLTP).
For more power and AWD, you’ll need the EQB 350 4Matic priced from $106,700, adding a second, rear-mounted electric motor for all-wheel-drive traction, upping the power output ante to 215kW, though range drops slightly to 360km.
But the latter is not available in seven-seat form as in some overseas markets, due to weight-related packaging safeguards. Sorry. It’s 250 or nothing if you need a third row.
On the safety front, you’ll find Mercedes’ Driver Assistance Package that includes autonomous emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control, as well as evasive steering and a ‘Parking Package’ featuring front and rear parking sensors and a surround-view camera.
Both models also boast LED headlights with high-beam assist, keyless entry/go, a Nappa-sheathed leather wheel, two 10.25-inch digital screens (for instrumentation and multimedia touchscreen), artificial leather upholstery, electric and heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, ambient lighting, ‘Hey, Mercedes’ voice control, a 10-speaker audio system, digital radio, wired Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, a wireless smartphone charger, a sensor-activated powered tailgate and alloy wheels (19-inch on 250 and 20-inch on 350 4Matic).
Keep in mind too that adaptive dampers are standard across the range.
Along with that second motor and AWD, the EQB 350 4Matic also adds a panoramic sunroof, sports seats, microfibre trim inserts, a flat-bottom steering wheel, illuminated door sills, a top-stitched dash and an AMG body kit.
For its first year on sale, the Edition 1 ($9100 extra on 250 and $3900 more on 350 4Matic) ushers in the AMG body kit on 250, Gold Rose 20-inch alloys, a Night Package with darkened highlights, illuminated sills, unique colour leather trim and vents, a different key, AMG mats and backlit interior elements.
Buyers of the EQB 250 can also choose other packs including an AMG Line Sports Package for $4300 and a $3000 Vision Package brandishing a Burmester audio upgrade and sunroof, while both models can be had with a $2500 MBUX Innovation pack offering a head-up display, MBUX Interior Assist that ‘senses’ hand gestures for the touchscreen and other functions, as well as MBUX Augmented reality for the standard navigation system.
At these prices, we'd argue they ought to be standard on every EQB...
There’s also a Mercedes-endorsed Wallbox option from $1710 if your home/work residence qualifies, bringing a Type 2 AC Charger, 22kW, single-phase and three-phase charging. A free Chargefox subscription is also expected to be announced shortly.
Direct, all-electric EQB rivals are very thin on the ground. Those optional third-row seats on the 250 are unique in the sub-$100K EV SUV field, with only the larger and more-expensive Tesla Model X offering the same. For now.
The EQB 350 4Matic, meanwhile, might offer a surprising amount of space and practicality, but at its six-figure starting price, it seems expensive for what you get.
While the EQB 350 loses its valuable third-row seats, it gains a much more impressive drivetrain than the lesser EQB 250 variant.
While that car has a so-so front-motor set-up producing 140kW/385Nm, the top-spec 350 sports a much more capable 215kW/520Nm dual-motor system.
This allows a 0-100km/h sprint time of 6.2 seconds, and while it’s not as fast as the entry-level Tesla Model 3, it’s still impressive for a 2153kg SUV.
The all-wheel drive capability also adds a level of confidence which can’t be matched by a front-drive, more on this in the driving section of this review.
As with the related EQA, the EQB uses an asynchronous motor and a single-speed reduction gear transmission under the bonnet to drive the front axle. In the 250, it makes 140kW of power and 385Nm of torque.
Moving on to the 350 4Matic, it delivers 215kW and 520Nm, since a second permanently excited synchronous motor is fitted on the rear axle. This slashes the 0-100km/h acceleration time from 8.9 seconds to 6.2s, though both offer a 160km/h top speed.
This is despite a heavier kerb weight (2153kg, up from 2059kg). Power to weight ratio for the 250 is 68kW per tonne, compared to the 350 4Matic’s 99.9kW/tonne. That second motor sure makes a difference!
Both models use a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack fitted between the axles, with a maximum 11kW AC and 100kW DC charging capability.
As with most electrified MFA2 models, front suspension is via MacPherson-style struts while the rear brings a multi-link arrangement. Steering is by electrically assisted rack-and-pinion.
