Mazda CX-3 vs GWM Haval H6GT

What's the difference?

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

The new GWM Haval H6 GT Ultra PHEV has got to be one of the few plug-in hybrids that makes sense to me, given I live in a regional area. The longer electric driving range and DC charging capability offers far more convenience and practicality than the usual plug-in hybrids I’ve sampled.

It’s well-priced and has enough features for the average family. So, while I don’t love everything about it, it offers decent value for money.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

The H6 GT is the better-looking cousin to the regular H6 SUV because the swoopy rear end adds some much-needed personality.

It's the 19-inch alloys, Michelin tyres and red brake calipers that add to the sporty vibe.

It looks quite large for the segment and while I’m not a massive fan of the heavy plastic moulding around the base of the car, it’s got enough charm to appeal to a wide audience.

Head inside though and you're immediately hit by a strong plasticky presence, whether it be from actual plastics in the dash and door panels or the synthetic feeling of the upholstery itself.

The sunroof and red-stitched 'GT' on the seats add something but its all rather plain and lacks some personality inside.

I do like though that there’s no transmission tunnel, which means more legroom for middle seaters in the rear.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

The most practical aspect of the H6 GT's cabin is its sheer size. It's a spacious cabin for the class and that translates to lots of passenger room in each row. Which is only let down by the relatively small boot capacity of 392L (when all five seats are in use).

The boot does feature a level loading space, a 12-volt power socket, retractable cargo cover and a powered tailgate. The latter I always appreciate with kids in tow.

There are lots of individual storage options with the front featuring a glove box large enough for an owner's manual, a middle console, two cupholders and two drink bottle holders. There's also a large shelf underneath the centre console, a dedicated phone cradle and a sunglasses holder.

In the rear there are two drink bottle holders, two map pockets and a couple of cupholders in a fold-down armrest. So plenty of choices for passengers.

Surprisingly, the most comfortable seats are in the rear which feature thick padding, good lumbar support and long seat beds. The electric front seats have heat and ventilation functions, as well as adjustable lumbar support but the lumbar sits too low and the seat backs curve in too far for them to be called comfortable on a longer journey.

The tech is made up of a 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system and 10.25-inch digital instrument panel and while they look nice, they're basic at best. The multimedia system is simply laid out but lacks any real customisation and doesn't have sat nav.

The touchscreen can be laggy and there is wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. GWM has confirmed that wireless phone mirroring is due sometime later this year.

Charging options include four USB-A ports (but no USB-C ports), two 12-volt sockets and a wireless charging pad but the pad didn't always work for my iPhone 15 Pro Max (whether that is a user or software issue, I'm not sure).

There is only one grade available for the H6 GT, which is the Ultra and it's available with two powertrains - a 2.0L turbo-petrol engine or the 1.5L turbo-petrol plug-in hybrid powertrain of our test vehicle.

Its sharp drive-away pricing of $53,990 makes it very competitive against its rivals. The BYD Sealion 6 Premium sits at $52,990 MSRP and you have to jump into the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV Exceed ($69,290 DA) if you want to match on some of the standard equipment of the H6 GT Ultra.

While the PHEV offers a class-leading electric driving range of up to 180km, it features pretty much the same equipment as it's non-hybrid sibling but is $9000 more expensive.

The premium features include a panoramic sunroof, synthetic leather and suede upholstery, electric front seats with heat and ventilation functions, a heated steering wheel, a powered tailgate, powered and heated side mirrors and rear tinted glass.

Technology includes a keyless entry/start, 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster, dual-zone climate control, 12.3-inch touchscreen multimedia system, coloured head-up display, four USB-A ports, two 12-volt sockets, a wireless charging pad, FM/AM radio, Bluetooth, and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

However, it doesn't have a spare tyre (just a repair kit) or sat nav and there's no wireless phone mirroring. At least, not yet but GWM has confirmed that they are working on getting the phone functionality up and running sometime later this year.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

The new H6 GT Ultra has a plug-in hybrid powertrain that combines a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with three electric motors, two at the front and one at the rear.

