Are you having problems with your Mazda 6? Let our team of motoring experts keep you up to date with all of the latest Mazda 6 issues & faults. We have gathered all of the most frequently asked questions and problems relating to the Mazda 6 in one spot to help you decide if it's a smart buy.
Show all
It sounds like there was a manufacturing fault with the tyre in question and as such it should be covered by a warranty, either by the seller or the tyre manufacturer. Return to Bob Jane T mart with your receipt for the tyres and ask them to replace the tyre at no cost, and if that doesn't produce the result you want, contact Bridgestone direct and seek their help.
The recommended fuel for the Mazda6 is 95, while the oil companies claim E10 has a minimum of 94. Your car would most likely run fine on E10, but I wouldn't expect it to perform as well or give the same economy as it would on PULP.
There is something wrong with the fuel gauge, so don't be fobbed off by the dealer. Insist it be fixed, they could always replace the gauge and any other parts that are faulty in the system.
I'D GO for the later model with the lower kilometres. Five years from now the Liberty will be 10 years old and probably have 125,000km on it, but the Mazda will be six years old with about 110,000km on its odometer. The Mazda will look much more attractive to buyers.
MANY people complained of the same noise on the Mazda3. In that case little could be done to fix it. A change of tyres might make a small difference, but it's an expensive exercise. There's nothing wrong with the Bridgestones. They're good tyres.
Brake wear is something all new car buyers need to be aware of, and perhaps something they should quiz dealers about before they commit to a car. That way they won't be surprised when they get a hefty bill for replacing discs and pads sometime later on.
Always good to hear from a satisfied owner. Your positive experience is added ammunition for George to have his dealer fix his car.
MANY cars have chains instead of belts, and carmakers seem to be returning to chains after many years during which they preferred belts. Belts were introduced because they cost less than chains. They are also quieter than a chain, which can be quite noisy as it wears. As to why it isn't mentioned in road test reports, I can only say it is a little too technical for most readers. They are more interested in how a car performs when put to the test. It is the sort of detail the buyer should check before settling on a new car.
In a sense you've already answered your own question. You have used 91 octane without a problem. The Mazda 6 will cope with the lower octane but will run at its best on the fuel with the higher number.