Regardless of which version of the EQB is chosen, the SUV has a 66.5kWh lithium-ion battery pack, and in the case of our all-wheel drive 350, this grants it a 360km WLTP-rated driving range between charges.
My car was reporting around 350km of range at or near a full charge, while my week of testing produced a dash-reported consumption figure of just 18.2kWh/100km.
This is surprising for two reasons. Firstly, I subjected the EQB 350 to a significant amount of freeway testing during my time with it, which usually produces worse consumption numbers for EVs, but it actually bested its official 21.0kWh/100km official figure by a decent margin.
Secondly, I’m puzzled to find this car outperformed the smaller and lighter EQA 250 I had on test in 2021 in terms of overall consumption, and by a significant margin. Very odd.
When it comes to charging up, the EQB can be charged at a rate of 100kW on a fast DC charger, for a 10-80 per cent charge time in a claimed 30 minutes.
On the slower but cheaper-to-install AC standard, the EQB has an 11kW inverter, allowing a convenient ‘slow’ charge time of 4.1 hours. Expect between 25 and 30 hours on a standard wall socket.
Using WLTP figures, the EQB 250 has a combined consumption rating of 20.4kWh per 100km, down from the EQB 350 4Matic’s 21kWh/100km.
Maximum range is rated at 371km and 360km respectively. Note that due to challenging flood-water and torrential rain weather conditions, on-road real-world figures were not available during the launch drive.
The EQB offers varying levels of energy recuperation to help recharge the battery pack. In ‘D Auto’ it figures out the level of resistance automatically, but drivers can also choose to do this manually via ‘D+’ that provides coasting, ‘D’ that brings mild regeneration off-throttle, and ‘D—’ that activates maximising regen for close to single-pedal driving. These are paddle activated.
Cables for home charging with three-prong outlets are included – an eight metre long one plus a five metre public charging cable.
Mercedes says that using a 100kW DC charger will take an EQB from 10-80 per cent charged in 30 minutes, while an 11kW AC public outlet needs 4.1 hours and at home using a regular 3kW 10-amp socket requires at least 25 hours.
This is where the 350 version of the EQB shines. This car is a beast to drive with plenty of power available at your right foot, and incredible amounts of traction to match from its torque-vectored all-wheel drive system.
This lets it be rapid, but not scary, and despite its square and upright body, might surprise you when it comes to carving a few corners.
Like many EVs, the EQB’s weight feels low and centred, but it appears the suspension has been adjusted to remove any bouncy quality, which might come with the additional weight added over the combustion variants, with nearly 500kg of lithium batteries under the floor.
In fact, the ride is also one of the things which impressed me most about the EQB. It even has huge 20-inch AMG wheels, yet it dealt with bumps of all shapes and sizes in an impressive manner, keeping the body under control, and communicating remarkably little in terms of vibration or unpleasantness into the cabin.
The steering offes a nice balance of feel and electrical assistance, a trait which combines with the EQB’s convenient size to make for an easy SUV to park and manoeuvre.
When it comes to the EQB’s traits as an electric car, there are several modes available to alter the experience.
Using the paddle shifters, there are several regenerative braking settings to choose from. While none of them are a ‘single pedal’ mode, the D- mode is pretty strong, and clearly contributed to the EQB’s surprisingly good energy consumption in my time with the car.
Activating D+ mode, which can be combined with a sporty driving setting, tones down the regenerative setting almost completely and feels as though it unleashes more potential from the potent electric motors.
While the sportier settings made the 2WD EQA I tested last year feel a little twitchy and prone to wheelspin, the all-wheel drive system keeps this well under control in the larger EQB for impressive acceleration characteristics.
The breadth of this SUV’s ability is perhaps its most impressive attribute. It can feel comfortable and tame around town, with alarming speed and tenacity when attacking the open road should you so desire.
Sure, it’s not as whiplash-inducing as some of its rivals, particularly the Volvo XC40 Recharge or Tesla Model Y, but for a luxury SUV like this it’s more than what you could ask for.