Together they produce a combined power output of 321kW and 762Nm of torque. That gives this 4WD a 0-100km/h sprint time of 4.9 seconds. So it's a quick SUV but somehow it doesn't manage to feel 'blow-your-hair-back' quick.

The engine is paired with a two-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (DHT) and the switch between the electric and engine components is practically seamless.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

The new H6 GT has a ternary lithium battery with a large 35.43kWh capacity. It also has a Type 2 CCS charging port, which is pretty rare but welcome on a plug-in. This system can accept up to 6.6kW on an AC charger and up to 48kW on a fast DC charger, which is great.

It means you can plug in at a DC fast charger during a road trip like a normal EV and that improves overall efficiency.

The combined fuel cycle figure is just 0.8L/100km and with the 55L fuel tank, you’ll get a theoretical driving range of over 1000km. That’s just something to consider right there. The considerable pure electric driving range of up to 180km also ensures that you can do your daily errands and school run without really touching the fuel tank. 

Which I totally proved this week after doing 469km of open-road driving and my daily 'urban' errands and only using 2.3L of fuel all week. I had two full charges during my week and that means my real-world usage beats the claimed figure at 0.49L/100km. Haval H6 GT for the win.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The new powertrain took a few days to get used to because it doesn't behave like some of the PHEVs I've driven before. The emphasis is on EV driving rather than the ICE components. The pedals are quite stiff which takes a moment to adjust to, but the auto-hold braking and strong regenerative braking means it's difficult 'creep' forward like you can in a regular ICE car.

The one-pedal function is true one-pedal driving and if you time your deceleration right, you won't touch the brake pedal. You'll either like that or you won't but it's been nice to use this week.

The power delivery is prompt and there's a lot of power available. It doesn’t feel wicked quick like a performance EV but it certainly has enough punch to satisfy. You don’t notice when it switches between the engine or motor, which makes it a very smooth powertrain.

The steering is a little spongy but responsive enough to feel spry for quick lane changes. It's just not particularly dynamic on a winding road with the combination of the firmer suspension and soft steering.

Road noise can creep up at higher speeds and there is an annoying whirring sound from the motors that my son likened to a dull aeroplane engine roar.

The suspension is on the firmer side and you notice the bumps but you also don’t wince when you hit one. Visibility is okay but the thick A-pillar can get in the way when you're scanning the road at intersections, and the back window is narrow. A digital rear-view mirror would be a handy feature for the model.

The H6 GT Ultra PHEV is pretty easy to park because it has a clear 360-degree view camera system and parking sensors at the front and rear. The 12-metre turning circle makes it pretty friendly in a carpark, too. 

The Haval H6 GT has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing done in 2022 and scored 90 per cent for adult protection, 88 per cent for child protection, 73 per cent for vulnerable road users and 81 per cent for safety assist.

It features seven airbags, including a front centre airbag. 

There are seatbelt reminders (all seats), hill-start assist, tyre pressure monitoring, front and rear parking sensors, surround-view camera system, adaptive cruise control with stop and go, rear cross-traffic alert, lane keeping aid, lane departure alert, rear collision warning, forward collision warning, traffic sign recognition and a driver monitoring system.

The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with cyclist, pedestrian, car and junction turning assist is operational from 5.0 - 85km/h (up to 150km/h for car detection).

There are two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top tether anchor points and the rear seat is wide enough to accommodate three child seats side by side.

The driver assist features seem to work smoothly most of the time but I did find the driver attention monitor a bit annoying, as you get a few more chimes than you need and the lane keeping aid feels too jerky.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.

GWM offers the H6 GT with a seven-year unlimited kilometre warranty, which is becoming the normal term for the class and you will enjoy five years of roadside assistance through Allianz.

There is also a five-year capped-price servicing program that costs $1680, which is competitive. The first service is at 10,000km but subsequent intervals are spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km.