The most remarkable thing about driving the EQB is how similar the 250 and 350 4Matic seem initially, until when push comes to shove.
Around town, both rise up to meet brand expectations. Easy and smooth off the line, acceleration is sufficiently brisk in the 250 and noticeably stronger driving the 350, as you’d expect in a two-motor EV. Progress is spirited, smooth and refined.
We're also grateful that the engineers seem to have cheekily dialled in connected and agile steering, imbuing the EQB with a likeable athletic attitude that’s just right for weaving in and out of tight traffic spots. Which is quite a feat really, given this car’s substantial size and mass.
Perhaps more surprising is how settled the ride is, no doubt aided by the sheer weight of these two-tonne-plus SUVs, as well as the standard-fitment adaptive dampers. Most bumps are quietly and effectively absorbed.
Out on the open road, the 250 remains sufficiently powerful, offering decent throttle response and quite a relaxed cruising gate. However, if you’re expecting Tesla-matching neck-snapping mid-range thrust, look elsewhere. Same applies to the other model. Though undeniably stronger throughout, not even the twin-motor 350 4Matic can be classed as especially quick.
However, while both EQBs display beautifully balanced steering that go exactly where you need them to be, only the 350 4Matic has the muscle to really explore the lofty dynamic capabilities available at higher speeds.
Across water-logged and desolate rural Victoria, the EQB behaved with exceptional athleticism given its role in life, providing outstanding steering precision, matched by brilliantly reassuring control. We’re talking planted confidence, as the 350 4Matic has the ability to really come together and move with the ebb and flow of a fast country road with outstanding aplomb. Despite teeming rain at times, the Mercedes behaved like you’d hope a swift, safe and sound grand tourer would. Who'd have figured?
Back on the highway, there was plenty of road noise intrusion coming up through the tyres, but otherwise, it seems obvious to us that though you pay more, you do get more with the twin-motor AWD version.
The EQB scores a thorough suite of active safety equipment including freeway-speed auto emergency braking (7.0-200km/h), lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, as well as one of the best adaptive cruise systems on the market.
In the event of an impact, the EQB scores dual front, side, and head curtain airbags (the side and curtain bags cover both rows) as well as a driver’s knee airbag. There are the usual dual outboard ISOFIX child seat mounting points on the rear row, as well as three top-tether points.
The EQB scored a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the current 2022 standards, but this rating only covers the base 250 variant. It scored highly across all criteria.
Tested way back in 2019, an EQB 250 in Europe scored a five-star crash-test rating with EuroNCAP, and that result is accepted by ANCAP.
Safety features include Mercedes’ Driver Assistance Package that includes autonomous emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring with an exit warning that alerts the driver of approaching cyclists or vehicles if the door begins to open into their path, lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control, as well as evasive steering and a ‘Parking Package’ featuring front and rear parking sensors and a surround-view camera.
The AEB with forward collision warning works between 7km/h and 200km/h, and offers pedestrian and cyclist protection day or night. The Active Lane Assist tech operates between 60km/h and 200km/h.
The EQB has nine airbags, made up of front, pelvis side and window bags for driver and front passenger, side airbags for rear occupants and a knee airbag for the driver, while the side curtains cover third-row occupants where relevant.
Along with a trio of child-seat tether anchorages, the EQB’s rear seat base is fitted with two ISOFIX attachments, and another two if the optional third-row chairs are present. That’s pretty rare, even in people movers.
Finally, the EQB makes a sound for pedestrians and other warns other road users that’s audible at speeds below 20km/h, plus a reversing tone.
Mercedes offers a five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with five years of roadside assist. The high-voltage battery components are also covered by a separate and industry-standard eight-year and 160,000km warranty.
Service intervals are once every 12 months or 25,000km and the service plan costs an average of $440 a year for the life of the warranty which is expensive for an EV, especially considering Polestar offers free servicing for the first five years, and Volvo’s electric offerings are around half the cost over the same period.
Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. The battery pack warranty is also industry-standard, valid for the usual eight years/160,000km.
Service intervals are every year or 25,000km. The EQB Service Plan starts at $1625 for the first three years, $2225 for four years and $2650 for five years.